To increase structural efficiency of stiffened panels in an aircraft, it is plausible to introduce skin buckling containment features to increase the local skin stability and thus static strength performance. Introducing buckling containment features may also significantly influence the fatigue crack growth performance of the stiffened panel. This study focuses on the experimental demonstration of panel durability with skin bay buckling containment features. Through a series of fatigue crack growth tests on integrally machined aluminium alloy stiffened panels, the potential to simultaneously improve static strength performance and crack propagation behaviour is demonstrated. The introduction of prismatic buckling containment features which have yielded significant static strength performance gains have herein demonstrated potential fatigue life gains of up to + 63 per cent.
QuinnD.MurphyA.McEwanW.LemaitreF.Stiffened panel stability behaviour and performance gains with plate prismatic sub-stiffening. Thin-Walled Struct., 2009, 47(12), 1457–1468.
2.
QuinnD.MurphyA.McEwanW.LemaitreF.Non-prismatic sub-stiffening for stiffened panel plates – stability behaviour and performance gains. Thin-Walled Struct., 2010, 48(6), 401–413.
3.
Munroe, J., Wilkins, K., and Gruber, M. Integral Airframe Structures (IAS) – Validated feasibility study of integrally stiffened metallic fuselage panels for reducing manufacturing costs. NASA contractor report no. NASA/CR-2000-209337, NASA, May 2000.
4.
Pettit, R. G., Wang, J. J., and Toh, C. Validated feasibility study of integrally stiffened metallic fuselage panels for reducing manufacturing costs. NASA contractor report no. NASA/CR-2000-209342, NASA, May 2000.
5.
Metschan, S. Validated feasibility study of integrally stiffened metallic fuselage panels for reducing manufacturing costs, cost assessment of manufacturing/design concepts. NASA contractor report no. NASA/CR-2000-209343, NASA, February 2000.
6.
Lequeu, P. and Danielou, A. Innovative high performance wing concepts. In The 17th Advanced Aerospace Materials & Processes Conference and Exposition (AeroMat 2006), Seattle, Washington, USA, 15–18 May 2006.
7.
Muzzolini, R. and Ehrström, J. C. Damage tolerance of integral structures with crack retardation features. In The 15th Advanced Aerospace Materials & Processes Conference and Exposition (AeroMat 2004), Seattle, Washington, USA, 7–10 June 2004.
8.
Ozakca, M., Murphy, A., and Van Der Veen, S. Buckling and post-buckling of sub-stiffened or locally tailored aluminium panels. In 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Hamberg, Germany, 3–8 September 2006.
9.
Bucci, R. J. Advanced metallic and hybrid structural concepts: tailorable solutions to meet the demanding performance/affordability requirements of tomorrow’s aircraft. In The Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference (ASIP 2006), San Antonio, Texas, 28–30 November 2006.
10.
Farley, G. L., Newman, J. A., and James, M. A. Selective reinforcement to improve fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth resistance in metallic structures. In 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference, California, 19–22 April 2004, (Palm Springs, California), AIAA 2004-1924.
11.
SchijveJ.Crack stoppers and ARALL laminates. Eng. Fract. Mech., 1990, 37(2), 405–421.
12.
ZhangX.LiY.Damage tolerance and fail-safety of welded aircraft wing panels. AIAA J., 2005, 43, 1613–1623.
13.
Gunnink, J. W. Hybrid structures: the new standard for advanced primary aircraft structures. In The 18th Advanced Aerospace Materials & Processes Conference and Exposition (AeroMat 2007), Baltimore, USA, 25–28 June 2007.
14.
Heinimann, M., Bucci, R. J., and Roebroeks, G. H. Advanced hybrid structural concepts for care-free structures: experimental validation and path forward. In The Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference (ASIP 2007), California, 4–6 December 2007, (Palm Springs, California).
15.
Roebroeks, G. H., Hooijmeijer, P. A., Kroon, E. J., and Heinimann, M. B. The development of centrAL. In The First International Conference on Damage tolerance of aircraft structures, Delft, Netherlands, 25–28 September 2007.
16.
ZhangX.BoscoloM.Fail-safe design of integral metallic aircraft structures reinforced by bonded crack retarders. Eng. Fract Mech., 2009, 76, 114–133.
17.
Ehrström, J. C., Van der Veen, S., Arsène, S., and Muzzolini, R. Improving damage tolerance of integrally machined panels. In the 23rd Symposium of International Committee on Aeronautical fatigue (ICAF 2005), Hamburg, Germany, 6–10 June 2005.
18.
Farley, G. Selective reinforcement to enhance the structural performance of metallic compression panels. In 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference, California, 19–22 April 2004 (Palm Springs, Calfornia).
BaranskiA. T.BiggersS. B.Postbuckling analysis of tailored composite plates with progressive damage. Compos. Struct., 1999, 46, 245–255.
22.
PetrisicJ.KoselF.BremecB.Buckling of plates with strengthenings. Thin-Walled Struct., 2006, 44, 334–343.
23.
Murphy, A., Quinn, D., Mawhinney, P., Ozakça, M., and van der Veen, S. Tailoring static strength performance of metallic stiffened panels by selective local sub-stiffening. In 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Newport, Rhode Island, 1–4 May 2006, AIAA-2006-1944.
24.
Bushnell, D. and Rankin, C. Optimum design of stiffened panels with sub-stiffeners. In 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference, Austin, Texas, 18–21 April 2005, AIAA 2005-1932.
25.
Watson, A., Featherston, C. A., and Kennedy, D. Optimization of postbuckled stiffened panels with multiple stiffener sizes. In 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 23–26 April 2007, AIAA 2007-2207.
26.
Maloney, J., Chauncey Wu, K., and Robinson, J. Analytical comparison of three stiffened panel concepts. NASA Technical Memorandum 110165, December 1995.
27.
BruhnE. F.Analysis and design of flight vehicle structures, 1st edition, 1973, Tri-State Offset Company.
ESDU Structures sub-series. Engineering sciences data units, 1965, ESDU International Ltd, London.
30.
Kapania, R., Li, J., and Kapoor, H. Optimal design of unitized panels with curvilinear stiffeners. In 5th Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), Arlington, Virginia, September 2005.
31.
Waldhart, C., Gurdal, Z., and Ribbens, C. Analysis of tow placed, parallel fiber, variable stiffness laminates. In 37th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Salt Lake City, USA, 15–17 April 1996, AIAA-96-1569.
32.
Tatting, B. F. and Gurdal, Z. Design and manufacture of elastically tailored tow placed plates. NASA contractor report no. NASA/CR-2002-211919, NASA, August 2002.
33.
ASTM E647-00. Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates. In Annual book of ASTM standards, 2002, 03.01, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA.
34.
Nesterenko, G. Designing the airplane structure for high durability. In Proceedings of AIAA/ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition, Dayton, Ohio, USA, 14–17 July 2003, AIAA-2003-2785.
35.
LlopartL. l.KurzB.WellhausenC.AngladaM.DrechslerK.WolfK.Investigation of fatigue crack growth and crack turning on integral stiffened structures under mode I loading. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2006, 73, 2139–2152.
36.
UzM.-V.KocakM.LemaitreF.EhrströmJ.-C.KempaS.BronF.Improvement of damage tolerance of laser beam welded stiffened panels for airframes via local engineering. Int. J. Fatigue, 2009, 31, 916–926.
37.
AndersonT. L.Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, 3rd edition, 2005, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, ISBN 9780849316562.
