Performance analysis of MISD suspension with conical pendulum displacement-dependent mem-inerter

Abstract

This study investigates the equivalence relationship between mem-inerters and semi-active inerters while assessing the performance of suspension systems with mechanical conical pendulum mem-inerters. Two mem-inerters with displacement-dependent relationships (positive and negative correlation) are developed, enabling the suspension system to autonomously adapt to varying loads without relying on sensors, controllers, or external power. The memory characteristics of the mem-inerters are confirmed through algebraic analyses and pinched hysteresis loops. To further investigate the suspension performance with the displacement-dependent mem-inerter, the MISD (Mem-Inerter-Spring-Damper) suspension model is established. According to the equivalent inertance theorem, the proposed mem-inerters can replicate the behavior of semi-active inertance control strategies. Subsequently, we demonstrated the functional equivalence between semi-active inerters and mem-inerters with inertance-displacement relationships through frequency-domain characteristic analyses. Numerical simulation tests compared the performance of the MISD against conventional passive system. Simulation results show that the positive correlation mem-inerter reduces body acceleration RMS values by 10.02% (no load), 11.55% (quarter load), 13.29% (half load), and 15.84% (full load) compared to the passive suspensions. These reductions consistently surpass those of the negative correlation mem-inerter. Furthermore, HiL (Hardware-in-the-Loop) test was conducted to analyze equivalent semi-active suspension performance. The effectiveness of the MISD suspension in vibration mitigation is verified by the fact that the suspension with the equivalent semi-active inerter has a smoother and higher ride quality than the passive one. This study improves passive suspension performance through direct substitution of linear inerters with conical pendulum mem-inerters, offering a passive yet adaptive suspension solution for practical automotive applications.

Keywords

mem-inerter displacement-dependent working mechanism suspension ride comfort HiL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Drexler

Hou

. Simulation analysis on vertical vehicle dynamics of three in-wheel motor drive configurations. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng 2024; 238(8): 2105–2119.

Deastra

Wagg

Sims

, et al. Experimental shake table validation of damping behaviour in inerter-based dampers. Bull Earthq Eng 2023; 21(3): 1389–1409.

Hamersma

Els

. Vehicle suspension force and road profile prediction on undulating roads. Veh Syst Dyn 2021; 59(10): 1616–1642.

Yuexia

Long

Ruochen

, et al. Modeling and test on height adjustment system of electrically-controlled air suspension for agricultural vehicles. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2016; 9(2): 40–47.

Liu

Yan

Shen

, et al. Model predictive control system based on direct yaw moment control for 4WID self-steering agriculture vehicle. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2021; 14(2): 175–181.

Zhang

Xue

Chen

, et al. Development of a low-cost quadrotor UAV based on ADRC for agricultural remote sensing. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2019; 12(4): 82–87.

Deng

Sun

Christie

, et al. Investigation of a seat suspension installed with compact variable stiffness and damping rotary magnetorheological dampers. Mech Syst Signal Process 2022; 171: 108802.

Steišūnas

Vaičiūnas

. Study on the vertical dynamics of a passenger car with independently rotating wheelsets. In: International Conference TRANSBALTICA: Transportation Science and Technology, 2022, pp. 101–109.

Cui

Mao

Xue

, et al. Design optimization and test for a pendulum suspension of the crop sprayer boom in dynamic conditions based on a six DoF motion simulator. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2018; 11(3): 76–85.

10.

Clare

, et al. A configuration-optimisation method for passive-active-combined suspension design. Int J Mech Sci 2023; 258: 108560.

11.

Pan

Luo

. Active disturbance rejection control of voice coil motor active suspension based on displacement feedback. Actuators 2022; 11: 351.

12.

Cui

Xue

, et al. Design and experiment of electro hydraulic active suspension for controlling the rolling motion of spray boom. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2019; 12(4): 72–81.

13.

Zhao

Zhou

. Comfort improvement of a novel nonlinear suspension for a seat system based on field measurements. J Mech Eng Vestn 2017; 63(2): 129–137.

14.

Yin

Ding

Qiu

. Nonlinear dynamic modelling of a suspension seat for predicting the vertical seat transmissibility. Math Probl Eng 2021; 2021(1): 1–10.

15.

Meng

Shi

. Random response analysis of nonlinear structures with inerter system. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2023; 164: 107565.

16.

Smith

. Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 2002; 47(10): 1648–1662.

17.

Chen

Papageorgiou

Scheibe

, et al. The missing mechanical circuit element. IEEE Circuits Syst Mag 2009; 9(1): 10–26.

18.

Wagg

. A review of the mechanical inerter: historical context, physical realizations and nonlinear applications. Nonlinear Dyn 2021; 104(1): 13–34.

19.

Wang

Hsu

, et al. Screw type inerter mechanism. US, US2009108510A1. 2009.

20.

Papageorgiou

Smith

. Laboratory experimental testing of inerters. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE conference on decision and control, 2005, pp. 3351–3356.

21.

Wang

Lin

. Hydraulic inerter mechanism. US, US2009139225A1. 2009.

22.

Shang

, et al. Dynamic modeling and damping performance improvement of two stage ISD suspension system. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng 2022; 236(10-11): 2259–2271.

23.

, et al. Optimization and vibration response analysis of vehicle suspension structure with inerter. Shock Vib 2025; 2025(1): 5689716.

24.

Zhao

, et al. Optimization design and vibration reduction performance analysis of vehicle suspension structure. J Vib Control 2026; 32: 1572–1581.

25.

Chen

MZQ

, et al. Semi-active suspension with semi-active inerter and semi-active damper. IFAC Proc Volumes 2014; 47(3): 11225–11230.

26.

Lazarek

Brzeski

Perlikowski

. Design and identification of parameters of tuned mass damper with inerter which enables changes of inertance. Mech Mach Theory 2018; 119: 161–173.

27.

Lazarek

Brzeski

Perlikowski

. Design and modeling of the cvt for adjustable inerter. J Franklin Inst 2019; 356(14): 7611–7625.

28.

Zhang

Gao

Nie

. The mem-inerter: a new mechanical element with memory. Adv Mech Eng 2018; 10(6): 1687814018778428.

29.

Wang

. A triangular periodic table of elementary circuit elements. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap 2013; 60(3): 616–623.

30.

Zhang

Geng

Nie

, et al. The missing mem-inerter and extended mem-dashpot found. Nonlinear Dyn 2020; 101: 835–856.

31.

Chua

. Everything you wish to know about memristors but are afraid to ask. Handbook Memristor Netw 2019: 89–157.

32.

Pei

Gay-Balmaz

Luscher

, et al. Connecting mem-models with classical theories. Nonlinear Dyn 2021; 103(2): 1321–1344.

33.

Chua

. Nonlinear circuit foundations for nanodevices, part I: the four-element torus. Proc IEEE 2003; 9(11): 1830–1859.

34.

Zhang

Zhu

Nie

, et al. Mem-inerter: a passive nonlinear element equivalent to the semi-active inerter performing initial-displacement-dependent inertance control strategy. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2021; 43: 1–14.