In service, railway tracks must withstand the transverse and longitudinal forces that are caused by running vehicles and thermal loads. The mechanical design that adopts any of the track models available in the technical literature requires that the strength of the track is fully characterised. In this paper, the results of an experimental research activity on the sleeper–ballast resistance along the lateral and the longitudinal directions are reported and discussed. In particular, the work is aimed at identifying the strength contributions offered by the base, the ballast between the sleepers, and the ballast shoulder to the global resistance of the track in the horizontal plane. These quantities were experimentally determined by means of an ad hoc system designed by the authors. Field tests were carried out on a series of track sections that were built to simulate scenarios in which the ballast was removed from the crib and/or the shoulder. The results of this study indicate that the strength percent contributions from the crib, the sleeper base, and the shoulder are, respectively, equal to about 50%, 25%, and 25% in the lateral direction, and 60%, 30%, and 10% in the longitudinal direction. Moreover, the comparison of the acquired data with literature results reveals that a detailed knowledge about the testing conditions and the activated ballast failure mechanisms is needed in order to correctly use the test data for the design purpose.
Kerr AD. Lateral buckling of railroad tracks due to constrained thermal expansions – a critical survey. In: Railroad track mechanics & technology, Proceedings of a symposium held at Princeton University, 21–23 April 1975, pp.141–169. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
2.
KerrADZarembskiAM. The response equations for a cross-tie track. Acta Mech1981; 40: 253–276.
3.
GrissomGTKerrAD. Analysis of lateral track buckling using new frame-type equations. Int J Mech Sci2006; 48: 21–32.
4.
Kish A, Samavedam G and Jeong D. Influence of vehicle induced loads on the lateral stability of CWR track. Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-85/03, Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, USA, 1985.
5.
Samavedam G. Buckling and post buckling analysis of CWR in the lateral plane. Technical Note no. TN-TS-34, British Railways Board, R&D Division, 1979.
6.
Samavedam G, Kish A and Jeong D. Parametric studies on lateral stability of welded rail track. Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-83/07, Washington, USA, 1983.
7.
Samavedam G, Kish A, Purple A, et al. Parametric analysis and safety concepts of CWR track buckling. Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-93/26, Washington, USA, 1993.
8.
MartinezINSanchisIVFernandezPMet al.Analytical model for predicting the buckling load of continuous welded rail tracks. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2014; 229: 542–552.
9.
EsveldCHengstumLA. Track stability in tight curves. Rail Int1988; 12: 15–20.
10.
El-GhazalyHASherbourneANArbabiF. Strength and stability of railway tracks – II. Deterministic, finite element stability analysis. Comput Struct1991; 39: 23–45.
11.
Jackson JE, Bauld NR, Ramesh MS, et al. A superelement for lateral track deformation. In: Applied mechanics rail transportation symposium – 1988. Chicago, USA, 27 November–2 December 1988, pp.7–18.
12.
LeiXFengQ. Analysis of stability of continuously welded rail track with finite elements. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2004; 218: 225–233.
13.
PucilloGP. Thermal buckling and post-buckling behaviour of continuous welded rail track. Veh Syst Dyn2016; 54: 1785–1807.
14.
LimNHHanSYHanTHet al.Parametric study on stability of continuous welded rail track – ballast resistance and track irregularity. Steel Struct2008; 8: 171–181.
15.
BaeHUChoiJYMoonJet al.Development of a probabilistic buckling analysis scheme for continuous welded rail track. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2016; 230: 747–758.
16.
Kish A and Samavedam G. Track buckling prevention: theory, safety concepts, and applications. Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-13/16, Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, USA, 2013.
17.
Jeong DY. Analyses for lateral deflection of railroad track under quasi-static loading. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 rail transportation division fall technical conference, Altoona, PA, 15–17 October 2013, pp.1–10.
18.
Kish A, Samavedam G and Wormley D. Fundamentals of track lateral shift for high-speed rail applications. In: ERRI interactive conference on cost effectiveness and safety aspects of railway track, Paris, France, 8–9 December 1998.
ShrubsallPRWebberPJ. Verse; non-destructive stress free temperature measurement of CWR. Rail Eng Int2001; 30: 3–6.
21.
Wu Y, Rasul MG, Powell J, et al. Rail temperature prediction model. In: CORE 2012: global perspectives; conference on railway engineering, Brisbane, Australia, 10–12 September 2012, pp.81-90. Canberra, Australia: The Railway Technical Society of Australasia.
22.
ERRI Committee D202. Improved knowledge of forces in CWR track (including switches). Report no. 2, Review of Existing Experimental Work in Behaviour of CWR Track, European Rail Research Institute, Utrecht, 1995.
23.
ERRI Committee D202. Improved knowledge of forces in CWR track (including switches). Report no. 3, Theory of CWR Track Stability, European Rail Research Institute, Utrecht, 1995.
24.
Samavedam G, Kanaan A, Pietrak J, et al. Wood tie track resistance characterization and correlations study. Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-94/07, 1995.
25.
ERRI D202/DT 363. Improved knowledge of forces in CWR track (including switches): determination of lateral and longitudinal ballast resistance of a railway track by experimental tests. Report, European Rail Research Institute, Utrecht, 1997.
26.
De IorioAGrassoMPentaFet al.Transverse strength of railway tracks: part 2. Test system for ballast resistance in line measurement. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale2014; 30: 578–592.
27.
KocWWilkAChrostowskiPet al.Tests on lateral resistance in railway tracks during the operation of a tamping machine. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2011; 225: 325–340.
28.
KocWWilkA. Investigations of methods to measure longitudinal forces in continuous welded rail tracks using the tamping machine. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2009; 223: 61–73.
29.
ZakeriJABaratiM. Utilizing the track panel displacement method for estimating vertical load effects on the lateral resistance of continuously welded railway track. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2015; 229: 262–267.
30.
Le PenLMPowrieW. Contribution of base, crib, and shoulder ballast to the lateral sliding resistance of railway track: a geotechnical perspective. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2011; 225: 113–128.
31.
KaboE. A numerical study of the lateral ballast resistance in railway tracks. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2006; 220: 425–433.
32.
ZakeriJAEsmaeiliMKasraeiAet al.A numerical investigation on the lateral resistance of frictional sleepers in ballasted railway tracks. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2016; 230: 440–449.
33.
MontalbánDLRealHJIZamoranoCet al.Design of a new high lateral resistance sleeper and performance comparison with conventional sleepers in a curved railway track by means of finite element models. Latin Am J Solids Struct2014; 11: 1238–1250.
34.
EsmaeiliMKhodaverdianANeyestanakiHKet al.Investigating the effect of nailed sleepers on increasing the lateral resistance of ballasted track. Comp Geotech2016; 71: 1–11.
35.
GottardiGButterfieldR. On the bearing capacity of surface footings on sand under general planar load. Soils Foundation1993; 33: 68–79.
36.
De IorioAGrassoMPentaFet al.Transverse strength of railway tracks: part 1. Planning and experimental setup. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale2014; 30: 478–485.
37.
Rete Ferroviaria Italiana (RFI). Technical Specification, Rome, Italy, June 2008.
38.
De IorioAGrassoMPentaFet al.Transverse strength of railway tracks: Part 3. Multiple scenarios test field. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale2014; 30: 593–601.
