At present there are no validated numerical models of the frangible bones used in the Motorcyclist Anthropometric Test Device (MATD). This shortcoming limits the research on leg protectors. The purpose of the work was to build and validate FE models of femur and tibia frangible bones of the MATD, as defined in ISO13232. The bones were modelled using data from the ISO13232 and from observation of the components used in a full scale crash test conducted at IDIADA within the framework of the PIONEERS project. Their final design was identified with a design of experiments approach and validated against the requirements of ISO standard with the prescribed quasi-static and dynamic mechanical tests. The models were further assessed with a numerical–experimental comparison using the data of the full-scale crash test. The validated models enable the replacement of Hybrid III dummy bones and provide a reliable tool for improving the evaluation of lower-limb injuries in motorcycle crashes.
HurtHHOuelletJVThomDR. Motorcycle accident cause factors and identification of countermeasures: appendix, vol. 2. The Administration, 1981.
7.
RizziM.Towards a safe system approach to prevent health loss among motorcyclists: the importance of motorcycle stability as a condition for integrated safety. PhD Thesis, Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola, Sweden, 2016.
8.
SeinigerPSchröterKGailJ.Perspectives for motorcycle stability control systems. Accid Anal Prev2012; 44(1): 74–81.
9.
WatsonPM. Features of the experimental safety motorcycle—ESMI. In: The seventh international technical conference on experimental safety vehicles, Paris, June 1979.
10.
HirschAEBothwellP.Air bag crash protection for motorcycle application. Mech Eng1974; 96(2): 70.
11.
FinnisMP.Air bags and motorcycles: are they compatible? (no. 900744). SAE Technical Paper, 1940.
12.
Happian-SmithJChinnBP.Simulation of airbag restraint systems in forward impacts of motorcycles (no. 900752). SAE Technical Paper, 1990.
13.
NieboerJJGoudswaardAPWismansJ, et al. Computer simulation of motorcycle airbag systems. In: Proceedings: international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, 1993, pp. 268–273.
14.
ChinnBPOkelloJAMcDonoughPJ, et al. Development and testing of a purpose built motorcycle airbag restraint system. In: International technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles (no. DOT HS 808 465), Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 15 October 1996.
15.
IijimaS. Exploratory study of an airbag concept for a large touring motorcycle. In: 16th International technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, 1998.
16.
YamazakiTIijimaSYamamotoT.Exploratory study of an airbag concept for a large touring motorcycle: further research (no. 2001-06-0100). SAE Technical Paper, 2001.
17.
ElliottMABaughanCJBroughtonJ, et al. Motorcycle safety: a scoping study, 2003.
18.
BergFAKönigJRückerP. Profit and protection of the airbag to enhance the passive safety of motorcycles. In: FISITA world automotive congress F, vol. 20042328, 2004.
19.
MukherjeeSChawlaAJangraJ. Studies for motorcycle airbags. In: International conference on the biomechanics of impact, 2005.
20.
KuroeTNamikiHIijimaS. Exploratory study of an airbag concept for a large touring motorcycle: further research second report. In: 19th International technical conference on the enhanced safety vehicles, June 2005.
21.
KanbeSDeguchiMHannyaY. Basic research for a new airbag system for motorcycle. In: Proceedings of the 20th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, June 2007, pp. 07-0095.
22.
ChinnBPMacaulayMA. Leg protection for motorcycles. In: Proceedings of the international IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impacts, Delft, 1984.
23.
ChinnBPHopesPMacaulayMA.Leg protection for riders of motorcycles (no. 856121). SAE Technical Paper, 1985.
24.
ChinnBPMacaulayMA. Leg protection for motorcyclists. In: Proceedings of the international research council on the biomechanics of injury conference, 1984, vol. 12, pp. 265–278.
25.
ChinnBPHopesPDFinnisMP. Leg protection and its effect on motorcycle rider trajectory. In: Proceedings of the 12th ESV conference, May 1989, pp. 1287–1297.
26.
SpornerALangwiederKPolaukeJ.Passive safety for motorcyclists—from the legprotector to the airbag. SAE Technical Paper, 1990, pp. 1064–1073.
27.
International Motorcycle Manufacturers Association. Leg protectors: do they work?. In: International seminar on leg protectors, Chantilly, France, 1992.
28.
RogersNMZellnerJW. An overall evaluation of UKDS motorcyclist leg protectors based on IS0 13232. In: Proceedings of the 16th ESV conference, 1998, pp. 2247–2259.
29.
PallacciTBaldanziniNBarbaniD, et al. Preliminary effectiveness assessment of an airbag-based device for riders’ leg protection in side impacts. Procedia Struct Integr2019; 24: 240–250.
30.
BracaliABarbaniDPieriniM.Design of an after-market lower limb protector for scooters: preliminary estimation of effectiveness. Procedia Struct Integr2019; 24: 448–454.
31.
International Standard of Organization. ISO13232:2005—motorcycle—test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to motorcycles. International Standard of Organization, 2005.
32.
U.S. Federal Register. Anthropomorphic test dummies, subpart E—Hybrid III test dummy, 49 CFR Part 572. U.S. Federal Register, 1993.
33.
WithnallCShewchenkoNWileyKD, et al. An improved dummy neck for the ISO 13232 motorcycle anthropometric test dummy. In: Proceedings of the 18th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, May 2003. https://trid.trb.org/View/750780
34.
ChawlaAMukherjeeSMohanD.A methodology for car–motorcycle crash simulation. JARI Res J2001; 23(2): 98–101.
35.
MukherjeeSChawlaAMohanD, et al. Motorcycle–car side impact simulation. In: Proc. IRCOBI, Isle of Man, UK, 2001.
36.
DeguchiM. Modeling of a motorcycle for collision simulation. In: Proceedings: international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, 2003, p. 7. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
37.
ChawlaAMukherjeeSMohanD, et al. FE simulations of motorcycle–car frontal crashes, validations and observations. Int J Crashworthiness2005; 10(4): 319–326.
38.
DeguchiM. Simulation of motorcycle–car collision. In: 19th International technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, June 2005, pp. 6–9.
39.
BarbaniDBaldanziniNPieriniM.Development and validation of an FE model for motorcycle–car crash test simulations. Int J Crashworthiness2014; 19(3): 244–263.
40.
CarrollJBeenBBurleighM. A novel powered two-wheeler rider dummy; specifications and initial testing. In: 27th International technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV; no. 23-0132), 2023. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
41.
PradhanVRamachandraRStammenJ, et al. Biofidelity assessment of the GHBMC M50-O seated in a Honda Accord seat in a rear-facing configuration during a high-speed frontal impact. SAE Int J Transp Saf2024; 12: 87–94.
42.
CarrollJBolteJIV. The powered two-wheeler crash test dummy behaviour compared with PMHS reference responses in one full-scale motorcycle-to-car collision. In: Conference proceedings: international research council on the biomechanics of injury, IRCOBI, 2024, pp. 552–566.
43.
ZellnerJWWileyKDBroenNL, et al. A standardized motorcyclist impact dummy for protective device research. In: Proceedings: international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, 1996. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
44.
GrassiABarbaniDBaldanziniN, et al. Belted safety jacket: a new concept in powered two-wheeler passive safety. Procedia Struct Integr2018; 8: 573–593.
45.
GrassiABaldanziniNBarbaniD, et al. A comparative analysis of MAIDS and ISO13232 databases for the identification of the most representative impact scenarios for powered 2-wheelers in Europe. Traffic Inj Prev2018; 19(7): 766–772.
46.
LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual, R11.0.
47.
HallquistJO.LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006.
48.
MontgomeryDC.Design and analysis for experiments. 8th ed.John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013.
49.
BhalsodDKrebsJ.Advanced European movable deformable barrier. In: LSTC documentation, 25September2012.
