Abstract
Motorcycle stability encompasses multiple physical phenomena, including straight-running divergence, cornering feasibility, oscillatory modes, and sensitivity to external disturbances. While these phenomena have been extensively studied in isolation, the absence of a transparent integration approach limits comparative assessment across vehicle configurations and operating conditions. This paper presents a structured Motorcycle Stability Index (MSI) that decomposes stability into five physically distinct and non-overlapping sub-indices, each representing a single stability phenomenon: straight-running non-oscillatory stability, steady-state cornering feasibility, high-frequency wobble stability, low-frequency weave stability, and crosswind response sensitivity. Each sub-index is evaluated using a formulation appropriate to its underlying physics, including eigenvalue analysis of the full linearized multibody model, quasi-static equilibrium analysis, and time-domain forced-response simulation, and is mapped to a bounded, dimensionless measure that preserves physical ordering while avoiding double counting by evaluation definition. The sub-indices are combined using a deliberately linear aggregation to maintain transparency and traceability rather than optimization or prediction. Application to representative motorcycle classes demonstrates physically consistent comparative trade-offs across stability phenomena, while robustness analysis confirms that relative rankings remain stable under moderate perturbations of sub-index weighting. Uncertainty is treated explicitly for forced-response behavior and propagated during integration. The proposed index is intended as a decision-support tool for comparative stability assessment within a declared linearized scope and passive rider assumption, providing relative stability indicators rather than direct prediction of real-world vehicle behavior, and complementing rather than replacing established multibody stability analyses. By explicitly separating stability phenomena and defining bounded evaluation measures, the proposed approach provides a transparent basis for engineering trade-off analysis in motorcycle development.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
