Mechanistic insights into contact fatigue of helical gears under cyclic loading: Impact of center distance error in eccentric load and uniform load scenarios
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Mechanistic insights into contact fatigue of helical gears under cyclic loading: Impact of center distance error in eccentric load and uniform load scenarios
The fatigue life of helical gear transmission systems is highly sensitive to critical geometric parameters, particularly center distance error (CDE). This study employs a combined approach of theoretical analysis and numerical simulation to systematically investigate the impact of CDE on the fatigue life of helical gears under cyclic operating conditions, along with its causal mechanisms. A rigid-flexible coupling finite element model based on eccentric load (EL) and uniform load (UL) configuration was established to analyze the influence mechanism of CDE on fatigue life. The results show that the life of the gear decreases with the increase of the center distance. The mechanism analysis determines the dynamic impact, bearing capacity, and oil film thickness (OFT) that the CDE affects the fatigue life, and then affects the contact stress. These findings provide important insights for the reliability-driven design and precision installation control of helical gear systems, and are of great significance for optimizing the performance of helical gear transmission systems in applications.
ChenSHuM. Active torsional vibration suppression of integrated electric drive system based on optimal harmonic current instruction analytic calculation method. Mech Mach Theory2023; 180: 105136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.105136
2.
HuJGuoQSunZ, et al. Study on low-frequency torsional vibration suppression of integrated electric drive system considering nonlinear factors. Energy2023; 284: 129251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129251
YangSChenWZhengL. On the grinding temperature field of helical gears: modeling and experiments. J Manuf Process2024; 124: 1010–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.06.066
LuoTQinXHuangJ, et al. Effects of helix deviation on load distributions and bending stresses of continuous engaged helical gear drives. Adv Mech Eng2015; 7: 1687814015588660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015588660
7.
ZhouCNingLWangH, et al. Effects of centring error and angular misalignment on crack initiation life in herringbone gears. Eng Fail Anal2021; 120: 105082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105082
LuZReitschusterSTobieT, et al. Contact fatigue life prediction of PEEK gears based on CTAB-GAN data augmentation. Eng Fract Mech2024; 312: 110639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110639
10.
DengHKongJLiuJ, et al. Fatigue reliability analysis methodology based on fatigue life and failure mechanism for carburized gear. Eng Fail Anal2025; 167: 108950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108950
11.
WangC. A study into the impact of tooth root transition curve morphology on the bending fatigue life of gears. Int J Fatigue2025; 190: 108643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108643
12.
WangHFengSYinL, et al. A calculation method of gear tooth surface wear considering the center distance error. Wear2025; 570: 206006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2025.206006
13.
KalayOCDoğanOYuceC, et al. Effects of tooth root cracks on vibration and dynamic transmission error responses of asymmetric gears: a comparative study. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2024; 52: 2569–2604. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2023.2186892
14.
ImDChungW-JLeeH, et al. Analysis of gear transmission error in helical gear using enhanced tooth contact analysis model considering measured tooth profile errors. Sci Rep2025; 15: 5981. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90010-6
HanHMaHTianH, et al. Sideband analysis of cracked planetary gear train considering output shaft radial assembly error. Mech Syst Signal Process2023; 200: 110618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110618
17.
ZhaoZYangYMaH, et al. Meshing characteristics of spur gear pairs with tooth modification under different assembly errors and sensitivity analysis for impact factors. J Mech Sci Technol2023; 37: 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-1215-2
18.
HjelmRHanssonHAhadiA, et al. Influence of manufacturing error tolerances on contact pressure in gears. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2020; 235: 5173–5185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406220976715
19.
WangYLiGTaoY, et al. Loaded tooth contact analysis for helical gears with surface waviness error. Mech Syst Signal Process2025; 224: 112045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112045
WangQZhangY. A model for analyzing stiffness and stress in a helical gear pair with tooth profile errors. J Vib Control2017; 23: 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546315576828
22.
YangHShiWChenZ, et al. An improved analytical method for mesh stiffness calculation of helical gear pair considering time-varying backlash. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 170: 108882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108882
23.
LinTHeZ. Analytical method for coupled transmission error of helical gear system with machining errors, assembly errors and tooth modifications. Mech Syst Signal Process2017; 91: 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.01.005
24.
WangC. Three-dimensional modification for vibration reduction and uniform load distribution focused on unique transmission characteristics of herringbone gear pairs. Mech Syst Signal Process2024; 210: 111153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111153
25.
LiS. Effects of machining errors, assembly errors and tooth modifications on loading capacity, load-sharing ratio and transmission error of a pair of spur gears. Mech Mach Theory2007; 42: 698–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.06.002
26.
DuanLWangLDuW, et al. Analytical method for time-varying meshing stiffness and dynamic responses of modified spur gears considering pitch deviation and geometric eccentricity. Mech Syst Signal Process2024; 218: 111590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111590
27.
LeeCLinHHOswaldFB, et al. Influence of linear profile modification and loading conditions on the dynamic tooth load and stress of high-contact-ratio spur gears. J Mech Des1991; 113: 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2912807
28.
Diez-IbarbiaAFernandez-del-RinconAde-JuanA, et al. Frictional power losses on spur gears with tip reliefs. The load sharing role. Mech Mach Theory2017; 112: 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.02.012
29.
MaperAKaruppananSPatilSS. Analysis and formulation of spur gear stresses with different tip modifications. J Cent South Univ2019; 26: 2368–2378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-019-4180-x
30.
RamaTGnanasekarN. Investigation of the effect of load distribution along the face width and load sharing between the pairs in contact on the fracture parameters of the spur gear tooth with root crack. Eng Fail Anal2019; 97: 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.051
31.
SánchezMBPleguezuelosMPedreroJI. Calculation of tooth bending strength and surface durability of internal spur gear drives. Mech Mach Theory2016; 95: 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.09.001
32.
PedreroJISánchezMBPleguezuelosM, et al. Analysis of the tooth-root stress of external spur gears with high effective contact ratio. Mech Mach Theory2024; 203: 105813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105813
33.
LiWZhaiPTianJ, et al. Thermal analysis of helical gear transmission system considering machining and installation error. Int J Mech Sci2018; 149: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.036
YangYZhangJZhangZ, et al. Time-domain extrapolation of vehicle durability load spectrum based on load decomposition and POT model threshold preference. Mech Syst Signal Process2025; 224: 112043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112043
37.
YanY. Load characteristic analysis and fatigue reliability prediction of wind turbine gear transmission system. Int J Fatigue2020; 130: 105259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105259
38.
BejarFPerret-LiaudetJBareilleO, et al. Review and benchmarking study of different gear contact analysis software in terms of the static transmission error response. Results Eng2024; 22: 102286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102286
39.
PedreroJISánchez-EspigaJSánchezMB, et al. Simulation and validation of the transmission error, meshing stiffness, and load sharing of planetary spur gear transmissions. Mech Mach Theory2024; 203: 105800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105800
40.
AutieroMPaoliGCirelliM, et al. The effect of different profile modifications on the static and dynamic transmission error of spur gears. Mech Mach Theory2024; 201: 105752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105752
41.
GuilbertBVelexP. Investigations on mesh stiffness functions in three-dimensional spur and helical gear models. Definitions and numerical simulations. Mech Mach Theory2024; 203: 105823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105823
42.
ZhangTLinTWeiJ. Theoretical investigation and experimental validation of dynamic excitations and vibration characteristics in double-helical planetary gear transmission systems with journal bearings. Mech Syst Signal Process2025; 234: 112801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112801
LiXShaoWTangJ, et al. Multi-physics field coupling interface lubrication contact analysis for gear transmission under various finishing processes. Eng Fail Anal2024; 165: 108742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108742
45.
Morales-EspejelGEWainwrightBKadiricA. Application of a contact fatigue life model to assess the relative risk of surface versus subsurface initiated fatigue in gears. Wear2025; 578–579: 206216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2025.206216
