The variable-configuration wheel-track unmanned ground vehicle (VCWT-UGV) can adapt to complex environments with advantages of high maneuverability and strong passing ability. The analysis of steering dynamics characteristics is the theoretical basis to ensure UGVs can still maintain high maneuverability in different environments. This article proposes a universal steering dynamic modeling for UGVs and an efficient driving strategy suitable for VCWT-UGV, starting from requirements of analyzing steering dynamics characteristics. Firstly, based on the operation environments and the characteristics of the wheel-track composite locomotion mechanism (WTCLM), the normal balance during steady-state steering process on soft soil is established; Secondly, based on the model, the steering dynamics characteristics of traditional three axle-wheeled UGV and VCWT-UGV were compared; Then, the optimal driving strategy is designed combined with the analysis results based on the motion mode and driving configuration. Finally, the simulation and test results demonstrate the accuracy of the model and the feasibility of strategies. The combination of wheel-track and variable-configuration can significantly improve the lateral mobility. Under the premise of maintaining the same driving configuration, by adjusting the moving mode, the critical load for slip has been increased by 40%, the sinkage depth has been reduced by 33% and the traction has been increased by 16.8%. In addition, considering the steering path and time, without changing the differential input, the steering radius is increased or decreased by 16.7% by adjusting the driving configuration, and the corresponding steering time is also optimized. The research results provide valuable references for the general dynamic modeling methods of UGVs.
ArmanMEbrahimiSAlipourK.6AP wheel: a new transformable robotic wheel for traction force improvement and halting avoidance of a UGV on soft terrains. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2020; 6(4): 7965–7972.
2.
EbrahimiSMardaniA.Expanding scissor-based UGV for large obstacles climbing. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2019; 47(1): 20–36.
3.
TangYXuXZhangL, et al. Structure design and configuration optimization of the reconfigurable deformed tracked wheel based on terramechanics characteristics. J Intell Robot Syst2023; 108(1): 1–23.
4.
ZhangLJiangYChenG, et al. Heading control of variable configuration unmanned ground vehicle using PID-type sliding mode control and steering control based on particle swarm optimization. Nonlinear Dyn2023; 111(4): 3361–3378.
5.
RajamaniR.Vehicle dynamics and control. Springer Science, 2012.
6.
WangWHXuXJXuHJ, et al. Enhancing lateral dynamic performance of all-terrain vehicles using variable-wheelbase chassis. Adv Mech Eng2020; 12(5): 1–19.
7.
AlexandruC.A mechanical integral steering system for increasing the stability and handling of motor vehicles. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2017; 231(8): 1465–1480.
8.
ChenTXuXChenL, et al. Estimation of longitudinal force, lateral vehicle speed and yaw rate for four-wheel independent driven electric vehicles. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 101: 377–388.
9.
AhmedMEl-GindyMLangH.A novel adaptive-rear axles steering controller for an 8 × 8 combat vehicle. Proc IMechE Part C:J Mechanical Engineering Science2022; 236(2): 738–751.
10.
DogruSMarquesL.An improved kinematic model for skid-steered wheeled platforms. Auton Robots2021; 45(2): 229–243.
11.
HeCWuDChenK, et al. Analysis of the Mecanum wheel arrangement of an omnidirectional vehicle. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233(15): 5329–5340.
12.
HuangSCaoWQianR, et al. Front wheel angle tracking control research of intelligent heavy vehicle steering system. Proc IMechE Part C:J Mechanical Engineering Science2021; 235(17): 3454–3467.
13.
JeonSYChungRLeeD.Planned trajectory classification for wheeled mobile robots to prevent rollover and slip. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2023; 8(7): 4227–4234.
14.
WangWSongY.A new high dimension nonlinear dynamics simulation model for four-wheel-steering vehicle. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2013; 227(1): 29–37.
15.
SobrinoMGuzman, et al. Vehicle performance assessment using the OBD2 port and Artificial Neural Network. Eng Lett2022; 30(4): 1246–1252.
16.
WongJYChiangCF.A general theory for skid steering of tracked vehicles on firm ground. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Eng2001; 215(3): 343–355.
17.
TangSYuanSHuJ, et al. Modeling of steady-state performance of skid-steering for high-speed tracked vehicles. J Terramechanics2017; 73: 25–35.
18.
HouXMaYXiangC.Design and comparative study of steering controller for tracked vehicle based on disturbance observation. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Eng2024; 238(13): 4216–4229.
19.
ZouTAngelesJHassaniF.Dynamic modeling and trajectory tracking control of unmanned tracked vehicles. Robot Auton Syst2018; 110: 102–111.
20.
WallinMAboubakrAKJayakumarP, et al. A comparative study of joint formulations: application to multibody system tracked vehicles. Nonlinear Dyn2013; 74(3): 783–800.
21.
FangYZhangYShangY, et al. Center-point steering analysis of tracked omni-vehicles based on skid conditions. Mech Sci2021; 12(1): 511–527.
22.
HaoZJianjunSXiaoliH, et al. Mechanics modeling and kinetic analysis of sub marine tracked vehicle-cable salvage during steady-state steering. J Phys Conf Ser2019; 1267: 012061.
23.
ZhangYQiuMLiuX, et al. Research on characteristics of tracked vehicle steering on slope. Math Probl Eng2021; 2021: 1–18.
24.
DingZWangZSuZ, et al. A new model to predict the slippage coefficient of tracked vehicles during steering. IEEE Access2022; 10: 72006–72014.
25.
WongJY.Terramechanics and its applications to the evaluation of terrestrial and extraterrestrial vehicle mobility: theory into practice. Int J Veh Des2014; 65(4): 384–410.
26.
GuoTGuoJHuangB, et al. Power consumption of tracked and wheeled small mobile robots on deformable terrains–model and experimental validation. Mech Mach Theory2019; 133: 347–364.
27.
GaoHBGuoJLDingL, et al. Wheel slip-sinkage and its prediction model of lunar rover. J Central South Univ Technol2010; 17: 129–135.
28.
SenatoreCSanduC.Torque distribution influence on tractive efficiency and mobility of off-road wheeled vehicles. J Terramechanics2011; 48: 372–383.
29.
DuY.A SWI theory and numerical research on tractive performance of military vehicle under multi-operation conditions. National University of Defence Technology, 2017.
30.
WongJYGarberMPreston-ThomasJ.Theoretical prediction and experimental substantiation of the ground pressure distribution and tractive performance of tracked vehicles. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Eng1984; 198(4): 265–285.
31.
WongJYHuangW.Wheelsvs.Tracks”– a fundamental evaluation from the traction perspective. J Terramechanics2006; 43(1): 27–42.
32.
KimJTImDChoiHJ, et al. Multi-body dynamics modeling and driving performance evaluation of oil recovery vehicle. Proc IMechE Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2023; 237(1): 74–85.
33.
JinningZXiangCMaY.Steering resistance characteristics of multi axle hub motor driven vehicles. J Northeast Univ2016; 37(8): 1155–1160.
34.
PacejkaHB.Tyre and vehicle dynamics. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 2006.
35.
PengZNingG. 2 DOF Lateral dynamic model with force input of skid steering wheeled vehicle. In: 2014 IEEE conference and expo transportation electrification Asia-Pacific, 2014. Beijing: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ITEC-AP.2014.6941009.
36.
JinningZ.Research on speed difference steering and driving control of multi wheel drive vehicles. Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016.
37.
ChungYC.Granular stresses in granular flows subjected to different obstacles. Int J Mech Sci2023; 247: 108190.
38.
TianJTongJLuoS.Differential steering control of four-wheel independent-drive electric vehicles. Energies2018; 11(11): 1–18.
39.
XueyuanL.Research on speed difference steering dynamics of multi wheel drive vehicles. Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010.
40.
WongJY.Theory of ground vehicles. John Wiley Press, 2008.
41.
YangKGanLChenS.Research on the design and traction characteristics of a vehicle track shoe for sandy land. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2022; 236(11): 5826–5835.
42.
ZhangYProustGRetraintD, et al. Discrete element simulation of surface mechanical attrition treatment with rough-surface sonotrode. Int J Mech Sci2019; 161–162: 105060.
43.
LeszczyńskiJS.Sensitivity analysis of the dynamics of fine and ultrafine particles using DEM. Nonlinear Dyn2023; 111(3): 2591–2605.
44.
YangPZangMZengH, et al. The interactions between an off-road tire and granular terrain: GPU-based DEM-FEM simulation and experimental validation. Int J Mech Sci2020; 179: 105634.
45.
ZhuJZouMShenY, et al. 3D DEM-FEM simulation of the flexible metal wheel–soil interaction in low gravity environments. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2023; 237(6): 1267–1278.
46.
BhattacharyyaAAdhikariS.Propagation characteristics of an elastic bar coupled with a discrete snap-through element. Nonlinear Dyn2023; 111(4): 2961–2990.
47.
HuCGaoJDiaoJ, et al. Numerical simulation of tire steering on sandy soil based on discrete element method. AIP Adv2021; 11: 015015.
48.
ZhouLGaoJChengP, et al. Study on track–soil traction using discrete element method simulation and soil bin test. AIP Adv2020; 10: 075307.
