A derailment phenomenon could take place on the windward side of a 120 km/h high-speed train when it runs by a breach, between two windbreak walls, subjected to a normal wind speed of 32 m/s. To study the safety of a high-speed train under different normal speeds of crosswind, six wind speeds are investigated; 32 m/s, 28 m/s, 25 m/s, 20 m/s, 15 m/s, and 10 m/s. The wind forces and moments of the moving train are calculated using the Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) model, which are then applied to the train multi-body dynamics. The pressure fields around the train passing by the breach are analysed, which gives a reasonable explanation for the fluctuation of the wind loads. After an analysis on the response of the train, it is apparent that the risk of derailment on the windward side is much greater than the risk of overturning. The lateral distance of the first wheelset increases towards the windward side as along with the yaw angle of the wheelset, which increases as well with wind speeds of higher than 20 m/s.
HeDChenHYuW, et al.
The influence of wind wall on high-speed train aerodynamic performance. Railw Locomot Car2016;
36: 21–27+32.
5.
QiaoYHeDChenH, et al.
Study on aerodynamic performance of train running in wind area. J Dalian Jiaotong Univ2018;
39: 34–39.
6.
LiuDLuZZhongM, et al.
Measurements of car-body lateral vibration induced by high-speed trains negotiating complex terrain sections under strong wind conditions. Veh Syst Dyn2018;
56: 173–189.
7.
LiuTChenZZhouX, et al.
A CFD analysis of the aerodynamics of a high-speed train passing through a windbreak transition under crosswind. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2018;
12: 137–151.
8.
SunZDaiHGaoH, et al.
Dynamic performance of high-speed train passing windbreak breach under unsteady crosswind. Veh Syst Dyn2019;
57: 408–424.
9.
SunZDaiHHemidaH, et al.
Safety of high-speed train passing by windbreak breach with different sizes. Veh Syst Dyn2020;
58: 1935–1918.
10.
BakerC.Ground vehicles in high cross winds part I steady aerodynamic forces. J Fluids Struct1991;
5: 69–90.
11.
BakerC.Ground vehicles in high cross winds part II unsteady aerodynamic forces. J Fluids Struct1991;
5: 91–111.
12.
BakerC.Ground vehicles in high cross winds part III unsteady aerodynamic forces. J Fluids Struct1991;
5: 221–241.
13.
BakerCJJonesJLopez-CallejaF, et al.
Measurements of the cross wind forces on trains. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2004;
92: 547–563.
14.
BakerCHemidaHIwnickiS, et al.
Integration of crosswind forces into train dynamic modelling. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2011;
225: 154–164.
15.
HemidaHKrajnovicSDavidsonL (eds). Large-eddy simulation of the flow around a simplified high speed train under the influence of a cross-wind. In: 17th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, Toronto, Ontario, 6–9 June 2005.
16.
HemidaHKrajnovicS. Numerical study of the unsteady flow structures around train-shaped body subjected to side winds. In: European conference on computational fluid dynamics, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, 5–8 September 2006.
17.
HemidaH.Numerical simulations of flows around trains and buses in cross winds.
Sweden:
Chalmers University of Technology, 2008.
18.
HemidaHKrajnovićS.Exploring flow structures around a simplified ICE2 train subjected to a 30° side wind using LES. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2009;
3: 28–41.
19.
HemidaHKrajnovićS.LES study of the influence of the nose shape and yaw angles on flow structures around trains. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2010;
98: 34–46.
20.
FlynnDHemidaHSoperD, et al.
Detached-eddy simulation of the slipstream of an operational freight train. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2014;
132: 1–12.
21.
MordenJAHemidaHBakerCJ.Comparison of RANS and detached eddy simulation results to wind-tunnel data for the surface pressures upon a class 43 High-Speed train. J Fluids Eng2015;
137: 041108.
22.
LiTHemidaHZhangJ, et al.
Comparisons of shear stress transport and detached eddy simulations of the flow around trains. J Fluids Eng2018;
140: 111108.
23.
LiTZhangJRashidiMM, et al.
On the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes modelling of the flow around a simplified train in crosswinds. Jafm2019;
12: 551–563.
24.
LiTZhangJZhangW.Nonlinear characteristics of vortex-induced vibration at low Reynolds number. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul2011;
16: 2753–2771.
25.
LiTZhangJ-yZhangW-h.A numerical approach to the interaction between airflow and a high-speed train subjected to crosswind. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A2013;
14: 482–493.
26.
LiTZhangJZouY, et al.
Dynamic performances of high-speed train in wind shear.Front Aerosp Eng2014;
3: 17.
27.
LiTYuMZhangJ, et al.
A fast equilibrium state approach to determine interaction between stochastic crosswinds and high-speed trains. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2015;
143: 91–104.
28.
LiTLiMWangZ, et al.
Effect of the inter-car gap length on the aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed train. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2019;
233: 448–465.
29.
FujiiTMaedaTIshidaH, et al.
Wind-induced accidents of train/vehicles and their measures in Japan. QR Rtri1999;
40: 50–55.
30.
HibinoYShimomuraTTanifujiK.Full-scale experiment on the behavior of a railway vehicle being subjected to lateral force. Jmtl2010;
3: 35–43.
31.
NoguchiYSuzukiMBakerC, et al.
Numerical and experimental study on the aerodynamic force coefficients of railway vehicles on an embankment in crosswind. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2019;
184: 90–105.
32.
LiTZhangJZhangW.Dynamic performance of high-speed train passing windbreak in crosswind. J China Railw Soc2012;
34: 30–35.
33.
NiuJZhouDLiangX.Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of highspeed trains of different lengths under crosswind with or without windbreaks. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2018;
12: 195–215.
34.
NiuJZhouDWangY.Numerical comparison of aerodynamic performance of stationary and moving trains with or without windbreak wall under crosswind. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2018;
182: 1–15.
35.
Chris BakerTJFlynnDQuinnHHA, et al. Train aerodynamics: fundamentals and applications.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2019.
36.
5599-85 G. Railway vehicles – specification for evaluation the dynamic performance and accreditation test. BeiJing.
37.
EN. 14067-6 2018. Railway applications – aerodynamics part 6: requirements and test procedures for cross wind assessment. European Committee for Standardization.
