Modeling of track geometry degradation and decisions on safety and maintenance: A literature review and possible future research directions

Abstract

In a railroad track, the inherent and small geometrical deviations in the position of rails from their ideal design states constitute imperfections that can have a significant impact on the safety and the rate of degradation of the rail system. These deviations are measured by various technologies and further assessed using various algorithms and statistical techniques to quantify the condition of the system. This paper reviews the existing research regarding the collection of track geometry data, analysis of degradation, and the associated safety and maintenance decisions. The knowledge gaps in the existing literature are identified and possible future research directions are suggested. The review can be used as a reference by practitioners and researchers to determine optimal practices for assuring the safety of tracks.

Keywords

Track geometry data collection degradation modeling safety maintenance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Liu

Saat

Barkan

. Analysis of causes of major train derailment and their effect on accident rates. J Transp Res Board 2012; 2289: 154–163.

Lopez-Pita

Teixeira

Casas

et al.

Maintenance Costs of high-speed lines in Europe: state of the art. J Transp Res Board 2009; 2043: 13–19.

Berawi

Raimundo

Calcada

et al.

Evaluating Track geometrical quality through different methodologies. Int J Technol 2010; 1: 38–47.

Australian Rail Track Corporation LTD. Track geometry section 5, https://extranet.artc.com.au/docs/eng/track-civil/procedures/track-geo/ETF-05-01.pdf (2015, accessed 20 April 2016).

Bhattacharjya

et al.

Track geometry defect rectification based on track deterioration modelling and derailment risk assessment. J Oper Res Soc 2014; 101: 1–13.

Liden T. Survey of railway maintenance activities from a planning perspective and literature review concerning the use of mathematical algorithms for solving such planning and scheduling problems, www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:754942/FULLTEXT01.pdf (2014, accessed 7 July 2017).

Soleimanmeigouni

Ahmadi

A survey on track geometry degradation modeling. In: Kumar

Ahmadi

Verma

Varde

(eds). Current trends in reliability, availability, maintainability and safety, 1st ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016, pp. 3–12.

Weston

Roberts

Yeo

et al.

Perspectives on railway track geometry condition monitoring from in-service railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 2015; 53: 1063–1091.

Carr G, Tajaddini A and Nejikovsky B. Autonomous Track inspection systems – today and tomorrow. In: AREMA 2009 annual conference, Chicago, Illinois, 20–23 September 2009, www.arema.org/files/library/2009_Conference_Proceedings/Autonomous_Track_Inspection_Systems-Today_and_Tomorrow.pdf (accessed 1 July 2017).

10.

Stuart C, Carr G and Sherrock E. Development of autonomous track geometry measurement systems for overall track assessment. In: AREMA 2011 annual conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 18–21 September 2011, www.arema.org/files/library/2011_Conference_Proceedings/Development-Autonomous_Track_Geometry_Measurement_Systems-Overall_Track_Assessment.pdf (accessed 1 July 2017).

11.

Sadaat S, Stuart C, Carr G, et al. Development and use of FRA autonomous track geometry measurement system technology. In: AREMA 2014 annual conference, Chicago, Illinois, 28–1 October 2014.

12.

Alfelor

Carr

Fateh

. Track degradation assessment using gage restraint measurements. J Transp Res Board 2001; 1742: 68–77.

13.

Choros J, Sussman T, Mahmood F, et al. Gage restraint measurement system comparison tests: railbound and hi-rail vehicles. Report for the United States federal railroad administration. Report no. DOT-VNTSC-FRA-03-11, December 2003.

14.

Martin G, Bloom J and Lee S. The deployable gage restraint measurement system – description and operational performance. In: AREMA 2006 annual conference, Louisville, Kentucky, 17–20 September 2006.

15.

Andani M, Ahmadian M, Munoz J, et al. On the application of LIDAR sensors for track geometry monitoring. In: 2015 joint rail conference, San Jose, California, 23–26 March 2015.

16.

Scott G, Chillingworth E and Dick M. Development of an unattended track geometry measurement system. In: 2010 joint rail conference, Urbana, Illinois, 27–29 April 2010.

17.

McAnaw

. The system that measures the system. NDT & E Int 2003; 36: 169–179.

18.

Tsunashima H, Naganuma Y and Kobayashi T. Track geometry estimation from car-body acceleration. In: 5th IET railway condition monitoring and non-destructive testing (RCM 2011), Derby, United Kingdom, 29–30 November 2011.

19.

Farritor S and Fateh M. Measurement of vertical track modulus from a moving rail car. report for the united states federal railroad administration, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.516.5019&rep=rep1&type=pdf (2013, accessed 7 July 2017).

20.

Al-Nazer L. Track profile approximation using Railcar body acceleration data. Federal Railroad Administration, https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1341313 (2014, accessed 7 July 2017).

21.

Real

Montalban

Real

et al.

Development of a system to obtain vertical track geometry measuring axle-box accelerations from inservice trains. J Vibroeng 2012; 14: 813–826.

22.

Sun

Liu

et al.

Key equipment identification model for correcting milepost errors of track geometry data from track inspection. Transp Res Board Part C: Emerg Technol 2013; 25: 85–103.

23.

Sun

Liu

et al.

Optimizing the alignment of inspection data from track geometry cars. Computer-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2014; 30: 19–35.

24.

. A method to correct the mileage error in railway track geometry data and its usage. Traffic Transp Stud 2010; 2010: 1130–1135.

25.

Selig

Cardillo

Stephens

et al.

Analyzing and forecasting railway data using linear data analysis. WIT Trans Built Environ 2008; 103: 25–34.

26.

Liu

Sun

et al.

Dynamic-time-warping-based measurement data alignment model for condition-based railroad track maintenance. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2015; 16: 799–812.

27.

Association of American Railroads. Safety and innovation state of the industry report, www.aar.org/report/Documents/AAR%20State%20of%20the%20Industry%202016%20Full%20Report.pdf (accessed 7 July 2017).

28.

Lewis R. Track geometry recording and usage: notes for a lecture to Network Rail. Raymond Lewis C Eng F.I.E.T. Technical Consultant Derby 2011, www.infrastructuremonitoring.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Track-Recording-And-Usage.pdf (accessed 7 July 2017).

29.

Asmunsen B. Overview of methods for measurement of track irregularities important for ground-borne vibration. RIVAS – Railway Induced Vibration Abatement Solutions Collaborative Project 2013, www.rivas-project.eu/fileadmin/documents/RIVAS_CHALMERS_WP2_D2_5_FINAL.pdf (accessed 7 July 2017).

30.

Sowinsky

. Interrelation between wavelengths of track geometry irregularities and rail vehicle dynamic properties. Arch Transp 2013; 25–26: 97–108.

31.

Luber

Haigermoser

Grabner

. Track geometry evaluation method based on vehicle response prediction. Veh Syst Dyn 2010; 48: 157–173.

32.

Haigermoser

Eickhoff

Thomas

et al.

Describing and assessing track geometry quality. Veh Syst Dyn 2014; 52: 189–206.

33.

El-Sibaie

Zhang

. Objective track quality indices. J Transp Res Board 2004; 1863: 81–87.

34.

Sadeghi

Fathali

Boloukian

. Development of a new track geometry assessment technique incorporating rail cant factor. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2008; 223: 255–263.

35.

Arasteh

Larsson-Krilik

Nissen

et al.

Cost-effective track geometry maintenance limits. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2014; 230: 611–622.

36.

Bai

Liu

Sun

et al.

Classification-learning-based framework for predicting railway track irregularities. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2014; 230: 598–620.

37.

Xiao

. Improved generalized energy index method for comprehensive evaluation and prediction of track irregularity. J Stat Comput Simul 2013; 84: 1213–1231.

38.

Sadeghi

Askarinejad

. Application of neural networks in evaluation of railway track quality condition. J Mech Sci Technol 2012; 26: 113–122.

39.

Bai

Liu

Sun

et al.

Markov-based model for the prediction of railway track irregularities. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2013; 229: 150–159.

40.

Chang

Liu

. A multi-stage linear prediction model for the irregularity of the longitudinal level over unit railway section. Trans Built Environ J 2010; 114: 641–650.

41.

Guo

Han

. Multi-stage linear prediction model for railway track irregularity. J Appl Mech Mater 2013; 361: 1811–1816.

42.

Jia

Futian

et al.

Track irregularity time series analysis and trend forecasting. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc J 2012; 2012: 1–15.

43.

Liu

Wang

. Research on a short-range prediction model for track irregularity over small track lengths. J Transp Eng 2010; 136: 1085–1091.

44.

Liu

Wang

et al.

Railroad track deterioration characteristics based track measurement data mining. Math Probl Eng J 2013; 2013: 1–7. doi: 10.1155/2013/970573.

45.

Prescott D and Andrews J. Modelling maintenance in railway infrastructure management. In: Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2013 proceedings – annual, Orlando, Florida, 28–31 January 2013.

46.

Sadeghi

Askarinejad

. An investigation into the effects of track structural conditions on railway track geometry deviations. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2009; 223: 415–425.

47.

Zarembski A and Attoh-Okine N. Using big data techniques to determine the relationship between rail defects and track geometry defects. In: Track maintenance planning in the era of big data, Newark, Delaware, 9 December 2014.

48.

Meddah

Hass

et al.

Relating track geometry to vehicle performance using neural network approach. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2006; 220: 273–281.

49.

Lyngby

. Railway track degradation: shape and influencing factors. Int J Performability Eng 2009; 5: 177–186.

50.

Audley

Andrews

. The effects of tamping on railway track geometry degradation. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2012; 227: 376–391.

51.

Jovanovic S. Railway track quality assessment and related decision making. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, The Hague, Netherlands, 10–13 October 2004.

52.

Vale

Ribeiro

. Railway condition-based model with stochastic deterioration. J Civil Eng Manage 2013; 20: 686–692.

53.

Quiroga

Schneider

. Monte Carlo simulation of railway track geometry deterioration and restoration. J Risk Reliab 2011; 226: 274–282.

54.

Andrade

Teixeira

. Uncertainty in rail-track geometry degradation: Lisbon-Oporto line case study. J Transp Eng 2011; 137: 193–200.

55.

Andrade

Teixeira

. A Bayesian model to assess rail track geometry degradation throughout its life-cycle. Res Transp Econ J 2012; 36: 1–8.

56.

Andrade

Teixeira

. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of rail track geometry degradation. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2013; 227: 364–375.

57.

Andrade

Teixeira

. Statistical modelling of railway track geometry degradation using hierarchical Bayesian models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf J 2015; 142: 169–183.

58.

Zhu

Cheng

Miao

et al.

Advanced stochastic modeling of railway track irregularities. Adv Mech Eng J 2013; 2013: 1–7.

59.

Xin

Famurewa

Gao

et al.

Grey-system-theory-based model for the prediction of track geometry quality. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2015; 230: 1735–1744.

60.

Quiroga L and Schneider E. Modelling of high speed rail geometry aging as a discrete-continuous process. In: Stochastic modeling techniques and data analysis international conference, Chania, Crete, Greece, 8–11 June 2010.

61.

Andrade A. Renewal decisions from a life-cycle cost (LCC) perspective in railway infrastructure: an integrative approach using separate LCC models for rail and ballast components. Report, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa, Portugal, 2008. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/242112040_Renewal_decisions_from_a_Life-cycle_Cost_LCC_Perspective_in_Railway_Infrastructure_An_integrative_approach_using_separate_LCC_models_for_rail_and_ballast_components (accessed 1 July 2017).

62.

Caetano

Teixeira

. Optimization model to schedule track renewal operations: a life-cycle cost approach. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2015; 11: 1524–1536.

63.

Mercier

Meier-Hirmer

Roussignol

. Bivariate Gamma wear processes for track geometry modelling, with application to intervention scheduling. Struct Infrastruct Eng J 2011; 8: 357–366.

64.

Vale

Ribeiro

Calcada

. Integer programming to optimize tamping in railway tracks as preventative maintenance. J Transp Eng 2012; 138: 123–131.

65.

Andrade

Teixeira

. Biobjective optimization model for maintenance renewal decisions related to rail track geometry. J Transp Res Board 2011; 226: 163–170.

66.

Andrade

Teixeira

. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of rail track geometry degradation. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2013; 227: 364–375.

67.

Andrade

Teixeira

. Unplanned-maintenance needs related to rail track geometry. Proc Instit Civil Eng 2013; 167: 400–410.

68.

Andrade A and Teixeira P. Optimal maintenance and renewal strategy due to rail track geometry. In: 13th World conference on transport research, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 14–18 July 2013.

69.

Bhattacharjya

et al.

Track geometry defect rectification based on track deterioration modelling and derailment risk assessment. J Oper Res Soc 2014; 101: 1–13.

70.

Cardenas-Gallo

Sarmiento

Morales

et al.

An ensemble classifier to predict track geometry degradation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2017; 161: 53–60.

71.

Arasteh

Juntti

Nissen

et al.

Evaluation of track geometry maintenance (Tamping) in Swedish heavy haul railroad – a case study. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2014; 228: 496–503.

72.

Antoni M and Meier-Hirmer C. Economic correlation between maintenance and regeneration – optimization of maintenance strategies for tracks, signaling equipment and overhead line components. In: 18th Euro Working Group on Transportation, EWGT, Delft, The Netherlands, 14–16 July 2015.

73.

Liu

Magel

. Performance-based track geometry and the track geometry interaction map. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2009; 223: 111–119.

74.

Ahac

Lakusic

. Tram track maintenance-planning by gauge degradation modelling. Transp J 2015; 30: 430–436.

75.

Madejski

. Light rail, tram track and turnout geometry measurement and diagnostic tools. WIT Trans Built Environ 2005; 77: 185–195.

76.

Novales

Orro

Bugarin

. Track geometry for light rail systems. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Transp Res Board, 2146: 18–25.