Lattice structures play a key role in influencing the mechanical and thermal properties of many applications. Knowing the importance of lattice structure and its influence on mechanical and thermal properties, this article discussed the triply periodic minimal surface-based gyroid shapes, their design, manufacturability, and difficulties while printing with the additive manufacturing process. This review also emphasizes the impact of changing the structure and additive manufacturing process parameters like porosity, wall thickness, unit cell size, infill, and gradient ratio on the mechanical and thermal properties of the printed parts. This study discussed the advantages and disadvantages of replacing conventional structures with bio-inspired gyroid structures and their effects on mechanical and thermal properties. This review also brought a comparative study between gyroid and other existing lattice structures in terms of mechanical and thermal properties and suggestions are been made to use gyroid shapes compared to existing lattice structures for improved thermal mechanical for different applications like biomedical, structural, and heat transfer fields. In this review article, a multitude of research areas could help the researcher to easily decide the appropriate application-based gyroid structure.
Al-KetanOAliMKhalilM, et al.Forced convection computational fluid dynamics analysis of architected and three-dimensional printable heat sinks based on triply periodic minimal surfaces. J Therm Sci Eng Appl13. Epub ahead of print 1 April 2021. DOI: 10.1115/1.4047385/1084162.
LuoJWChenLMinT, et al.Macroscopic transport properties of gyroid structures based on pore-scale studies: permeability, diffusivity and thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transf2020; 146: 118837.
4.
GibsonLJ. Modelling the mechanical behavior of cellular materials. Mater Sci Eng A1989; 110: 1–36.
5.
TaoWLeuMC. Design of lattice structure for additive manufacturing. Int Symp Flex Autom ISFA2016: 325–332. DOI: 10.1109/ISFA.2016.7790182.
6.
HelouMKaraS. Design, analysis and manufacturing of lattice structures: an overview. 2017; 31: 243–261. DOI: 101080/0951192X20171407456.
7.
SeharingAAzmanAHAbdullahS. A review on integration of lightweight gradient lattice structures in additive manufacturing parts. 2014; 12: 1–21. DOI: 101177/1687814020916951.
8.
BoguszPPopławskiAStankiewiczM, et al.Experimental research of selected lattice structures developed with 3D printing technology. Mater (Basel, Switzerland)15. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2022. DOI: 10.3390/MA15010378.
9.
MaloneyKJFinkKDSchaedlerTA, et al.Multifunctional heat exchangers derived from three-dimensional micro-lattice structures. Int J Heat Mass Transf2012; 55: 2486–2493.
10.
ZhuFLuGRuanD, et al.Plastic deformation, failure and energy absorption of sandwich structures with metallic cellular cores. 2010; 1: 507–541. DOI: 101260/2041-419614507.
11.
KassimDHPutraAHamidMFSC, et al.Sound absorption of BCC lattice structures. Lect Notes Mech Eng2020: 69–79. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-4481-1_8.
12.
MonkovaKMonkaPZetkovaI, et al.Three approaches to the gyroid structure modelling as a base of lightweight component produced by additive technology. DEStech Trans Comput Sci Eng. Epub ahead of print 6 December 2017: 124–129. DOI: 10.12783/DTCSE/CMSAM2017/16361.
AbueiddaDWElhebearyMShiangC(, et al.Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric gyroid cellular structures: experimental and finite element study. Mater Des2019; 165: 107597.
16.
YanCHaoLHusseinA, et al.Advanced lightweight 316L stainless steel cellular lattice structures fabricated via selective laser melting. Mater Des2014; 55: 533–541.
17.
YanCHaoLHusseinA, et al.Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2012; 62: 32–38.
18.
TinoRLearyMYeoA, et al.Gyroid structures for 3D-printed heterogeneous radiotherapy phantoms. Phys Med Biol2019; 64: 21NT05.
19.
GawronskaEDyjaRGrosserA, et al.Engineering calculations for complex geometric domains. MATEC Web Conf2018; 157: 02009.
20.
ParkJHLeeJC. Unusually high ratio of shear modulus to young’s modulus in a nano-structured gyroid metamaterial. Sci Reports2017; 7: 1–8.
21.
MaconachieTTinoRLozanovskiB, et al.The compressive behaviour of ABS gyroid lattice structures manufactured by fused deposition modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 107: 4449–4467.
22.
PengHGaoFHuW. Design, modeling and characterization of triply periodic minimal surface heat exchangers with additive manufacturing.
23.
Catchpole-SmithSSéloRRJDavisAW, et al.Thermal conductivity of TPMS lattice structures manufactured via laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf2019; 30: 100846.
24.
YuanLDingSWenC. Additive manufacturing technology for porous metal implant applications and triple minimal surface structures: a review. Bioact Mater2019; 4: 56–70.
25.
CoimbraJCMartinsMAOliveiraPS, et al.The potential use of a gyroid structure to represent monolithic matrices for bioseparation purposes: fluid dynamics and mass transfer analysis via CFD. Sep Purif Technol254. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2021. DOI: 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2020.117594.
26.
XuXGoyanesATrenfieldSJ, et al.Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing of a bladder device for intravesical drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C2021; 120: 111773.
27.
FinaFGoyanesAMadlaCM, et al.3D printing of drug-loaded gyroid lattices using selective laser sintering. Int J Pharm2018; 547: 44–52.
28.
PoltueTKarunaCKhrueaduangkhamS, et al.Design exploration of 3D-printed triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds for bone implants. Int J Mech Sci2021; 211: 106762.
29.
Baena-MorenoFMGonzález-CastañoMNavarro De MiguelJC, et al.Stepping toward efficient microreactors for CO2Methanation: 3D-printed gyroid geometry. ACS Sustain Chem Eng2021; 9: 8198–8206.
30.
PechoPAžaltovičVKanderaB, et al.Introduction study of design and layout of UAVs 3D printed wings in relation to optimal lightweight and load distribution. Transp Res Procedia2019; 40: 861–868.
31.
PodroužekJMarconMNinčevićK, et al.Bio-inspired 3D infill patterns for additive manufacturing and structural applications. Mater2019; 12: 499.
32.
Al-KetanOAbu Al-RubRK. MSLattice: a free software for generating uniform and graded lattices based on triply periodic minimal surfaces. Mater Des Process Commun3. Epub ahead of print 1 December 2021. DOI: 10.1002/MDP2.205.
33.
JoWYoonBJLeeH, et al.3D printed hierarchical gyroid structure with embedded photocatalyst TiO2 nanoparticles. 2017; 4: 222–230. https://home.liebertpub.com/3dp.
34.
BeanPLopez-AnidoRAVelS. Numerical modeling and experimental investigation of effective elastic properties of the 3D printed gyroid infill. Appl Sci2022; 12: 2180.
35.
SimsekUGayirCEKiziltasG, et al.An integrated homogenization-based topology optimization via RBF mapping strategies for additively manufactured FGLS and its application to bandgap structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 111: 1361–1374.
36.
VlahinosMO’haraR. Unlocking Advanced Heat Exchanger Design and Simulation with nTop Platform and ANSYS CFX.
37.
YuSSunJBaiJ. Investigation of functionally graded TPMS structures fabricated by additive manufacturing. Mater Des2019; 182: 108021.
38.
HanLCheS. An overview of materials with triply periodic minimal surfaces and related geometry: from biological structures to self-assembled systems. Adv Mater2018; 30: 1705708.
JonesALearyMBatemanS, et al.TPMS designer: a tool for generating and analyzing triply periodic minimal surfaces. Softw Impacts2021; 10: 100167.
42.
Grosse-BrauckmannK. Triply periodic minimal and constant mean curvature surfaces. Interface Focus2012; 2: 582–588.
43.
FengJFuJYaoX, et al.Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) porous structures: from multi-scale design, precise additive manufacturing to multidisciplinary applications. Int J Extrem Manuf2022; 4: 022001.
44.
SychovMMLebedevLADyachenko SV, et al.Mechanical properties of energy-absorbing structures with triply periodic minimal surface topology. Acta Astronaut2018; 150: 81–84.
45.
KhaleghiSDehnaviFNBaghaniM, et al.On the directional elastic modulus of the TPMS structures and a novel hybridization method to control anisotropy. Mater Des2021; 210: 110074.
46.
SaghaianSEAmerinatanziAMoghaddamNS, et al.Mechanical and shape memory properties of triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) NiTi structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Biol Eng Med3. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.15761/BEM.1000152.
47.
WangXWangCZhouX, et al.Evaluating lattice mechanical properties for lightweight heat-resistant load-bearing structure design. Mater2020; 13: 4786.
48.
FuYBaoJWangC, et al. CFD Study of Countercurrent Flow in Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces with CO2BOL Solvent. Epub ahead of print 1 December 2019. DOI: 10.2172/1691506.
49.
QuSDingJSongX. Achieving triply periodic minimal surface thin-walled structures by micro laser powder bed fusion process. Micromachines (Basel)2021; 12: 705.
50.
VietNVKarathanasopoulosNZakiW. Mechanical attributes and wave propagation characteristics of TPMS lattice structures. Mech Mater2022; 172: 104363.
51.
OudaMAl-KetanOSreedharN, et al.Novel static mixers based on triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) architectures. J Environ Chem Eng2020; 8: 104289.
52.
RestrepoSOcampoSRamirezJA, et al.Mechanical properties of ceramic structures based on triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) processed by 3D printing. J Phys Conf Ser2017; 935: 012036.
53.
VijayavenkataramanSZhangLZhangS, et al.Triply periodic minimal surfaces sheet scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: an optimization approach toward biomimetic scaffold design. ACS Appl Bio Mater2018; 1: 259–269.
54.
AlhammadiAAl-KetanOKhanKA, et al.Microstructural characterization and thermomechanical behavior of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg sheet cellular materials. Mater Sci Eng A2020; 791: 139714.
55.
ZhaoMZhangDZLiuF, et al.Mechanical and energy absorption characteristics of additively manufactured functionally graded sheet lattice structures with minimal surfaces. Int J Mech Sci2020; 167: 105262.
56.
MaXZhangDZZhaoM, et al.Mechanical and energy absorption properties of functionally graded lattice structures based on minimal curved surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 118: 995–1008.
57.
WinterBButzBDiekerC, et al.Coexistence of both gyroid chiralities in individual butterfly wing scales of Callophrys rubi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2015; 112: 12911–12916.
58.
CorkeryRWTyrodeEC. On the colour of wing scales in butterflies: iridescence and preferred orientation of single gyroid photonic crystals. Interface Focus7. Epub ahead of print 2017. DOI: 10.1098/RSFS.2016.0154.
59.
LiWYuGYuZ. Bioinspired heat exchangers based on triply periodic minimal surfaces for supercritical CO2 cycles. Appl Therm Eng2020; 179: 115686.
60.
MilleCTyrodeECCorkeryRW. Inorganic chiral 3-D photonic crystals with bicontinuous gyroid structure replicated from butterfly wing scales. Chem Commun2011; 47: 9873–9875.
61.
YoshiokaSFujitaHKinoshitaS, et al.Alignment of crystal orientations of the multi-domain photonic crystals in Parides sesostris wing scales. J R Soc Interface11. Epub ahead of print 6 March 2014. DOI: 10.1098/RSIF.2013.1029.
62.
WiltsBDMichielsenKDe RaedtH, et al.Iridescence and spectral filtering of the gyroid-type photonic crystals in Parides sesostris wing scales. Interface Focus2012; 2: 681–687.
SaranathanVNarayananSSandyA, et al.Evolution of single gyroid photonic crystals in bird feathers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A118. Epub ahead of print 8 June 2021. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.2101357118/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.2101357118.SD01.XLSX.
65.
MouchetSRVukusicP. Structural colours in lepidopteran scales. Adv In Insect Phys2018; 54: 1–53.
66.
AlmsherqiZMargadantFDengY. A look through ‘lens’ cubic mitochondria. Interface Focus2012; 2: 539–545.
67.
SingerABoucheronLDietzeSH, et al.Domain morphology, boundaries, and topological defects in biophotonic gyroid nanostructures of butterfly wing scales. Sci Adv2. Epub ahead of print 1 June 2016. DOI: 10.1126/SCIADV.1600149/SUPPL_FILE/1600149_SM.PDF.
68.
MichielsenKStavengaDG. Gyroid cuticular structures in butterfly wing scales: biological photonic crystals. J R Soc Interface2007; 5: 85–94.
69.
SaranathanVOsujiCOMochrieSGJ, et al.Structure, function, and self-assembly of single network gyroid (I4 132) photonic crystals in butterfly wing scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2010; 107: 11676–11681.
70.
LuzzatiVSpegtPA. Polymorphism of lipids. Nat1967; 215: 701–704.
71.
DolanJAWiltsBDVignoliniS, et al.Optical properties of gyroid structured materials: from photonic crystals to metamaterials. Adv Opt Mater2015; 3: 12–32.
72.
WiltsBDZubiriBAKlattMA, et al.Butterfly gyroid nanostructures as a time-frozen glimpse of intracellular membrane development. Sci Adv3. Epub ahead of print 1 April 2017. DOI: 10.1126/SCIADV.1603119/SUPPL_FILE/1603119_SM.PDF.
73.
SunJBonneauCCantínÁ, et al.The ITQ-37 mesoporous chiral zeolite. Nat2009; 458: 1154–1157.
74.
SunPWangWZhangW, et al.3D interconnected gyroid Au-Cus materials for efficient solar steam generation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 34837–34847.
75.
HsuehHYYaoCTHoRM. Well-ordered nanohybrids and nanoporous materials from gyroid block copolymer templates. Chem Soc Rev2015; 44: 1974–2018.
76.
WangFFuHRZhangJ. Homochiral metal-organic framework with intrinsic chiral topology and helical channels. Cryst Growth Des2015; 15: 1568–1571.
77.
BanerjeeRPhanAWangB, et al.High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and application to CO2 capture. Science (80-)2008; 319: 939–943.
Al-KetanOAl-RubRKARowshanR. Mechanical properties of a new type of architected interpenetrating phase composite materials. Adv Mater Technol2017; 2: 1600235.
80.
MaskeryIAboulkhairNTAremuAO, et al.Compressive failure modes and energy absorption in additively manufactured double gyroid lattices. Addit Manuf2017; 16: 24–29.
WuLWangWZhangW, et al.Highly sensitive, reproducible and uniform SERS substrates with a high density of three-dimensionally distributed hotspots: gyroid-structured au periodic metallic materials. NPG Asia Mater2018; 10: e462–e462.
83.
GuarientoLBuonamiciFMarzolaA, et al.Graded gyroid structures for load bearing orthopedic implants. In: Proc 2020 IEEE 10th Int Conf “Nanomaterials Appl Prop N 2020”. Epub ahead of print 9 November 2020. DOI: 10.1109/NAP51477.2020.9309692.
84.
YangELearyMLozanovskiB, et al.Effect of geometry on the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V gyroid structures fabricated via SLM: a numerical study. Mater Des2019; 184: 108165.
85.
JinYKongHZhouX, et al.Design and characterization of sheet-based gyroid porous structures with bioinspired functional gradients. Mater2020; 13: 3844.
86.
GawronskaEDyjaR. A numerical study of geometry’s impact on the thermal and mechanical properties of periodic surface structures. Mater2021; 14: 427.
YooDJKimKH. An advanced multi-morphology porous scaffold design method using volumetric distance field and beta growth function. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2015; 16: 2021–2032.
89.
ZhangJHuQWangS, et al.Digital light processing based three-dimensional printing for medical applications. Int J Bioprinting2020; 6: 12–27.
90.
LehderEFAshcroftIAWildmanRD, et al.A multiscale optimisation method for bone growth scaffolds based on triply periodic minimal surfaces. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2021; 20: 2085–2096.
91.
Asbai-GhoudanRde Galarreta SRRodriguez-FlorezN. Analytical model for the prediction of permeability of triply periodic minimal surfaces. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater124. Epub ahead of print 1 December 2021. DOI: 10.1016/J.JMBBM.2021.104804.
92.
du PlessisARazaviSMJBertoF. The effects of microporosity in struts of gyroid lattice structures produced by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Des2020; 194: 108899.
93.
MaSTangQFengQ, et al.Mechanical behaviours and mass transport properties of bone-mimicking scaffolds consisted of gyroid structures manufactured using selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 93: 158–169.
94.
Alizadeh-OsgoueiMLiYVahidA, et al.High strength porous PLA gyroid scaffolds manufactured via fused deposition modeling for tissue-engineering applications. Smart Mater Med2021; 2: 15–25.
95.
YánezAHerreraAMartelO, et al.Compressive behaviour of gyroid lattice structures for human cancellous bone implant applications. Mater Sci Eng C2016; 68: 445–448.
96.
AtaeeALiYBrandtM, et al.Ultrahigh-strength titanium gyroid scaffolds manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM) for bone implant applications. Acta Mater2018; 158: 354–368.
97.
Corona-CastueraJRodriguez-DelgadoDHenaoJ, et al.Design and fabrication of a customized partial hip prosthesis employing CT-scan data and lattice porous structures. ACS Omega2021; 6: 6902–6913.
98.
KladovasilakisNTsongasKTzetzisD. Finite element analysis of orthopedic hip implant with functionally graded bioinspired lattice structures. Biomimetics2020; 5: 44.
99.
ZhuLYLiLLiZA, et al.Design and biomechanical characteristics of porous meniscal implant structures using triply periodic minimal surfaces. J Transl Med2019; 17: 1–10.
KellyCNLinASLeguinecheKE, et al.Functional repair of critically sized femoral defects treated with bioinspired titanium gyroid-sheet scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2021; 116: 104380.
102.
YangYWangGLiangH, et al.Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds. Int J Bioprinting5. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.18063/IJB.V5I1.148.
103.
ZhouXFengYZhangJ, et al.Recent advances in additive manufacturing technology for bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 108: 3591–3606.
104.
KellyCNFrancovichJJulmiS, et al.Fatigue behavior of as-built selective laser melted titanium scaffolds with sheet-based gyroid microarchitecture for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2019; 94: 610–626.
105.
GeethaMSinghAKAsokamaniR, et al.Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – a review. Prog Mater Sci2009; 54: 397–425.
106.
PengXHuangQZhangY, et al.Elastic response of anisotropic gyroid cellular structures under compression: parametric analysis. Mater Des2021; 205: 109706.
YanCHaoLHusseinA, et al.Ti-6Al-4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2015; 51: 61–73.
109.
EhrigSSchambergerBBidanCM, et al.Surface tension determines tissue shape and growth kinetics. Sci Adv2019; 5: 9394–9405.
110.
BidanCMKommareddyKPRumplerM, et al.Geometry as a factor for tissue growth: towards shape optimization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater2013; 2: 186–194.
111.
YánezACuadradoAMartelO, et al.Porous titanium structures fabricated by electron beam melting: a versatile solution to use as bone scaffolds.
112.
AtaeeALiYFraserD, et al.Anisotropic Ti-6Al-4V gyroid scaffolds manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) for bone implant applications. Mater Des2018; 137: 345–354.
113.
SikavitsasVITemenoffJSMikosAG. Biomaterials and bone mechanotransduction. Biomaterials2001; 22: 2581–2593.
114.
PoumaratGSquireP. Comparison of mechanical properties of human, bovine bone and a new processed bone xenograft. Biomaterials1993; 14: 337–340.
115.
NiYWangLFanY. Mechanical properties of triply periodic minimal surface structures mimicking the microstructure of woodpecker’s cranial bone. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS2017: 1873–1876.
116.
LvJJinWLiuW, et al.Selective laser melting fabrication of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds with triply periodic minimal surface architectures: structural features, cytocompatibility, and osteogenesis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol10. Epub ahead of print 26 May 2022. DOI: 10.3389/FBIOE.2022.899531.
117.
LiLShiJZhangK, et al.Early osteointegration evaluation of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface models. J Orthop Transl2019; 19: 94–105.
118.
CastroAPGRubenRBGonçalvesSB, et al.Numerical and experimental evaluation of TPMS gyroid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin2019; 22: 567–573.
119.
CheongVSFrommePMumithA, et al.Novel adaptive finite element algorithms to predict bone ingrowth in additive manufactured porous implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2018; 87: 230–239.
120.
KellyCNMillerATHollisterSJ, et al.Design and structure-function characterization of 3D printed synthetic porous biomaterials for tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater7. Epub ahead of print 11 April 2018. DOI: 10.1002/ADHM.201701095.
121.
MaskeryISturmLAremuAO, et al.Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer (Guildf)2018; 152: 62–71.
122.
YangLLiYWuS, et al.Tailorable and predictable mechanical responses of additive manufactured TPMS lattices with graded structures. Mater Sci Eng A2022; 843: 143109.
RamosHSantiagoRSoeS, et al.Response of gyroid lattice structures to impact loads. Int J Impact Eng2022; 164: 104202.
125.
QinZJungGSKangMJ, et al.The mechanics and design of a lightweight three-dimensional graphene assembly. Sci Adv3. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2017. DOI: 10.1126/SCIADV.1601536/SUPPL_FILE/1601536_SM.PDF.
126.
JoskaZAndrésLDražanT, et al.Influence of the shape of the filling on the mechanical properties of samples made by 3D printing. 2021; 21: 200–206. http://journalmt.com/doi/1021062/mft2021024.html.
127.
Al-KetanORowshanRAbu Al-RubRK. Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials. Addit Manuf2018; 19: 167–183.
128.
AlsallaHHaoLSmithC. Fracture toughness and tensile strength of 316L stainless steel cellular lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Mater Sci Eng A2016; 669: 1–6.
129.
WangYRenXChenZ, et al.Numerical and experimental studies on compressive behavior of gyroid lattice cylindrical shells. Mater Des2020; 186: 108340.
130.
YangLMertensRFerrucciM, et al.Continuous graded gyroid cellular structures fabricated by selective laser melting: design, manufacturing and mechanical properties. Mater Des2019; 162: 394–404.
131.
YánezACuadradoAMartelO, et al.Gyroid porous titanium structures: a versatile solution to be used as scaffolds in bone defect reconstruction. Mater Des2018; 140: 21–29.
132.
YangLYanCHanC, et al.Mechanical response of a triply periodic minimal surface cellular structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Int J Mech Sci2018; 148: 149–157.
133.
MiralbésRRanzDHigueraS. Study of the application of gyroid structures in cyclist helmets. Lect Notes Mech Eng2022: 64–70.
134.
RezaMSereshkVShresthaR, et al.Mechanical Behavior of Additively-Manufactured Gyroid Lattice Structure under Different Heat Treatments.
135.
DowningDJonesABrandtM, et al.Increased efficiency gyroid structures by tailored material distribution. Mater Des2021; 197: 109096.
136.
DalaqASAbueiddaDWAbu Al-RubRK, et al.Finite element prediction of effective elastic properties of interpenetrating phase composites with architectured 3D sheet reinforcements. Int J Solids Struct2016; 83: 169–182.
137.
KimJYooDJ. 3D printed compact heat exchangers with mathematically defined core structures. J Comput Des Eng2020; 7: 527–550.
YooDJ. New paradigms in cellular material design and fabrication. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2015; 16: 2577–2589.
141.
OhSHHaJWParkK. Adaptive conformal cooling of injection molds using additively manufactured TPMS structures. Polym2022; 14: 181.
142.
QureshiZAAl-OmariSABElnajjarE, et al.Nature-inspired triply periodic minimal surface-based structures in sheet and solid configurations for performance enhancement of a low-thermal-conductivity phase-change material for latent-heat thermal-energy-storage applications. Int J Therm Sci2022; 173: 107361.
143.
NakanishiKLabonteDCeboT, et al.Mechanical properties of the hollow-wall graphene gyroid lattice. Acta Mater2020; 201: 254–265.
144.
PadraoDMagniniMPatersonJ, et al.UKAEA-CCFE-PR(22)15 Investigating gyroid and primitive lattice structures for additively manufactured heat exchangers.
145.
CooperNColesLAEvertonS, et al.Additively manufactured ultra-high vacuum chamber for portable quantum technologies. Addit Manuf2021; 40: 101898.
146.
AbueiddaDWAbu Al-RubRKDalaqAS, et al.Effective conductivities and elastic moduli of novel foams with triply periodic minimal surfaces. Mech Mater2016; 95: 102–115.
147.
SéloRRJCatchpole-SmithSMaskeryI, et al.On the thermal conductivity of AlSi10Mg and lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf2020; 34: 101214.
148.
ThomasNSreedharNAl-KetanO, et al.3D printed triply periodic minimal surfaces as spacers for enhanced heat and mass transfer in membrane distillation. Desalination2018; 443: 256–271.
149.
WernerJGRodríguez-CaleroGGAbruñaHD, et al.Block copolymer derived 3-D interpenetrating multifunctional gyroidal nanohybrids for electrical energy storage. Energy Environ Sci2018; 11: 1261–1270.
150.
ElliottOGraySMcClayM, et al.Design and manufacturing of high surface area 3D-printed media for moving bed bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J Contemp Water Res Educ2017; 160: 144–156.
151.
EltlhawyBFoudaNEldesoukyI. Numerical evaluation of a porous tibial-knee implant using gyroid structure. J Biomed Phys Eng2022; 12: 75–82.
152.
Al-KetanOPelanconiMOrtonaA, et al.Additive manufacturing of architected catalytic ceramic substrates based on triply periodic minimal surfaces. J Am Ceram Soc2019; 102: 6176–6193.
153.
AnwajlerB. The thermal properties of a prototype insulation with a gyroid structure & optimization of the structure of a cellular composite made using SLS printing technology. Mater2022; 15: 1352.
154.
YangWAnJChuaCK, et al.Acoustic absorptions of multifunctional polymeric cellular structures based on triply periodic minimal surfaces fabricated by stereolithography. 2020; 15: 242–249. DOI: 101080/1745275920201740747.
155.
GodboldOBSoarRCBuswellRA. Implications of solid freeform fabrication on acoustic absorbers. Rapid Prototyp J2007; 13: 298–303.
156.
ElmadihWSyamWPMaskeryI, et al.Mechanical vibration bandgaps in surface-based lattices. Addit Manuf2019; 25: 421–429.
LiYWuRYuL, et al.Rational design of nonstoichiometric bioceramic scaffolds via digital light processing: tuning chemical composition and pore geometry evaluation. J Biol Eng2021; 15: 1–12.
YapYLYeongWY. Additive manufacture of fashion and jewellery products: a mini review. 2014; 9: 195–201. DOI: 101080/174527592014938993.
165.
LuCZhangCWenP, et al.Mechanical behavior of Al-Si10-Mg gyroid surface with variable topological parameters fabricated via laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Res Technol2021; 15: 5650–5661.
166.
HameedPLiuCFUmmethalaR, et al.Biomorphic porous Ti6Al4V gyroid scaffolds for bone implant applications fabricated by selective laser melting. Prog Addit Manuf2021; 6: 455–469.
167.
BidarePMehmetiAJiménezA, et al.High-density direct laser deposition (DLD) of CM247LC alloy: microstructure, porosity and cracks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 120: 8063–8074. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-09289-8.
168.
YanCHaoLHusseinA, et al.Microstructural and surface modifications and hydroxyapatite coating of Ti-6Al-4V triply periodic minimal surface lattices fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng C2017; 75: 1515–1524.
169.
KortelainenJLeinoMLehtinenT. Troubleshooting and tackling the common problems in vat photopolymerization and FDM 3d printing. Int J 3D Print Tech Dig Ind2021; 5: 281–292.
FerrettiPLeon-CardenasCSantiGM, et al.Relationship between FDM 3D printing parameters study: parameter optimization for lower defects. Polym2021; 13: 2190.
CaoYAlaasarMNallapaneniA, et al.Molecular packing in double gyroid cubic phases revealed via resonant soft x-ray scattering. Phys Rev Lett125. Epub ahead of print 10 July 2020. DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.125.027801.
176.
GaoWZhangYRamanujanD, et al.The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Des2015; 69: 65–89.
177.
BeyerCFigueroaD. Design and analysis of lattice structures for additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME138. Epub ahead of print 1 December 2016. DOI: 10.1115/1.4033957/473234.
McMillanMLJurgMLearyM, et al.Programmatic generation of computationally efficient lattice structures for additive manufacture. Rapid Prototyp J2017; 23: 486–494.
180.
ShahrubudinNLeeTCRamlanR. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manuf2019; 35: 1286–1296.
MatiasERaoB. 3D printing: on its historical evolution and the implications for business. In: Portal Int Conf Manag Eng Technol, 2015 September, pp. 551–558.
183.
ChapiroM. Current achievements and future outlook for composites in 3D printing. Reinf Plast2016; 60: 372–375.
184.
PereiraTKennedy JVPotgieterJ. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manuf2019; 30: 11–18.
185.
JiménezMRomeroLDomínguezIA, et al. Additive manufacturing technologies: an overview about 3D printing methods and future prospects. Complexity2019. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1155/2019/9656938.
186.
OberoiGNitschSEdelmayerM, et al.3D printing-encompassing the facets of dentistry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2018; 6: 172.
187.
LevesqueJNShahAEkhtiariS, et al.Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: a scoping review. EFORT Open Rev2020; 5: 430–441.
188.
VéronneauSTorringtonGHlavkaJ. 3D printing: downstream production transforming the supply chain. 3D Print Downstr Prod Transform Supply Chain. Epub ahead of print 8 September 2017. DOI: 10.7249/PE229.
HagerIGolonkaAPutanowiczR. 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction?Procedia Eng2016; 151: 292–299.
191.
SiddiqueTHMSamiINisarMZ, et al.Low cost 3D printing for rapid prototyping and its application. In: 2019 2nd Int Conf Latest Trends Electr Eng Comput Technol INTELLECT 2019. Epub ahead of print 1 November 2019. DOI: 10.1109/INTELLECT47034.2019.8954983.
192.
PutameGTerziniMCarbonaroD, et al. Application of 3D printing technology for design and manufacturing of customized components for a mechanical stretching bioreactor. J Healthc Eng2019. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1155/2019/3957931.
193.
SilvaCPaisAICaldasG, et al.Study on 3D printing of gyroid-based structures for superior structural behaviour. Prog Addit Manuf2021; 6: 689–703.
194.
LiDLiaoWDaiN, et al.Optimal design and modeling of gyroid-based functionally graded cellular structures for additive manufacturing. Comput Des2018; 104: 87–99.
195.
KristiawanRBImaduddinFAriawanD, et al.A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: filament processing, materials, and printing parameters. Open Eng2021; 11: 639–649.
196.
MaharjanGKKhanSZRizaSH, et al.Compressive behaviour of 3D printed polymeric gyroid cellular lattice structure. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2018; 455: 012047.
197.
GülcanOGünaydınKTamerA. The state of the art of material jetting—a critical review. Polymers (Basel)13. Epub ahead of print 2 August 2021. DOI: 10.3390/POLYM13162829.
198.
ZhaoWWangZZhangJ, et al.Vat photopolymerization 3D printing of advanced soft sensors and actuators: from architecture to function. Adv Mater Technol2021; 6: 2001218.
199.
SantoliquidoOColomboPOrtonaA. Additive manufacturing of ceramic components by digital light processing: a comparison between the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” approaches. J Eur Ceram Soc2019; 39: 2140–2148.
200.
TiwariSKPandeSAgrawalS, et al.Selection of selective laser sintering materials for different applications. Rapid Prototyp J2015; 21: 630–648.
201.
TofailSAMKoumoulosEPBandyopadhyayA, et al.Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater Today2018; 21: 22–37.
202.
WohlersTCampbellRIDiegelO,et al.Wohlers Report 2021. 2021, p. 375.
203.
ZaneldinEAhmedWMansourA, et al.Dimensional stability of 3D printed objects made from plastic waste using FDM: potential construction applications. Build2021; 11: 516.
204.
Del ReFContaldiVAstaritaA, et al.Statistical approach for assessing the effect of powder reuse on the final quality of AlSi10Mg parts produced by laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 97: 2231–2240.
205.
CordovaLBorTde SmitM, et al.Effects of powder reuse on the microstructure and mechanical behaviour of Al–Mg–Sc–Zr alloy processed by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Addit Manuf2020; 36: 101625.
206.
OussaiAKátaiLBártfaiZ. Development of 3D printing raw materials from plastic waste. Hungarian Agric Eng2020: 34–40.
207.
MorenoEBeltránFRArrietaMP, et al.Technical evaluation of mechanical recycling of PLA 3D printing wastes. Proc2020; 69: 19.
208.
ChenZYangMJiM, et al.Recyclable thermosetting polymers for digital light processing 3D printing. Mater Des2021; 197: 109189.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
