A robust suspension-control strategy is presented for electric vehicles equipped with in-wheel motors and dynamic vibration absorbers (DVAs). A quarter-car model incorporating an in-wheel motor and an adjustable DVA is developed to mitigate excess unsprung mass. A finite-horizon stochastic linear quadratic regulator (FHS-LQR) that explicitly accounts for control delays and parameter uncertainties is coupled with an NSGA-II multi-objective optimizer to tune both DVA mechanics and controller weights. Compared with passive and conventional LQR baselines, the proposed framework reduces the root-mean-square values of sprung-mass acceleration, suspension deflection, tire dynamic load, and motor dynamic force by up to 40% under ISO 8608 road profiles and maintains performance for input delays up to 100 ms, demonstrating real-time feasibility and improved ride comfort.
DeepakKFrikhaMABenômarY, et al. In-wheel motor drive systems for electric vehicles: state of the art, challenges, and future trends. Energies2023; 16(7): 3121.
2.
MerahAHartaniKYazidNEH, et al. New integrated full vehicle suspension system for improvements in vehicle ride comfort and road holding. SAE Int J Veh Dyn Stab NVH2022; 6: 267–281.
3.
YazidNEHChikoucheTMHartaniK, et al. Advanced vertical and lateral coupling dynamics control for a four in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle. Period Polytech Electr Eng Comput Sci2023; 67(1): 21–39.
4.
ChenXKongAWangW.In-wheel drive system design with dynamic vibration absorption based on the adaptive transmission mechanism. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automob Eng2024; 238(9): 2685–2695.
5.
ZhaoPFanZ.Optimisation of electric vehicle with the in-wheel motor as a dynamic vibration absorber considering ride comfort and motor vibration based on particle swarm algorithm. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K: J Multi-body Dyn2023; 237(1): 49–59.
6.
QinYWangZYuanK, et al. Comprehensive analysis and optimization of dynamic vibration-absorbing structures for electric vehicles driven by in-wheel motors. Automot Innov2019; 2: 254–262.
7.
LewisFLVrabieDSyrmosVL.Optimal control. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
8.
BoulaarasZAouicheAChafaaK.Optimal and robust control of active suspension system for a quarter car model. Aijr Abstr2024: 39–41.
9.
SolimanAM. Adaptive LQR control strategy for active suspension system. SAE technical paper 2011-01-0430, 2011.
10.
LuYZhenRLiuY, et al. Practical solution for attenuating industrial heavy vehicle vibration: a new gain-adaptive coordinated suspension control system. Control Eng Pract2025; 154: 106125.
11.
FallahMSBhatRXieW-F. H∞ robust control of active suspensions: a practical point of view. In: 2009 American control conference, St. Louis, MO, USA, 10–12 June 2009, pp. 1385–1390. New York: IEEE.
12.
ZouJZuoX.Active suspension LQR control based on modified differential evolutionary algorithm optimization. J Vibroeng2024; 26(5): 1150–1165.
13.
AbdelkareemMAEldalyABAliMKA, et al. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of vehicle suspension energy harvesting in frequency domain. J Adv Res2020; 24: 53–67.
14.
ListovPSchwarzJJonesCN.Stochastic optimal control for autonomous driving applications via polynomial chaos expansions. Optim Control Appl Methods2024; 45(1): 3–28.
15.
KimJLeeTKimC-J, et al. Model predictive control of a semi-active suspension with a shift delay compensation using preview road information. Control Eng Pract2023; 137: 105584.
16.
AliLMAl-ZughaibiAI.Investigation of control behavior via active suspension system considering time-delay and variable masses. J Eng2024; 30(11): 108–127.
17.
HeirungTANPaulsonJAO’LearyJ, et al. Stochastic model predictive control—how does it work?Comput Chem Eng2018; 114: 158–170.
18.
CamachoEFBordonsC.Model predictive control: classical, robust and stochastic. Springer International Publishing, 2016.
19.
KumarMGuriaC.The elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm with inheritance (i-NSGA-II) and its jumping gene adaptations for multi-objective optimization. Inf Sci2017; 382: 15–37.
20.
StornRPriceK.Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim1997; 11: 341–359.
21.
WangDTanDLiuL.Particle swarm optimization algorithm: an overview. Soft Comput2018; 22(2): 387–408.
22.
WuDWangSLiuQ, et al. An improved teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm with reinforcement learning strategy for solving optimization problems. Comput Intell Neurosci2022; 2022(1): 1535957.
23.
PrasadVPawaskarDNSeshuP.Hybrid GA for multi-objective design of heavy goods vehicle suspension system. Soft Comput2023; 27(15): 10719–10735.
24.
LiuMGuFHuangJ, et al. Integration design and optimization control of a dynamic vibration absorber for electric wheels with in-wheel motor. Energies2017; 10(12): 2069.
25.
ShaoXNaghdyFDuH, et al. Output feedback H∞ control for active suspension of in-wheel motor driven electric vehicle with control faults and input delay. ISA Trans2019; 92: 94–108.
26.
YeLLiCWangC, et al. A multi-objective optimization approach for battery thermal management system based on the combination of BP neural network prediction and NSGA-II algorithm. J Energy Storage2024; 99: 113212.
27.
LiHZhangLLiH. Modified NSGA-II based interactive algorithm for linear multiobjective bilevel programs. In: 2019 15th international conference on computational intelligence and security (CIS), Macao, China, 13–16 December 2019, pp. 406–410. New York: IEEE.
28.
XuHLiuJLuoT, et al. Model-based design of an active suspension for the improvement of in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle. IEEE Access2024; 12: 45597–45615.
29.
ZhaoDGongMZhaoD, et al. Active suspension and steering system control of emergency rescue vehicle based on sliding mode dual robust coordination control. Adv Mech Eng2024; 16(6): 16878132241259720.
30.
FuQWuJYuC, et al. Linear quadratic optimal control with the finite state for suspension system. Machines2023; 11(2): 127.
31.
NguyenDNNguyenTA.Evaluate the stability of the vehicle when using the active suspension system with a hydraulic actuator controlled by the OSMC algorithm. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 19364.
32.
DeshpandeVSBhaskaraMPhadkeS. Sliding mode control of active suspension systems using a disturbance observer. In: 2012 12th international workshop on variable structure systems, Mumbai, India, 12–14 January 2012, pp. 70–75. New York: IEEE.
33.
HaseenSFLakshmiP.Active suspension control using novel HB3C optimized LQR controller for vibration suppression and ride comfort enhancement. J Vib Control2025; 31(13–14): 2606–2623.
34.
LiuDXuJ.Stochastic optimal linear quadratic regulation control of discrete-time systems with delay and quadratic constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10795, 2024.
35.
MúčkaP.Simulated road profiles according to ISO 8608 in vibration analysis. J Test Eval2018; 46(1): 405–418.
36.
BasarganHMihályAGáspárP, et al. Road quality information based adaptive semi-active suspension control. Period Polytech Transp Eng2021; 49(3): 210–217.
