Field investigation on the effect of the tamping machine and dynamic track stabilizer on changing the rail support modulus

Abstract

Due to increasing train speed and passage tonnage, the repair and maintenance of ballasted railway tracks is essential. As a result of cyclic train loads on ballasted tracks, the ballast layer can deteriorate. When the ballast bed deteriorates, it can change the track geometry, which leads to uncomfortable ride and an increase in wheel-rail interaction. Tamping is one of the most widely used methods for filling the ballast layer gaps around sleepers and homogenizing ballast beds in order to align the track geometry. After passing the tamping machine, the dynamic stabilizing machine is utilized to improve the quality of the ballast bed. The rail support modulus is an essential parameter for analyzing ballasted railway tracks, and it can change after maintenance operations. This paper extensively discusses the effects of maintenance operations on rail support modulus as an essential safety factor in ballasted tracks. In this study, a series of field tests are planned and conducted at Karaj station in Iran to investigate the effects of passing tamping and stabilizing machines on the rail support modulus in ballasted tracks. In this regard, the rail support modulus of the ballasted track according to deflection basins was measured in three stages (before tamping, after tamping, and after stabilizing), and the results were analyzed to determine the effects of passing maintenance machines on ballast beds. Based on the results, the tamping operation results in a 75.5% reduction in the rail support modulus, and after stabilizing the railway track, the rail support modulus is increased by 35.8%.

Keywords

Railway ballasted track maintenance operations tamping and stabilizing operation rail support modulus

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Esveld

. Modern railway track. MRT-Productions Zaltbommel, 2001.

Zarembski

Choros

. On the measurement and calculation of vertical track modulus. AREA Bull 1979; 81: 156.

Dahlberg

. Railway track stiffness variations – consequences and countermeasures. Int J Civ Eng; 8: 1.

Sussmann

Thompson

. Track structural design for maintenance and rehabilitation with automated track inspection data, 2017.

Zhao

Dollevoet

, et al. Differential wear and plastic deformation as causes of squat at track local stiffness change combined with other track short defects. Veh Syst Dyn 2008; 46: 237–246.

Selig

. Track modulus: its meaning and factors influencing it.

Puzavac

Popović

Lazarević

. Influence of track stiffness on track behaviour under vertical load. Promet - Traffic & Transp 1970; 24: 405–412. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v24i5.1176, Epub ahead of print 31.

Tong

Liu

Yousefian

, et al. Track vertical stiffness –value, measurement methods, effective parameters and challenges: a review. Transp Geotech 2022; 37: 100833.

Wang

Huang

, et al. Stabilization effect of dynamic stabilizer with different operation parameters. Adv Mech Eng 2023; 15: 168781322311571.

10.

Selig

Waters

. Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. London: Thomas Telford Publishing. DOI: 10.1680/tgasm.20139. Epub ahead of print 1994.

11.

Gao

Shi

Zhong

, et al. Real-time evaluation of mechanical qualities of ballast bed in railway tamping maintenance. Int J Mech Sci 2023; 248: 108192.

12.

McDowell

Lim

Collop

, et al. Laboratory simulation of train loading and tamping on ballast. Proc Inst Civ Eng - PROC INST Civ ENG-TRANSPORT 2005; 158: 89–95.

13.

Hong

Xiaoyu

Zhihai

, et al. Dynamic stability model and analysis of mechanical properties for railway operations. Comput Times Part Mech 2023; 10: 1205–1219. DOI: 10.1007/s40571-023-00560-7, Epub ahead of print 2023.

14.

Shi

Gao

Cai

, et al. Mechanical characteristics of ballasted track under different tamping depths in railway maintenance. Transp Geotech 2022; 35: 100799.

15.

Kumara

Hayano

. Deformation characteristics of fresh and fouled ballasts subjected to tamping maintenance. Soils Found 2016; 56: 652–663.

16.

Aingaran

Le Pen

Zervos

, et al. Modelling the effects of trafficking and tamping on scaled railway ballast in triaxial tests. Transp Geotech 2018; 15: 84–90.

17.

Yayu

Bin

, et al. Mechanical characteristics optimization of ballast bed variable on operating process for the dynamic track stabilizer. In: Proceedings of 2017 9th international conference on modelling, identification and control, ICMIC 2017 2018, Kunming, March, 2018, pp. 874–879.

18.

Przybyłowicz

Sysyn

Gerber

, et al. Comparison of the effects and efficiency of vertical and side tamping methods for ballasted railway tracks. Constr Build Mater 2022; 314: 125708.

19.

Liu

Wang

Liu

, et al. Influence of a tamping operation on the vibrational characteristics and resistance-evolution law of a ballast bed. Constr Build Mater 2020; 239: 117879.

20.

Mosayebi

Zakeri

Esmaeili

. Field test investigation and numerical analysis of ballasted track under moving locomotive. J Mech Sci Technol 2016; 30: 1065–1069.

21.

Zakeri

Esmaeili

Mosayebi

. Effects of sleeper support modulus on dynamic behaviour of railway tracks caused by moving wagon. Int J Heavy Veh Syst 2017; 24: 277–287.

22.

Mosayebi

S-A

Zakeri

Esmaeili

. Effects of train bogie patterns on the mechanical performance of ballasted railway tracks with unsupported sleepers. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2016; 232: 238–248.

23.

Zhang

Xiao

Zhu

, et al. Macro–meso mechanical properties of ballast bed during three-sleeper tamping operation. Int J Rail Transp 2022; 11: 886–911.

24.

Xiao

Zhang

Zhu

, et al. Experimental analysis of ballast bed state in newly constructed railways after tamping and stabilizing operation. Constr Build Mater 2023; 362: 129772.

25.

Jadidirendi

Zakeri

Teng

. Field investigation for Identifying the effects of dynamic track stabilizing operation on track geometrical indices. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Joint Rail Conference, San Jose, March 2015. DOI: 10.1115/JRC2015-5602.

26.

Rießberger

Wenty

. 40 Years of dynamic track stabilisation.

27.

Shi

Gao

Cai

, et al. Effect of tamping operation on mechanical qualities of ballast bed based on DEM-MBD coupling method. Comput Geotech 2020; 124: 103574.

28.

Kish

. On the fundamentals of track lateral resistance. In: American railway engineering and maintenance of way association, 2011.

29.

Jing

Aela

. Review of the lateral resistance of ballasted tracks. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2019; 234: 807–820.

30.

Sussmann

Kish

Trosino

. Influence of track maintenance on lateral resistance of concrete-tie track. Transp Res Rec 2003; 1825: 56–63.

31.

Wang

Chen

, et al. Overview and outlook on railway track stiffness measurement. J Mod Transp 2016; 24: 89–102.

32.

Zakeri

Abbasi

. Field investigation on variation of rail support modulus in ballasted railway tracks. Lat Am J Solids Struct 2012; 9: 643–656.

33.

Wasiutynski

. Experimental research on the elastic deformations and stresses in a railroad track. Ann L’Academie des Sci Tech á Varsavie; 5.

34.

Talbot

. Stresses in railroad track. Report of the special AREA-ACE Committee on stresses in railroad track, 6th progress report. AREA Proceedings. 1933; V2: 66–848.

35.

Zarembski

Palese

. Transitions eliminate impact at crossings. Railw Track Struct 2003; 99: 28.

36.

Kerr

. The determination of the track modulus k for the standard track analysis, 2002.

37.

Mosayeb

Zakeri

Esmaeili

. A comparison between the dynamic and static stiffness of ballasted track: a field study. Geomech Eng 2016; 11: 757–769.

38.

ASTM. C136/C136M–14 . Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates.

39.

No L. 301 . Manag Plan Organ Iran 2002, Technical and general specification of Ballasted Railway.

40.

Yan

Yang

. Modeling and parameter optimization of dynamic characteristic variables of ballast bed during operation for dynamic track stabilizer. Complexity 2021; 2021: 1–11. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5519566, Epub ahead of print 2021.