Evolutionary design of a full-envelope full-authority flight control system for an unstable high-performance aircraft

Abstract

The use of an evolutionary algorithm in the framework of H_∞ control theory is being considered as a means for synthesizing controller gains that minimize a weighted combination of the infinite norm of the sensitivity function (for disturbance attenuation requirements) and complementary sensitivity function (for robust stability requirements) at the same time. The case study deals with a complete full-authority longitudinal control system for an unstable high-performance jet aircraft featuring (i) a stability and control augmentation system and (ii) autopilot functions (speed and altitude hold). Constraints on closed-loop response are enforced, that representing typical requirements on airplane handling qualities, that makes the control law synthesis process more demanding.

Gain scheduling is required, in order to obtain satisfactory performance over the whole flight envelope, so that the synthesis is performed at different reference trim conditions, for several values of the dynamic pressure, used as the scheduling parameter. Nonetheless, the dynamic behaviour of the aircraft may exhibit significant variations when flying at different altitudes, even for the same value of the dynamic pressure, so that a trade-off is required between different feasible controllers synthesized at different altitudes for a given equivalent airspeed. A multi-objective search is thus considered for the determination of the best suited solution to be introduced in the scheduling of the control law. The obtained results are then tested on a longitudinal non-linear model of the aircraft.

Keywords

aircraft control system robust control multi-objective optimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abzug

M. J.

Larabee

E. E.

Airplane stability and control: a history of the technologies that made aviation possible, 1997 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) chapter 20.

Stevens

B. L.

Lewis

F. L.

Aircraft control and simulation, 2nd edition. 2003 (J. Wiley and Sons, New York) chapters 2 and 3.

Avanzini

Galeani

Robust antiwindup for manual flight control of an unstable aircraft. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2005, 28(6), 1275–1282.

Avanzini

De Matteis

Design of a shipboard recovery system for a shrouded-fan UAV. September, 2002, Proceedings of the 23rd ICAS Congress (Toronto, Canada) Proceedings published on CD-ROM.

Avanzini

Ciniglio

De Matteis

Full–envelope robust control of a shrouded–fan unmanned vehicle. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2006, 29(2), 435–443.

Zhou

Doyle

J. C.

Essentials of robust control, 1998 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey) chapters 6–9.

Hyde

R. A.

The VAAC Harrier design study. 1999, Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit (Portland, Oregan, USA) AIAA Paper 99–4278, Proceedings published on CD-ROM.

Smerlas

Design and flight testing of an H_∞ controller for the NRC bell 205 experimental fly-by-wire helicopter. 1998, AIAA Paper 98–4300, Proceedings published on CD-ROM, Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit (Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

La Civita

Papageorgiou

Messner

W. C.

Kanade

Design and flight testing of an H_∞ controller for a robotic helicopter. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2006, 29(2), 485–494.

10.

Anonymous. Flying qualities of piloted aircraft, MIL-HDBK-1797, 1997 (Department of Defense, USA).

11.

Francis

B. A.

A course in H_∞control theory. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. 1987, Vol. 88 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).

12.

D. W.

Petkov

P. Hr.

Konstantinov

M. M.

Grimble

M. J.

Johnson

M. A.

Robust control design with MATLAB®. Advanced textbooks in control and signal processing, 2005 (Springer, London) 389–389.

13.

Cervera

Baños

Nonlinear nonconvex optimization by evolutionary algorithms applied to robust control. Math. Probl. Eng., 2009, 2009, 1–22.

14.

Menon

P. P.

Kim

Bates

D. G.

Postlethwaite

Clearance of nonlinear flight control laws using hybrid evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp., 2006, 10(6), 689–699.

15.

Menon

P. P.

Bates

D. G.

Postlethwaite

Deterministic versus evolutionary optimisation methods for nonlinear robustness analysis of flight control laws. 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary computation (Singapore) Proceedings published on CD-ROM.

16.

Bourmistrova

Khantsis

Control system design optimisation via genetic programming. 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary computation (Singapore) Proceedings published on CD-ROM.

17.

Droste

C. S.

The general dynamics case study on the F16 fly-by-wire flight control system, 1985 (AIAA Professional Series, New York).

18.

Minisci

E. A.

Avanzini

D'Angelo

Dutto

Multi–objective design of robust flight control systems. 2008, Proceedings of ICNPAA 2008 (Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Aerospace and Sciences) (Genova, Italy) Proceedings published on CD-ROM.

19.

Etkin

Dynamics of atmospheric flight, 1972 (J. Wiley and Sons, New York).

20.

Larrañaga

Lozano

J. A.

Estimation of distribution algorithms. a new tool for evolutionary computation, 2002 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).

21.

Mitchell

An introduction to genetic algorithms, 1998 (The MIT Press, Boston).

22.

Khan

Golberg

D. E.

Pelikan

Multi-objective Bayesian optimisation algorithm, 2002 (Technical Report IlliGAL 2002009, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champain - IlliGAL, USA).

23.

Costa

Minisci

MOPED: a multi-objective Parzen-based estimation of distribution algorithm. 2003, Proceedings of EMO 2003, 2nd International Conference on Evolutionary multi–criterion optimization (Faro, Portugal) 282–294.

24.

Avanzini

Biamonti

Minisci

E. A.

Minimum-fuel/minimum-time maneuvers of formation flying satellites. Adv. Astronaut. Sci., 2003, 116(III), 2403–2422.