Determining the shape and size of a wheel-rail contact area is required to calculate fatigue and wear of wheel and rail. Fatigue and wear are influenced by high pressures of up to 1000 MPa that act on the small contact area of approximately 1 cm². One problem in identifying the contact patch is the inaccessibility of the contact point. Therefore, numerical and experimental methods have been applied to identify the shape and size of the contact area in the static wheel-rail contact. Here, we summarize and compare methods to identify the static wheel-rail contact area, in particular the Hertzian calculation, the use of carbon paper, the use of pressure measurement film, the finite element method, the use of ultrasonic testing, and a semi-Hertzian method called STRIPES. Our review revealed that several methods exist to determine the static wheel-rail contact, which were introduced as well as results of some research projects. However, the partly incomplete description of methods studied impeded a detailed assessment of the results. Furthermore, due to the non-comparable parameters applied in the different studies, it was impossible to contrast the results and methods presented in the different publications. Hence, it is recommended that future results in the field of static wheel-rail contact should be directly contrasted with a detailed finite element model. This proceeding will allow to directly compare different methods on the bases of finite element analysis and thus the identification of a method for each situation.
BrunskillHHunterAZhouL, et al. An evaluation of ultrasonic arrays for the static and dynamic measurement of wheel–rail contact pressure and area. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2020; 234: 1580–1593.
2.
AndrewsHI.The contact between a locomotive driving wheel and the rail. Wear1959; 2: 468–484.
3.
DörnerFLekueJRanganathanP, et al. Über den einsatz von druckmeßfolie zur ermittlung der kontaktflächengröße und -form des Rad-Schiene-Kontakts. In: Proceedings of the 1st international railway symposium Aachen 2017 (eds RW De Doncker, N Nießen and C Schindler), Aachen, 28–30 November 2017, pp.230–240. Germany: RWTH Aachen University.
4.
PauMAymerichFGinesuF.Ultrasonic measurements of nominal contact area and contact pressure in a wheel-rail system. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2000; 214: 231–243.
5.
PauMAymerichFCoronaG. Experimental Investigation on wheel-rail contact by means of ultrasonic waves. In: Book of paper summaries: world congress of railway research (WCCR) in Tokyo, Tokyo, 19–23 October 1999, p.164.
6.
HertzH.Über die berührung fester elastischer körper. J für die reine angewandte mathematik1882; 92: 156–171.
7.
KleinerO.Numerische und experimentelle Untersuchung der Rad/Schiene-Interaktion unter Berücksichtigung mechanischer und thermomechanischer Effekte. Zugl.: Kaiserslautern, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2011. Technical University, Kaiserslautern, 2011.
8.
DörnerFBettingerTSchindlerC. Sensitivitätsuntersuchung des Rad-Schiene-Normalkontakts. In: Tagungsband/ 14. Internationale Schienenfahrzeugtagung: 23–25. September 2015. mit begleitender Fachausstellung; Dresden, Rad, Schiene, 2015, pp.42–44. Hamburg: DVV Media Group Eurailpress.
9.
DörnerFBettingerTSchindlerC.Sensitivity analysis of the wheel–rail normal contact on the basis of continuous factors. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2017; 231: 1022–1034.
10.
ZhouLBrunskillHPLewisR.Real-time non-invasive measurement and monitoring of wheel–rail contact using ultrasonic reflectometry. Struct Health Monit2019; 18: 1953–1965.
11.
Dwyer-JoyceRSLewisRDrinkwaterBW, et al. A rail mounted ultrasonic sensor for contact patch measurement. In: Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE joint rail conference –2008: mechanical and civil engineering papers, electrical engineering papers, Wilmington, Delaware USA, 22–24 April 2008, pp.125–130. New York, NY: ASME.
12.
MarshallMBLewisRDwyer-JoyceRS, et al. Experimental characterization of wheel-rail contact patch evolution. J Tribol2006; 128: 493–504.
13.
DörnerFKörbleinCSchindlerC.On the accuracy of the pressure measurement film in Hertzian contact situations similar to wheel-rail contact applications. Wear2014; 317: 241–245.
14.
LewisROlofssonU.Basic tribology of the wheel–rail contact. In: LewisROlofssonU (eds) Wheel-rail interface handbook. Boca Raton, FL, Oxford: CRC Press, 2009, pp.34–57.
15.
ZhuYOlofssonUSöderbergA.Adhesion modeling in the wheel–rail contact under dry and lubricated conditions using measured 3D surfaces. Tribol Int2013; 61: 1–10.
16.
TelliskiviTOlofssonUSellgrenU, et al. A tool and a method for FE analysis of wheel and rail interaction. In: 9th International ANSYS conference and exhibition on simulation: leading design into the new millennium Pittsburgh: Proceedings of the 9th International ANSYS, Pittsburgh, 28–30 August 2000.
17.
MeymandSZKeylinAAhmadianM.A survey of wheel–rail contact models for rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn2016; 54: 386–428.
18.
DörnerF.Methode zur Verifizierung und Validierung von Finite-Elemente-Berechnungen des Rad-Schiene-Normalkontakts. Dissertation, 2016 Technische Universität Kaiserslautern; ISBN: 978-3-95974-020-3.
19.
KleinerOSchindlerC. Numerical and experimental research into loads on wheel and rail. In: Proceedings of the 8th International conference on railway bogies and running gears, BOGIE '10 (ed. I Zobory). Department of Railway Vehicles and Vehicle System Analysis, BME – section of Rolling Stock, SSME. Budapest, 13–16 September 2010, pp.213–219.
20.
KleinerOSchindlerC.Geometrie und druckspannungen im rad/Schiene-Kontakt. EI – Der Eisenbahningenieur2011; 62: 9–12.
21.
ZhuY.The influence of iron oxides on wheel–rail contact: a literature review. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 232: 734–743.
22.
YanWFischerFD.Applicability of the hertz contact theory to rail-wheel contact problems. Arch Appl Mech (Ingenieur Archiv)2000; 70: 255–268.
23.
ZhuYOlofssonU.An adhesion model for wheel–rail contact at the micro level using measured 3d surfaces. Wear2014; 314: 162–170.
24.
ZhouLBrunskillHPletzM, et al. Real-Time measurement of dynamic wheel-rail contacts using ultrasonic reflectometry. J Tribol2019; 141: 533.
25.
SixKMeierhoferATrummerG, et al. Plasticity in wheel–rail contact and its implications on vehicle–track interaction. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2017; 231: 558–569.
26.
SebeşanIZakariaY.Determination of wheel-rail contact characteristics by creating a special program for calculation. Math Modell Civil Eng2014; 10: 48–59.
27.
DörnerFBettingerTLekueJ, et al. Validation of finite element simulations for wheel-rail normal contact. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance (eds J Pombo, A Gomes Correia, S Costa d’Aguiar S, et al.), Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy, 5–8 April 2016, paper 156. Stirlingshire: Civil-Comp Press.
28.
Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. DIN EN 13715:2020-10. Railway applications – wheelsets and bogies – wheels – tread profile.
29.
Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. DIN EN 13674-1:2017-07. Railway applications – track – rail – part 1: vignole railway rails 46 kg/m and above.
30.
KleinerOSchindlerC.Geometry and compressive stresses in wheel/rail contact. RTR – Railw Techn Rev2012; 52: 24–28.
31.
LabrijnP.Wheel and rail. Bull Int Railw Congr Assoc1951; 28: 255–287.
KrächterH.Ein neuartiges verfahren zur messung von druckkräften mit ultraschall. Werkstatt Und Betrieb1958; 91: 246–248.
34.
AymerichFPauMGinesuF.Evaluation of nominal contact area and contact pressure distribution in a Steel-Steel interface by means of ultrasonic techniques. JSME Int J Ser C2003; 46: 297–305.
35.
PauM.Ultrasonic waves for effective assessment of wheel-rail contact anomalies. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2005; 219: 79–90.
36.
AlemiACormanFLodewijksG.Condition monitoring approaches for the detection of railway wheel defects. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2017; 231: 961–981.
37.
PauMAymerichFGinesuF, et al. Evaluation of the influence of surface conditions on wheel-rail contact performances. In: Proceedings of the world congress of railway research (WCCR), Cologne, Köln. November 25–29, 2001.
38.
PauM.Estimation of real contact area in a wheel-rail system by means of ultrasonic waves. Tribol Int2003; 36: 687–690.
39.
MarshallMBLewisRDwyer-JoyceRS, et al. Ultrasonic characterisation of a wheel/rail contact. In: Dalmaz G, Lubrecht A, Dowson D, et al. (eds) Tribology series transient processes in tribology: Proceedings of the 30th Leeds-Lyon symposium on tribiology. 1. Aufl. s.l., 2003//2004, pp. 151–158. Amsterdam: Elsevier (Elsevier textbooks).
40.
PauMLebanBBaldiA.Simultaneous subsurface defect detection and contact parameter assessment in a wheel–rail system. Wear2008; 265: 1837–1847.
41.
PauMLebanB.Ultrasonic assessment of wheel—rail contact evolution exposed to artificially induced wear. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2009; 223: 353–364.
42.
PauMAymerichFGinesuF.Distribution of contact pressure in wheel–rail contact area. Wear2002; 253: 265–274.
43.
ChenHBanTIshidaM, et al. Experimental investigation of influential factors on adhesion between wheel and rail under wet conditions. Wear2008; 265: 1504–1511.
LekueJDörnerFSchindlerC. Determination of the measurement accuracy of the prescale pressure measurement film in the wheel-rail normal contact. In: Proceedings of the 10th International conference on railway bogies and running gears (ed. I Zobory), Budapest, Hungary, Department of Rolling Stock of the SSME, Budapest, 5–8 April 2016, pp.149–156.
46.
LekueJDörnerFSchindlerC.On the source of the systematic error of the pressure measurement film applied to wheel–rail normal contact measurements. J Tribol2018; 140: 34.
47.
KleinerOSchindlerC. Numerische und experimentelle Analyse der Kontaktspannungsverteilung in der Berührfläche von Rad und Schiene. In: Tagungsband - 11. Internationale Schienenfahrzeugtagung 23. - 25. Februar 2011. mit begleitender Fachausstellung ; Dresden, Rad, Schiene 2011, Internationale Schienenfahrzeugtagung; 11, 23–25 February 2011, pp.35–37. Hamburg: DVV Media Group, Eurailpress.
48.
PooleW.The measurement of the contact area between opaque objects under static and dynamic rolling conditions. In: GladwellGMLGhonemHKalousekJ (eds) Contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems II: Proceedings of the international symposium held at the University of Rhode Island, Kingston, R.I., July 8–11, 1986, 1987, pp. 59–71. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press.
49.
PaulB.A review of rail–wheel contact stress problems. In: KerrAD (ed.) Railroad track mechanics and technology: Proceedings of a symposium held at Princeton University, April 21–23, 1975, 1978, pp.323–351. Burlington: Elsevier Science.
50.
KnotheKTheH.Ermittlung der normalspannungsverteilung beim kontakt von rad und schiene. Forsch Ing-Wes1983; 49: 79–85.
51.
OllertonE.Stresses in the contact zone. Paper 10. Proc Instn Mechanical Engrs1963–1964; 178: 161–171.
52.
TelliskiviTOlofssonU.Contact mechanics analysis of measured wheel-rail profiles using the finite element method. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2001; 215: 65–72.
53.
BerndtG.Über die gültigkeit der hertzschen formeln zur berechnung der abplattung von meßkörpern. Z Tech Phys1922; 14: 14–21.
AyasseJBCholletH.Determination of the wheel rail contact patch in semi-Hertzian conditions. Veh Syst Dyn2005; 43: 161–172.
56.
HoischenHHesserW (eds) Technisches zeichnen: Grundlagen, normen, beispiele, darstellende geometrie ; lehr-, übungs- und nachschlagewerk für schule, fortbildung, studium und praxis ; mit mehr als 100 tabellen. 30., grundlegend überarb. und aktualisierte aufl. Berlin: Cornelsen, 2005.
57.
QuostXSebesMEddhahakA, et al. Assessment of a semi-Hertzian method for determination of wheel–rail contact patch. Veh Syst Dyn2006; 44: 789–814.
58.
SebesMAyasseJBCholletH, et al. Application of a semi-Hertzian method to the simulation of vehicles in high-speed switches. Veh Syst Dyn2006; 44: 341–348.
59.
KalkerJJ.Wheel-rail wear calculations with the program CONTACT. In: GladwellGMLGhonemHKalousekJ (eds) Contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems II: Proceedings of the international symposium held at the University of Rhode Island, Kingston, R.I., July 8–11, 1986, 1987, pp.3–26. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press.
SladkowskiAKuminekT. Influence of the FE discretization on accuracy of calculation of contact stress in a system wheel–rail. In: Proceedings of third scientific conference: Sborník příspěvků třetí vědecké konference, 11–12 September 2003, pp.13–18. Pardubice: Univerzita Pardubice.
62.
SladkowskiASitarzM.Analysis of wheel–rail interaction using FE software. Wear2005; 258: 1217–1223.
63.
Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (GOST R). Solid-rolled wheels. Design and dimensions. Russia: Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology.
64.
Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (GOST R). Railway rails type P65. Construction and dimensions. Russia: Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology.
65.
DammeS.Zur Finite-Element-Modellierung des stationären Rollkontakts von Rad und Schiene. Zugl.: Dresden, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2006, Inst. für Mechanik und Flächentragwerke, Dresden, 2006.
66.
Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. DIN 5573:1995-06. Rail vehicles – wheel profiles – widths 135 and 140 mm.
67.
DörnerFSchindlerC. Validierung Finiter-Elemente-Berechnungen des Rad-Schiene-Normalkontakts mit probabilistischen Simulationen. In: Berechnung und Simulation: Anwendungen - Entwicklungen - Trends: 3. NAFEMS DACH Regionalkonferenz: unabhängig - übergreifend - neutral 25.-27. April 2016, Bamberg, Deutschland Tagungsband, Bamberg, 25–27 April 2016, pp.59–64. Bernau am Chiemsee: NAFEMS GmbH.
68.
KleinerOSchindlerC.Investigating the stress on wheels and rails. RTR – Railw Tech Rev2011; 51: 15–21.
69.
DellmannT, et al. Zugfördertechnik. In: SchindlerCBrandhorstMDellmannT, et al. (eds) Handbuch schienenfahrzeuge: Entwicklung, produktion, instandhaltung. 1. Aufl. Hamburg: Eurailpress, 2014, pp.16–98.
70.
SichaniMSEnblomRBergM.Comparison of non-elliptic contact models: towards fast and accurate modelling of wheel–rail contact. Wear2014; 314: 111–117.
71.
AymerichFPauM.Assessment of nominal contact area parameters by means of ultrasonic waves. J Tribol2004; 126: 639–645.
72.
PauMAymerichFGinesuF.Measurements of nominal contact area in metallic interfaces: a comparison between an ultrasonic method and a pressure-sensitive film. Wear2001; 249: 533–535.
73.
DruckerDCPragerW.Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Quart Appl Math1952; 10: 157–165.
74.
LekueJDörnerFSchindlerC.Multiscale finite element modeling of wheel–rail rough normal contact measurements using pressure measurement film. Tribol Trans2018; 61: 972–978.
75.
RoviraARodaAMarshallMB, et al. Experimental and numerical modelling of wheel–rail contact and wear. Wear2011; 271: 911–924.
