This study investigates the integration of additive manufacturing (AM), specifically fused deposition modeling, in the fabrication of microscale riblet geometries aimed at enhancing aerodynamic performance. Riblet structures with varying orientations and dimensional parameters were initially produced as flat-plate samples to examine their influence on flow direction and behavior using TiO2-based surface oil visualization techniques. The most effective riblet configurations were subsequently applied to NACA0015 airfoil models to evaluate their aerodynamic performance in a controlled wind tunnel environment. Comprehensive experimental tests including force measurements and detailed flow visualizations revealed that riblet-enhanced surfaces can manipulate flow behavior, delay stall onset, increase the lift, and reduce drag under certain conditions. Among the tested geometries, the 45° riblet configuration demonstrated a notable improvement in lift generation, while the 60° model provided smoother stall characteristics. Furthermore, the 0° riblet orientation exhibited a 2° stall delay, suggesting enhanced flow attachment even at higher angles of attack. This work demonstrates the feasibility and practicality of using cost-effective, scalable AM techniques for advanced surface engineering in aerospace applications, offering an innovative path for passive flow control without the need for complex and time-consuming conventional manufacturing methods.
LiQZhongSLiL. Effects of bio-inspired micro-scale surface patterns on the profile losses in a linear cascade. J Turbomach2019; 141: 121006.
2.
ChenHRaoFShangX, et al.Flow over bio-inspired 3D herringbone wall riblets. Exp Fluids2014; 55: 1698.
3.
WalshMJWeinsteinLM. Drag and heat transfer on surfaces with small longitudinal fins. In: Fluid and plasma dynamics conference, AIAA Paper, Seattle, WA, 10–12 July 1978, p. 19780057951.
4.
WalshMJ. Drag characteristics of V-groove and transverse curvature riblets. In: HoughGR (eds) Viscous drag reduction, AIAA paper, New York, NY, USA, Vol. 72. AIAA, 1980, pp.168–184.
5.
WalshMJ. Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using riblets, In: Aerospace Sciences Meeting,. AIAA PaperOrlando, FL, January 11 - January 14 1982p. 19820034284.
6.
WalshMJ. Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique. AIAA J1983; 21: 485–486.
7.
BechertDBartenwerferM. The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs. J Fluid Mech1989; 206: 105–129.
8.
KevinKMontyJPBaiHL, et al.Cross-stream stereoscopic particle image velocimetry of a modified turbulent boundary layer over directional surface pattern. J Fluid Mech2017; 813: 412–435.
9.
XuFZhongSZhangS. Vortical structures and development of laminar flow over convergent-divergent riblets. Phys Fluids2018; 30: 051901.
10.
SunSLeiZLuX, et al.An experimental study of separation control on ultra-highly-loaded low pressure turbine blade by surface roughness. J Therm Sci2015; 24: 229–238.
11.
HansenKLKelsoRMDallyBB. Performance variations of leading-edge tubercles for distinct airfoil profiles. AIAA J2011; 49: 185–194.
12.
BechertDWBruseMHageW, et al.Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. J Fluid Mech1997; 338: 59–87.
13.
ChenHRaoFShangX, et al.Biomimetic drag reduction study on herringbone riblets of bird feather. J Bionic Eng2013; 10: 341–349.
14.
GuoHCaoSLiL, et al.A review on the mainstream through-silicon via etching methods. Mater Sci Semicond Process2022; 137: 106182.
15.
WalshMJLindemannAM. Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique. Presented at the 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV. AIAA Paper 84-0347, January 1984.
HirtGThomeM. Surface structure and its effects on friction and flow separation. Prod Eng Res Devel2007; 1: 351–355.
18.
LiXFuDXuW, et al.Fabrication of high aspect ratio ceramic micro-channel in diamond wire sawing as catalyst support used in micro-reactor for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy2022; 47: 35123–35135.
19.
MarenticFJMorrisTL. Drag-reducing surfaces. (United States Patent No. 5,133,516).
WohlersT. 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry. Colorado, USA: Wohlers Associates, 2018.
25.
GibsonIRosenDStuckerB. Additive manufacturing technologies: Rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing, NewYork, NY: Springer, 2010.
26.
AktitizİDarıcıkFAydınA, et al.Experimental investigations on metallization in the surface modified additively manufactured plastic substrates using DC sputtering. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering2024; OnlineFirst.
27.
VyavahareSTeraiyaSPanghalDKumarS. Fused deposition modelling: A review. Rapid Prototyping Journal2020.
28.
ShortDDanielB. Use of 3D printing by museums: Educational exhibits, artifact education, and artifact restoration. 3D Print Addit Manuf 20152: 209–215.
29.
UjjinRNgaongamCChaikaindeeS, et al.3D-Printed Airfoil wind tunnel aerodynamic testing and simulation. In: RSU international research conference, Pathumthani, Thailand, 26 April 2019, pp. 931–942.
30.
MathewAKishoreSRTomyAT, et al.Vapour polishing of fused deposition modelling (FDM) parts: a critical review of different techniques, and subsequent surface finish and mechanical properties of the post-processed 3D-printed parts. Prog Addit Manuf2023; 8: 1161–1178.
31.
Sanchez RamirezAIslán MarcosMEBlaya HaroF, et al.Application of FDM technology to reduce aerodynamic drag. Rapid Prototyp J2019; 25: 781–791.
32.
MuhammadCChongTP. Mitigation of turbulent noise sources by riblets. J Sound Vib2022; 541: 1–48.
33.
AktitizİAydınKTopcuA. Characterization of TiO2 nanoparticle–reinforced polymer nanocomposite materials printed by stereolithography method. J Mater Eng Perform2021; 30: 4975–4980.
34.
WenJPrawelDLiYV. A study on the mechanical and antimicrobial properties of biomimetic shark skin fabrics with different denticle size via 3D printing technology. Phys Scr2023; 98: 035031.
35.
PurandareS. Mechanical and antimicrobial performance analysis of a shark skin bio-mimicked fabric swatch via 3D printing. Colorado State University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2020.
BhalodiDZalavadiyaKGurralaPK. Influence of temperature on polymer parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling process. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2019; 41: 113. 10.1007/s40430-019-1616-z.
41.
GrgićIKarakašićMGlavašH, et al.Accuracy of FDM PLA Polymer 3D Printing Technology Based on Tolerance Fields. Processes2023; 11: 2810.
42.
JaksaLPahrDKronreifGLorenzA. Calibration Dependencies and Accuracy Assessment of a Silicone Rubber 3D Printer. Inventions2022; 7.
43.
ColemanHWSteeleWGBuzhugaM. Experimentation, validation, and uncertainty analysis for engineers. Noise Control Eng J2010; 58: 43.
44.
KayaFAkbıyıkH. Investigation of biomimetic structures for drag reduction. Bioinspir Biomim2025; 20: 016030.
45.
SlavkovićVHanželičBPlesecV, et al.Thermo-mechanical behavior and strain rate sensitivity of 3D-printed polylactic acid (PLA) below glass transition temperature (Tg). Polymers2024; 16: 1526.
46.
YangXWangJJiangB, et al.Numerical study of effect of sawtooth riblets on low-Reynolds-number airfoil flow characteristic and aerodynamic performance. Processes2021; 9: 2102. 10.3390/pr9122102.
47.
ChowCYChungDYHemschMJ. Surface flow visualization of the High-Lift Common Research Model (NASA Technical Report No. NASA/TM–2020-5008713). National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA),2020.
48.
AndersonJDJr.Fundamentals of aerodynamics. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2017.
49.
FishFEBattleJM. Mimicking the humpback whale: an aerodynamic perspective. Integr Comp Biol1995; 35: 265–272.
50.
StanekMJShadaramAMaughmerMD. Investigating mechanical response and structural integrity of tubercle leading edge under static loads. J Aircr2017; 54: 1356–1367.
51.
KaiLJinmiaoGTimothyC, et al.Novel herringbone riblets for mitigating flow separation in a linear diffuser cascade. Aerosp Sci Technol2025; 164: 110390.
52.
WangDCaiCZhaR, et al.Impact of leading-edge tubercles on airfoil aerodynamic performance and flow patterns at different Reynolds numbers. Energies2024; 17: 5518.
53.
DaiWAlkahtaniMHemmerPR, et al.Drag-reduction of 3D printed shark-skin-like surfaces. Friction2019; 7: 603–612.
54.
AkbıyıkH. The effect of cavity modified stepped geometry on aerodynamic performance of an airfoil at a low Reynolds number. Phys Fluids2025; 37: 047106.
55.
MuellerTJ. Aerodynamic Measurements at Low Reynolds Numbers for Fixed Wing Micro-Air Vehicles.
56.
McMastersJHHendersonML. Low-speed single element airfoil synthesis. Seattle, WA: Boeing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
