This study investigates the performance of biocompatible polylactic acid (PLA) processed through material extrusion/fused filament fabrication (FFF). In this study, the significant FFF input parameters, such as layer deposition, infill angle (degree), and infill percentage (%), were designated to process the PLA based on the screening design experiments. Following Box–Behnken design (BBD), the different input conditions were analyzed to evaluate the performance by assessing the characteristics such as ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and relative density (RD). Printing speed (30 mm/s), nozzle temperature (200°C), and bed temperature (70°C) are considered as fixed input parameters. The novel combination of BBD approach with the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) technique was employed to obtain the appropriate input conditions. It was beneficial to attain the individual parameter's contribution to the PLA characteristics through analysis of variance and best alternative condition through degree of utility. The combined approach was validated with a composite desirability index “D.” Finally, the hybrid approach yielded better results, such as a maximum ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 37.43 MPa, relative density (RD) 99.12%, and microhardness 52 HRB under the layer deposition: 0.12 mm, infill angle: 0°, and infill percentage: 100% in the printed biocompatible PLA.
MartinOAvérousL. Poly(lactic acid): plasticization and properties of biodegradable multiphase systems. Polymer (Guildf)2001; 42: 6209–6219.
2.
LiuJSunLXuW, et al.Current advances and future perspectives of 3D printing natural-derived biopolymers. Carbohydr Polym2019; 207: 297–316.
3.
WangSDaelemansLFiorioR, et al.Improving mechanical properties for extrusion-based additive manufacturing of poly(lactic acid) by annealing and blending with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Polymers (Basel)2019; 11: 1529–1541.
4.
StansburyJWIdacavageMJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater2016; 32: 54–64.
5.
BandyopadhyayABoseSDasS. 3D printing of biomaterials. MRS Bull2015; 40: 108–114.
6.
WangLGardnerDJ. Effect of fused layer modeling (FLM) processing parameters on impact strength of cellular polypropylene. Polymer (Guildf)2017; 113: 74–80.
7.
LanzottiAGrassoMStaianoG, et al.The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyp J2015; 21: 604–617.
8.
TymrakBMKreigerMPearceJM. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des2014; 58: 242–246.
9.
SinghSSinghGPrakashC, et al.Current status and future directions of fused filament fabrication. J Manuf Process2020; 55: 288–306.
10.
GaoXQiSKuangX, et al.Fused filament fabrication of polymer materials: a review of interlayer bond. Additive Manuf2020; 37: 101658–101672.
11.
BraconnierDJJensenREPetersonAM. Processing parameter correlations in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf2020; 31: 100924–100932.
12.
DizonJRCEsperaAHChenQ, et al.Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Additive Manuf2018; 20: 44–67.
13.
KoziorTKunderaC. Evaluation of the influence of parameters of FDM technology on the selected mechanical properties of models. Procedia Eng2017; 192: 463–468.
14.
BiroszMTLedenyákDAndóM. Effect of FDM infill patterns on mechanical properties. Polym Test2022; 113: 107654–107659.
15.
LeLRabsattMAEisazadehH, et al.Reducing print time while minimizing loss in mechanical properties in consumer FDM parts. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf2022; 5: 197–212.
16.
VǎleanCMarşavinaLMǎrghitaşlM, et al.. Effect of manufacturing parameters on tensile properties of FDM printed specimens. Procedia Struct Integr2020; 26: 313–320.
17.
SzustAAdamskiG. Using thermal annealing and salt remelting to increase tensile properties of 3D FDM prints. Eng Fail Anal2022; 132: 105932–105945.
18.
ZhaoYChenYZhouY. Novel mechanical models of tensile strength and elastic property of FDM AM PLA materials: experimental and theoretical analyses. Mater Des2019; 181: 108089–108098.
19.
HikmatMRostamSAhmedYM. Investigation of tensile property-based Taguchi method of PLA parts fabricated by FDM 3D printing technology. Results Eng2021; 11: 100264–100273.
20.
GebisaAWLemuHG. Influence of 3D printing FDM process parameters on tensile property of ULTEM 9085. Procedia Manuf2019; 30: 331–338.
21.
ChacónJMCamineroMAGarcía-PlazaE, et al.Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des2017; 124: 143–157.
22.
MarșavinaLVăleanCMărghitașM, et al.Effect of the manufacturing parameters on the tensile and fracture properties of FDM 3D-printed PLA specimens. Eng Fract Mech2022; 274: 108766–108780.
23.
RaoVDRajivPGeethikaVN. Effect of fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameters on tensile strength of carbon fibre PLA. Mater Today2019; 6: 2012–2018.
24.
ShergillKChenYBullS. An investigation into the layer thickness effect on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured polymers: PLA and ABS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 126: 3651–3665.
25.
ÖzdenIScheithauerUIvekovićA, et al.Effect of infill strategy on the flexural strength of 3Y-TZP bars fabricated by thermoplastic 3D printing (T3DP). Open Ceramics2023; 14: 100367–100373.
26.
SanfordLTJaafarIHSeibiA, et al.Manufacturing letters: the effect of infill angle, build orientation, and void fraction on the tensile strength and fracture of 3D printed ASA via fused filament fabrication, www.sciencedirect.com (2022).
27.
GargSSardarASrivastavaR, et al.Variation in tensile strength of 3D printed PLA parts by varying infill density and infill pattern. Saudi J Eng Technol2023; 8: 103–107.
28.
Ambati SSAmbatipudiR. Effect of infill density and infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts. Mater Today Proc2022; 64: 804–807.
29.
Naresh BabuMAnandanVMuthukrishnanN. Analysis of EN24 steel in turning process with copper nanofluids under minimum quantity lubrication. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng2019; 41: 101–113.
30.
Mousavi-NasabSHSotoudeh-AnvariA. A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems. Mater Des2017; 121: 237–253.
31.
VahdaniBMousaviSMTavakkoli-MoghaddamR, et al.Robot selection by a multiple criteria complex proportional assessment method under an interval-valued fuzzy environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2014; 73: 687–697.
32.
MohammadiKMovahhedyMRKhodayganS. A multiphysics model for analysis of droplet formation in electrohydrodynamic 3D printing process. J Aerosol Sci2019; 135: 72–85.
33.
VanajaKRaniRHS. Design of experiments: concept and applications of plackett burman design. Clin Res Regul Aff2007; 24: 1–23.
34.
VaratharajuluMDuraiselvamMKumarMB, et al.Multi criteria decision making through TOPSIS and COPRAS on drilling parameters of magnesium AZ91. J Magnesium Alloys2022; 10: 2857–2874.
35.
PatilSBPatoleTAJadhavRS, et al.Complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) based multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM) paradigm for hard turning process parameters. Mater Today Proc2022; 59: 835–840.
NatarajanHParamasivamSSSKumaranD, et al.. Evaluation of process parameters selection by COPRAS and ANOVA methods to get better spinning cylindrical cups. Mater Today2020; 47: 7099–7104.
38.
MohanrasuSSJananiKRakkiyappanR. A COPRAS-based approach to multi-label feature selection for text classification. Math Comput Simul2023; 222: 3–23.
39.
WankhedeSPesodePPawarS, et al.Comparison Study Of GRA, COPRAS And MOORA for ranking of phase change material for cooling system. Mater Today Proc2023; 2: 437.
40.
BathrinathSKumarPSVenkadeshS, et al.. A fuzzy COPRAS approach for analysing the factors affecting sustainability in ship ports. Mater Today2021; 50: 1017–1021.
41.
KangDJaisankarRMurugesanV, et al.A novel MCDM approach to selecting a biodegradable dynamic plastic product: a probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set-based COPRAS method. J Environ Manage2023; 340: 117967–117976.
42.
PandaSSPandaMRSenapatiAK, et al.Optimizing abrasive wear loss of aluminum/fly ash and aluminum/rice husk ash metal matrix composites using AHP-EDAS and AHP-COPRAS techniques for enhanced performance. Mater Today Proc2023; 10: 20.
43.
AmbatiSSAmbatipudiR. Effect of infill density and infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts. Mater Today Proc2022; 64: 804–807.
44.
SamykanoM. Mechanical property and prediction model for FDM-3D printed polylactic acid (PLA). Arab J Sci Eng2021; 46: 7875–7892.
45.
TaoYKongFLiZ, et al.A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication. J Mater Res Technol2021; 15: 4860–4879.
46.
MishraPKSenthilPAdarshS, et al.An investigation to study the combined effect of different infill pattern and infill density on the impact strength of 3D printed polylactic acid parts. Composites Commun2021; 24: 100605–100615.
47.
JangSBoddorffAJangDJ, et al.Effect of material extrusion process parameters on filament geometry and inter-filament voids in as-fabricated high solids loaded polymer composites. Additive Manuf2021; 47: 102313–102328.
48.
Travieso-RodriguezJAZandiMDJerez-MesaR, et al.Fatigue behavior of PLA-wood composite manufactured by fused filament fabrication. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9: 8507–8516.
49.
VidakisNPetousisMMountakisN, et al.Box-Behnken modeling to quantify the impact of control parameters on the energy and tensile efficiency of PEEK in MEX 3D-printing. Heliyon2023; 9: e18363.
50.
VorkapićMMladenovićIIvanovT, et al.Enhancing mechanical properties of 3D printed thermoplastic polymers by annealing in moulds. Adv Mech Eng2022; 14: 1–15.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
