This article develops a missile guidance technique for a ‘defense missile’ trying to protect a cooperative aircraft from guided munitions which have the same thrust and maneuvering capabilities as that of the defense missile. A novel guidance law for the missile-to-missile intercept is developed via a geometrical approach. Performance of the guidance law is analysed in detail and its potential is demonstrated with results from a six degrees-of-freedom simulation and comparison with a conventional guidance law.
MacholR. E.TannerW. P.JrAlexanderS. N.HoweR. E.Guidance. System engineering handbook, Chap. 19, 1965 (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).
2.
ZarchanP.Tactical and strategic missile guidance, progress in astronautics and aeronautics, fifth edition, 2007 (AIAA Inc, Reston, Virginia).
3.
ZipfelP.Modeling and simulation of aerospace vehicle dynamics, second edition, 2007 (AIAA Inc, Reston, Virginia) AIAA Education Series.
4.
Kuroda, T. and Imado, F. Advanced missile guidance system against a very high speed maneuvering target. In Proceedings of the 1989 AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 14–16 August 1989, AIAA 1989-3445, pp. 176–180 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia).
5.
BrysonA. E.JrHoY.-C.Applied optimal control,- optimization, estimation, and control, 1975, pp. 154–155 (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York).
6.
RusnakI.MeirL.Optimal guidance for acceleration constrained missile and maneuvering target. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1990, 26(4), 618–623.
7.
Shinar, J., Siegel, A., and Gold, Y., On the analysis of a complex differential game using artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 27th IEEE conference on Decision and control, Austin, Texas, 7–9 December 1988, pp. 1436–1441 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey).
8.
ShimaT.IdanM.GolanO. M.Sliding-mode control for integrated missile autopilot guidance. AIAA J. Guidance Control Dyn., 2006, 29(2), 250–260.
9.
Harl, N., Balakrishnan, S. N., and Phillips, C. Sliding mode integrated missile guidance and control. In Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2–5 August 2010, AIAA 2010-7741 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia).
10.
RatnooA.GhoseD.State-dependent Riccati-equation-based guidance law for impact-angle-constrained trajectories. AIAA J. Guidance Control Dyn., 2009, 32(1), 320–325.
11.
XinM.BalakrishnanS. N.StansberyD. T.OhlmeyerE. J.Nonlinear missile autopilot design with θ−D technique. AIAA J. Guidance Control Dyn., 2004, 27(3), 406–417.
12.
Robb, M. C., White, B. A., and Tsourdos, A. ‘Earliest intercept line guidance’: a novel concept for improving mid-course guidance in area air defence. In Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, San Francisco, California, 15–18 August 2005, AIAA 2005-5971 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia).
13.
Robb, M. C., White, B. A., Tsourdos, A., and Rulloda,D. Reachability guidance: a novel concept to improve mid-course guidance. In Proceedings of the American control conference, Portland, Oregon, 8–10 June 2005, pp. 339–345 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey).
14.
Robb, M. C., Tsourdos, A., and White, B. A. Earliest intercept line guidance using a game theory approach. In Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Keystone, Colorado, 21–24 August 2006, AIAA 2006-6216 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia).
15.
Shin, H.-S., Tsourdos, A., LeMenec, S., Markham, K., and White, B. A. Cooperative mid course guidance for area air defence. In Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2–5 August 2010, AIAA 2010-8056 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia).
16.
BoyellR. L.Defending a moving target against missile or torpedo attack. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1976, AES-12(4), 522–526.
17.
ShneydorN. A.Comments on defending a moving target against missile or torpedo attack. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1977, AES-13(3), 321–321.
18.
Rusnak, I. Guidance laws in defense against missile attack. In Proceedings of the IEEE 25th convention of electrical and electronics engineers in Israel, Eilat, Israel, 3–5 December 2008, pp. 90–94 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey).
19.
Perelman, A., Shima, T., and Rusnak, I. Cooperative differential games strategies for active aircraft protection from a homing missile. In Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2–5 August 2010, AIAA 2010-7878 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia).
20.
ShneydorN. A.Missile guidance and pursuit: kinematics, dynamics and control, Chap. 2, 1998 (Horwood Publishing Ltd, Chichester, England).
21.
LinC.-F.Modern navigation, guidance, and control processing, Sec. 6.4 and Sec. 6.5, 1991 (Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
22.
GarnellP.Guided weapon control systems, Chap. 7, second edition, 1980 (Pergamon Press, New York).
23.
RatnooA.ShimaT.Line-of-sight interceptor guidance for defending an aircraft. AIAA J. Guidance Control Dyn, 2011, 34(2), 522–532.
24.
ShimaT.Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile. AIAA J. Guidance Control Dyn., 2011, 34(2), 414–425.
25.
ShafermanV.ShimaT.Cooperative multiple model adaptive guidance for an aircraft defending missile. AIAA J. Guidance Control Dyn., 2010, 33(6), 1801–1813.
