This paper examines the behaviour of a hybrid nanofluid flow towards a stagnation point on a stretching or shrinking surface with second-order slip and melting heat transfer effects. Copper (Cu) and alumina (Al2O3) are considered as the hybrid nanoparticles while water as the base fluid. The governing equations are reduced to the similarity equations using similarity transformations. The resulting equations are programmed in MATLAB software through the bvp4c solver to obtain the numerical solutions. The results reveal that two solutions are possible for the shrinking case , where the bifurcation of the solutions occurs in this region. Moreover, the heat transfer rate and the skin friction coefficient enhance with the rise of the melting parameter. Meanwhile, these quantities decrease for a smaller second-order slip parameter. The temporal stability analysis shows that only one of the two solutions is stable as time evolves.
HiemenzK.Die grenzschicht an einem in den gleichförmigen flüssigkeitsstrom eingetauchten geraden kreiszylinder. Dinglers Polytech J1911;
326: 321–410.
2.
HomannF.Der einflub grober zähigkeit bei der strömung um den zylinder und um die kugel. Z Angew Math Mech1936;
16: 153–164.
3.
WangCY.Stagnation flow towards a shrinking sheet. Int J Non Linear Mech2008;
43: 377–382.
4.
BachokNIshakAPopI.Melting heat transfer in boundary layer stagnation-point flow towards a stretching/shrinking sheet. Phys Lett Sect A Gen at Solid State Phys2010;
374: 4075–4079.
5.
BachokNIshakAPopI.Stagnation-point flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet in a nanofluid. Nanoscale Res Lett2011;
6: 623.
6.
FangTGWangFJ.Momentum and heat transfer of a special case of the unsteady stagnation-point flow. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed2020;
41: 51–82.
7.
RobertsL.On the melting of a semi-infinite body of ice placed in a hot stream of air. J Fluid Mech1958;
4: 505–528.
8.
EpsteinMChoDH.Melting heat transfer in steady laminar flow over a flat plate. J Heat Transfer1976;
98: 531–533.
9.
AhmadSPopI.Melting effect on mixed convection boundary layer flow about a vertical surface embedded in a porous medium: opposing flows case. Transp Porous Med2014;
102: 317–323.
10.
MerkinJHPopIAhmadS.Note on the melting effect on mixed convection boundary-layer flow over a vertical flat surface embedded in a porous medium. Int J Heat Mass Transf2015;
84: 786–790.
11.
MaboodFShafiqAHayatT, et al.
Radiation effects on stagnation point flow with melting heat transfer and second order slip. Results Phys2017;
7: 31–42.
12.
JavedMFarooqMAnjumA, et al.
Insight of thermally stratified Jeffrey fluid flow inside porous medium subject to chemical species and melting heat transfer. Adv Mech Eng2019;
11: 1–14.
13.
MuhammadKHayatTAlsaediA, et al.
Melting heat transfer in squeezing flow of basefluid (water), nanofluid (CNTs + water) and hybrid nanofluid (CNTs + CuO + water). J Therm Anal Calorim2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09391-7.
14.
HayatTShahFAlsaediA, et al.
Entropy optimized dissipative flow of effective Prandtl number with melting heat transport and joule heating. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2020;
111: 104454.
15.
AnderssonHI.Slip flow past a stretching surface. Acta Mech2002;
158: 121–125.
16.
WuL.A slip model for rarefied gas flows at arbitrary Knudsen number. Appl Phys Lett2008;
93: 253103.
17.
FangTYaoSZhangJ, et al.
Viscous flow over a shrinking sheet with a second order slip flow model. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul2010;
15: 1831–1842.
18.
RoşcaAVPopI.Flow and heat transfer over a vertical permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with a second order slip. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2013;
60: 355–364.
19.
YasinMHMIshakAPopI.Boundary layer flow and heat transfer past a permeable shrinking surface embedded in a porous medium with a second-order slip: a stability analysis. Appl Therm Eng2017;
115: 1407–1411.
20.
KhanMIAlzahraniF.Entropy optimized magnetohydrodynamics Darcy–Forchheimer second order velocity slip flow of nanomaterials between two stretchable disks. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2020; 4190--4199.
21.
KhanMIAlzahraniFHobinyA.Simulation and modeling of second order velocity slip flow of micropolar ferrofluid with Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium. J Mater Res Technol2020;
9: 7335–7340.
22.
AbbasSZKhanMIKadryS, et al.
Fully developed entropy optimized second order velocity slip MHD nanofluid flow with activation energy. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020;
190: 105362.
23.
ChoiSUSEastmanJA.Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. ProcASME Int Mech Eng Congr Expo FED 231/MD1995;
66: 99–105.
24.
KhanaferKVafaiKLightstoneM.Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf2003;
46: 3639–3653.
25.
OztopHFAbu-NadaE.Numerical study of natural convection in partially heated rectangular enclosures filled with nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2008;
29: 1326–1336.
26.
MohebbiRRashidiMM.Numerical simulation of natural convection heat transfer of a nanofluid in an L-shaped enclosure with a heating obstacle. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2017;
72: 70–84.
27.
RashadAMRashidiMMLorenziniG, et al.
Magnetic field and internal heat generation effects on the free convection in a rectangular cavity filled with a porous medium saturated with Cu–water nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf2017;
104: 878–889.
28.
MansouryDIlami DoshmanziariFRezaieS, et al.
Effect of Al2O3/water nanofluid on performance of parallel flow heat exchangers: an experimental approach. J Therm Anal Calorim2019;
135: 625–643.
29.
DasSKChoiSUSYuW, et al. Nanofluids: Science and technology.
New Jersey:
Wiley-Interscience, 2007.
30.
MinkowyczWJSparrowEMAbrahamJP.Nanoparticle heat transfer and fluid flow.
New York:
CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013.
31.
ShenoyASheremetMPopI.Convective flow and heat transfer from wavy surfaces. Viscous fluids, porous media, and nanofluids.
New York:
CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 2016.
32.
NieldDABejanA.Convection in porous media. 5th ed.
New York:
Springer International Publishing, 2017.
33.
TurcuRDarabontANanA, et al.
New polypyrrole-multiwall carbon nanotubes hybrid materials. J Optoelectron Adv Mater2006;
8: 643–647.
34.
JanaSSalehi-KhojinAZhongWH.Enhancement of fluid thermal conductivity by the addition of single and hybrid nano-additives. Thermochim Acta2007;
462: 45–55.
35.
SarkarJGhoshPAdilA.A review on hybrid nanofluids: recent research, development and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015;
43: 164–177.
36.
Hemmat EsfeMAlirezaieARejvaniM.An applicable study on the thermal conductivity of SWCNT-MgO hybrid nanofluid and price-performance analysis for energy management. Appl Therm Eng2017;
111: 1202–1210.
37.
SundarLSSharmaKVSinghMK, et al.
Hybrid nanofluids preparation, thermal properties, heat transfer and friction factor – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017;
68: 185–198.
38.
LeongKYKu AhmadKZOngHC, et al.
Synthesis and thermal conductivity characteristic of hybrid nanofluids – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017;
75: 868–878.
39.
BabuJARKumarKKRaoSS.and State Of-art review on hybrid nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017;
77: 551–565.
40.
HuminicGHuminicA.Hybrid nanofluids for heat transfer applications – a state-of-the-art review. Int J Heat Mass Transf2018;
125: 82–103.
41.
AhmadiMHMirlohiAAlhuyi NazariM, et al.
A review of thermal conductivity of various nanofluids. J Mol Liq2018;
265: 181–188.
42.
DeviSPADeviSSU.Numerical investigation of hydromagnetic hybrid Cu- Al2O3/water nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with suction. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul2016;
17: 249–257.
43.
SureshSVenkitarajKPSelvakumarP, et al.
Synthesis of Al2O3-Cu/water hybrid nanofluids using two step method and its thermo physical properties. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp2011;
388: 41–48.
44.
WainiIIshakAPopI.Unsteady flow and heat transfer past a stretching/shrinking sheet in a hybrid nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf2019;
136: 288–297.
45.
WainiIIshakAPopI.Hybrid nano fluid flow and heat transfer over a permeable biaxial stretching/shrinking sheet. Hff2019;
30: 3497–3513.
WainiIIshakAPopI.MHD flow and heat transfer of a hybrid nanofluid past a permeable stretching/shrinking wedge. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed2020;
41: 507–520.
48.
WainiIIshakAPopI.Hybrid nanofluid flow past a permeable moving thin needle. Mathematics2020;
8: 612.
49.
WainiIIshakAGroşanT, et al.
Mixed convection of a hybrid nanofluid flow along a vertical surface embedded in a porous medium. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2020;
114: 104565.
50.
WainiIIshakAPopI.Mixed convection flow over an exponentially stretching/shrinking vertical surface in a hybrid nanofluid. Alexandria Eng J2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.05.030.
51.
WainiIIshakAPopI.Transpiration effects on hybrid nanofluid flow and heat transfer over a stretching/shrinking sheet with uniform shear flow. Alexandria Eng J2020;
59: 91–99.
52.
WainiIIshakAPopI.Hybrid nanofluid flow towards a stagnation point on an exponentially stretching/shrinking vertical sheet with buoyancy effects. Hff2020; 59: 1881--1891.
53.
WainiIIshakAPopI.Hybrid nanofluid flow towards a stagnation point on a stretching/shrinking cylinder. Sci Rep2020;
10: 9296.
54.
WainiIIshakAPopI.Squeezed hybrid nanofluid flow over a permeable sensor surface. Mathematics2020;
8: 898.
55.
Khashi’ieNSArifinNMPopI, et al.
Non-axisymmetric homann stagnation point flow and heat transfer past a stretching/shrinking sheet using hybrid nanofluid. Hff2020;
30: 4583–4606.
56.
HayatTNadeemSKhanAU.Rotating flow of Ag-CuO/H2O hybrid nanofluid with radiation and partial slip boundary effects. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter2018;
41: 75.
57.
SubhaniMNadeemS.Numerical analysis of micropolar hybrid nanofluid. Appl Nanosci2019;
9: 447–459.
58.
Khashi'ieNSArifinNMNazarR, et al.
Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) axisymmetric flow and heat transfer of a hybrid nanofluid past a radially permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with joule heating. Chinese J Phys2020;
64: 251–263.
59.
AlyEHPopI.MHD flow and heat transfer near stagnation point over a stretching/shrinking surface with partial slip and viscous dissipation: hybrid nanofluid versus nanofluid. Powder Technol2020;
367: 192–205.
60.
AladdinNALBachokNPopI.Cu-Al2O3/water hybrid nanofluid flow over a permeable moving surface in presence of hydromagnetic and suction effects. Alexandria Eng J2020;
59: 657–666.
61.
LundLAOmarZKhanI, et al.
Stability analysis and multiple solution of Cu-Al2O3/H2O nanofluid contains hybrid nanomaterials over a shrinking surface in the presence of viscous dissipation. J Mater Res Technol2020;
9: 421–432.
62.
ZainalNANazarRNaganthran, et al.
MHD mixed convection stagnation point flow of a hybrid nanofluid past a vertical flat plate with convective boundary condition. Chinese J Phys ; 66: 630--644.
63.
MahantheshBShehzadSAAmbreenT, et al.
Significance of joule heating and viscous heating on heat transport of MoS2–Ag hybrid nanofluid past an isothermal wedge. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09578-y.
64.
MerkinJH.On dual solutions occurring in mixed convection in a porous medium. J Eng Math1986;
20: 171–179.
65.
WeidmanPDKubitschekDGDavisAMJ.The effect of transpiration on self-similar boundary layer flow over moving surfaces. Int J Eng Sci2006;
44: 730–737.
66.
HarrisSDInghamDBPopI.Mixed convection boundary-layer flow near the stagnation point on a vertical surface in a porous medium: Brinkman model with slip. Transp Porous Med2009;
77: 267–285.
67.
ShampineLFGladwellIThompsonS.Solving ODEs with MATLAB.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2003.
68.
JusohRNazarRPopI.Impact of heat generation/absorption on the unsteady magnetohydrodynamic stagnation point flow and heat transfer of nanofluids. Hff2019;
30: 557–574.
69.
WainiIIshakAPopI.On the stability of the flow and heat transfer over a moving thin needle with prescribed surface heat flux. Chinese J Phys2019;
60: 651–658.
70.
Khashi’ieNSArifinNMNazarR, et al.
A stability analysis for magnetohydrodynamics stagnation point flow with zero nanoparticles flux condition and anisotropic slip. Energies2019;
12: 1268.
