Evaporative cooling is an environmentally friendly and low-cost method to deliver cooling load in hot climates. It has been proposed as an alternative to traditional vapour compression systems, mainly due to its lower power consumption and the ability to provide cooling without the need for refrigerants. The present study investigates a novel regenerative indirect evaporative cooling system to address the high cooling demands in hot climates. The proposed unit consists of commercially available aluminium plate cross-flow heat exchangers. Within the study, system performance is simulated in MATLAB software and numerical results are validated with experimental testing results. In the analysis, the effects of exhaust-to-inlet air ratio, inlet air temperature and inlet air relative humidity on the system energetic and exergetic performance were investigated. Individual effects of the inlet parameters on the thermal, mechanical and chemical exergies of the inlet, product and exhaust air streams were also investigated. Maximum wet bulb effectiveness values were achieved as 0.99 and 1.06 for the single and double effect configurations, respectively. In all inlet air conditions, an optimal exhaust-to-inlet air ratio of 0.4 was found to maximize the cooling capacity. Maximum exergy destruction rate was 35W. On the other hand, yearly potential energy savings of 695 kWh was calculated by replacing a vapour compression system with the proposed regenerative evaporative cooler.
AydinDChardiMKhosraviN. Synthesis and experimental investigation of V-CaCl2 composite desiccant for performance enhancement in evaporative cooling applications. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering2020; 234: 70–82.
2.
Li B, You L, Zheng M, et al. Energy consumption pattern and indoor thermal environment of residential building in rural China. Energy and Built Environment 2020; 1: 327–336.
3.
Abdel-Ghany AM, Al-Helal IM and Shady MR. Human thermal comfort and heat stress in an outdoor urban arid environment: A case study. Adv Meteorol 2013; 693541. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/693541
4.
De AntonellisSJoppoloCMLiberatiP. Performance measurement of a cross-flow indirect evaporative cooler: effect of water nozzles and airflows arrangement. Energy Build2019; 184: 114–121.
5.
Al-ZubaydiAYTHongG. Experimental study of a novel water-spraying configuration in indirect evaporative cooling. Appl Therm Eng2019; 151: 283–293.
6.
WangLZhanCZhangJ,et al.Optimization of the counter-flow heat and mass exchanger for M-cycle indirect evaporative cooling assisted with entropy analysis. Energy2019; 171: 1206–1216.
7.
Al HorrYTashtoushBChilengweN,et al.Operational mode optimization of indirect evaporative cooling in hot climates. Case Stud Therm Eng2020; 18: 100574.
8.
Kashif M, Niaz H, Sultan M, et al. Study on desiccant and evaporative cooling systems for livestock thermal comfort: Theory and experiments. Energies 2020; 13(11): 2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112675
9.
DelfaniSKaramiM. Transient simulation of solar desiccant/M-cycle cooling systems in three different climatic conditions. J Build Eng2020; 29: 101152.
10.
SunTHuangXChenY,et al.Experimental investigation of water spraying in an indirect evaporative cooler from nozzle type and spray strategy perspectives. Energy Build2020; 214: 109871.
11.
KashyapSSarkarJKumarA. Performance enhancement of regenerative evaporative cooler by surface alterations and using ternary hybrid nanofluids. Energy2021; 225: 120199.
12.
RazaHMUSultanMBahramiM,et al.Experimental investigation of evaporative cooling systems for agricultural storage and livestock air-conditioning in Pakistan. Build Simul2021; 14: 617–631.
13.
YangYRenCYangC,et al.Energy and exergy performance comparison of conventional, dew point and new external-cooling indirect evaporative coolers. Energy Convers Manag2021; 230: 113824.
14.
LiWLiYShiW,et al.Energy and exergy study on indirect evaporative cooler used in exhaust air heat recovery. Energy2021; 235: 121319.
RaoVVDattaSP. Comprehensive exergetic, sustainability and enviro-economic evaluation of single-stage and hybrid evaporative coolers in India. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments2021; 47: 101403.
JingLZhuMXuH,et al.The entransy analysis in the wet channel of dew point evaporative cooler. J Build Eng2021; 44: 103371.
19.
BaakeemSSOrfiJMohamadAA. Investigations of geometrical and operational aspects of a dew-point air-cooling system (M-cycle). J Build Eng2021; 36: 102117.
20.
AliMAhmadWSheikhNA,et al.Performance enhancement of a cross flow dew point indirect evaporative cooler with circular finned channel geometry. J Build Eng2021; 35: 101980.
21.
PandelidisD. Numerical study and performance evaluation of the Maisotsenko cycle cooling tower. Energy Convers Manag2020; 210: 112735.
22.
MinYShiWShenB,et al.Enhancing the cooling and dehumidification performance of indirect evaporative cooler by hydrophobic-coated primary air channels. Int J Heat Mass Transf2021; 179: 121733.
23.
KashyapSSarkarJKumarA. Effect of surface modifications and using hybrid nanofluids on energy-exergy performance of regenerative evaporative cooler.Build Environ2021; 189: 107507.
24.
ChenYHuangXSunT,et al.Experimental study of plant fiber-polymer composite for indirect evaporative cooler application.Appl Therm Eng2021; 199: 117543.
25.
KimNH. Performance of an indirect evaporative cooler (IEC) made of PET/cellulose composite sheet as wetting media. Appl Therm Eng2021; 186: 116492.
26.
KashyapSSarkarJKumarA. Experimental exergy, economic and sustainability analyses of the dual-mode evaporative cooler. Int J Refrig2022; 135: 121–130.
27.
PakariAGhaniS. Comparison of 1D and 3D heat and mass transfer models of a counter flow dew point evaporative cooling system: numerical and experimental study. Int J Refrig2019; 99: 114–125.
28.
Cengel YA and Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 8th Ed. 2015. ISBN 978-0-07-339817-4.
Piasecki M, Kostyrko K, Fedorczak-Cisak M, et al. Air enthalpy as an IAQ indicator in hot and humid environment - experimental evaluation. Energies 2020; 13(6): 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061481
31.
CengelYACimbalaJM. Fluid mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 3rd ed. 2014. ISBN 978-0-07-338032-2
32.
Stetsyuk V, Kubiak KJ, Liu L and Chai JC. An alternative approach to evaluate the average Nusselt number for mixed boundary layer conditions in parallel flow over an isothermal flat plate. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 2017; 46(3): 241–251.
33.
SpaldingDB. Handbook of heat transfer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf1975; 18: 1221.
34.
KashyapSSarkarJKumarA. Exergy, economic, environmental and sustainability analyses of possible regenerative evaporative cooling device topologies. Build Environ2020; 180: 107033.
35.
Cengel YA and Ghajar AJ. Heat and Mass Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 5th ed. 2014. ISBN 978-0-07-339818-1
36.
American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). 2020 ASHRAE Handbook - HVAC Systems and Equipment (SI), Chp. 26: Air-to-Air Energy Recovery Equipment. Atlanta. 2020. ISBN 978-1-947192-53-9.
37.
RodgersRCHillGE. Equations for vapour pressure versus temperature: derivation and use of the Antoine equation on a hand-held programmable calculator. Br J Anaesth1978; 50: 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/50.5.415.
38.
KhosraviNAydinDKarim NejhadM,et al.Comparative performance analysis of direct and desiccant assisted evaporative cooling systems using novel candidate materials. Energy Convers Manag2020; 221: 113167.
39.
LinJBuiDTWangR,et al.On the exergy analysis of the counter-flow dew point evaporative cooler. Energy2018; 165: 958–971.
40.
JradiMRiffatS. Experimental and numerical investigation of a dew-point cooling system for thermal comfort in buildings. Appl Energy2014; 132: 524–535.
41.
AntonellisSDJoppoloCMLiberatiP,et al.Experimental analysis of a cross flow indirect evaporative cooling system. Energy Build2016; 121: 130–138.
42.
Kousar R, Ali M, Amjad MK, et al. Energy, Exergy, Economic, Environmental (4Es) comparative performance evaluation of dewpoint evaporative cooler configurations. J Build Eng 2022; 45: 103466.
43.
ZhouYYanZDaiQ,et al.Experimental and numerical evaluation of a two-stage indirect/thermoelectric assisted direct evaporative cooling system. Energy Convers Manag2021; 248: 114780.
44.
PandelidisDAnisimovS. Numerical analysis of the selected operational and geometrical aspects of the M-cycle heat and mass exchanger. Energy Build2015; 87: 413–424.
45.
RezaeiMAtikolUÖzdenefeM. Promotion of Trombe wall through demand-side management. Sol Energy2020; 206: 216–227.
46.
ÖzdenefeMAtikolURezaeiM. Trombe wall size-determination based on economic and thermal comfort viability. Sol Energy2018; 174: 359–372.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
