Vertical track irregularity analysis of high-speed railways on simply-supported beam bridges based on the virtual track inspection method

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between the static and dynamic track geometry irregularities is crucial for the proper maintenance of rail infrastructures and the reduction of on-site workload. This paper focuses on the analysis of the dynamic and static track irregularities on simply-supported beam bridges for high-speed railways. Based on the simulation of three-dimensional vehicle–track–bridge dynamics, a virtual track inspection method is proposed according to the measurement principle with the inertial reference. With the static irregularity provided as the initial input to the simulation model, the virtual track inspection of dynamic track irregularities is carried out considering different supporting structures, i.e. subgrade and bridges. Furthermore, the characteristics and advantages of the proposed model are investigated in the “rigid track structure”. Then, using the virtual track inspection method, this paper analyzes the relationship between the dynamic and static track irregularities (in the vertical direction) on the simply-supported beam bridge in both the time and frequency domains with respect to different train speeds, and the simulation results are validated by real-world measurements. Numerical results show that the stiffness irregularity in the vertical direction is periodical, with the cycle length equal to the span of the bridge. Furthermore, there is an obvious linear relationship between the dynamic and static irregularities. Also, the regression coefficient increases with increasing vehicle speed.

Keywords

High-speed railway track geometry irregularity simply-supported beam virtual track inspection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bai

, et al. Classification-learning-based framework for predicting railway track irregularities. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2016; 230(2): 598–610.

Bruni

, et al. Control and monitoring for railway vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn 2007; 45(7–8): 743–779.

Wang S, et al. Study of rail surface irregularity detection based on asymmetrical chord offset method. In: Proceedings of the 2012 third international conference on mechanic automation and control engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 2012, pp.829–832.

Mao XJ, Li HF and Xu YD. A new method for detecting rail short wave irregularity. In: Applied mechanics and materials. Trans Tech Publications, 2013, pp.1640–1644.

Wang

, et al. Error theory of chord-based measurement system regarding track geometry and improvement by high frequency sampling. Measurement 2018; 115: 204–216.

Mori

, et al. Condition monitoring of railway track using in-service vehicle. J Mech Syst Transp Logist 2010; 3(1): 154–165.

Lee

, et al. A mixed filtering approach for track condition monitoring using accelerometers on the axle box and bogie. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2012; 61(3): 749–758.

Salvador

, et al. Axlebox accelerations: their acquisition and time–frequency characterisation for railway track monitoring purposes. Measurement 2016; 82: 301–312.

Westeon

, et al. Monitoring vertical track irregularity from in-service railway vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2007; 221(1): 75–88.

10.

Weston

, et al. Monitoring lateral track irregularity from in-service railway vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2007; 221(1): 89–100.

11.

Shi H and Yu Z. Estimation of track irregularity based on genetic algorithm and unscented Kalman filtering. In: 2012 joint rail conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012.

12.

Fujimoto

Tanifuji

Miyamoto

. Influence of track gauge variation on rail vehicle dynamics (an examination based on comparison between data from a test train running on track with irregularity artificially set and numerical simulation). Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2000; 214(4): 223–230.

13.

Tsunashima

Naganuma

Kobayashi

. Track geometry estimation from car-body vibration. Veh Syst Dyn 2014; 52(suppl 1): 207–219.

14.

Escalona JL. Vertical track geometry monitoring using inertial sensors and complementary filters. In: ASME 2016 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016.

15.

Frohling

Scheffel

Ebersöhn

. The vertical dynamic response of a rail vehicle caused by track stiffness variations along the track. Veh Syst Dyn 1996; 25(S1): 175–187.

16.

Luo

. Track random interference function. China Railway Sci 1982; 3(1): 74–111.

17.

The existing track quality index standards and management. Beijing, China: Transport Bureau, Ministry Railways People's Republic China, 2009.

18.

Lei

Mao

. Dynamic response analyses of vehicle and track coupled system on track transition of conventional high speed railway. J Sound Vibr 2004; 271: 1133–1146.

19.

Lei

Zhang

. Influence of track stiffness distribution on vehicle and track interactions in track transition. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2010; 224(6): 592–604.

20.

Kerr

Moroney

. Track transition problems and remedies. Bulletin 1993; 742: 267–298.

21.

Kerr

. On the vertical modulus in the standard railway track analysis. Rail Int 1987, pp. 11.

22.

Lundqvist

Dahlberg

. Dynamic train/track interaction including model for track settlement evolvement. Veh Syst Dyn 2004; 41: 667–676.

23.

Tan

Mao

. Research on transfer matrix between dynamic and static track quality index in newly-build ballastless track of high-speed railway. J Railway Sci Eng 2016; 13(09): 1674–1680.

24.

Research report on dynamic-static interrelation and management standard value of normal speed railway track. Beijing, China: China Academy of Railway Sciences, 2018.

25.

Zhai

Sun

. A detailed model for investigating vertical interaction between railway vehicle and track. Veh Syst Dyn 1994; 23(S1): 603–615.

26.

Zhai

Wang

Cai

. Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn 2009; 47(11): 1349–1376.

27.

Gao

Zhai

Guo

. Wheel–rail dynamic interaction due to rail weld irregularity in high-speed railways. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2018; 232(1): 249–261.

28.

Hauser

Shen

O'Brien

. Interactive deformation using modal analysis with constraints. Graphics Interface 2003, pp. 3.

29.

Hung

Hsu

. Influence of long-wavelength track irregularities on the motion of a high-speed train. Veh Syst Dyn 2018; 56(1): 95–112.

30.

Hedjazi

Rahai

Sennah

. Evaluation of creep effects on the time-dependent deflections and stresses in prestressed concrete bridges. Bridge Struct 2007; 3(2): 119–132.

31.

Barr

Stanton

Eberhard

. Effects of temperature variations on precast, prestressed concrete bridge girders. J Bridge Eng 2005; 10(2): 186–194.

32.

Brigham EO. The fast Fourier transform and its applications. vol. 448. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.

33.

Shuai L. Analysis on the characteristic identification and evolution law of high-speed railway track spectrum. Master's Thesis. Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018.

34.

Jingchuan

YAO

. Rating of operation performance for simply supported box beam with common span for high speed railway. China Railway Sci 2017, pp. 34–41.