The growing demand for railway transportation requires higher speeds and axle loads, but this can negatively impact critical track components like railway crossings. This study investigates the dynamic behavior of high-speed turnout components under varying train speeds and axle loads, focusing on vertical displacements and contact forces. Using detailed finite element analysis, comparative results reveal trends in rail displacements, with higher speeds reducing the responsiveness of the crossing tip (frog) to rapid changes. The study also highlights the role of static axle loads in maintaining wheel-rail contact and identifies vulnerable components, such as the frog tip and base plate, under higher static loads. These findings provide valuable insights into the dynamics of turnout components, enabling stakeholders to derive strategies for improving turnout performance and safety.
SayeedMAShahinMA. Dynamic response analysis of ballasted railway track-ground system under train moving loads using 3D finite element numerical modelling. In: Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology2023; 10: 639–659.
2.
LuCRenZMaC. Study on the technologies development trend of high speed EMUs. High-speed Railway2023; 1: 1–5.
3.
DoomernikJE. Performance and efficiency of high-speed rail systems. Transp Res Procedia2015; 8: 136–144.
Wang Wanming ZhaiQCLuZWWuXS. “Dynamic effects of vehicles on tracks in the case of raising train speeds”. en. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2001; 215: 125–135.
WuTXThompsonDJ. A hybrid model for the noise generation due to railway wheel flats. J Sound Vib2002; 251: 115–139. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/28035/
15.
JohanssonANielsenJCO. Out-of-round railway wheels—wheel-rail contact forces and track response derived from field tests and numerical simulations. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2003; 217: 135–146. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1243/095440903765762878
16.
PieringerAKroppW. A fast-time-domain model for wheel/rail interaction demonstrated for the case of impact forces caused by wheel flats. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008; 123: 3266. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2933708
17.
PieringerAKroppWNielsenJ. The influence of contact modelling on simulated wheel/rail interaction due to wheel flats. Wear2014; 314: 273–281.
RamosAPredicting critical speed of railway tracks using artificial intelligence algorithms. Vibration2023; 6: 57–64. https://www.mdpi.com/2504-477X/6/1/5
21.
NguyenKGoicoleaJMGalbadónF. Comparison of dynamic effects of high-speed traffic load on ballasted track using a simplified two-dimensional and full three-dimensional model. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2012; 228(2): 128–142.
22.
WangSWangHJingG. “Experimental analysis of profile degradation of high-speed turnouts: a case study in China”. Tribol Int2023; 178: 108035.
YiQLiuXWangS, et al.“Failure mechanism and damage tolerance of turnout point rail in high-speed railway”. Eng Fail Anal2024; 157: 107936.
27.
WanCMarkineVLShevtsovIY. Analysis of train/turnout vertical interaction using a fast numerical model and validation of that model. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2014; 228(7): 730–743.
SistaniniaMDavesWBucherC, et al.“Finite element investigation of the dynamic behavior of high-speed turnouts with swing-nose crossing”. In: Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks III. Ed. by HuangWAhmadianM. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 1047–1058.
30.
GallegoIMuñozJRivasA, et al.Vertical track stiffness as a new parameter involved in designing high-speed railway infrastructure. J Transport Eng2011; 137: 971–979.
31.
Ali ZakeriJHeXFanJJ. Dynamic behavior of high-speed railway tracks. Second international conference on transportation and traffic studies (ICTTS). Beijing, China: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000, vol 277, pp. 971–976. DOI: 10.1061/40503.
32.
FangJChenRHuC, et al.Simulation analysis of high-speed turnout point rail switching force considering influence of external locking device. Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit2022; 236: 48–57.
33.
XiangKLiTQianY, et al.Dynamic wheel-rail interaction of a train crossing a turnout under traction/braking behaviour and research on rail wear of the turnout. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. London: Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2024.
34.
HiroyukiKSudaYYamaguchiM, et al.Dynamic analysis of the vehicle running on turnout at high speed considering longitudinal variation of rail profiles. Volume 6: 5th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control2005; 6: 2149–2154. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1362825896084133248
35.
SadowskyJ. The continuous wavelet transform: a tool for signal investigation and understanding. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig1994; 15: 306–310.
