The current article presents a comprehensive investigation of MHD viscous flow of hybrid-nanofluids (Al2O3 − Ag/ water and (Al2O3 − Cu/) over a horizontally irregular 3D plane with non-uniform thickness combined with slip effects. The foremost aim of conducting this study is to enhance thermal transportation. Based on the following novelties, the subject study holds tremendous significance: i. A comparative analysis of two hybrid nanofluids with hybrid-base fluid together with slip effects ii. An exclusive study where the Tiwari and Das nanofluid model is employed combined with Fourier's heat flux model iii. Development of finite-difference code which implements the three-stage Lobatto IIIa approach for the designed problem. We have used suitable scaling transformations to convert the three-dimensional conservation equations of mass, momentum, and energy into a dimensionless system of boundary layer equations. The numerical solution of the coupled non-linear boundary layer problem is determined using the built-in finite-difference code designed to employ the three-stage Lobatto IIIa formula. A comprehensive assessment is carried out in how the velocity components, temperature, skin friction, and heat transfer rate are affected by the physical parameters of interest. The same is presented through graphs and in tabular form to offer a pictorial overview. The fluctuating trends of skin friction coefficients (x, y-directions) and Nusselt number are investigated to explore the physical landscape of the current study. The findings of this study offer a noticeable contrast to their existing counterparts.
AliBHussainSNieY, et al. Buoyancy effetcs on falkner–skan flow of a maxwell nanofluid fluid with activation energy past a wedge: finite element approach. Chin J Phys2020; 68: 368–380.
2.
SheikholeslamiMRokniHB. Effect of melting heat transfer on nanofluid flow in existence of magnetic field considering buongiorno model. Chin J Phys2017; 55: 1115–1126.
3.
ChoiSUS. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. ASME FED1995; 66: 99–105.
4.
KangHUKimJMOhJM. Estimation of thermal conductivity of nanofluid using experimental effective particle volume. Exp Heat Transf2006; 19: 181–191.
5.
AliBNaqviRAAliL, et al. A comparative description on time-dependent rotating magnetic transport of a water base liquid with hybrid nano-materials and over an extending sheet using buongiorno model: Finite element approach. Chin J Phys2021; 70: 125–139.
6.
DinarvandSHosseiniRPopI. Homotopy analysis method for unsteady mixed convective stagnation-point flow of a nanofluid using tiwari-das nanofluid model. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2016; 26: 1–25.
7.
MaboodFAkinshiloAT. Stability analysis and heat transfer of hybrid nanofluids transport over a stretching surface. Int Commun Heat and Mass trans2021; 123: 105215.
8.
MaboodFIbrahimSKumarP, et al. Viscous dissipation effects on unsteady mixed convective stagnation point flow using tiwari-das nanofluid model. Results Phys2017; 7: 280–287.
9.
DeviSPADeviSSU. Numerical investigation of hydromagnetic hybrid /water nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with suction. Int J Nonlin Sci.Num2016; 17: 249–257.
10.
AparnaZMonishaMPabiSK, et al. Thermal conductivity of aqueous hybrid nanofluid at different temperatures and volume concentrations: An experimental investigation and development of new correlation function. Powder Technol2019; 343: 714–722.
11.
ShokouhmandHTakabiB. Effects of /water hybrid nanofluid on heat transfer and flow characteristics in turbulent regime. Int J Modern Phy C2015; 26: 1550047.
12.
DeviSPADeviSSU. Heat transfer enhancement of /water hybrid nanofluid flow over stretching sheet. J Niger Math Soc2017; 36: 419–433.
13.
ChamkaAJMicroshnichenkoIVSheremetMA. Numerical analysis of unsteady conjugate natural convection of hybrid water based nanofluid in a semi-circular cavity. J Therm Sci Eng Appl 9(4) (2017)2017; 9: 041004.
14.
SadiqRKhanQMHashmatAJ. In vitro toxicological assessment of iron oxide. aluminium oxide and copper nanoparticles in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cell types, Drug Chem Toxicol2015; 38: 152–161.
15.
MehryanSAMGhalambazMChamkhaAJ, et al. Numerical study on natural convection of ag–mgO hybrid/water nanofluid inside a porous enclosure: A local thermal non-equilibrium model. Powder Technol2020; 360: 443–455.
16.
GhalambazMDoostaniAIzadpanahiE, et al. Conjugate natural convection flow of ag–mgo/water hybrid nanofluid in a square cavity. J Therm Anal Calorim2019; 139: 2321–2336.
17.
MehryanSAMIzadpanahiMGhalambazmM, et al. Effects of two-phase nanofluid model on MHD mixed convection in a lid-driven cavity in the presence of conductive inner block and corner heater. J Therm Anal Calorim2019; 137: 965–982.
18.
GhalambazMMehryanSAMMashoofiN, et al. Free convective melting-solidification heat transfer of nanoencapsulated phase change particles suspensions inside a coaxial pipe. Adv.Pwdr.Tech2020; 31: 4470–4481.
19.
GhalambazMMehryanSAMZahmatkeshI, et al. Free convection heat transfer analysis of a suspension of nano–encapsulated phase change materials (nepcms) in an inclined porous cavity. Int J Thrml. Sci2020; 157: 106503.
20.
SadeghiMHBabayanMChamkhaAJ. Investigation of using multi-layer pcms in the tubular heat exchanger with periodic heat transfer boundary condition. Int J Heat and Mass Tran2020; 147: 118970.
21.
ToghraieDMashayekhiRArastehH, et al. Two-phase investigation of water- nanofluid in a micro concentric annulus under non-uniform heat flux boundary conditions. Int J Numer Method H 2020; 30(4): 1795–1814.
22.
AlsaberyAIGedikEChamkhaAJ, et al. Impacts of heated rotating inner cylinder and two-phase nanofluid model on entropy generation and mixed convection in a square cavity. Heat and Mass Transfer2019; 56: 321–338.
23.
TayebiTChamkhaAJ. Entropy generation analysis due to MHD natural convection flow in a cavity occupied with hybrid nanofluid and equipped with a conducting hollow cylinder. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 139: 2165–2179.
24.
SheikholeslamiMGanjiDD. Nanofluid convective heat transfer using semi analytical and numerical approaches: A review. J Taiwan Inst Chem E2016; 65: 43–77.
25.
AliFMNaganthranKNazarR, et al. Mhd mixed convection boundary layer stagnation-point flow on a vertical surface with induced magnetic field. Internat J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2019; 30: 0961–5539.
26.
TurkyilmazogluMNaganthranKPopI. Unsteady mhd rear stagnation-point flow over off-centred deformable surfaces. Internat J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2017; 27: 1554–1570.
27.
MagyariMChamkhaAJ. Combined effect of heat generation or absorption and first-order chemical reaction on micropolar fluid flows over a uniformly stretched permeable surface: The full analytical solution. Int J Therm Sci2010; 49: 1821–1828.
28.
KhashiieNSArifinNMNazarR, et al. Magnetohydrodynamics (mhd) axisymmetric flow and heat transfer of a hybrid nanofluid past a radially permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with joule heating. Chin J Phys2020; 64: 251–263.
29.
RamachandranNChenBFArmalyTS. Mixed convection in stagnation flows adjacent to vertical surfaces. ASME J Heat Transf1988; 110: 373–377.
30.
IshakANazarRArifinNM, et al. Dual solutions in magnetohydrodynamic mixed convection flow near a stagnation-point on a vertical surface. ASME J Heat Transf2007; 129: 1212–12163.
31.
RasheedAAnwarM. Interplay of chemical reacting species in a fractional viscoelastic fluid flow. J Mol Liq2019; 273: 576–588.
32.
IskanderTHossamANAshwinkumarGP, et al. 3-d magnetohydrodynamic AA7072-AA7075/methanol hybrid nanofuid flow above an uneven thickness surface with slip efect. Sci Rep 10 (2020)2020; 10: 4265.
33.
ReddySRRPolBARBhattacharyyaK. Effect of nonlinear thermal radiation on 3d magneto slip flow of eyring-powell nanofluid flow over a slendering sheet with binary chemical reaction and arrhenius activation energy. Adv.Powder.Technol2019; 30: 3203–3213.
34.
HayatTNadeemS. Heat transfer enhancement with ag-cuO/water hybrid nanofluid. Results Phys2017; 7: 2317–2324.
35.
XieHJiangBLiuB, et al. An investigation on the tribological performances of the hybrid nanofluids for magnesium alloy-steel contacts. , Nanoscale Res Lett2016; 11: 329–336.
36.
MerajENIqbalZAzharE, et al. A comprehensive shape factor analysis using transportation of inside an isothermal semi vertical inverted cone with porous boundary. Results Phys2018; 8: 633–641.
37.
WainiIIshakAPopI. Mhd flow and heat transfer of a hybrid nanofluid past a permeable stretching/shrinking wedge. Appl Math Mech.-Engl Ed2020; 41: 507–520.
38.
ShampineLFGladwellIThompsonS. Solving ODEs with MATLAB, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39.
SoidSKIshakAPopI. MHD stagnation-point flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet in a micropolar fluid with a slip boundary. Sains Malays2018; 47: 2907–2916.
40.
JusohRNazarRPopI. Magnetohydrodynamic boundary layer flow and heat transfer of nanofluids past a bidirectional exponential permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with viscous dissipation effect. J.Heat.Trans-T ASME2019; 141: 012406.
41.
KamalFZaimiKIshakA, et al. Stability analysis of MHD stagnation-point flow towards a permeable stretching/shrinking sheet in a nanofluid with chemical reactions effect. Sains Malays2019; 48: 243–250.
42.
KhashiIArifinNMNazarR, et al. A stability analysis for MHD stagnation point flow with zero nanoparticles flux condition and anisotropic slip. Energies2019; 12: 1268.
43.
KhashiIArifinNMRashidiMM, et al. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) stagnation point flow past a shrinking/stretching surface with double stratification effect in a porous medium. J Therm.Anal.Calorim2019; 8: 1–14.
44.
KhaderMMegahedAM. Numerical solution for boundary layer fow due to a nonlinearly stretching sheet with variable thickness and slip velocity. Eur Phys J2013; 129: 1–7.
45.
Khader MM, Babatin MM, Eid A, et al. Numerical study for simulation the MHD flow and heat-transfer due to a stretching sheet on variable thickness and thermal conductivity with thermal radiation. Appl Math 2015; 6: 2045-2056.
