The present study investigated the influence of interface shear strength on the support removal effort without deviating the dimensional accuracy of laser powder bed fusion processed gear-type parts. The finite element method simulations were carried out to evaluate the effect of different process parameters of support structures on the distortion of laser powder bed fusion processed parts. Additionally, the dimensional accuracy of manufactured parts was assessed using a non-contact three-dimensional white light scanning technique. Support structures are the inevitable features in the laser powder bed fusion process. A simple in-house technique is adopted to evaluate the interface shear strength of support removal using a mechanical torque wrench. The support structures were fabricated with four different laser power and scanning speed. The results showed that all the laser powder bed fusion parts had insignificant dimensional deviation compared to the computer-aided design model despite changing the process parameters (laser power and scanning speed). However, the results indicated that ∼60% interface shear strength could be reduced with optimized process parameters which are favourable for easy part removal after printing.
DebRoyTWeiHLZubackJS, et al.Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci2018; 92: 112–224.
2.
VermaRKumarJSinghNK, et al.Design and analysis of biomedical scaffolds using TPMS-based porous structures inspired from additive manufacturing. Coatings2022; 12: 839.
3.
Nagesha BK, Kumar SA, Rajeswari S, et al. Inspection of additively manufactured aero-engine parts using computed radiography technique. J Mater Eng and Perform 2022; 31: 6322–6331.
4.
Verma R, Kumar J, Singh NK, et al. Low elastic modulus and highly porous triply periodic minimal surfaces architectured implant for orthopedic applications. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering 2022. DOI:10.1177/09544089221111258
5.
SahaiNSaxenaKKGogoiM. Modelling and simulation for fabrication of 3D printed polymeric porous tissue scaffolds. Adv Mater Process Technol2020; 6: 530–539.
6.
Manmadhachary A, Siva Rama Krishana L and Saxena KK. Quantification of the accuracy of additive manufactured (3D printed) medical models. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 2022; 1–7.
7.
Beaman JJ, Bourell DL, Seepersad CC, et al. Additive manufacturing review: early past to current practice. J Manuf Sci Eng 2020; 142: 110812.
8.
BrandtMSunSJLearyM, et al.High-Value SLM aerospace components: from design to manufacture. Adv Mat Res2013; 633: 135–147.
9.
LiuSShinYC. Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4 V alloy: a review. Mater Des2019; 164: 107552.
10.
CaoSZouYLimCVS, et al.Review of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) fabricated ti-6Al-4V: process, post-process treatment, microstructure, and property. Light: Adv Manuf2021; 2: 313–332.
11.
WangDYangYYiZ, et al.Research on the fabricating quality optimization of the overhanging surface in SLM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2013; 65: 1471–1484.
12.
KrolTAZachFSeidelC. Optimization of supports in metal-based additive manufacturing by means of finite element models. In: 2012 International solid freeform fabrication symposium. University of Texas at Austin, 2012, pp. 707–718.
13.
ZengKPalDTengC, et al.Evaluations of effective thermal conductivity of support structures in selective laser melting. Add Manuf2015; 6: 67–73.
14.
MishurovaTCabezaSThiedeT, et al.The influence of the support structure on residual stress and distortion in SLM inconel 718 parts. Metall Mater Trans A2018; 49: 3038–3046.
15.
VaidyaRAnandS. Optimum support structure generation for additive manufacturing using unit cell structures and support removal constraint. Proc Manuf2016; 5: 1043–1059.
16.
SalvatiEKorsunskyAM. Micro-scale measurement & FEM modelling of residual stresses in AA6082-T6 al alloy generated by wire EDM cutting. J Mater Process Technol2020; 275: 116373.
17.
SubediSCShahbaAThevamaranM, et al.Towards the optimal design of support structures for laser powder bed fusion-based metal additive manufacturing via thermal equivalent static loads. Add Manuf2022; 57: 102956.
18.
MikiTNishiwakiS. Topology optimization of the support structure for heat dissipation in additive manufacturing. Finite Elem Anal Des2022; 203: 103708.
19.
DimopoulosAZournatzisIGanT-H, et al.Multi-Response optimization of Ti6Al4 V support structures for Laser powder bed fusion systems. J Manuf Mater Process2023; 7: 22.
20.
JärvinenJ-PMatilainenVLiX, et al.Characterization of effect of support structures in Laser additive manufacturing of stainless steel. Phys Procedia2014; 56: 72–81.
21.
HusseinAHaoLYanC, et al.Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol2013; 213: 1019–1026.
22.
Johannes LindeckePNBlunkHWenzlJ-P, et al.Optimization of support structures for the laser additive manufacturing of TiAl6V4 parts. Procedia CIRP2018; 74: 53–58.
23.
YanCHaoLHusseinA, et al.Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2012; 62: 32–38.
24.
BobbioLDQinSDunbarA, et al.Characterization of the strength of support structures used in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of ti-6Al-4V. Additive Manuf2017; 14: 60–68.
25.
DidierPLe CozGRobinG, et al.Consideration of SLM additive manufacturing supports on the stability of flexible structures in finish milling. J Manuf Process2021; 62: 213–220.
26.
ManogharanGWyskRAHarryssonOLA. Additive manufacturing–integrated hybrid manufacturing and subtractive processes: economic model and analysis. Int J Computer Integr Manuf2016; 29: 473–488.
27.
Pérez-RuizJDMarinFMartínezS, et al.Stiffening near-net-shape functional parts of inconel 718 LPBF considering material anisotropy and subsequent machining issues. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 168: 108675.
28.
CalignanoF. Design optimization of supports for overhanging structures in aluminum and titanium alloys by selective laser melting. Mater Des2014; 64: 203–213.
29.
ZhuLFengRXiJ, et al.A lightweight design of tree-shaped support structures for SLM additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des Appl2020; 17: 716–726.
30.
WangCQianX. Optimizing Support for Heat Dissipation in Additive Manufacturing. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. Epub ahead of print 3 November 2020. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2020-22198.
31.
PaggiURanjanRThijsL, et al.New support structures for reduced overheating on downfacing regions of direct metal printed parts. In: 2019 International solid freeform fabrication symposium. University of Texas at Austin, 2019, pp. 1626–1640.
32.
HanQGuHSoeS, et al.Manufacturability of AlSi10Mg overhang structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Des2018; 160: 1080–1095.
33.
ZhangZ-DIbhadodeOAliU, et al.Topology optimization parallel-computing framework based on the inherent strain method for support structure design in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Int J Mech Mater Des2020; 16: 897–923.
34.
SubediSCThomaDJSureshK. Optimal Truss-Type Supports for Minimal Part Distortion in LPBF. 2022 Int Solid Freeform Fabric Symp2022; 823–839.
35.
Wei C, Chueh Y-H, Zhang X, et al. Easy-to-remove composite support material and procedure in additive manufacturing of metallic components using multiple material laser-based powder bed fusion. J Manuf Sci Eng 2019; 141: 071002.
36.
SchmittMKempterBSchlickG, et al.Parameter identification approach for support structures in laser powder bed fusion and analysis of influencing factors. Proc CIRP2020; 94: 260–265.
37.
Bangi JO, Maranga SM, Nganga SP, et al. Torque wrench calibration and uncertainty of measurement. Proc IMEKO 22nd TC3, 15th TC5 and 3rd TC22 2014.
38.
ISO - ISO 6789-1:2017 - Assembly tools for screws and nuts — Hand torque tools — Part 1: Requirements and methods for design conformance testing and quality conformance testing: minimum requirements for declaration of conformance, https://www.iso.org/standard/62549.html (accessed 27 February 2023).
39.
WadhwaniCPKO’BrienRRosenPS, et al.Testing and calibrating the mechanical-type toggle torque wrenches used in implant dentistry: a dental technique. J Prosthet Dent2020; 123: 403–407.
40.
WadhwaniCPKO’BrienRTRosenPS, et al.A technique to validate the accuracy of a beam-type mechanical torque limiting device. J Prosthet Dent2020; 124: 647–652.
41.
Additive Calibration Guide.
42.
ChenCChangSZhuJ, et al.Residual stress of typical parts in laser powder bed fusion. J Manuf Process2020; 59: 621–628.
43.
GhoshABiswasSTurnerT, et al.Surface, microstructure, and tensile deformation characterization of LPBF SS316L microstruts micromachined with femtosecond laser. Mater Des2021; 210: 110045.
44.
JamshidiniaMKovacevicR. The influence of heat accumulation on the surface roughness in powder-bed additive manufacturing. Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop2015; 3: 014003.
45.
ZhangLZhuHZhangS, et al.Fabricating high dimensional accuracy LPBFed Ti6Al4 V part by using bi-parameter method. Opt Laser Technol2019; 117: 79–86.
46.
du PlessisA. Effects of process parameters on porosity in laser powder bed fusion revealed by X-ray tomography. Add Manuf2019; 30: 100871.
47.
PathaniaASubramaniyanAKNageshaBK. Influence of post-heat treatments on microstructural and mechanical properties of LPBF-processed Ti6Al4 V alloy. Prog Addit Manuf2022; 7: 1323–1343.
48.
Pathania A, Subramaniyan AK and Nagesha BK. Densification behaviour of laser powder bed fusion processed Ti6Al4V: effects of customized heat treatment and build direction. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering 2023 (Accepted for publication).
49.
KingWEBarthHDCastilloVM, et al.Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol2014; 214: 2915–2925.
50.
FabbroR. Scaling laws for the laser welding process in keyhole mode. J Mater Process Technol2019; 264: 346–351.
51.
BudynasRGNisbettJKShigleyJE. Shigley’s mechanical engineering design. Tenth edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 2015.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
