Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2025
A review of Link-level uncertainty in the perception–decision–control pipeline of connected and autonomous vehicles: Generation,evolution,propagation,and amplification
The Perception–Decision–Control (PDC) pipeline forms the core architecture enabling environmental perception, path planning, and trajectory execution in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs). Uncertainty, as a key factor limiting system reliability and safety, permeates all stages of this pipeline, continuously generation, evolution, propagation, and amplification along the pipeline. This paper focuses on Link-Level Uncertainty management and systematically reviews modeling and mitigation strategies for uncertainty in the PDC pipeline. First, this paper distinguishes between externally induced and internally modeled perception uncertainties. Then, this paper analyzes the evolution of upstream uncertainty within the decision-making module, highlighting modal conflicts and policy ambiguity in trajectory reasoning and intent inference. Subsequently, this paper investigates the downstream propagation of decision uncertainty into the control stage, leading to distorted execution signals and reduced stability. Finally, this paper summarizes mainstream mitigation strategies including perception confidence modeling, robust decision optimization, and fault-tolerant control execution. In contrast to traditional module-specific approaches, future research should emphasize system-level modeling of chain-wise uncertainty evolution, develop cross-layer collaborative representation and optimization mechanisms, and construct end-to-end risk-aware frameworks to ensure safe and robust CAV operation in complex, dynamic environments.
LotjensBEverettMHowJP.Safe reinforcement learning with model uncertainty estimates. In: 2019 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 2019. DOI: 10.1109/icra.2019.8793611.
2.
DahlJde CamposGROlssonC, et al. Collision avoidance: a literature review on threat-assessment techniques. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2019; 4: 101–113.
3.
ZhangXZhouMShaoW, et al. The architecture of the intended safety system for intelligent driving. In: 2022 IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS), 2019, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2019.8702580.
4.
WangKPuLDongW.Cross-domain adaptive object detection based on refined knowledge transfer and mined guidance in autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2024; 9: 1899–1908.
5.
KendallAGalY.What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. 2017; arXiv:1703.04977.
6.
CollierMMustafaBKokiopoulouE, et al. Correlated input-dependent label noise in large-scale image classification. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 2021. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00160.
7.
LiuJPaisleyJKioumourtzoglouMA, et al. Accurate uncertainty estimation and decomposition in ensemble learning. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst2019; 32: 3521–3533.
8.
QieTWangWYangC, et al. An improved model predictive control-based trajectory planning method for automated driving vehicles under uncertainty environments. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2023; 24: 3999–4015.
9.
YuYShanDBenderiusO, et al. Formally robust and safe trajectory planning and tracking for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 22971–22987.
10.
SinghASPNishiharaO. Trajectory tracking and integrated chassis control for obstacle avoidance with minimum jerk. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 4625–4641.
11.
ZhangRSunCNingM, et al. Quantifying learning algorithm uncertainties in autonomous driving systems: enhancing safety through polynomial chaos expansion and high definition maps. Accid Anal Prev2025; 211: 107903.
12.
LiYWuSWangH. Adaptive mining of failure scenarios for autonomous driving systems based on multi-population genetic algorithm. In: 2022 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV)2024; 2458–2464. DOI: 10.1109/iv55156.2024.10588541.
13.
ArunrajNSMandalSMaitiJ.Modeling uncertainty in risk assessment: an integrated approach with fuzzy set theory and monte carlo simulation. Accid Anal Prev2013; 55: 242–255.
14.
ChoiJOChunDKimH, et al. Gaussian yolov3: an accurate and fast object detector using localization uncertainty for autonomous driving. In: 2019 IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision (ICCV), 2019. DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00059.
15.
PostelsJFerroniFCoskunH, et al. Sampling-free epistemic uncertainty estimation using approximated variance propagation. 2021 IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision (ICCV), 2019, pp. 2931–2940. DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00302.
16.
PengLLiBYuW, et al. Sotif entropy: online sotif risk quantification and mitigation for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2024; 25: 1530–1546.
17.
LakshminarayananBPritzelABlundellC.Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. 2016; arXiv:1612.01474.
OksuzKJoyTDokaniaPK.Towards building self-aware object detectors via reliable uncertainty quantification and calibration. In: 2022 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 2023, vol. 34, pp. 9263–9274. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00894.
20.
ZangSDingMSmithD, et al. The impact of adverse weather conditions on autonomous vehicles: how rain, snow, fog, and hail affect the performance of a self-driving car. IEEE Vehicular Technol Mag2019; 14: 103–111.
21.
ZhangYCarballoAYangH, et al. Perception and sensing for autonomous vehicles under adverse weather conditions: a survey. J Photogramm Remote Sens2023; 196: 146–177.
22.
TaoTWeiX.Stbna-yolov5: an improved yolov5 network for weed detection in rapeseed field. Agriculture2024; 15: 22.
23.
NiuYHanWZhangH, et al. Estimating maize plant height using a crop surface model constructed from uav rgb images. Biosyst Eng2024; 241: 56–67.
24.
LianYChenJGuanZ, et al. Development of a monitoring system for grain loss of paddy rice based on a decision tree algorithm. Int J Agric Biol Eng2021; 14: 224–229.
25.
LuPZhengWLvX, et al. An extended method based on the geometric position of salient image features: solving the dataset imbalance problem in greenhouse tomato growing scenarios. Agriculture2024; 14: 1893.
26.
AwaisMLiWHussainS, et al. Comparative evaluation of land surface temperature images from unmanned aerial vehicle and satellite observation for agricultural areas using in situ data. Agriculture2022; 12: 184.
27.
PengYZhaoSLiuJ.Fused deep features-based grape varieties identification using support vector machine. Agriculture2021; 11: 869.
28.
RenYHuangXAhetoJH, et al. Application of volatile and spectral profiling together with multimode data fusion strategy for the discrimination of preserved eggs. Food Chem2021; 343: 128515.
29.
FengDRosenbaumLTimmF, et al. Leveraging heteroscedastic aleatoric uncertainties for robust real-time lidar 3d object detection. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2019. DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2019.8814046.
30.
HuangXPanSSunZ, et al. Evaluating quality of tomato during storage using fusion information of computer vision and electronic nose. J Food Process Eng2018; 41. DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12832.
31.
ElsherbinyOGaoJMaM, et al. Advancing lettuce physiological state recognition in iot aeroponic systems: a meta-learning-driven data fusion approach. Eur J Agron2024; 161: 127387.
32.
ZhangZLuYYangM, et al. Optimal training strategy for high-performance detection model of multi-cultivar tea shoots based on deep learning methods. Sci Hortic2024; 328: 112949.
33.
AzevedoTJongDMattinaM, et al. Stochastic-yolo: efficient probabilistic object detection under dataset shifts. 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02967
34.
ZhuHWangDWeiY, et al. Combining transfer learning and ensemble algorithms for improved citrus leaf disease classification. Agriculture2024; 14: 1549.
35.
ChengJSunJYaoK, et al. A decision fusion method based on hyperspectral imaging and electronic nose techniques for moisture content prediction in frozen-thawed pork. LWT2022; 165: 113778.
36.
RezaeeKYadmellatPChamorroS. Motion planning for autonomous vehicles in the presence of uncertainty using reinforcement learning. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 2021, pp. 3506–3511. DOI: 10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636480.
37.
ChoiSLeeKJLimSB, et al. Uncertainty-aware learning from demonstration using mixture density networks with sampling-free variance modeling. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 2018. DOI: 10.1109/icra.2018.8462978.
38.
LiuJAbbasINoorRS.Development of deep learning-based variable rate agrochemical spraying system for targeted weeds control in strawberry crop. Agronomy2021; 11: 1480.
39.
UlsoyAG.Velocity occupancy space: autonomous navigation in an uncertain, dynamic environment. Int. J. Veh. Auton. Syst. 2012; 10: 41–66.
40.
ZhangZLuYZhaoY, et al. Ts-yolo: an all-day and lightweight tea canopy shoots detection model. Agronomy2023; 13: 1411.
41.
DingYLiuJXiongJ, et al. Revisiting the evaluation of uncertainty estimation and its application to explore model complexity-uncertainty trade-off. In: 2022 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (CVPRW), 2020, pp. 22–31. DOI: 10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00010.
42.
TianXZhangJXiangM, et al. Modeling the distributional uncertainty for salient object detection models. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 2023, vol. 34, pp. 19660–19670. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01883.
43.
BisRPengHUlsoyG.Velocity occupancy space: Robot navigation and moving obstacle avoidance with sensor uncertainty. In: ASME 2009 dynamic systems and control conference, 2009, pp. 363–370. DOI: 10.1115/dscc2009-2570.
44.
WerlingMZieglerJKammelS, et al. Optimal trajectory generation for dynamic street scenarios in a frenét frame. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/robot.2010.5509799.
45.
LiuJWangHPengL, et al. Pnnuad: perception neural networks uncertainty aware decision-making for autonomous vehicle. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 24355–24368.
46.
ReisJXieWCabecinhasD, et al. Nonlinear backstepping controller for an underactuated asv with model parametric uncertainty: design and experimental validation. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2023; 8: 2514–2526.
GuoYGaoJTunioMH, et al. Study on the identification of mildew disease of cuttings at the base of mulberry cuttings by aeroponics rapid propagation based on a bp neural network. Agronomy2022; 13: 106.
49.
YangFZhaiQLiX, et al. Uncertainty-guided transformer reasoning for camouflaged object detection. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision (ICCV), 2021. DOI: 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00411.
50.
BlumHSarlinPENietoJJ, et al. Fishyscapes: a benchmark for safe semantic segmentation in autonomous driving. In: International conference on computer vision, 2019. DOI:10.1109/iccvw.2019.00294.
51.
LiGLiZKnoopV, et al. Uqnet: quantifying uncertainty in trajectory prediction by a non-parametric and generalizable approach. SSRN Electron J2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4241523.
52.
MillerDDayoubFMilfordM, et al. Evaluating merging strategies for sampling-based uncertainty techniques in object detection. In: 2019 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 2019. DOI: 10.1109/icra.2019.8793821.
53.
CaiMKezierbiekeJZhongX, et al. Uncertainty-aware and class-balanced domain adaptation for object detection in driving scenes. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2024; 25: 15977–15990.
54.
FengDRosenbaumLDietmayerK. Towards safe autonomous driving: capture uncertainty in the deep neural network for lidar 3d vehicle detection. In: 2018 21st international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), 2018. DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2018.8569814.
55.
MaZYangSLiJ, et al. Research on slam localization algorithm for orchard dynamic vision based on yolod-slam2. Agriculture2024; 14: 1622. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/9/1622
56.
YuWLiJPengLM, et al. Sotif risk mitigation based on unified odd monitoring for autonomous vehicles. J Intell Connect Veh2022; 5: 157–166.
57.
WangJAdcockPWChiuWK.Novel methods to determine hydrothermal residual stresses in fiber-reinforced polymer composite. Acad Mater Sci2024; 1. DOI: 10.20935/AcadMatSci7429.
58.
GuoZChenHXuF, et al. Uncertainty-aware safe trajectory planner based on model predictive control for autonomous driving. In: IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2025, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1109/tits.2025.3554836.
59.
JeongDChoiSB.Tube-based robust model predictive control for tracking control of autonomous articulated vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2024; 9: 2184–2196.
60.
HuKChengK.Robust tube-based model predictive control for autonomous vehicle path tracking. IEEE Access2022; 10: 134389–134403.
61.
WuXWeiCTianH, et al. Fault-tolerant control for path-following of independently actuated autonomous vehicles using tube-based model predictive control. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 20282–20297.
62.
NairSHLeeHJoaE, et al. Predictive control for autonomous driving with uncertain, multimodal predictions. In: IEEE transactions on control systems technology, 2024, pp. 1–15. DOI:10.1109/tcst.2024.3451370.
63.
LiXLiuKEric TsengH, et al. Decision-making for autonomous vehicles with interaction-aware behavioral prediction and social-attention neural network. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2025; 33: 1285–1300.
64.
GuoXWangJLiaoF, et al. Distributed adaptive sliding mode control strategy for vehicle-following systems with nonlinear acceleration uncertainties. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2017; 66: 981–991.
65.
WangYWangCZhaoW, et al. Decision-making and planning method for autonomous vehicles based on motivation and risk assessment. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2021; 70: 107–120.
66.
LiangCXuXWangF, et al. Can-induced asynchronous random delays-considered mode transition system for dm-phev based on constrained output feedback robust control strategy. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2022; 71: 5995–6006.
67.
XieJXuXWangF, et al. Coordination control strategy for human-machine cooperative steering of intelligent vehicles: a reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 21163–21177.
68.
ZhouWCaoZDengN, et al. Identify, estimate and bound the uncertainty of reinforcement learning for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2023; 24: 7932–7942.
69.
LuEXueJChenT, et al. Robust trajectory tracking control of an autonomous tractor-trailer considering model parameter uncertainties and disturbances. Agriculture2023; 13: 869.
70.
TangXYangKWangH, et al. Driving environment uncertainty-aware motion planning for autonomous vehicles. Chin J Mech Eng2022; 35: 35.
71.
HernandezBATroddenPAAndersonSR.Fast tube model predictive control for driverless cars using linear data-driven models. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2023; 31: 1395–1410.
72.
PanHLuoMWangJ, et al. A safe motion planning and reliable control framework for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2024; 9: 4780–4793.
73.
LuYLiGYueY, et al. Fault detection and data-driven optimal adaptive fault-tolerant control for autonomous driving using learning-based smpc. In: IEEE transactions on intelligent vehicles, 2024, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1109/tiv.2024.3385755.
74.
TrauthRMollerKBetzJ.Toward safer autonomous vehicles: occlusion-aware trajectory planning to minimize risky behavior. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems2023; 4: 929–942.
75.
CuiBCuiXWeiX, et al. Design and testing of a tractor automatic navigation system based on dynamic path search and a fuzzy stanley model. Agriculture2024; 14: 2136.
76.
LiuYPeiXZhouH, et al. Spatiotemporal trajectory planning for autonomous vehicle based on reachable set and iterative lqr. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2024; 73: 10932–10947.
77.
YangZHuangJYinH, et al. Path tracking control for underactuated vehicles with matched-mismatched uncertainties: an uncertainty decomposition based constraint-following approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 12894–12907.
78.
MouhagirHTaljRCherfaouiV, et al. Evidential-based approach for trajectory planning with tentacles, for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst2020; 21: 3485–3496.
79.
TangXYangKWangH, et al. Prediction-uncertainty-aware decision-making for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2022; 7: 849–862.
80.
BrudigamTLuzioFDPallottinoL, et al. Grid-based stochastic model predictive control for trajectory planning in uncertain environments. In: 2020 IEEE 23rd international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), 2020. DOI: 10.1109/itsc45102.2020.9294388.
81.
HouZLiuWKnollA.Safe reinforcement learning for autonomous driving by using disturbance-observer-based control barrier functions. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2025; 10: 3782–3791.
82.
XuSLiuQHuY, et al. Decision-making models on perceptual uncertainty with distributional reinforcement learning. Green Energy Intell Transport2023; 2: 100062.
83.
ChenYYuZHanZ, et al. A decision-making system for cotton irrigation based on reinforcement learning strategy. Agronomy2023; 14: 11.
84.
HoelCJWolffKLaineL.Ensemble quantile networks: Uncertainty-aware reinforcement learning with applications in autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2023; 24: 6030–6041.
85.
ChenYLinMYuZ, et al. Enhancing cotton irrigation with distributional actor–critic reinforcement learning. Agric Water Manag2025; 307: 109194.
86.
XieFGuoZLiT, et al. Dynamic task planning for multi-arm harvesting robots under multiple constraints using deep reinforcement learning. Horticulturae2025; 11: 88.
87.
LiDLiuBHuangZ, et al. Safe motion planning for autonomous vehicles by quantifying uncertainties of deep learning-enabled environment perception. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2024; 9: 2318–2332.
88.
CaoCLiFDingR, et al. Intelligent attitude control for morphing flight vehicle: a deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2025; 74: 8851–8865.
89.
AbbaspourAYenKKForouzannezhadP, et al. A neural adaptive approach for active fault-tolerant control design in uav. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2020; 50: 3401–3411.
90.
AminAAHasanKM.A review of fault tolerant control systems: advancements and applications. Measurement2019; 143: 58–68.
91.
CuiLMaoHXueX, et al. Design optimization and test for a pendulum suspension of the crop sprayer boom in dynamic conditions based on a six dof motion simulator. Int J Agric Biol Eng2018; 11: 76–85.
92.
ZhangFTengSWangY, et al. Design of bionic goat quadruped robot mechanism and walking gait planning. Int J Agric Biol Eng2020; 13: 32–39.
ChengSLiLLiuCZ, et al. Robust lmi-based h-infinite controller integrating afs and dyc of autonomous vehicles with parametric uncertainties. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2021; 51: 6901–6910.
95.
OkKAnsariSGallagherB, et al. Path planning with uncertainty: Voronoi uncertainty fields. In: SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology), 2013, pp. 4596–4601. DOI: 10.1109/icra.2013.6631230.
96.
KhasawnehLDasM.Adaptive steering angle controller for autonomous vehicles in the presence of parameter uncertainty and disturbances. Int J Autom Technol2022; 23: 1313–1321.
97.
KibalovVShipitkoO. Safe speed control and collision probability estimation under ego-pose uncertainty for autonomous vehicle. In: 2020 IEEE 23rd international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), 2020, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/itsc45102.2020.9294531.
98.
LiYChenXQuanL, et al. Loss rescaling by uncertainty inference for single-stage object detection. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), 2020, pp. 698–702. DOI: 10.1109/icip40778.2020.9190845.
99.
GaoZYuWYanJ.Neuroadaptive fault-tolerant control embedded with diversified activating functions with application to auto-driving vehicles under fading actuation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst2024; 35: 6255–6264.
100.
OleksiienkoIIosifidisA.Uncertainty-aware ab3dmot by variational 3d object detection. In: 2024 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), 2024, pp. 3389–3395. DOI: 10.1109/icip51287.2024.10647838.
101.
ZhangJXYangGH.Robust adaptive fault-tolerant control for a class of unknown nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2017; 64: 585–594.
102.
CaiGXuLZhuX, et al. Fuzzy adaptive event-triggered path tracking control for autonomous vehicles considering rollover prevention and parameter uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2024; 54: 4896–4907.
103.
KhaitanSLinQDolanJM.Safe planning and control under uncertainty for self-driving. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2021; 70: 9826–9837.
104.
ShiRHanXGuoW.Uncertain multi-objective programming approach for planning supplementary irrigation areas in rainfed agricultural regions. Irrigation Drainage2025; 74: 1193–1214.
105.
AbdarMPourpanahFHussainS, et al. A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: techniques, applications and challenges. Inf Fusion2021; 76: 243–297.
106.
LeeDJinSLeeC.Deep reinforcement learning of semi-active suspension controller for vehicle ride comfort. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2023; 72: 327–339.
107.
ZhangYGuoLGaoB, et al. Deterministic promotion reinforcement learning applied to longitudinal velocity control for automated vehicles. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2020; 69: 338–348.
108.
LefkopoulosVKamgarpourM.Trajectory planning under environmental uncertainty with finite-sample safety guarantees. Automatica2021; 131: 109754.
109.
LuEMaZLiY, et al. Adaptive backstepping control of tracked robot running trajectory based on real-time slip parameter estimation. Int J Agric Biol Eng2020; 13: 178–187.
110.
ChengYZhangYChuH, et al. Safety-critical control of 4wdev trajectory tracking via adaptive control barrier function. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2024; 10: 10361–10373.
111.
LongCQinXBianY, et al. Trajectory tracking control of rovs considering external disturbances and measurement noises using eskf-based mpc. Ocean Eng2021; 241: 109991.
112.
HubmannCSchulzJBeckerM, et al. Automated driving in uncertain environments: planning with interaction and uncertain maneuver prediction. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2018; 3: 5–17.
113.
YangKTangXLiJ, et al. Uncertainties in onboard algorithms for autonomous vehicles: Challenges, mitigation, and perspectives. In: IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2023, pp. 1–5. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3270887.
114.
TaoG.Adaptive output tracking control with reference model system uncertainties. Automatica2025; 174: 112174.
115.
YuexiaCLongCRuochenW, et al. Modeling and test on height adjustment system of electrically-controlled air suspension for agricultural vehicles. Int J Agric Biol Eng2016; 9: 40–47.
116.
ChenSQiJGaoJ, et al. Research on the control system for the conveying and separation experimental platform of tiger nut harvester based on sensing technology and control algorithms. Agriculture2025; 15: 115.
117.
HanSYoonKParkG, et al. Robust lane keeping control for tractor with multi-unit trailer under parametric uncertainty. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2024; 9: 2333–2347.
118.
BaoHKangQShiX, et al. Robust learning-based model predictive control for intelligent vehicles with unknown dynamics and unbounded disturbances. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2024; 9: 3409–3421.
119.
DongZXuXHeS, et al. Tire slip angle estimation based lateral stability control strategy for trajectory tracking scenarios of ddaev. Control Eng Pract2025; 161: 106343.
120.
DanielsonCBerntorpKWeissA, et al. Robust motion planning for uncertain systems with disturbances using the invariant-set motion planner. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2020; 65: 4456–4463.
121.
DiehlCSievernichTSKrugerM, et al. Uncertainty-aware model-based offline reinforcement learning for automated driving. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2023; 8: 1167–1174.
122.
LiuHYanSShenY, et al. Model predictive control system based on direct yaw moment control for 4wid self-steering agriculture vehicle. Int J Agric Biol Eng2021; 14: 175–181.
123.
LiJWuZLiM, et al. Dynamic measurement method for steering wheel angle of autonomous agricultural vehicles. Agriculture2024; 14: 1602.
124.
HeCXuXJiangH, et al. Cyber-attack detection for lateral control system of cloud-based intelligent connected vehicle based on bilstm-attention network. Measurement2025; 247: 116740.
125.
LiangCXuXAugerDJ, et al. Efficient mode transition control for dm-phev with mechanical hysteresis based on piecewise affine H∞ strategy. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2023; 9: 4366–4379.
126.
XuYWuZGPanYJ.Perceptual interaction-based path tracking control of autonomous vehicles under dos attacks: a reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2023; 72: 14028–14039. DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2023.3287272.
127.
LiuZWangYChengQ, et al. Analysis of the information entropy on traffic flows. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 18012–18023.
128.
AmesADXuXGrizzleJW, et al. Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2017; 62: 3861–3876.
129.
BertoniLKreissSAlahiA.Monoloco: monocular 3d pedestrian localization and uncertainty estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00696.
130.
ZhuX.Review of intelligent sprinkler irrigation technologies for autonomous and remote sensing system. Smart Agriculture2023; 3: 125–140. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-8319-1_7.
131.
ZhangRLiuJLiX, et al. Bevuda++: geometric-aware unsupervised domain adaptation for multi-view 3d object detection. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol2025; 35: 5109–5122.
132.
RyanCMurphyFMullinsM.End-to-end autonomous driving risk analysis: a behavioural anomaly detection approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 22: 1650–1662.
133.
JinYMaJ.Large language model as parking planning agent in the context of mixed period of autonomous vehicles and human-driven vehicles. Sustain Cities Soc2024; 117: 105940.
134.
RaoZCaiYWangH, et al. Enhancing autonomous driving: a low-cost monocular end-to-end framework with multi-task integration and temporal fusion. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2024; 9: 6326–6339.
135.
MichelmoreRWickerMLaurentiL, et al. Uncertainty quantification with statistical guarantees in end-to-end autonomous driving control. In: Proceedings of the international conference on robotics and automation, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196844.
136.
HuangZLvCXingY, et al. Multi-modal sensor fusion-based deep neural network for end-to-end autonomous driving with scene understanding. IEEE Sens J2021; 21: 11781–11790.
137.
HwangSLeeKJeonH, et al. Autonomous vehicle cut-in algorithm for lane-merging scenarios via policy-based reinforcement learning nested within finite-state machine. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 17594–17606.
138.
FanWXuBZhangY, et al. Adaptive fault-tolerant control of a novel ducted-fan aerial robot against partial actuator failure. Aerosp Sci Technol2022; 122: 107371.
139.
AlahiABierlaireMVandergheynstP.Robust real-time pedestrians detection in urban environments with low-resolution cameras. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol2014; 39: 113–128.
140.
UlreichFKaupAEbertM. Uncertainty quantification for adaptive measurement noise in Kalman filter based object tracking. In: 2024 sensor data fusion: trends, solutions, applications (SDF), 2024, pp. 1–7. DOI:10.1109/sdf63218.2024.10773809.
141.
BrechtelSGindeleTDillmannR. Probabilistic decision-making under uncertainty for autonomous driving using continuous pomdps. In: International conference on intelligent transportation systems, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2014.6957722.
142.
LeeHChoiYHanT, et al. Probabilistically guaranteeing end-to-end latencies in autonomous vehicle computing systems. IEEE Trans Comput2022; 71: 3361–3374. DOI: 10.1109/tc.2022.3152105.
