Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Many-objective optimization design method for rear seat backrest frame of a passenger car based on hierarchical optimization and adaptive radial basis function neural network
Addressing the “dimensional catastrophe” in optimal design while ensuring a balance between optimization efficiency and time cost has become a central focus for researchers. This paper proposes an efficient design strategy for automotive seatback optimization based on the concepts of adaptive approximation-optimization and many-objective hierarchical optimization. To begin with, the finite element analysis models of the rear seat of a passenger car are developed and validated using experimental results. Considering factors such as total cost, seat material quality, and safety performance index, the seat structure parameters are categorized into primary and secondary sensitivity parameters through comprehensive parameter sensitivity analysis. Then, an advanced optimization strategy was developed, integrating optimal Latin hypercube experimental design, adaptive radial basis function neural network approximation model, non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-III, modified entropy weight method, and Euclidean distance method to enhance grey relational analysis techniques. The strategy was subsequently applied to optimize an automotive seat skeleton. When compared with a non-hierarchical many-objective optimization strategy, the proposed approach demonstrated significant advantages in optimization search performance, time cost, and iterative convergence speed. Finally, the optimized automotive rear seat achieves a 6.78% reduction in weight and a 19.3% reduction in cost of the backrest skeleton, while also enhancing comfort and occupant protection to varying degrees.
ShanZYLongJQYuP, et al. Lightweight optimization of passenger car seat frame based on grey relational analysis and optimized coefficient of variation. Struct Multidiscip Optim2020; 62: 3429–3455.
2.
ZhouXJiangHLLongJQ.Multi-objective optimization design of rear seat for a passenger car based on GARS and NSGA-III. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automob Eng2024; 239(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070241240168.
3.
ZhangJYChenJLLiZY, et al. Optimisation design of CFRP passenger car seat backplane based on impact characteristics. Int J Crashworthiness2021; 26(4): 355–367.
4.
HaverothGAThoreC-JCorreaMR, et al. Topology optimization including a model of the layer-by-layer additive manufacturing process. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2022; 398: 115203.
5.
BaumalAEMcPheeJJCalamaiPH.Application of genetic algorithms to the design optimization of an active vehicle suspension system. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1998; 163 (1–4): 87–94.
6.
ChenDTFuDCWangHH, et al. Lightweight design of an automobile seat. Mech Sci Technol Aerosp Eng2011; 30(6): 942–946.
7.
DaiCWangXLongJ.A new optimization strategy for multi-objective design of automotive seat frame. Struct Multidiscip Optim2023; 66(11): 236.
8.
YaoWMZuoWJLinJQ, et al. Optimization strategy of automobile seat structure for high stiffness and light weight. J Wuhan Univ Technol2010; 32(10): 73–77.
9.
LongJQLiaoYQYuP.Multi-response weighted adaptive sampling approach based on hybrid approximation model. IEEE Access2021; 9: 45441–45453.
10.
HuGZhengYAbualigahL, et al. DETDO: an adaptive hybrid dandelion optimizer for engineering optimization. Adv Eng Inform2023; 57: 102004.
11.
GuptaSAbderazekHYıldızBS, et al. Comparison of metaheuristic optimization algorithms for solving constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Expert Syst Appl2021; 183: 115351.
12.
AbualigahLDiabatAMirjaliliS, et al. The arithmetic optimization algorithm. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2021; 376: 113609.
13.
MengDYangSDe JesusAMP, et al. A novel hybrid adaptive Kriging and water cycle algorithm for reliability-based design and optimization strategy: application in offshore wind turbine monopile. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2023; 412: 116083.
14.
ShiYLinCMaY, et al. Active learning Kriging-based multi-objective modeling and optimization for system reliability-based robust design. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2024; 245: 110007.
15.
PangYLaiXZhangS, et al. A Kriging-assisted global reliability-based design optimization algorithm with a reliability-constrained expected improvement. Appl Math Model2023; 121: 611–630.
16.
WuZPWangDHOkoloPN, et al. Efficient space-filling and near-orthogonality sequential Latin hypercube for computer experiments. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2017; 324: 348–365.
17.
LiuXChenZHLiuX, et al. Structural optimisation of transportation equipment using an adaptive approximation model. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-transport, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.22.00100.
18.
AydoğanHOzkirV.A Fermatean fuzzy MCDM method for selection and ranking problems: case studies. Expert Syst Appl2024; 237: 121628.
19.
Shahrabi-FarahaniSHafezalkotobAMohammaditabarD, et al. Selection of sustainable industrial livestock site using the R-Number GIS-MCDM method: a case study of Iran. Environ Sustain Indic2024; 22: 100362.
20.
ZhuZYJiaoJSXuZ, et al. Multi-objective stratified optimization design of spherical bearingless flywheel machine based on sensitivity analysis. J Electr Eng Early View2025; 20(2): 130–139.
ChenGHanXLiuG, et al. An efficient multi-objective optimization method for black-box functions using sequential approximate technique. Appl Soft Comput2012; 12(1): 14–27.
23.
YePPanG.A novel sequential approximate optimization approach using data mining for engineering design optimization. Opt Method Softw2015; 30(6): 1255–1275.
24.
WangGGDongZAitchisonP.Adaptive response surface method-a global optimization scheme for approximation-based design problems. Eng Optimiz2001; 33(6): 707–734.
25.
WangGG.Adaptive response surface method using inherited Latin hypercube design points. J Mech Des2003; 125(2): 210–220.
26.
ZhangJXiaoMGaoL, et al. A combined projection-outline-based active learning Kriging and adaptive importance sampling method for hybrid reliability analysis with small failure probabilities. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2019; 344: 13–33.
27.
HuangTSongXLiuM.The optimization of the loading path for T-shape tube hydroforming using adaptive radial basis function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 82(9): 1843–1857.
28.
ZhouXYuPLongJQ.A novel multi-objective optimization method based on adaptive RBFNN-MIGA with multi-point sequences. Struct Multidisc Optim2025; 68: 100.
29.
ZhangJMaYOuyangL, et al. A multi-points infill sampling criterion and parallel surrogate-based optimization algorithm based on Kriging model. Syst Eng Theory Pract2020; 40(1): 251–261.
30.
WangDFXieSWangS.An adaptive RBF neural network–based multi-objective optimization method for lightweight and crashworthiness design of cab floor rails using fuzzy subtractive clustering algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim2021; 63: 915–928.
31.
DebKPratapAAgarwal, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2002; 6(2): 182–197.
32.
DebKJainHAn evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part i: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2014; 18(4): 577–601.
33.
Ghane’i-OstadMVahdat-NejadHAbdolrazzagh-NezhadM.Detecting overlapping communities in LBSNs by fuzzy subtractive clustering. Soc Netw Anal Min2018; 8(1): 23.
34.
MaHPZhangYJSunSY, et al. A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications. Artif Intell Rev2023; 56: 15217–15270.
35.
LiHDebKZhangQF, et al. Comparison between MOEA/D and NSGA-III on a set of novel many and multi-objective benchmark problems with challenging difficulties. Swarm Evol Comput2019; 46: 104–117.
36.
SchoberPBoerCSchwarteLA.Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg2018; 126(5): 1763–1768.
37.
KanirajanPSuresh KumarV.Power quality disturbance detection and classification using wavelet and RBFNN. Appl Soft Comput2015; 35: 470–481.
38.
DaiCXYuPYinMG, et al. Optimization of the crashworthiness design of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer bumper beam. Int J Crashworthines2024; 29(1): 163–177.
39.
LiaoYQZhengWLongJQ, et al. Ply optimization of backrest skeleton of carbon fiber reinforced plastic car seat based on grey Euclidean relational analysis method. Int J Automot Technol2023; 24: 1189–1203.
40.
ZhouXZouRXieX, et al. Enhanced predictive modeling framework for multi-objective global optimization of passenger car rear seat using hybrid approximation models. Sci Rep2025; 15(1): 5281.
41.
ZhouXLongJ.A systematic and optimal design method for replacing steel backrest in automotive seat with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automob Eng2024; 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070241299611.
42.
ZhouXLongJ.A systematic design and optimization strategy for CFRP automotive seatback. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2025; 53: 6497–6529.
43.
ZhouXJuJLongJ.A novel lightweight combinatorial optimization strategy based on ASA-NLPQL optimization algorithm for front seat skeleton of a passenger car. Adv Eng Softw2025; 205: 103908.
44.
LongJZouRLiaoY, et al. Failure analysis and optimization design of CFRP automotive seat back under multiple conditions. Mech Adv Mater Struct2025; 32(15): 3748–3761.
45.
ZhouXGaoTDLongJQ.Lightweight optimization design for automotive front seat frame based on comprehensive Sobol global sensitivity analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2025; 239(18): 7321–7340.
