Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
A novel multi-scale finite element modeling method for high-precision analysis of hydraulic damper dynamics characteristics under full-operating conditions
Due to the complexity of the valve systems in vehicle dampers, the components exhibit synergistic and coupling effects during operation. To comprehensively investigate the interaction mechanisms of critical internal structures within the damper, this paper proposes a finite element modeling method for different operating conditions, and analyzes the dynamic characteristics of the damper. For low-velocity conditions, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is employed for modeling and simulation to investigate the oil flow rule under the throttling effect of orifices only. The length and entrance area of the orifices are found to have a significant impact on the low-velocity damping force. Following the CFD model, a fluid-solid interaction (FSI) model is successively established for the medium- and high-velocity conditions to analyze the interaction between the deflecting valve systems and the oil in the damper. The inner and outer diameters of the valve seat, and the disc valves stiffness are found to have a significant impact on the medium- and high-velocity damping force. The simulation results indicate that the deviation of the damping force is less than 5% and 10% for CFD and FSI models, respectively. During the valve systems opening process to overcome the preload, the flow rate distribution between the valve opening gaps and orifices fundamentally changes, with most of the oil flowing through the valve opening gaps. At this time, a larger deflection occurred in the high pressure region of the disc valves, and the deflection is uniform along the radial direction. The maximum valve opening gaps of the valve systems are all less than 0.5 mm, while the compensation and flow valve systems open earlier and larger than the rebound and compression valve systems, which highlights the sensitivity of the damping force to the stiffness of the disc valves. The modeling method proposed in this paper can be targeted to investigate different velocity conditions of the damper, reducing model complexity while improving simulation efficiency and confidence level, and providing guidance for damper performance design and optimization.
JauharSSethiSKambleS, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning-based decision support system for forecasting electric vehicles’ power requirement. Technol Forecast Soc Change2024; 204: 123396.
2.
GuJWuZSongY, et al. A win-win relationship? New evidence on artificial intelligence and new energy vehicles. Energy Econ2024; 134: 107613.
3.
ManoharanABegamKAparowV, et al. Artificial neural networks, gradient boosting and support vector machines for electric vehicle battery state estimation: a review. J Energy Storage2022; 55: 105384.
4.
MohantyPReddyKPanigrahyS, et al. Leveraging generative and explainable AI for electric vehicle energy toward sustainable, consumer-centric transportation. IEEE Access2024; 12: 143721–143732.
5.
XiongYPanYWuL, et al. Effective weight-reduction- and crashworthiness-analysis of a vehicle’s battery-pack system via orthogonal experimental design and response surface methodology. Eng Fail Anal2021; 128: 105635.
6.
ChenQShaoHLiuY, et al. Hydraulic-pressure-following control of an electronic hydraulic brake system based on a fuzzy proportional and integral controller. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2020; 14: 1228–1236.
7.
BetülS.Marine predators algorithm and multi-verse optimisation algorithm for optimal battery case design of electric vehicles. Int J Veh Des2022; 88: 1–11.
8.
GuoSXuLLiuY, et al. Modeling and experiments of a hydraulic electromagnetic energy-harvesting shock absorber. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron2017; 22: 2684–2694.
9.
HajidavallooMCosnerJLiZ, et al. Simultaneous suspension control and energy harvesting through novel design and control of a new nonlinear energy harvesting shock absorber. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2022; 71: 6073–6087.
10.
PulitiMGalluzziRTessariF, et al. Energy efficient design of regenerative shock absorbers for automotive suspensions: a multi-objective optimization framework. Appl Energy2024; 358: 122542.
11.
ZhengYShangguanWYinZ, et al. A hybrid modeling approach for automotive vibration isolation mounts and shock absorbers. Nonlinear Dyn2023; 111: 15911–15932.
12.
WeiXYanTLiuS.Multi-objective optimization design of magnetorheological damper and vehicle handling stability performance research. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2024; 35: 206–217.
13.
BrötzNRexerMPuffN, et al. Fluid dynamic vibration absorber for vehicle suspension system. Veh Syst Dyn2023; 62: 1122–1141.
14.
XuJKouFZhangX, et al. Modeling and testing for continuously adjustable damping shock absorber equipped with proportional solenoid valve. J Mech Sci Technol2023; 37: 3851–3866.
15.
LiSYuanQ.Research on deformation of valve slice of automobile shock absorber. J Vibroengineering2023; 25: 856–872.
16.
SilvaPSheikhATsoutsanisP, et al. Study of orifice design on oleo-pneumatic shock absorber. Fluids2024; 9: 108.
17.
SimicMHerakovicN.Reduction of the flow forces in a small hydraulic seat valve as alternative approach to improve the valve characteristics. Energy Convers Manag2015; 89: 708–718.
18.
MaSGaoYHuangR.Conical ring gap flow and throttle-slice dynamic opening of automobile shock absorber. J Vib Shock2021; 40: 152–160.
19.
DeubelCVincenzHProkopG.Shock absorber friction testing on a MacPherson suspension considering realistic mounting situation. J Vib Control2023; 29: 4344–4356.
20.
PuneetNSainiRKumarH.Design and fabrication of cost effective semi-active vehicular suspension system and testing on full scale quarter car suspension rig. Smart Struct Syst2024; 34: 87–96.
21.
ChenXWenHLiuX.Vibration characteristics analysis and anti-rattle optimization of vehicle suspension damper based on the combination of test-simulation approach. J Vib Eng Technol2025; 13: 295.
22.
WenHHuangHZhangW, et al. Research of time lag characteristics of pilot-operated solenoid valve damper based on multi-physics field. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2025; 239(5): 1660–1684.
23.
DengXZhouYChenX, et al. Modelling and application of yaw damper with frequency-selective damping on railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. Epub ahead of print 25December2024. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2024.2445761.
24.
NieSZhuangYWangY, et al. Velocity and displacement-dependent damper: a novel passive shock absorber inspired by the semi-active control. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 99: 730–746.
25.
ChenSMaCZhangH, et al. Simulation and experimental investigation on vibration of a radial turbine wheel using a two-way FSI approach. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2022; 237(7): 1584–1594.
26.
WangYDuMSuC, et al. Numerical investigation on the contribution of underbody flow-induced noise on vehicle interior noise. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(10–11): 2667–2678.
27.
HuoXJiangYWeiW, et al. Three-dimensional finite element simulation and reconstruction of jointed rock masses for bench blasting. Simul Model Pract Theory2024; 135: 102975.
28.
ZhaoZPaudelSXuY, et al. A monolithic overset finite element method for CFD with application to bio-inspired fliers. Eng Comput2025; 41: 1791–1808.
29.
QiLQiuJXuG, et al. RFF-meshing: a parallel and anisotropic quad-dominant mesh generation framework based on Riemann frame field. Eng Comput. Epub ahead of print 24December2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-024-02096-7.
30.
BuczkowskiDNowakG.Modelling the shock absorber piston valve using 2-way fluid-structure interaction. Transp Probl2021; 16: 46–57.
31.
Tharehalli MataGKumarHMahalingamA. Performance analysis of a semi-active suspension system using coupled CFD-FEA based non-parametric modeling of low capacity shear mode monotube MR damper. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2019; 233: 1214–1231.
32.
YuZZhangNLiuS.Simulation analysis of dynamic nonlinear characteristics of vehicle shock absorber based on fluid-structure interaction. J Jilin Univ2015; 45: 16–21.
33.
ZhouLQinALiG, et al. Dynamic characteristics analysis of automobile twin-tube damper based on fluid-solid coupling. Automobile Technol2021; 1: 45–50.
34.
ChenQXuZWuM, et al. Study on dynamic characteristic analysis of vehicle shock absorbers based on bidirectional fluid-solid coupling. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2021; 15: 426–436.
35.
DesaiRJamadarMKumarH, et al. Performance evaluation of a single sensor control scheme using a twin-tube MR damper based semi-active suspension. J Vib Eng Technol2021; 9: 1193–1210.
36.
SantosAGarcía-BarruetabeñaJ.Development and validation of a simplified nonlinear dynamic model of a passive twin-tube hydraulic shock absorber. J Vib Control2021; 27: 1724–1735.
37.
RenJLiQRenZ, et al. A new hydraulic damper dynamics model and the availability on high speed vehicle dynamics investigation. Veh Syst Dyn2022; 61: 356–374.
38.
XieFWangDWangC.Theoretical and experimental study on driving force and flow characteristics of damping control valve of shock absorber. Int J Struct Integr2018; 9: 693–704.
39.
ZhuXNingDHaoZ, et al. Modelling and experimental evaluation of a variable stiffness MR suspension with self-powering capability. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2021; 32: 1473–1483.
40.
AndersonJWendtJ.Computational fluid dynamics. Vol. 206. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
41.
LukasSJohannesW.Fluid–structure interaction and dynamic stability of shock absorber check valves. J Fluids Struct2022; 110: 103536.
42.
ElsaadyWOyadijiSNasserA.Study of failure symptoms of a single-tube MR damper using an FEA-CFD approach. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2021; 32: 1391–1419.
43.
DengZWeiXLiX, et al. Design and multi-objective optimization of magnetorheological damper considering vehicle riding comfort and operation stability. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2022; 33: 1215–1228.
44.
ChenQWuMKangS, et al. Study on cavitation phenomenon of twin-tube hydraulic shock absorber based on CFD. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2019; 13: 1049–1062.
45.
DingW.Study on dynamic characteristics of dual-tube hydraulic shock absorber by multi-physics coupling. Dissertation, Southwest Jiaotong University, China, 2013.
46.
PetöMEisenträgerSDuvigneauF, et al. Boolean finite cell method for multi-material problems including local enrichment of the Ansatz space. Comput Mech2023; 72: 743–764.
47.
NandiTYeoD.A solution verification study for URANS simulations of flow over a 5:1 rectangular cylinder using grid convergence index and least squares procedures. J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif2023; 8(4): 041001.
48.
AycanOTopuzAKademL.Evaluating uncertainties in CFD simulations of patient-specific aorta models using Grid Convergence Index method. Mech Res Commun2023; 133: 104188.
49.
WangXZhuRXuD, et al. Mechanism analysis and prediction of longitudinal cut wave pattern resistance based on CFD simulation. J Ocean Eng Sci2025; 10: 258–273.
50.
MannaPMalsuPDebasisC, et al. Optimization of a flight-worthy scramjet combustor through CFD. Aerosp Sci Technol2013; 27: 138–146.
51.
LuNLamJLinY, et al. Aeroelastic simulation of full-machine wind turbines using a two-way fluid-structure interaction approach. J Mar Sci Eng2024; 12(12): 2271.
52.
HuWGuoGHuX, et al. A consistent spatially adaptive smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for fluid–structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2019; 347: 402–424.
53.
WangWZhouZYuD, et al. Rail vehicle dynamic response to a nonlinear physical ‘in-service’ model of its secondary suspension hydraulic dampers. Mech Syst Signal Process2017; 95: 138–157.
54.
NochnichenkoIUzunovO.Characteristics of throttles in hydraulic shock absorber considering temperature changes of fluid. Mech Adv Technol2017; 2: 39–44.
55.
ADINA R&D Inc. ADINA theory and modeling guide. Vol. III, ADINA CFD FSI. Watertown, MA: ADINA R&D Inc., 2011.
56.
MaWShenXLuX, et al. Simulation analysis of bidirectional fluid-solid coupling for hydrodynamic coupling. Appl Mech Mater2015; 744: 1128–1132.
