The effect of different cryogenic treatments on the wear behavior of chromium base die steel under dry condition has been examined at five levels of sliding velocity and normal loads. Parameters chosen for cryogenic treatment cycles are subjected to soaking duration of 6, 21, and 36 h at soaking temperatures of −154 ℃ and −184 ℃. Soaking period of 21 h shows higher wear resistance, whereas 36 h treatment shows the reduction in wear resistance. Worn out surface and wear debris exhibit that mechanisms responsible for wear of samples are rupturing of martensitic matrix and delaminating.
TottenGE. Steel heat treatment handbook (metallurgy and techniques), London: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
3.
HolmbergKMatthewsA. Coating tribology: Properties, techniques and applications in surface engineering, Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V., 1998.
4.
LeiteMVFigueroaCAGalloSCet al.Wear mechanisms and microstructure of pulsed plasma nitrided AISI H13 tool steel. Wear2010; 269: 466–472.
5.
JawingXJPengQFanHet al.Effects of DC plasma nitriding parameter on microstructure and properties of 304L stainless steel. Mater Charact2009; 60: 197–203.
6.
BarronRFEffects of cryogenic treatment on lath tool wear. In: PentzerWT (ed). Progress in refrigeration science and technology, Westport, CT: AVI Publishing Co, 1973, pp. 529–534.
7.
LalDMRenganarayananSKalanidhiA. Cryogenic treatment to augment wear resistance of tool and die steel. Cryogenics2001; 41: 149–155.
8.
BenselyAVenkateshSLalDMet al.Effect of cryogenic treatment on distribution of residual stress in case carburized En 353 steel. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 479: 229–235.
9.
BowesRG. The theory and practice of sub zero treatment of metals. Heat Treatment Metal1974; 1: 29–32.
10.
MolinariAPellizzariMGialanellaSet al.Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of tool steels. Mater Process Technol2001; 118: 350–355.
11.
FanjuMKohsukeTRyoAet al.Role of η - Carbide precipitation in the wear resistance improvement of Fe-12Cr-Mo- V-1.4C tool steel by the cryogenic treatment. ISI J Int1994; 34: 205–210.
12.
SilvaFJFrancoSDMachadoARet al.Performance of cryogenically treated HSS tools. Wear2006; 261: 674–685.
13.
LesovekVUleB. Improved vacuum heat-treatment for fine-blanking tools from high-speed steel M2. J Mater Process Technol1998; 82: 89–94.
14.
CollinsDN. The cryogenic treatment of tool steels. Adv Mater Process1998; 12: 23–29.
15.
CollinsDN. Deep cryogenic treatment of tool steels: Review. Heat Treatment Metals1996; 2: 40–42.
16.
GogteCLIyerKMParetkaRKet al.Deep subzero processing of metals and alloys: Evolution of microstructure of AISI T42 tool steel. Mater Manuf Process2009; 24: 718–722.
17.
StraffenliniGBizzottoGZanonV. Improving the wear resistance of tools for stamping. Wear2010; 269: 693–697.
18.
DasDDuttaAKRayKK. Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: Part I. Microstructure and hardness. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 2182–2193.
19.
MehtediMERicciPDrudiLet al.Analysis of the effect of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on the hardness and microstructure of X30CrMoN 15 1 steel. Mater Des2012; 33: 136–144.
20.
KoneshlouMMeshinchiKKhomamizadehF. Effect of cryogenic treatment on microstructure, mechanical and wear behaviors of AISI H13 hot work tool steel. Cryogenics2011; 51: 55–61.
21.
Katoch S, Sehgal R and Singh V. Effect of cryogenic treatment on hardness, microstructure and wear behavior of hot die steel grade AISI-H13. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in tribology and engineering systems, 2014, pp. 159–166. Delhi: Springer.
22.
DasDDuttaAKRayKK. Influence of varied cryo-treatment on the wear behavior of AISI D2 steel. Wear2009; 266: 297–309.
23.
AminiKNateghSShafyeiA. Influence of different cryo-treatments on tribological behavior of 80CrMo12 5 cold work tool steel. Mater Des2010; 31: 4666–4675.
24.
GillSSSinghJSinghRet al.Effect of cryogenic treatment on AISI M2 high speed steel: Metallurgical and mechanical characterization. JMEPEG2012; 21: 1320–1326.
25.
KalinMLeskovsekVVizintinJ. Wear behavior of deep-cryogenic treated high-speed steels at different loads. Mater Manuf Process2006; 21: 741–746.
26.
ASTM E 415-2014. Standard test method for analysis of carbon and low alloy steel by spark atomic emission spectrometry. In: ASTM annual book of standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2014.
27.
ASTM G77-2010. Standard test method for ranking resistance of materials to sliding wear using block-on-ring wear test. In: ASTM annual book of standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2010.
28.
ASTM E384-08a.Standard test method for Micro indentation hardness of materials. In: ASTM annual book of standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2008.
29.
ASTM E18-08b. Standard test method for Rockwell hardness of metallic materials. In: ASTM annual book of standards. vol. 3.01. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2008.
30.
ASTM E3-01 (Reapproved 2007). Standard guide for preparation of metallographic specimens. In: ASTM annual book of standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2001.
31.
ASTM E975-00. Standard practice for X-ray determination of retained austenite in steel with near random crystallographic orientation. In: ASTM annual book of standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2000.
32.
GavriljukVGSiroshVAPetrovYNet al.Carbide precipitation during tempering of a tool steel subjected to deep cryogenic treatment. Metall Mater Trans A2014; 45: 2453–2465.
33.
SenthikumarDRajendranIPellizzariMet al.Influence of shallow and deep cryogenic treatment on the residual state of stress of 4140 steel. J Mater Process Technol2011; 211: 396–401.
34.
GunesICicekAAslantasKet al.Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on wear resistance of AISI 52100 bearing steel. Trans Indian Inst Met2014; 67: 909–917.
35.
SuhNP. An overview of the delamination theory of wear. Wear1977; 44: 1–16.
36.
LiSXieYWuX. Hardness and toughness investigations of deep cryogenic treated cold work die steel. Cryogenics2010; 50: 89–92.
37.
LoskovsekVKalinVizintinJ. Influence of deep-cryogenic treatment on wear resistance of vacuum heat-treated HSS. Vacuum2006; 80: 507–518.
38.
HuangYZhuYTLiaoXZet al.Microstructure of cryogenic treated M2 Tool Steel. Mater Sci Eng A2003; 339: 241–244.
