This study deals with the validation of an anti-slip control method that is based on the acceleration of a wheel. The method uses the angular acceleration signal and a threshold value to prevent the wheel from a severe slip. Initially, the implemented method was tested with an experimental roller rig under several wheel–roller surface conditions (half-dry, wet and greasy). Then, the validity of the control algorithm was verified using the numerical model of a full-scale roller rig that is built via the MATLAB editor, with the simulation scenarios following the experiments. The results from both experiments and simulations confirm that the acceleration-based slip regulation controller prevents the excessive wheel slip and improves the traction performance of a rail vehicle. Moreover, it is observed that the performance of the controller could be further improved by properly setting the control parameters of the acceleration-based slip regulation controller.
Park D-Y, Kim M-S, Hwang D-H, et al. Hybrid re-adhesion control method for traction system of high-speed railway. In: ICEMS’2001 proceedings of the fifth international conference on electrical machines and systems (IEEE Cat. No.01EX501), Shenyang, China, 2001, pp.739–742. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
2.
ChangC-YKimJ-MKimY-H. A design of prototype 1C2M railway vehicle propulsion control system considering slip reduction of traction motor. J Electr Eng Technol2015; 10: 429–435.
3.
Kim JS, Park SH, Choi JJ, et al. Adaptive sliding mode control of adhesion force in railway rolling stocks. In: Bartoszewicz A (ed) Sliding mode control. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2011, pp.385–408.
4.
HussainIHalepotoIAKumarW, et al.Anti-slip traction control of railway vehicle based on estimated wheel-rail contact condition. Sindh Univ Res J Sci Ser2013; 45: 373–378.
5.
Koseki T and Hara T. Compensation of excessive angular momentum in a re-adhesion control of an electric train. Aachen, Germany: IEEE, 2015, pp.1–6.
6.
SpiryaginMSunYQColeC, et al.Development of traction control for hauling locomotives. J Syst Des Dyn2011; 5: 1214–1225.
7.
Yamashita M and Soeda T. Development of a new traction control method to suppress wheel-slip of electric locomotives. In: Electrical systems for aircraft, railway and ship propulsion (ESARS), 2012, pp.1–6. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
8.
OhishiKHataTSanoT, et al.Realization of anti-slip/skid re-adhesion control for electric commuter train based on disturbance observer. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng2009; 4: 199–209.
9.
ZirekAVoltrPLataM, et al.An adaptive sliding mode control to stabilize wheel slip and improve traction performance. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 232: 2392–2405.
10.
YinGWangSJinX. Optimal slip ratio based fuzzy control of acceleration slip regulation for four-wheel independent driving electric vehicles. Math Probl Eng 2013: 1–7. .
11.
Gou J, Zhang B, Wang L, et al. Acceleration slip regulation of electric vehicle. In: 2010 International conference on logistics engineering and intelligent transportation systems, Wuhan, China, 2010, pp.1–3. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
12.
HeHPengJXiongR, et al.An acceleration slip regulation strategy for four-wheel drive electric vehicles based on sliding mode control. Energies2014; 7: 3748–3763.
13.
PichlíkPZděnekJ. Overview of slip control methods used in locomotives. Trans Electr Eng2014; 2: 38–43.
14.
OnatAVoltrPLataM. An unscented Kalman filter-based rolling radius estimation methodology for railway vehicles with traction. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2017; 232: 1686–1702.
15.
VoltrP. Simulation of wheel-rail contact conditions on experimental equipment. Railw Transp Logist2015; 11: 77–82.
16.
Voltr P, Lata M and Cerny O. Measuring of wheel-rail adhesion characteristics at a test stand. In: 18th International conference on engineering mechanics, Svratka, Czech Republic, 2012, pp.1543–1553. Prague: Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
17.
VoltrPLataM. Transient wheel–rail adhesion characteristics under the cleaning effect of sliding. Veh Syst Dyn2015; 53: 605–618.
18.
DolečekRNovakJCernyO. Traction permanent magnet synchronous motor torque control with flux weakening. Radioengineering2009; 18: 601–605.
19.
Simanek J, Novak J, Cerny O, et al. FOC and flux weakening for traction drive with permanent magnet synchronous motor. In: 2008 IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics, Cambridge, UK, 2008, pp.753–758. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
20.
Qian P and Zhang Y. Study on hysteresis current control and its applications in power electronics. In: Hu W (ed) Electronics and signal processing. Berlin: Springer, 2011, pp.889–895.
21.
Simanek J, Novak J, Dolecek R, et al. Control algorithms for permanent magnet synchronous traction motor. In: International conference on ‘computer as a tool’, Warsaw, Poland, pp.1839–1844. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
22.
LeedyAW. Simulink/MATLAB dynamic induction motor model for use as a teaching and research tool. Int J Soft Comput Eng2013; 3: 102–107.
23.
PolachO. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit. Wear2005; 258: 992–1000.
24.
Yamashita M and Soeda T. Anti-slip re-adhesion control method for increasing the tractive force of locomotives through the early detection of wheel slip convergence. In: 2015 17th European conference on power electronics and applications (EPE'15 ECCE-Europe), Geneva, Switzerland, 2015, pp.1–10. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
