Thin-walled aluminum tubes are widely recognized for their excellent energy absorption capability under dynamic loading due to their high plastic deformability. This study investigates the blast response of sandwich panels composed of horizontally arranged aluminum tube cores and steel face sheets, using combined experimental testing and finite element simulations in Abaqus/Explicit. Four panel configurations were examined to assess the influence of core tube number and face-sheet thickness on structural performance. Controlled blast experiments were conducted using PE4 explosive charges, and numerical simulations were performed with the Johnson-Cook material model and Conventional Weapon (CONWEP)-defined blast loading. The results demonstrate that increasing the number of core tubes enhances the overall panel stiffness. However, the reduced spacing between tubes limits their deformation capacity, which subsequently decreases energy absorption. Increasing the face-sheet thickness lowers displacement and stress concentration but also restricts energy dissipation in the core. The numerical model showed close agreement with experimental measurements, with less than 10% deviation in displacement and specific energy absorption. These findings provide valuable insight for the design of lightweight blast-resistant components in critical infrastructure, military vehicles, and protective engineering applications, and highlight the importance of optimally balancing core arrangement and face-sheet properties to improve both blast resistance and energy absorption in sandwich structures.
FanZShenJLuG. Investigation of lateral crushing of sandwich tubes. Procedia Eng2011; 14: 442–449.
2.
ShenJLuGRuanD, et al.Lateral plastic collapse of sandwich tubes with metal foam core. Int J Mech Sci2015; 91: 99–109.
3.
Zou C, Wong LNY and Cheng Y. The strength and crack behavior of the rock–like gypsum under high strain rate. In: ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Chicago, IL, 2012, pp.2012–2338. ARMA.
4.
YazdiMSHosseinzadehMHNadimiV, et al.Experimental, numerical and optimization investigation of sandwich structures with 3D-printed sacrificial core under explosive loading. Materials Today Commun2024; 41: 111073.
5.
AndrewJJKhalidMYCantwellWJ, et al.Innovative 2D material enhanced 3D-printed sandwich lattice sheet-embedded composites: advancements in transient energy absorption characteristics. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2025; 181: 109057.
6.
GharababaeiHDarvizehA. Experimental and analytical investigation of large deformation of thin circular plates subjected to localized and uniform impulsive loading#. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2010; 38: 171–189.
7.
FarmaniSMAlitavoliMBabaeiH, et al.Investigation of dynamic response of circular sandwich plates with metal vertical tubes core under blast load. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng2024; 46: 50.
8.
ChenCHeYXuR, et al.Dynamic behaviors of sandwich panels with 3D-printed gradient auxetic cores subjected to blast load. Int J Impact Eng2024; 188: 104943.
9.
MirzaeiJHRZKhodamoradiMK. Experimental analysis of energy absorption characteristics in composite sandwich structures with 3D-printed honeycomb core under quasi-static compression. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025; 39: 08927057251325184.
10.
KocabaşİYılmazH. Crashworthiness performance of Al6061 tubes with stiffened quatrefoil sections under axial and oblique impact conditions. Mühendis ve Makina2021; 63: 23–40.
11.
RawatSNarayananAUpadhyayA, et al.Multiobjective optimization of functionally corrugated tubes for improved crashworthiness under axial impact. Procedia Eng2017; 173: 1382–1389.
12.
HajfathalianAMirniaMJElyasiM. Experimental study of two-point incremental forming of St12 sheet using negative dies. Iran J Manufact Eng2023; 9: 32–42.
13.
ZamaniMMirzadehHNourooziM. Processing of fine-grained DP300/600 dual phase steel from St12 structural steel by the thermo-mechanical processing of cold rolling and intercritical annealing. Intern J Iron Steel Soc Iran2018; 15: 12–17.
14.
Departments of the Army TN and Force TA. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, the Navy and the Air Force, 1990.
15.
KingeryCNBulmashG. Airblast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst. Aberdeen, MD: US Army Armament and Development Center, Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1984.
16.
JacobNNurickGLangdonG. The effect of stand-off distance on the failure of fully clamped circular mild steel plates subjected to blast loads. Eng Struct2007; 29: 2723–2736.
17.
JacobNYuenSCKNurickG, et al.Scaling aspects of quadrangular plates subjected to localised blast loads—experiments and predictions. Int J Impact Eng2004; 30: 1179–1208.
18.
MostofiTMBabaeiHAlitavoliM. Theoretical analysis on the effect of uniform and localized impulsive loading on the dynamic plastic behaviour of fully clamped thin quadrangular plates. Thin-Walled Struct2016; 109: 367–376.
19.
Ziya-ShamamiMBabaeiHMostofiTM, et al.Structural response of monolithic and multi-layered circular metallic plates under repeated uniformly distributed impulsive loading: an experimental study. Thin-Walled Struct2020; 157: 107024.
20.
ElekPMJaramazSSMickovićDM, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation of perforation of thin steel plates by deformable steel penetrators. Thin-Walled Struct2016; 102: 58–67.
21.
AuneVValsamosGCasadeiF, et al.Numerical study on the structural response of blast-loaded thin aluminium and steel plates. Int J Impact Eng2017; 99: 131–144.
22.
GranumHAuneVBørvikT, et al.Effect of heat-treatment on the structural response of blast-loaded aluminium plates with pre-cut slits. Int J Impact Eng2019; 132: 103306.
23.
HaghgooMBabaeiHMostofiTM. 2D Numerical study on the deflection of thin steel plate subjected to gaseous detonation wave interaction. Int J Hydrogen Energy2021; 46: 36348–36368.
24.
VigneshSMunirajDSreehariV. Experimental and numerical investigation of high-velocity impacts on aluminium 6061 plates under thermal environment. Trans Indian Inst Met2025; 78: 96.
25.
ToussaintGBouamoulA. Close-range blast effects on small square clamped plates made from aluminum 6061-T6. J Dyn Behav Mater2017; 3: 83–99.
26.
CorbettB. Numerical simulations of target hole diameters for hypervelocity impacts into elevated and room temperature bumpers. Int J Impact Eng2006; 33: 431–440.
27.
MotamediMHashemiR. Evaluation of temperature effects on forming limit diagrams of AA6061-T6 considering the marciniak and kuczynski model. J Test Eval2021; 49: 854–865.
28.
LangdonGYuenSCKNurickG. Experimental and numerical studies on the response of quadrangular stiffened plates. Part II: localised blast loading. Int J Impact Eng2005; 31: 85–111.
29.
YuenSCKNurickG. Experimental and numerical studies on the response of quadrangular stiffened plates. Part I: subjected to uniform blast load. Int J Impact Eng2005; 31: 55–83.
30.
YoungdahlC. Correlation parameters for eliminating the effect of pulse shape on dynamic plastic deformation. J Appl Mech 1970; 37: 744–752.
31.
YoungdahlCK. Influence of pulse shape on the final plastic deformation of a circular plate. Int J Solids Struct1971; 7: 1127–1142.
32.
HenchieTFYuenSCKNurickG, et al.The response of circular plates to repeated uniform blast loads: an experimental and numerical study. Int J Impact Eng2014; 74: 36–45.
33.
DeyCNimjeS. Experimental and numerical study on response of sandwich plate subjected to blast load. Exp Tech2016; 40: 401–411.
34.
HaghgooMBabaeiHMostofiTM. A non-dimensional analysis on the large plastic deformation triangular plates under impulsive loading. J Brazil Soc Mechan Sci Eng2023; 45: 25.
RezasefatMMostofiTMOzbakkalogluT. Repeated localized impulsive loading on monolithic and multi-layered metallic plates. Thin-Walled Struct2019; 144: 106332.
37.
AlberdiRPrzywaraJKhandelwalK. Performance evaluation of sandwich panel systems for blast mitigation. Eng Struct2013; 56: 2119–2130.
38.
LanXFengSHuangQ, et al.A comparative study of blast resistance of cylindrical sandwich panels with aluminum foam and auxetic honeycomb cores. Aerosp Sci Technol2019; 87: 37–47.
39.
BenabdallahHS. Static friction coefficient of some plastics against steel and aluminum under different contact conditions. Tribol Int2007; 40: 64–73.
40.
BatheKJ. Finite element procedures. Watertown, MA: Klaus-Jurgen Bathe, 2006.
HallquistJO. LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Soft Technol Corp2006; 3: 25–31.
43.
WierzbickiTAbramowiczW. On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures. J Appl Mech1983; 50: 727–734.
44.
WierzbickiTReckeLAbramowiczW, et al.Stress profiles in thin-walled prismatic columns subjected to crush loading—I. Compression. Comput Struct1994; 51: 611–623.
45.
ChenWFHanDJHanDJ. Plasticity for structural engineers. Boca Raton, FL: J. Ross Publishing, 2007.
46.
CallisterJWRethwischDG. Materials science and engineering: an introduction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
47.
JonesN. Structural impact. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
48.
CinarK. Evaluation of sandwich panels with composite tube-reinforced foam core under bending and flatwise compression. J Sandwich Struct Mater2020; 22: 480–493.
49.
RadfordDFleckNDeshpandeV. The response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to shock loading. Int J Impact Eng2006; 32: 968–987.
50.
XueZHutchinsonJW. A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates. Int J Impact Eng2004; 30: 1283–1305.
51.
NgoTMendisPGuptaA, et al.Blast loading and blast effects on structures–an overview. Electron J Struct Eng2007: 76–91.
52.
ZhaoHGaryG. A new method for the separation of waves. Application to the SHPB technique for an unlimited duration of measurement. J Mech Phys Solids1997; 45: 1185–1202.
53.
YuenSCKCunliffeGDu PlessisM. Blast response of cladding sandwich panels with tubular cores. Int J Impact Eng2017; 110: 266–278.
54.
ZhuFLuG. A review of blast and impact of metallic and sandwich structures. Electron J Struct Eng2007: 92–101.
55.
LuGYuT. Energy absorption of structures and materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003.
56.
AbramowiczWJonesN. Dynamic axial crushing of circular tubes. Int J Impact Eng1984; 2: 263–281.
57.
WangEGardnerNShuklaA. The blast resistance of sandwich composites with stepwise graded cores. Int J Solids Struct2009; 46: 3492–3502.
58.
RvM. Mechanik der festen körper im plastisch-deformablen zustand. Nachrichten von der gesellschaft der wissenschaften zu göttingen. Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse1913; 1913: 582–592.
59.
GhamarizadehMKhodarahmiHMirzababaie MostofiT. The experimental and analytical response of circular metal sandwich panels with tubular cores under blast load. Aerospace Mechan2022; 17: 81–95.
60.
QiCRemennikovAPeiLZ, et al.Impact and close-in blast response of auxetic honeycomb-cored sandwich panels: experimental tests and numerical simulations. Compos Struct2017; 180: 161–178.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
