The performance of airlift pump for the solid particles lifting during the transportation of gas-liquid-solid three-phase flow: A comprehensive research review
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online April, 2021
The performance of airlift pump for the solid particles lifting during the transportation of gas-liquid-solid three-phase flow: A comprehensive research review
Research about the enhancement of the airlift pump performance by changing the geometry and operational parameters has drawn considerable attention in recent years. This paper presents a comprehensive review of some published research articles on the enhancement performance of the airlift pump and the future direction of the research. In the introductory section, the description, the application, and the performance of the airlift pump are described. The influencing parameters of the airlift pump performance are classified in the geometry and operational. The geometry parameters are including submergence ratio, pipe diameter, pipe length, design, and position of the injector. The operational parameters are including the testing fluid, diameter and density particles, and the superficial velocity of injected air. All of the involved parameters are detail explained in the experimental study section. The detailed derivation of equations of the airlift pump performance and also the modified equation was shown in the theoretical study section. The numerical study of airlift pump operating on two and three phases was also discussed. In the last section, the future directions of the airlift pump are noted, and some conclusions were summarized. It was found that only limited literature about flow patterns in terms of the dynamic interface of each phase and development bubble jet generator airlift pump. Therefore, experimental data are needed to support this effort. Additional work, both theoretical and experimental, needs to be conducted on the effects of type and position bubble jet generators on the flow characteristic and the airlift pump performance, with the hope that the better performance will be obtained.
KassabSZKandilHAWardaHA, et al.
Experimental and analytical investigations of airlift pumps operating in three-phase flow. Chem Eng J2007;
131: 273–281.
2.
AhmedWHAmanAMBadrHM, et al.
Air injection methods: the key to a better performance of airlift pumps. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2016;
70: 354–365.
3.
HuDTangC-LCaiS-P, et al.
The effect of air injection method on the airlift pump performance. J Fluids Eng2012;
134: 111302.
4.
HuDKangYTangC. l, et al.
Modeling and analysis of airlift system operating in three-phase flow. China Ocean Eng2015;
29: 121–132.
5.
KatoHMiyazawaTTimayaS, et al.
A study of an air-lift pump for solid particles. Bul JSME1975;
18: 286–294.
6.
PougatchKSalcudeanM.Numerical modelling of deep sea air-lift. Ocean Eng2008;
35: 1173–1182.
7.
SadatomiMKawaharaAMatsuuraH, et al.
Micro-bubble generation rate and bubble dissolution rate into water by a simple multi-fluid mixer with orifice and porous tube. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2012;
41: 23–30.
8.
YoshinagaTSatoY.Performance of an air-lift pump for conveying coarse particles. Int J Multiph Flow1996;
22: 223–238.
9.
FujimotoHOgawaSTakudaH, et al.
Operation performance of a small air-lift pump for conveying solid particles. J Energy Resour Technol2003;
125: 17–25.
10.
NicklinDJ.The air-lift pump: theory and optimization. Trans Inst Chem Eng1963;
41: 29–39.
11.
HanafizadehPRaffieeAHSaidiMH.Experimental investigation of characteristic curve for gas-lift pump. J Pet Sci Eng2014;
116: 19–27.
12.
OueslatiAMegricheA.The effect of liquid temperature on the performance of an airlift pump. Energy Procedia2017;
119: 693–701.
13.
AbedRChadwickEAhmedWH.Two-phase flow behaviour in airlift pumps. Proc 5th Int Conf Fluid Flow, Heat Mass Transf2018;
168: 1–8.
14.
FanWChenJPanY, et al.
Experimental study on the performance of an air-lift pump for artificial upwelling. Ocean Eng2013;
59: 47–57.
15.
HosokawaSFujimotoSTomiyamaA.Gaslift pump making use of phase change of working fluid. Appl Therm Eng2016;
103: 1119–1125.
16.
TalebFSAAl-JarrahJA.Experimental study of an air lift pump. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res2017;
7: 1676–1680.
17.
QiangYFanWXiaoC, et al.
Effects of operating parameters and injection method on the performance of an artificial upwelling by using airlift pump. Appl Ocean Res2018;
78: 212–222.
18.
Catrawedarma I, Deendarlianto and Indarto. The performance and flow characteristics of swirl flow injector type airlift pump system. In: Proc 10th Int Conf on Thermofluid, 17 July 2020, pp. 040002, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
19.
CamposJBLMCarvalhoJRFGD.An experimental study of the wake of gas slugs rising in liquids. J Fluid Mech1988;
196: 27–37.
20.
KassabSZKandilHAWardaHA, et al.
Air-lift pumps characteristics under two-phase flow conditions. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2009;
30: 88–98.
21.
StenningAHMartinCB.An analytical and experimental study of air-lift pump performance. J Eng Gas Turbines Power1968;
90: 106–110.
22.
ChoNCHwangIJLeeCM, et al.
An experimental study on the airlift pump with air jet nozzle and booster pump. J Environ Sci2009;
21: S19–S23.
23.
HanafizadehPGhanbarzadehSSaidiMH.Visual technique for detection of gas-liquid two-phase flow regime in the airlift pump. J Pet Sci Eng2011;
75: 327–335.
24.
MahrousA-F.Airlift pump with a gradually enlarged segment in the riser tube. J Fluids Eng2013;
135: 031301.
25.
MahrousA-F.Experimental study of airlift pump performance with S-shaped riser tube bend. IJEM2013;
3: 1–12.
26.
TighzertHBrahimiMKechroudN, et al.
Effect of submergence ratio on the liquid phase velocity, efficiency and void fraction in an air-lift pump. J Pet Sci Eng2013;
110: 155–161.
27.
WallisGB.One-dimensional two phase flow.
United States of America:
McGraw-Hill, 1969.
28.
HillsJH.The operation of a bubble column at high throughputs. I. Gas holdup measurements. Chem Eng J1976;
12: 89–99.
29.
BhagwatSMGhajarAJ.Similarities and differences in the flow patterns and void fraction in vertical upward and downward two phase flow. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2012;
39: 213–227.
30.
KimSHSohnCHHwangJY.Effects of tube diameter and submergence ratio on bubble pattern and performance of air-lift pump. Int J Multiph Flow2014;
58: 195–204.
31.
MahrousA-FMatrawyK.Effect of air injection strategy on airlift pump performance. Int J Control Autom Syst2014;
3: 20–25.
32.
WangZKangYWangX, et al.
Investigating the flow characteristics of air-lift pumps operating in gas–liquid two-phase flow. Chinese J Chem Eng2018;
26: 219–227.
33.
SadatomiMKawaharaAGotoT.Dredging of sediments by bubble-jet-type air-lift-pump (experiment and performance prediction in its revised system). Japanese JMultiphase Flow2010;
23: 623–634.
34.
ChladekJEnstadGGMelaaenMC.Effect of operating conditions and particle properties on performance of vertical air-lift. Powder Technol2011;
207: 87–95.
35.
Sadatomi M, Kawahara A and Nishiyama T. Experiment and performance prediction of bubble-jet type air-lift pump for dredging sediments on sea and lake beads. Advances in Fluid Mechanics and Heat & Mass Transfer 2012; ISBN: 978-1-61804-114-2: 311-316.
36.
HattaNFujimotoHIsobeM, et al.
Theoretical analysis of flow characteristics of multiphase mixtures in a vertical pipe. Int J Multiph Flow1998;
24: 539–561.
37.
MaWRheeC, vanSchottD.Technological and profitable analysis of airlifting in deep sea mining systems. Minerals2017;
7: 143.
38.
TaitelYBorneaDDuklerAE.Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas-liquid flow in vertical tubes. AIChE J1980;
26: 345–354.
39.
Deendarlianto SuprabaIMajidAI.Experimental investigation on the flow behavior during the solid particles lifting in a micro-bubble generator type airlift pump system. Case Stud Therm Eng2019;
13: 100386.
40.
WangZDengYPanY, et al.
Experimentally investigating the flow characteristics of airlift pumps operating in gas-liquid-solid flow. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2020;
112: 109988.
41.
KhalilMFElshorbagyK. aKassabSZ, et al.
Effect of air injection method on the performance of an air lift pump. Int J Heat Fluid Flow1999;
20: 598–604.
42.
MahrousA-F.Performance of airlift pumps: single-stage vs. multistage air injection. AJME2014;
2: 28–33.
43.
SamarasVCMargarisDP.Two-phase flow regime maps for air-lift pump vertical upward gas-liquid flow-part II. Int Rev Mech Eng2005;
3: 721–725.
44.
HanafizadehPSaidiMHKarimiA, et al.
Effect of bubble size and angle of tapering upriser pipe on the performance of airlift pumps. Part Sci Technol2010;
28: 332–347.
45.
RichardsonJFHigsonDJ.A study of the energy losses associated with the operation of an air-lift pump. Trans Inst Chem Eng1962;
40: 169–182.
46.
MahrousA-F.Numerical study of solid particles-based airlift pump performance. WSEAS Trans Appl Theor Mech2012;
7: 221–230.
47.
YoonCHParkYCLeeDK, et al. Numerical analysis of solid-liquid-air three-fluid transient flow for air lift system. In: The fourteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference. Toulon, France, 23-28 May 2004, pp.23–28.
48.
KawashimaTNodaKMasuyamaT, et al.
Hydraulic transport of solids by air lift pump. J Min Met Inst Japan1975;
91: 765–772.
49.
DedegilMY.Principles of air-lift techniques (Chapter 12). In: ChereimisinoffNP (ed.) Encyclopedia of fluid mechanics. 1987,
Gulf, Houston, Texas, pp.384–397.
50.
TomiyamaAFurutaniNMinagawaH, et al.
Numerical analyses of air lift pumps based on the Multi-Fluid model. Japanese J Multiph Flow1992;
6: 173–188.
51.
TomiyamaAMinagawaHFurutaniN, et al.
Application of a two phase flow model based on local relative velocity to gas-liquid-solid three-phase flows. JSME Int J Ser B, Fluids Thermal Eng1995;
38: 555–562.
52.
HattaNOmodakaMNakajimaF, et al.
Predictable model for characteristics of one-dimensional solid-gas-liquid three-phase mixtures flow along a vertical pipeline with an abrupt enlargement in diameter. J Fluids Eng1999;
121: 330–342.
53.
LiangNKPengHK.A study of air-lift artificial upwelling. Ocean Eng2005;
32: 731–745.
54.
CazarezOMontoyaDVitalAG, et al.
Modeling of three-phase heavy oil-water-gas bubbly flow in upward vertical pipes. Int J Multiph Flow2010;
36: 439–448.
55.
IshiiMMishinaKKataokaI, et al. Two-fluid model and importance of the interfacial area in two-phase flow analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National congress of applied mechanics. 21-25 June 1982, Ithaca, New York, 1982, pp.73–80.
56.
SatoYYoshinagaTSadatomiM. Data and empirical correlation for the mean velocity of coarse particles in a vertical three-phase air-waste-solid particle flow. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Multiphase flow, 24 September 1990-27 September 1991, Tsukuba, Japan, 1991. pp. 363–366.
57.
SadatomiMSatoYYoshinagaT, et al.
Hydraulic lifting of coarse particles in vertical pipe (2nd report, gas-liquid-solid three-phase flow). Japanese JMultiphase Flow1990;
4: 125–140.
58.
SadatomiMYoshifusaSKatsumiI, et al.
Hydraulic lifting of coarse particles in vertical pipes (1st report, liquid – solid two-phase flow) Japanese JMultiphase Flow1990;
4: 111–124.
59.
SmithSL.Void fractions in two-phase flow: a correlation based upon an equal velocity head model. Proc Inst Mech1969;
184: 647–664.
ZhangQXuLYuW. A simulation of air-lift artificial upwelling in vertical pipe. In: International conference on intelligent systems research and mechatronics engineering (ISRME 2015). 11-13 April 2015, pp. 1347–1351.
62.
HanafizadehPMoezziMSaidiMH.Simulation of gas-liquid two phase flow in upriser pipe of gas-lift systems. Energy Equip Syst2014;
2: 25–42.
63.
AlasadiAAMHHabeebAK.Experimental and numerical simulation of an airlift pump with conventional and modified air injection device. J Eng2017;
23: 62–82.
64.
Wahba EM, Gadalla MA, Abueidda D, et al. On the performance of Air-Lift pumps: from analytical models to large eddy simulation. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 2014; 136, pp. 111301-1 -111301-7.
65.
Reinemann DJ, Parlange JY and Timmons MB. Theory of small-diameter airlift pumps. Int J Multiphase Flow 1990; 16; 113–122.
66.
YoshinagaTSatoYSadatomiM.Characteristics of air-lift pump for conveying solid particles. Japanese JMultiphase Flow1990;
4: 174–191.
67.
PatankarSV.Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow.
New York:
Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1980.
68.
WeberMDedegilMY. Transport of solids according to the air-lift principle. In: Proc. 4th International Conf. on the Hydraulic Transport of Solids in Pipes, 18-21 May 1976. Alberta, Canada, 1976. pp. H1-1-23 and X93-94.
69.
ParkerGJ.The effect of footpiece design on the performance of a small air lift pump. Top Catal1980;
2: 245–252.
70.
Deendarlianto HöhneTLucasD, et al.
Gas-liquid countercurrent two-phase flow in a PWR hot leg: a comprehensive research review. Nucl Eng Des2012;
243: 214–233.
71.
ZiegenheinTGarconMLucasD.Particle tracking using micro bubbles in bubbly flows. Chem Eng Sci2016;
153: 155–164.
