Past works have shown that the application of the non-Hertzian wheel/rail contact in the multibody system simulation may produce non-negligible differences in the results compared to the results obtained using the classical Hertzian approach. As a continuation of this research line, the running stability of a passenger rail vehicle running on tangent and curved tracks has been investigated considering the wheel/rail creep force being determined using Hertzian and non-Hertzian approaches, respectively. The results show that the creep force modelling has varied levels of influence on the estimation of the stability of a rail vehicle on both tangent and curved tracks depending on the non-ellipticity of the contact. The non-Hertzian model is recommended to be used for such kind of applications as the traditional Hertzian approach may misestimate the dynamics behaviour of the vehicle under certain circumstances.
TrueH. On the theory of nonlinear dynamics and its applications in vehicle systems dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn1999; 31(5–6): 393–421.
2.
YanWFischerFD. Applicability of the Hertz contact theory to rail-wheel contact problems. Arch Appl Mech2000; 70(4): 255–268.
3.
EnblomRBergM. Impact of non-elliptic contact modelling in wheel wear simulation. Wear2008; 265(9–10): 1532–1541.
4.
BurgelmanNSichaniMSEnblomR, et al.Influence of wheel–rail contact modelling on vehicle dynamic simulation. Veh Syst Dyn2015; 53(8): 1190–1203.
5.
LiuBBruniS. Comparison of wheel–rail contact models in the context of multibody system simulation: Hertzian versus non-Hertzian. Veh Syst Dyn2022; 60(3): 1076–1096.
6.
PiotrowskiJKikW. A simplified model of wheel/rail contact mechanics for non-Hertzian problems and its application in rail vehicle dynamic simulations. Veh Syst Dyn2008; 46(1–2): 27–48.
7.
LiuBBruniSVollebregtE. A non-Hertzian method for solving wheel–rail normal contact problem taking into account the effect of yaw. Veh Syst Dyn2016; 54(9): 1226–1246.
8.
Sh SichaniMEnblomRBergM. A novel method to model wheel–rail normal contact in vehicle dynamics simulation. Veh Syst Dyn2014; 52(12): 1752–1764.
9.
AyasseJCholletH. Determination of the wheel rail contact patch in semi-Hertzian conditions. Veh Syst Dyn2005; 43(3): 161–172.
10.
LinderC. Verschleiß von Eisenbahnrä dern mit Unrundheiten. Zurich: ETH, 1997.
11.
KalkerJJ. Three dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
12.
KalkerJJ. A fast algorithm for the simplified theory of rolling contact. Veh Syst Dyn1982; 11(1): 1–13.
13.
Sh SichaniMEnblomRBergM. An alternative to FASTSIM for tangential solution of the wheel–rail contact. Veh Syst Dyn2016; 54(6): 748–764.
14.
LiuBFuBBruniS. Generalisation of the linear theory of rolling contact to a single double-elliptic contact region and its application to solve non-Hertzian contact problems using extended FASTSIM. Veh Syst Dyn2022: 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2022.2113808
15.
Gómez-BoschJGiner-NavarroJCarballeiraJ, et al.A direct method for the extension of FastSim under non-Hertzian contact conditions. Veh Syst Dyn2022: 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2022.2120022
16.
PiotrowskiJLiuBBruniS. The Kalker book of tables for non-Hertzian contact of wheel and rail. Veh Syst Dyn2017; 55(6): 875–901.
17.
PiotrowskiJBruniSLiuB, et al.A fast method for determination of creep forces in non-Hertzian contact of wheel and rail based on a book of tables. Multibody Syst Dyn2019; 45: 169–184.
18.
VollebregtEAH. User guide for CONTACT, Rolling and sliding contact with friction. Technical Report 09-03, version v18.1.5, VORtech CMCC, 2018, Delft, The Netherlands.
19.
VollebregtEAHWeidemannCKienbergerA, “Use of ‘CONTACT’ in multi-body vehicle dynamics and profile wear simulation: Initial results. In: 22nd Int. Symp. Dyn. Veh. Roads Tracks, pp. 1–6, 2011.
TrueHJensenJC. Parameter study of hunting and chaos in railway vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn1994; 23(Suppl 1): 508–521.
22.
PolachO. Comparability of the non-linear and linearized stability assessment during railway vehicle design. Veh Syst Dyn2006; 44(Suppl 1): 129–138.
23.
PolachO. On non-linear methods of bogie stability assessment using computer simulations. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2006; 220: 13–27.
24.
ChengYCHsuCT. Hunting stability and derailment analysis of a car model of a railway vehicle system. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2012; 226(2): 187–202.
25.
BigoniDTrueHEngsig-KarupAP. Sensitivity analysis of the critical speed in railway vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn2014; 52(Suppl 1): 272–286.
26.
LiuBBruniS. Influence of individual wheel profiles on the assessment of running dynamics of a rail vehicle by numerical simulation: A case study. Veh Syst Dyn2022; 60(7): 2393–2412.
27.
KumarVRastogiVPathakPM. Modelling and evaluation of the hunting behaviour of a high-speed railway vehicle on curved track. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2019; 233(2): 220–236.
28.
ZboinskiKDuszaM. Development of the method and analysis for non-linear lateral stability of railway vehicles in a curved track. Veh Syst Dyn2006; 44(Suppl 1): 147–157.
29.
MazzolaLAlfiSBruniS. Evaluation of the hunting behaviour of a railway vehicle in a curve. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2015; 229(5): 530–541.
30.
ZhangTTrueHDaiH, et al.The influence of the perturbation of the wheel rotation speed on the stability of a railway bogie on steady curve sections of a track. Veh Syst Dyn2019; 57(3): 425–443.
MarquesFMagalhãesHLiuB, et al.On the generation of enhanced lookup tables for wheel-rail contact models. Wear2019; 434–435: 202993.
33.
IwnickS. Manchester benchmarks for rail vehicle simulation. Veh Syst Dyn1998; 30(Suppl 1): 295–313.
34.
HoffmannMTrueH. The dynamics of European two-axle railway freight wagons with UIC standard suspension. Veh Syst Dyn2008; 46(Suppl 1): 225–236.
35.
Di GialleonardoEBruniSTrueH. Analysis of the nonlinear dynamics of a 2-axle freight wagon in curves. Veh Syst Dyn2014; 52(1): 125–141.
36.
CEN. Railway applications - Testing and simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles - Running behaviour and stationary tests. Brussels: CEN-CENELEC Management Centre, 2016.
37.
ORE. Bogies with steered or steering wheelsets. Preliminary studies and specifications. Utrecht: ERRI, 1989.
38.
AlfiSMazzolaLBruniS. Effect of motor connection on the critical speed of high-speed railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn2008; 46(Suppl 1): 201–214.
39.
ZboińskiK. Dynamical investigation of railway vehicles on a curved track. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids1998; 17(6): 1001–1020.
40.
ZengJWuP. Stability analysis of high speed railway vehicles. JSME Int J Ser C2004; 47(2): 464–470.
