KingRP. Modeling and simulation of mineral processing systems. Elsevier, 2001.
2.
BondFC. Crushing and grinding calculations. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturiing Company, 1961.
3.
TangsathitkulchaiCAustinLG. The effect of slurry density on breakage parameters of quartz, coal and copper ore in a laboratory ball mill. Powder Technol1985; 42: 287–296.
4.
TangsathitkulchaiCAustinLG. Slurry density effects on ball milling in a laboratory ball mill. Powder Technol1989: 285–293.
5.
KlimpelRCAustinLG. Chemical additives for wet grinding of minerals. Powder Technol1982; 31: 239–253.
6.
KlimpelRCAustinLG. A preliminary model of liberation from a binary system. Powder Technol1983; 34: 121–130.
7.
AustinLGKlimpelRC. A note on the prediction of specific rates of breakage for an equilibrium ball charge. Powder Technol1985; 43: 199–201.
8.
TangsathitkulchaiC. Acceleration of particle breakage rates in wet batch ball milling. Powder Technol2002; 124: 67–75.
9.
TangsathitkulchaiC. The effect of slurry rheology on fine grinding in a laboratory ball mill. Int J Miner Process2003; 69: 29–47.
10.
AustinLGKlimpelRRLuckiePT. The process engineering of size reduction: ball milling. New York.: SMEAIME, 1984, pp. 99–110.
11.
FrancesCLaguerieC. Fine wet grinding of an alumina hydrate in a ball mill. Powder Technol1998: 147–153.
12.
YekelerMOzkanAAustinLG. Kinetics of fine wet grinding in a laboratory ball mill. Powder Technol2001; 114: 224–228.
13.
AustinLGBaggaP. An analysis of fine dry grinding in ball mills. Powder Technol1981; 28: 83–90.
14.
OzkanAYekelerM. Fine dry grinding of zeolite in a laboratory ball mill. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization: Measurement and Description of Particle Properties and Behavior in Powders and Other Disperse Systems2003; 20: 276–282.
15.
OzkanAYekelerMEFTUNİCalkayaM. Kinetics of fine wet grinding of zeolite in a steel ball mill in comparison to dry grinding. Int J Miner Process2009; 90: 67–73.
16.
BuXChenYMaG, et al.Differences in dry and wet grinding with a high solid concentration of coking coal using a laboratory conical ball mill: breakage rate, morphological characterization, and induction time. Adv Powder Technol2019; 30: 2703–2711.
17.
BuXChenYMaG, et al.Wet and dry grinding of coal in a laboratory-scale ball mill: particle-size distributions. Powder Technol2020; 359: 305–313.
18.
BuXMaGPengY, et al.Grinding kinetics of coal in wet ball-milling using the taguchi method. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization2019: 1–20.
19.
AustinLG. A discussion of equations for the analysis of batch grinding data. Powder Technol1999; 106: 71–77.
20.
FuerstenauDWPhatakPBKapurPC, et al.Simulation of the grinding of coarse/fine (heterogeneous) systems in a ball mill. Int J Miner Process2011; 99: 32–38.
21.
PetrakisEKomnitsasK. Improved modeling of the grinding process through the combined use of matrix and population balance models. Minerals2017; 7: 67.
22.
DenizV. The effects of ball filling and ball diameter on kinetic breakage parameters of barite powder. Adv Powder Technol2012; 23: 640–646.
23.
ShinHLeeSJungHS, et al.Effect of ball size and powder loading on the milling efficiency of a laboratory-scale wet ball mill. Ceram Int2013; 39: 8963–8968.
24.
ZhaoRHanYHeM, et al.Grinding kinetics of quartz and chlorite in wet ball milling. Powder Technol2017; 305: 418–425.
25.
LittleLMainzaANBeckerM, et al.Fine grinding: how mill type affects particle shape characteristics and mineral liberation. Miner Eng2017; 111: 148–157.
26.
Napier–MunnTJMorrelSMorrisonRD, et al.Mineral comminution circuits. Australia: JKMRC, 1996, 318–320, 332.
27.
AustinLGShahI. A method for inter-conversion of microtrac and sieve size distributions. Powder Technol1983; 35: 271–278.
28.
FrançoisKMMoysMH. Effects of slurry pool volume on milling efficiency. Powder Technol2014; 256: 428–435.
29.
MoysMH. Grinding to nano-sizes: effect of media size and slurry viscosity. Miner Eng2015; 74: 64–67.
30.
TuzcuETRajamaniRK. Modeling breakage rates in mills with impact energy spectra and ultra fast load cell data. Miner Eng2011; 24: 252–260.
31.
TuzcuETDhawanNRajamaniRK. Coarse particle fracture with the ultrafast load cell. Mining. Metallurgy & Exploration2011; 28: 176–186.
32.
ClearyPWMorrisonRD. Prediction of 3D slurry flow within the grinding chamber and discharge from a pilot scale SAG mill. Miner Eng2012; 39: 184–195.
33.
RezaeizadehMFooladiMPowellMS, et al.A new predictive model of lifter bar wear in mills. Miner Eng2010; 23: 1174–1181.
34.
RazaniMMasoumiARezaeizadehM, et al.Prediction model to estimate the specific energy and product particle size distribution of semi-autogenous mill. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering2019; 233: 306–313.
35.
AkhondizadehMRezaeizadehM. Effect of specimen size and ball size on breakage throughput in the drop-weight testProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering2019; 233: 202–210.
36.
SoleymaniMMFooladiMRezaeizadehM. Effect of slurry pool formation on the load orientation, power draw, and impact force in tumbling mills. Powder Technol2016; 287: 160–168.
37.
SoleymaniMMFooladi MahaniMRezaeizadehM. Experimental study the impact forces of tumbling mills. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering2017; 231: 283–293.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
