With the improving capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for the prediction of aerodynamic performance, CFD tools are now being increasingly used for aerodynamic design optimization in the aerospace industry. In this article, an automated optimization framework is presented to address inviscid aerodynamic design problems. Key aspects of this framework include the use of the continuous adjoint methodology to make the computational requirements independent of the number of design variables, and computer-aided design-based shape parameterization, which uses the flexibility of non-uniform rational B-splines to handle complex configurations.
The Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe (ACARE). A vision for 2020, The Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe (ACARE), January 2001.
2.
Jameson, A. Aerodynamic shape optimization using the adjoint method. In Lecture Series at the Von Karman Institute, Brussels, Belgium, 6 February 2003.
Jameson, A., Alonso, J. J., Reuther, J. J., Martinelli, L., and Vassberg, J. C. Aerodynamic shape optimization techniques based on control theory. AIAA paper 98-2538, 2000.
5.
MavriplisD.Multigrid solution of the discrete adjoint for optimization problems on unstructured meshes. AIAA J., 2006, 44, 42–50.
6.
AndersonW. K.VenkatakrishnanV.Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with continuous adjoint formulation. Comput. Fluids, 1999, 28(4–5), 443–480.
7.
NadarajahS. K.JamesonA.Optimum shape design for unsteady flows with time-accurate continuous and discrete adjont methods. AIAA J., 2007, 45(7), 1478–1491.
8.
Younis, A., Gu, J., Dong Z., and Li, G. Trends, features, and test of common an recently introduced global. AIAA 2008-5853, September 2008.
9.
StückA.RungT.Adjoint RANS with filtered shape derivatives for hydrodynamic optimisation. Comput. Fluids, 2011, 47, 22–32.
10.
Schmidt, S., Ilic, C., Schulz, V., and Gauger, N. Shape gradients and their smoothness for practical aerodynamic design optimization. Tech. Rep. SPP1253-10-03, DFG Forschungsbericht, 2008.
11.
HicksR. M.HenneP. A.Wing design by numerical optimization. J. Aircr., 1978, 15(7), 407–412.
12.
Kulfan, B. M. and Bussoletti, J. “Fundamental” parametric geometry representations for aircraft component shapes. AIAA-2006-6948, September 2006.
13.
Kulfan, B. M. A universal parametric geometry representation method “CST”. AIAA-2007-0062, January 2007.
Lepine, J. and Trepanier, J. Wing aerodynamic design using an optimized NURBS geometrical representation. In 38th Aerospace Science Meeting and Exibit, Reno, Nevada, 10–13 January, 2000, AIAA paper 2000-0669.
16.
Bentamy A., Guibault F., and Trepanier J. Aerodynamic optimization of a realistic aircraft wing. AIAA paper 2005-332, 2005.
17.
Mousavi, A., Castonguay, P., and Nadarajah, S. Survey of shape parameterization techniques and its effect on three-dimensional aerodynamic shape optimization. In AIAA 37th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Miami, Florida, 25–28 June 2007, AIAA paper 2007-3837.
18.
Galle, M., Gerhold, T., and Evans, J. Technical Documentation of the DLR TAU-Code. DLR-IB 233-97/A43 1997.
Castro, C., Lozano, C., Palacios, F., and Zuazua, E. A systematic formulation of the continuous adjoint method applied to viscous aerodynamic design. In Proceedings of ERCOFTAC 2006, Design Optimisation: Methods & Applications, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 5–7 April 2006, pp. 167–170.
28.
Lozano, C. DOVRES Task 2.1/INTA3 Final report: Assessment of mesh sensitivities in continuous adjoint gradients for aerodynamic shape optimization in the TAU Code. INTA technical report, December 2009.
29.
Gerhold, T., Galle, M., Friedrichs, O., and Evans, J. Calculation of complex three-dimensional configurations employing the DLR TAU-code. AIAA paper AIAA-97-0167, 1997.
30.
LainK. R.KlausmeyerS. M.ZickuhrT.VassbergJ. C.WahlsR. A.MorrisonJ. H.BrodersenO.RakowitzM. E.TinocoE. N.GodardJ.-L.Data summary from second AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop. J. Aircr., 2005, 42(5), 1165–1178.
31.
Vassberg, J. C., Tinoco, E. N., Mani, M., Brodersen, O. P., Eisfeld, B., Wahls, R. A., Morrison, J. H., Zickuhr, T., Lain, K. R., and Mavriplis, D. J. Summary of the third AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop. In AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 8–11 January 2007, AIAA paper 2007-0260.
