This study aims at identifying the roles and tasks of a train driver, who operates a highly automated high-speed passenger train, as well as the job requirements in terms of personnel selection criteria. To this end, two studies – a prospective task analysis and a prospective job analysis based on Fleishman – were conducted with two samples of experienced high-speed train drivers from Germany. The results show that cognitive information acquisition and continuous monitoring tasks require mental persistence and sustained attention, thus converting the train driver into a train operator. It is proposed that the future tasks and working conditions should be designed to strengthen the train operators’ share in tasks of information integration, strategizing, and decision-making. Thus, the detrimental effects of continuous monitoring tasks, which are well established across transportation industry domains, could be alleviated.
European Commission. White Paper: Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system, Brussels, 28 March 2011.
2.
European Railway Agency. ERTMS/ ETCS: Functional requirements specification (FRS), 21 July 2007.
BeheshtiMBaygiM. A comparison study of fixed and moving-block signalling in rapid transit railways. J Electr Eng2003; 3: 104–112.
5.
TaschF. Verfahrensregeln zum Fahren von Zügen [Operation rules in train driving]. Deine Bahn2015, pp. 14–19.
6.
FußyMBeyerS. ETCS Level 2 ohne Signale auf der Strecke Halle/Leipzig – Erfurt [ETCS level 2 without track signalling Halle/Leipzig]. Deine Bahn20156, 12–17.
7.
Rookmaaker D and Vorderegger J. Human interoperability - fact or science fiction. In: Rentzsch M (ed.) Verkehrs- und Arbeitssicherheit im Eisenbahnverkehr - Wege zur Vereinheitlichung, Karlsruhe, 1999, pp.1–64.
8.
RoseJBearmanC. Making effective use of task analysis to identify human factors issues in new rail technology. Appl Ergonom2012; 43: 614–624.
9.
Roth E and Multer J. Technology implications of a cognitive task analysis for locomotive engineers. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
10.
Dietsch S and Giesemann S. Analyse der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion bei ausgewählten Betriebssituationen des HGV der Gegenwart [Analysis of human-machine interaction in specific situations of today’s high speed train operation]. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., 2014. Internal document.
11.
ParasuramanRSheridanTWickensC. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum2000; 30: 286–297.
Schmitz M. Simulationsgestützte Kompetenzfeststellung von Triebfahrzeugführern: Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Verhaltensmarkersystems [Simulation based evaluation of train driver skills]. Dissertation, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, 2013.
14.
BainbridgeL. Ironies of automation. Automatica1983; 19: 775–779.
15.
SauerJNickelPWastellD. Designing automation for complex work environments under different levels of stress. Appl Ergonom2013; 44: 119–127.
16.
StrandNNilssonJKarlssonIMet al.Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transport Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav2014; 27: 218–228.
17.
KaberDBEndsleyMR. The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoret Issues Ergonom Sci2004; 5: 113–153.
18.
SarterNWoodsDBillingsCAutomation surprises. In: SalvendyG (ed). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1997, pp. 637–656.
19.
RushbyJ. Using model checking to help discover mode confusions and other automation surprises. Reliab Eng Syst Safety2002; 75: 167–177.
20.
KlugeA. The acquisition of knowledge and skills for taskwork and teamwork to control complex technical systems: A cognitive and macroergonomics perspective, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.
21.
FischerAGreiffSFunkeJ. The process of solving complex problems. J Prob Solving2012, pp. 4–4.
22.
SteinJNaumannAMonotony, fatigue and microsleeps - train drivers’ daily routine: A simulator study. In: MiliusBNaumannA (eds). Proceedings of the 2nd German workshop on rail human factors, Braunschweig: ITS Automotive Nord, 2016, pp. 96–102.
23.
Dunn N and Williamson A. Monotony in the rail industry. In: HFESA conference, 47th ed., 2011.
24.
ThiffaultPBergeronJ. Monotony of road environment and driver fatigue: A simulator study. Accid Anal Prev2003; 35: 381–391.
25.
PeldszusRDalkeHPretloveSet al.The perfect boring situation—Addressing the experience of monotony during crewed deep space missions through habitability design. Acta Astronaut2014; 94: 262–276.
26.
GiambraLQuitterR. Sustained attention in adulthood: A unique, large-sample, longitudinal and multicohort analysis using the Mackworth Clock-Test. Psychol Aging1988; 3: 75–83.
27.
MackworthNH. The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quart J Exp Psychol1948; 1: 6–21.
28.
De Waard D. The measurement of drivers’ mental workload. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 1996.
29.
BrandenburgerNNaumannADetermining the allocation of tasks in automated high speed driving. In: MiliusBNaumannA (eds). Proceedings of the 2nd German workshop on rail human factors, Braunschweig: ITS Automotive Nord, 2016, pp. 112–121.
30.
EndsleyM. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors1995; 37: 32–64.
31.
FleishmanEAReillyME. Fleishman job analysis survey, Administrator Guide. Potomac: Management Research Institute (MRI), 1995.
32.
KleinmannMManzeyDSchumacherSet al.Fleishman Job Analyse System für eigenschaftsbezogene Anforderungsanalysen (F-JAS). German Version of Fleishman Job Analysis Survey by Edwin A. Fleishman, Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, 2010.
33.
EißfeldtHHeintzASchulze-KissingD. Selection requirements to work in future ATM systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on aviation psychology, Dayton, OH: Wright State University, 2011, pp. 215–320.
34.
Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB). Rail industry standard for train driver selection, RIS-3751-TOM. London: RSSB, 2015.
35.
KluweR. Acquisition of knowledge in the control of a simulated technical system. Le Travail Humain1997; 60: 61–85.
36.
LeachPMurphyPIntegrating non-technical skills into the competence management of train drivers. In: MiliusBNaumannA (eds). Proceedings of the 2nd German workshop on rail human factors, Braunschweig: ITS Automotive Nord, 2016, pp. 103–111.
37.
European Parliament and the Council. Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the certification of train drivers operating locomotives and trains on the railway system in the community. Off J Eur Union 2007; L 315: 51–78.
