It is a practical engineering problem to lift the pantograph during train operation. In this paper, a pantograph-catenary (PAC) model is established, which can realize pantograph lifting during train operation. In this model, the contact model between contact piece and contact wire is established using the polygon contact model (PCM). The PAC collision test rig is established, and the simulation model at low speed is verified by comparing the contact force and vertical acceleration of contact piece obtained from simulation and test. The factors influencing the process of pantograph lifting are analyzed. The simulation results show that the position where the dropper and contact wire are connected is the most disadvantageous position for pantograph lifting. The maximum impact force increases with the increase of pantograph lifting speed, and the relationship between them is linear. In addition, if the influence of aerodynamic force is not considered, the running speed of vehicle will not affect the pantograph lifting process.
GaoSWangYLiuZ, et al. Thermal distribution modeling and experimental verification of contact wire considering the lifting or dropping pantograph in electrified railway. IEEE Trans Transp Electrific2016; 2: 256–265.
3.
WuJ.The mechanism and effect of pantograph-catenary arc. Electr Railw2008; 84: 27–29.
4.
WangYLiuZGFanFQ, et al. Review of research development of pantograph-catenary arc model and electrical characteristics. J China Railw Soc2013; 35: 35–43.
5.
WangYLiuZMuXQ, et al. Modeling and verification of contact line transient temperature difference based on lifting or lowering the pantograph electric contacts. Chin J Sci Instrum2014; 35: 2663–2672.
6.
Beirão da VeigaLBrezziFMariniLD, et al. The Hitchhiker’s guide to the virtual element method. Math Models Methods Appl Sci2014; 24: 1541–1573.
7.
GhaedniaHPopeSAJacksonRL, et al. A comprehensive study of the elasto-plastic contact of a sphere and a flat. Tribol Int2016; 93: 78–90.
8.
KogutLEtsionI.Elasto-plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid flat. J Appl Mech2002; 69: 657–662.
9.
JacksonRLGreenI.A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces. Tribol Int2006; 39: 906–914.
10.
ChongWWFTeodorescuMRahnejatH.Nanoscale elastoplastic adhesion of wet asperities. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2013; 227: 996–1010.
11.
GhaedniaHMarghituDBJacksonRL.Predicting the permanent deformation after the impact of a rod with a flat surface. J Tribol2015; 137: 011403.
12.
HuntKHCrossleyFRE.Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. J Appl Mech1975; 42: 440–445.
13.
YuanWLiLZhangDG, et al. New method for oblique impact dynamics research of a flexible beam with large overall motion considering impact friction force. Acta Mech Sin2016; 32: 720–730.
14.
ChristoforouAPYigitAS.Inelastic impact and the coefficient of restitution. J Eng Res2016; 4: 194–213.
15.
MengWWangY.Comprehensive analyses of the elasto-plastic oblique contact-impact with vibration response. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-Body Dynamics2019; 233: 441–454.
WhittakerET.A treatise on the analytical dynamics of particles and rigid bodies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
18.
ZhaoJZhaoRXueZ, et al. A new modeling method for flexible multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn2015; 35: 179–190.
19.
MarghituDBCojocaruDJacksonRL.Elasto-plastic impact of a rotating link with a massive surface. Int J Mech Sci2011; 53: 309–315.
20.
HanSLHongJZ.Multi-variable method for flexible multibody systems with contact/impact. Chin J Theor Appl Mech2011; 43: 886–893.
21.
HanWHuHYJinDP.Experimental study on dynamics of an oblique-impact vibrating system of two degrees of freedom. Nonlinear Dyn2007; 50: 551–573.
22.
GheadniaHCermikOMarghituDB.Experimental and theoretical analysis of the elasto-plastic oblique impact of a rod with a flat. Int J Impact Eng2015; 86: 307–317.
23.
KrishnaIRPPadmanabhanC.Experimental and numerical investigations of impacting cantilever beams part 1: first mode response. Nonlinear Dyn2012; 67: 1985–2000.
24.
KrishnaIRPPadmanabhanC.Experimental and numerical investigation of impacting cantilever beams: second mode response. Int J Mech Sci2015; 92: 187–193.
25.
BartierOHernotXMauvoisinG.Theoretical and experimental analysis of contact radius for spherical indentation. Mech Mater2010; 42: 640–656.
26.
ZhouNZhangWLiR.Dynamic performance of a pantograph-catenary system with the consideration of the appearance characteristics of contact surfaces. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A2011; 12: 913–920.
27.
MeiGZhangWZhaoH, et al. A hybrid method to simulate the interaction of pantograph and catenary on overlap span. Veh Syst Dyn2006; 44: 571–580.
28.
HippmannG.An algorithm for compliant contact between complexly shaped bodies. Multibody Syst Dyn2004; 12: 345–362.
29.
EN50318. Railway applications. Current collection systems. Validation of simulation of the dynamic interaction between the pantograph and overhead contact line. Belgium: European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization,2002.
30.
EN50317. Railway applications. Current collection systems. Requirements for and validation of measurements of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line. Belgium: European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization,2012.
31.
BruniSAmbrosioJCarniceroA, et al. The results of the pantograph-catenary interaction benchmark. Veh Syst Dyn2015; 53: 412–435.
