Rail surface contaminations causing wheel-rail low adhesion problems may gradually be cleaned by passing wheelsets, leading to the phenomenon of adhesion recovery. This suggests an enhancement in available adhesion under low adhesion conditions for a train composed of multiple coaches. Using a four-coach Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) metro train equipped with a wheel slide protection system, field tests are conducted on a test line to measure the adhesion recovery rate of braking wheelsets under soapy water contamination. Initial braking speeds range from 100 km/h to 140 km/h, and tests under dry conditions are also conducted for reference and braking force calibration. Instantaneous creepages for different wheelsets are determined by recorded train speeds and rotational speeds of wheelsets, and the corresponding creep forces are calculated by measured vehicle speed, angular speeds of wheelsets, and brake cylinder pressures. Creep curves for different wheelsets are then obtained in consideration of the calculated axle load transfer. Adhesion coefficients corresponding to friction saturation are further derived for sliding wheelsets, typically located in the leading part of the train, with a maximum measured creepage of up to 11%. The number of passing wheelsets required to achieve adhesion recovery meeting braking requirements is also identified. The results indicate that the adhesion coefficient is as low as approximately 0.075 of the 1st axle at speeds between 93 and 132 km/h, with an adhesion recovery rate of 0.0040/axle among the first seven wheelsets. Such measurement technology holds potential application in operational trains, as it requires no significant modifications.
LewisRGallardo-HernandezEAHiltonT, et al.Effect of oil and water mixtures on adhesion in the wheel/rail contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2008; 223: 275–283.
2.
ZhuYOlofssonUNilssonR. A field test study of leaf contamination on railhead surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2014; 228: 71–84.
3.
FletcherDILewisS. Creep curve measurement to support wear and adhesion modelling, using a continuously variable creep twin disc machine. Wear2013; 298-299: 57–65.
4.
TanimotoHChenH. Influence of surface roughness and temperature on wheel-rail adhesion in wet conditions. Q rep RTRI2015; 56: 206–211.
5.
ShiLBMaLGuoJ, et al.Influence of low temperature environment on the adhesion characteristics of wheel-rail contact. Tribol Int2018; 127: 59–68.
6.
ChangCChenBCaiY, et al.Experimental investigation of high-speed wheel-rail adhesion characteristics under large creepage and water conditions. Wear2024; 540-541: 205254.
7.
ChenH. Review of various influencing factors and improvement measures on wheel-rail adhesion. Wear2024; 550-551: 205283.
8.
GalasROmastaMShiL, et al.The low adhesion problem: the effect of environmental conditions on adhesion in rolling-sliding contact. Tribol Int2020; 151: 106521.
9.
BossoNGugliottaAMagelliM, et al.Study of wheel–rail adhesion during braking maneuvers. Procedia Struct Integr2019; 24: 680–691.
10.
VollebregtESixKPolachO. Challenges and progress in the understanding and modelling of the wheel–rail creep forces. Veh Syst Dyn2021; 59: 1026–1068.
11.
RahamanMLBernalESpiryaginM, et al.An investigation into the effect of slip rate on the traction coefficient behaviour with a laboratory replication of a locomotive wheel rolling/sliding along a railway track. Tribol Int2023; 187: 108773.
12.
MeymandSZAhmadianM. Design, development, and calibration of a force-moment measurement system for wheel–rail contact mechanics in roller rigs. Measurement2016; 81: 113–122.
13.
ChangCChenBCaiY, et al.An experimental study of high speed wheel-rail adhesion characteristics in wet condition on full scale roller rig. Wear2019; 440-441: 203092.
14.
VoltrPLataM. Transient wheel–rail adhesion characteristics under the cleaning effect of sliding. Veh Syst Dyn2015; 53: 605–618.
15.
Buckley-JohnstoneLETrummerGVoltrP, et al.Full-scale testing of low adhesion effects with small amounts of water in the wheel/rail interface. Tribol Int2020; 141: 105907.
16.
ZhangWHChenJZWuXJ, et al.Wheel/rail adhesion and analysis by using full scale roller rig. Wear2002; 253: 82–88.
17.
ZhouJWuMTianC, et al.Experimental investigation on wheel–rail adhesion characteristics under water and large sliding conditions. Ind Lubric Tribol2021; 73: 366–372.
18.
Arias-CuevasOLiZLewisR, et al.Rolling–sliding laboratory tests of friction modifiers in dry and wet wheel–rail contacts. Wear2010; 268: 543–551.
19.
LewisRTrummerGSixK, et al.Leaves on the line: characterising leaf based low adhesion on railway rails. Tribol Int2023; 185: 108529.
20.
BossoNGugliottaAZampieriN. Strategies to simulate wheel–rail adhesion in degraded conditions using a roller-rig. Veh Syst Dyn2015; 53: 619–634.
21.
BossoNMagelliMZampieriN. Investigation of adhesion recovery phenomenon using a scaled roller-rig. Veh Syst Dyn2019; 59: 295–312.
22.
MagelliM. Study of adhesion recovery phenomenon using a multi-axle roller-rig. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2021; 1038: 012001.
23.
NaeimiMLiZPetrovRH, et al.Development of a new downscale setup for wheel-rail contact experiments under impact loading conditions. Exp Tech2017; 42: 1–17.
24.
YangZZhangPMoraalJ, et al.An experimental study on the effects of friction modifiers on wheel–rail dynamic interactions with various angles of attack. Railw Eng Sci2022; 30: 360–382.
25.
HeCYangZZhangP, et al.A finite element thermomechanical analysis of the development of wheel polygonal wear. Tribol Int2024; 195: 109577.
26.
ZhangPMoraalJLiZ. Design, calibration and validation of a wheel-rail contact force measurement system in V-Track. Measurement2021; 175: 109105.
27.
ChenCTianCZhouJ, et al.Development of a new test-rig for wheel–rail contact experiments under large slip conditions. Applied Sciences2023; 13: 5320.
28.
ZhouJChenCTianC, et al.Experimental study on adhesion recovery based on a circumferential test rig. Ind Lubric Tribol2024; 76: 317–326.
29.
ZhouJZhuWTianCet al. Experimental investigation of wheel rail adhesion under leaf contamination conditions. Int J Real Ther. 2024; 1–20.
30.
OldknowKEadieDTStockR. The influence of precipitation and friction control agents on forces at the wheel/rail interface in heavy haul railways. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2012; 227: 86–93.
31.
Arias-CuevasOLiZ. Field investigations into the adhesion recovery in leaf-contaminated wheel–rail contacts with locomotive sanders. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2011; 225: 443–456.
32.
LogstonCItamiG. Locomotive friction-creep studies. J Eng Ind Trans ASME1980; 102: 275–281.
33.
MeliEPugiLRidolfiA. An innovative degraded adhesion model for multibody applications in the railway field. Multibody Syst Dyn2013; 32: 133–157.
34.
PolachO. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit. Wear2005; 258: 992–1000.
35.
WuBXiaoGAnB, et al.Numerical study of wheel/rail dynamic interactions for high-speed rail vehicles under low adhesion conditions during traction. Eng Fail Anal2022; 137: 106266.
36.
CARS. Railway Train Traction Calculation. Trains with locomotives. China Railway Publishing House, 2018.
37.
ZhangPZhangLWeiD, et al.A high-performance copper-based brake pad for high-speed railway trains and its surface substance evolution and wear mechanism at high temperature. Wear2020; 444-445: 203182.
38.
GrzesPKuciejMYevtushenkoA. Numerical calculations of thermal stresses in a railway disk brake at the coupling of temperature coefficient of friction velocity and wear. J Therm Stress2024; 47: 1297–1329.
39.
ZhangQYuZLiuH, et al.The evolution of friction and wear behavior of train brake friction pairs during sustained drag braking on long steep slopes. Wear2024; 564-565: 205724.
40.
TrimpeFSalanderC. Wheel–rail adhesion during torsional vibration of driven railway wheelsets. Veh Syst Dyn2020; 59: 785–799.
41.
YinSZhaoXHuangS, et al.Influence of high frequency vibrations on the wheel-rail creep curve at high speeds. Wear2024; 536-537: 205161.
42.
LiuWHuangSQiH, et al.Explicit finite element simulations of dynamic low adhesion behavior between wheel and rail in the presence of high-frequency vibrations. Eng Comput2024; 41: 1185–1202.
43.
WuGShenLYaoY, et al.Determination of the dynamic characteristics of locomotive drive systems under re-adhesion conditions using wheel slip controller. J Zhejiang Univ - Sci2023; 24: 722–734.
44.
ZhaoXLiZ. A solution of transient rolling contact with velocity dependent friction by the explicit finite element method. Eng Comput2016; 33: 1033–1050.
