In automotive design, composite materials are increasingly being considered as alternatives to metals due to their superior strength-to-weight ratios and corrosion resistance. However, their high costs and complex behaviour, arising from their heterogeneous nature, present challenges in studying these materials. The finite element method (FEM) has become a crucial tool for analysing composites under various conditions. This review focuses on the finite element modelling (FEM) of composite materials, emphasizing the material models and damage criteria used in simulation software, material properties, failure criteria and element types utilized in automotive components. From a modelling perspective, the review covers micro, meso and macro levels of FEM, explaining how these scales contribute to accurate simulations. Regarding material properties, the discussion includes various constitutive relationships, theories and mechanical characteristics relevant to modelling composites. The types of finite elements, such as solid, shell and cohesive elements, are explored, highlighting their roles in capturing the behaviour of composites during simulations. The article also delves into failure criteria, outlining the methods developed and implemented for predicting the failure of composite materials in simulations. Additionally, the review covers specific automotive components like fenders, leaf springs, Drive Shaft and crash boxes, illustrating how FEM has been used to optimize their designs and the benefits of using composite materials in these applications.
GhassemiehE. Materials in automotive application, state of the art and prospects. In: ChiabergeM (ed.), New trends and developments in automotive industry. Rijeka, Croatia: IntechOpen, 2011, pp.364–394.
2.
ClyneTWHullD.An introduction to composite materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, p.363.
3.
RezendeMCCostaMLBotelhoEC. Compositos estruturais - Tecnologia E Pratica. ARTLIBER, 2011, Sao Paulo, p.396.
4.
KawAK. Mechanics of composite materials. 2nd ed.Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2006, p.466 (Mechanical engineering).
BelingardiG. Recent research results in composite materials and adhesive applications for vehicle lightweight. In: International congress motor vehicles and motors2014, 2014, no. 2, pp.23–38.
10.
FriedrichKAlmajidAA.Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications. Appl Compos Mater2013; 20(2): 107–128.
11.
KatsoulisCKandolaBKMylerP, et al. Post-fire flexural performance of epoxy-nanocomposite matrix glass fibre composites containing conventional flame retardants. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2012; 43: 1389–1399.
12.
BoumbimbaRMFrousteyCVoitP, et al. Preparation and mechanical characterisation of laminate composites made of glass fibre/epoxy resin filled with tri bloc copolymers. Compos Struct2014; 116: 414–422.
13.
XingJDuCHeX, et al. Finite element study on the impact resistance of laminated and textile composites. Polymers2019; 11(11): 1798.
14.
JiaZBaiYWangF, et al. Effect of drill flute direction on delamination at the exit in drilling carbon fiber reinforced plastic. Polym Compos2018; 40: E1434–E1440
15.
JacquesKBaxLVasiliadisI, et al. Polymer composites for automotive sustainability. Eur Technol Platf Sustain Chem2015; 56: 1–56.
16.
LeeJMMinBJParkJH, et al. Design of lightweight CFRP automotive part as an alternative for steel part by thickness and lay-up optimization. Materials2019; 12(14): 2309.
17.
MohammadiHAhmadZMazlanSA, et al. Lightweight glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite for automotive bumper applications: a review. Polymers2022; 15(1): 193.
18.
AzmanMAAsyrafMRMKhalinaA, et al. Natural fiber reinforced composite material for product design: a short review. Polymers2021; 13(12): 1917.
SahooNGRanaSChoJW, et al. Polymer nanocomposites based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. Prog Polym Sci2010; 35(7): 837–867.
29.
WatermanP.Simulating composites: 6 tips for new users, Digital Engineering 24/7, Nov. 1, 2018.
30.
HeimbsSStrobiFMiddendorfP, et al. Crash simulation of an F1 racing car front impact structure. In: 7th european LS DYNA users conference, Salzburg, Austria, May 2009. DYNAmore GmbH.
ArolaDRamuluM.Orthogonal cutting of fiber-reinforced composites: a finite element analysis. Int J Mech Sci1997; 39(5): 597–613.
33.
GeramiH. Development and numerical modeling of composite structures. Master’s thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada–includes comprehensive FEM-based analyses of FRP (Fiber Reinforced Polymer) structures such as wind turbine towers and highway luminaires, 2016.
34.
BeaumontP.Physical modelling of damage development in structural composite materials under stress. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2003. pp.365–412 (Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering).
35.
AboudiJArnoldSMBednarcykBA. Micromechanics of composite materials: a generalized multiscale analysis. Amsterdam and Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.
36.
MaJDuWGaoW, et al. Multiscale finite element analysis of uncertain-but-bounded heterogeneous materials at finite deformation. Finite Elem Anal Des2018; 149: 15–31.
37.
KoloorSSRRahimian-KoloorSMKarimzadehA, et al. Nano-level damage characterization of graphene/polymer cohesive interface under tensile separation. Polymers2019; 11(9): 1435.
38.
ShaikASalviA.A multi scale approach for analysis of fiber reinforced composites. Mater Today Proc2017; 4(2): 3197–3206.
39.
StierBSimonJWReeseS.Numerical and experimental investigation of the structural behavior of a carbon fiber reinforced ankle-foot orthosis. Med Eng Phys2015; 37(5): 505–511.
40.
WhitneyMBednarcykBAArnoldSM.A modeling approach across length scales for progressive failure analysis of woven composites. Appl Mech Rev2012; 64(6): 060802.
41.
YinHZhaoY.Introduction to the micromechanics of composite materials. Berlin: Springer, 2016.
42.
TianWQiLZhouJ, et al. Representative volume element for composites reinforced by spatially randomly distributed discontinuous fibers and its applications. Compos Struct2015; 131: 366–373.
43.
LuZYuanZLiuQ.3D numerical simulation for the elastic properties of random fiber composites with a wide range of fiber aspect ratios. Comput Mater Sci2014; 90: 123–129.
44.
LiSSitnikovaE.Front Matter. In: Representative volume elements and unit cells: Concepts, theory, applications and implementation. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2020, p.iii–p.468.
BarberoE.Finite element analysis of composite materials using Abaqus. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 2008.
47.
LiWYangXZhangG, et al. Cohesive zone modeling of creep–fatigue crack propagation with dwell time. Adv Mech Eng2017; 9: 168781401772114.
48.
YangQCoxB.Cohesive models for damage evolution in laminated composites. Int J Fract2005; 133(2): 107–137.
49.
ChandraNLiHShetC, et al. Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal–ceramic interfaces. Int J Solids Struct2002; 39(10): 2827–2855.
50.
ZobackMD.Porous rock fracture mechanics: with application to hydraulic fracturing, drilling and structural engineering. 1st ed.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017.
BeaumontPWRSoutisCHodzicA.Structural integrity and durability of advanced composites: innovative modelling methods and intelligent design. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2015.
53.
KatnamKBSargentJPCrocombeAD, et al. Characterisation of moisture-dependent cohesive zone properties for adhesively bonded joints. Eng Fract Mech2010; 77(16): 3105–3119.
54.
KhoramishadHCrocombeADKatnamKB, et al. Predicting fatigue damage in adhesively bonded joints using a cohesive zone model. Int J Fatigue2010; 32(7): 1146–1158.
55.
ParkSJSeoMK.Types of composites. In: ParkSJSeoMK (eds) Interface science and technology. Vol. 18. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011, pp.501–629.
56.
ParkSJSeoMK.Modeling of fiber–matrix interface in composite materials. In: ParkSJSeoMK (eds) Interface science and technology. Vol. 18. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011, pp.739–776.
57.
SharmaHKumarARanaS, et al. Critical review on advancements on the fiber-reinforced composites: role of fiber/matrix modification on the performance of the fibrous composites. J Mater Res Technol2023; 26: 2975–3002.
58.
MehdikhaniMGorbatikhLVerpoestI, et al. Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater2019; 53(12): 1579–1669.
59.
ElkolaliMNogueiraLPRønningPO, et al. Void content determination of carbon fiber reinforced polymers: a comparison between destructive and non-destructive methods. Polymers2022; 14(6): 1212.
60.
XuXYangXLiM, et al. Resin impregnation and interface property improvement of CFRP composite via modulating wettability of carbon fibers. Compos Sci Technol2025; 59: 61–74.
61.
GengJCaiY.Influence of interface modification on the moisture absorption and thermal resistance of ramie fiber/degradable epoxy composites. Materials2024; 17(8): 1779.
62.
ZienkiewiczOCDe S.r. GagoJPKellyDW.The hierarchical concept in finite element analysis. Comput Struct1983; 16(1–4): 53–65.
63.
MatthewsFL.Finite element modelling of composite materials and structures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000, p.214.
64.
BauchauOACraigJI.Structural analysis with applications to aerospace structures. Vol. 943. Berlin: Springer, 2009.
65.
VanalliLO.MEC e o MEF aplicados à análise de problemas viscoplásticos em meios anisotrópicose compostos. Doctoral dissertation, Escola de Engenharia de So Carlos, Universidade de So Paulo, So Carlos, Brazil, 2004. p. 194.
66.
BarberoEJ.Finite element analysis of composite materials using Abaqus. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013, p.413 (Composite materials, design and analysis).
67.
AdamsVAskenaziA.Building better products with finite element analysis. 1st ed.Santa Fe, NM: OnWord Press, 1999. p.587.
68.
UguralAC.Stresses in plates and shells. Boston: WCB/McGraw Hill, 1999, p.536.
69.
SouzaJ. Theory of plates and shells. 2nd ed.New York: Timoshenko & S. Woinowsky-Krieger.
70.
PoitevinD.Finite element method in structural analysis, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, published by Wiley Online Library on December 15, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470686652.eae143
71.
VasilievVVMorozovEV.Mechanics and analysis of composite materials. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2001.
72.
AltenbachHEremeyevV.Shell-like structures: advanced theories and applications. Vol. 572. CISM Courses and Lectures. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022.
73.
TsiatasGC.A new Kirchhoff plate model based on a modified couple stress theory. Int J Solids Struct2009; 46(13): 2757–2764.
74.
PhadnisVARoyASilberschmidtVV.Finite element analysis of drilling in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Phys Conf Ser2012; 382(1): 012014.
75.
LiuGRDaiKYNguyenTT.A smoothed finite element method for plate analysis. Comput Fluids2007; 36(1): 12–26.
76.
Nguyen-ThoiTBui-XuanTPhung-VanP, et al. An edge-based smoothed three-node mindlin plate element (ES-MIN3) for static and free vibration analyses of plates. KSCE J Civil Eng2014; 18(4): 1072–1082.
77.
ZienkiewiczOCTaylorRLTooJM.Reduced integration technique in general analysis of plates and shells. Int J Numer Methods Eng1971; 3(2): 275–290.
78.
AltenbachJAltenbachHEremeyevVA.On generalized Cosserat-type theories of plates and shells: a short review and bibliography. Arch Appl Mech2010; 80(1): 73–92.
79.
NorrieDHVriesGD.The finite element method : fundamentals and applications. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1973, p.346.
80.
EloyL.Método dos elementos finitos em análise de estruturas. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011, p.296.
81.
SalibaSSPennaSPitangueiraRLDS. Abordagem orientada a objetos para implementação computacional de elementos finitos de placas. Cadernos de Engenharia de Estruturas2012; 13(60): 37–54.
82.
SchneiderPKienzlerRBöhmM.Modeling of consistent second-order plate theories for anisotropic materials. ZAMM Z Angew Math Mech2014; 94(1–2): 21–42.
83.
LuPHeLHLeeHP, et al. Thin plate theory including surface effects. Int J Solids Struct2006; 43(16): 4631–4647.
84.
WitkowskiWPietraszkiewiczW. Shell structures: Theory and applications, Volume 4. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference “shell structures: theory and applications”, 2017. CRC Press.
85.
JawadMH. Theory and design of plate and shell structures. Boston: Springer, 1994.
86.
SpringDWPaulinoGH.A growing library of three-dimensional cohesive elements for use in ABAQUS. Eng Fract Mech2014; 126: 190–216.
87.
XuXPNeedlemanA.Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids1994; 42(9): 1397–1434.
88.
KumarRSinghSPPrakashC.Manufacturing engineering: select proceedings of CPIE 2018. Berlin: Springer, 2019.
Murali KrishnaMShunmugamMSSiva PrasadN. A study on the sealing performance of bolted flange joints with gaskets using finite element analysis. Int J Press Vessel Piping2007; 84(6): 349–357.
91.
ScheiderI.Micromechanical based derivation of traction-separation laws for cohesive model simulations. Procedia Eng2009; 1(1): 17–21.
92.
ParkKPaulinoGH.Cohesive zone models: a critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces. Appl Mech Rev2011; 64: 060802.
93.
MotepalliP.Engineering mechanics of composite materials. Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 2005.
94.
BednarcykBAAboudiJArnoldSM.Micromechanics of composite materials governed by vector constitutive laws. Int J Solids Struct2017; 110–111: 137–151.
95.
Azevedo CACD. Formulação alternativa para análise de domínios não-homogêneos e inclusões anisotrópicas via MEC. São Carlos: Universidade de São Paulo, 2007.
96.
TripathiLBeheraSKBeheraBK.Numerical modeling of flatwise energy absorption behavior of 3D woven honeycomb composites with different cell structures. J Sandwich Struct Mater2022; 24(7): 2047–2064.
CiampagliaASantiniABelingardiG.Design and analysis of automotive lightweight materials suspension based on finite element analysis. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(9): 1501–1511.
99.
AhmedAWeiL.Introducing CFRP as an alternative material for engine hood to achieve better pedestrian safety using finite element modeling. Thin-Walled Struct2016; 99: 97–108.
100.
HashinZ.Analysis of composite materials—a survey. J Appl Mech1983; 50(3): 481–505.
MangalgiriPD.Composite materials for aerospace applications. Bull Mater Sci1999; 22(3): 657–664.
103.
CroitoruEIMorariuCOSoicaA, et al. Composite automobile fender impact testing with a spherical ball. Mater Plast2020; 57(1): 175–190.
104.
Haque ProtyaiMIAdibFMTaherTI, et al. Performance evaluation of Kevlar fiber reinforced epoxy composite by depositing graphene/SiC/Al2O3 nanoparticles. Hybrid Advances2024; 6: 100245. DOI: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100245.
105.
IhuezeCCObiafudoOJOkaforCE.Biofibers in polymer matrixes: an application for auto body fender. Int J Plast Technol2017; 21(1): 171–193.
106.
BolcuADumitruNStănescuMM, et al. Experimental study, modeling and virtual simulations of car part realized from Composite Materials. Adv Eng Forum2019; 34: 115–122.
107.
TaoWLiuZZhuP, et al. Multi-scale design of three dimensional woven composite automobile fender using modified particle swarm optimization algorithm. Compos Struct2017; 181: 73–83.
108.
XiaZZhouCYongQ, et al. On selection of repeated unit cell model and application of unified periodic boundary conditions in micro-mechanical analysis of composites. Int J Solids Struct2006; 43(2): 266–278.
HuangZM.A bridging model prediction of the ultimate strength of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loads. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 395–448.
111.
DhimanSPotluriPSilvaC.Influence of binder configuration on 3D woven composites. Compos Struct2015; 134: 862–868.
112.
SalehMNLubineauGPotluriP, et al. Micro-mechanics based damage mechanics for 3D orthogonal woven composites: experiment and numerical modelling. Compos Struct2016; 156: 115–124.
113.
DaiSCunninghamPR.Multi-scale damage modelling of 3D woven composites under uni-axial tension. Compos Struct2016; 142: 298–312.
114.
FuXRicciSBisagniC.Minimum-weight design for three dimensional woven composite stiffened panels using neural networks and genetic algorithms. Compos Struct2015; 134: 708–715.
115.
FetoTNSinghBNallamothuRB, et al. Design and analysis of composite mono leaf spring for Toyota LHD Hilux Double Cabin. Int J Mech Eng2022; 7(6): 649–657.
116.
OztoprakNGunesMDTanogluM, et al. Developing polymer composite-based leaf spring systems for automotive industry. Sci Eng Compos Mater2018; 25(6): 1167–1176.
117.
KeJWuZYChenXY, et al. A review on material selection, design method and performance investigation of composite leaf springs. Compos Struct2019; 226: 111277.
118.
ShankarGSSVijayaranganS. Mono composite leaf spring for light weight vehicle–design, end joint analysis and testing. Mater Sci2006; 12(3): 220–225.
BettiniPAiroldiASalaG, et al. Composite chiral structures for morphing airfoils: numerical analyses and development of a manufacturing process. Compos B Eng2010; 41(2): 133–147.
121.
JournalIVenkateshPHJMeherA, et al. Design and modal analysis of composite layered shaft: optimum design and analysis of a composite drive shaft for an automobile by using genetic algorithm. IJEST2011; 3: 310–314.
122.
KuehJTJFarisT. Finite element analysis on the static and fatigue characteristics of composite multi-leaf spring. J Zhejiang Univ Sci2012; 13(3): 159–164.
123.
HelongLIUWenkuSHIRuiG, et al. Modal prediction and analysis of composite leaf springs. J Vib Shock2022; 41(22): 246–252.
124.
JolaiySYousefiAMashhadiMM, et al. Dynamic behaviors of composite leaf springs with viscoelastic cores. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2023; 51(5): 2632–2654.
125.
AmsaluCDamtieEG.Mechanical characterization, and comparison of stress-induced on mono and multi-leaf spring from laminated composite material. Results Mater2022; 16: 100331.
126.
SeralathanSPrasannaHArunJ, et al. Finite element analysis of hybrid composite material based leaf spring at various load conditions. Mater Today Proc2020; 33: 3540–3548.
127.
MaLHeJGuY, et al. Structure design of GFRP composite leaf spring: an experimental and finite element analysis. Polymers2021; 13: 1193.
128.
TadesseBAFatobaO.Theoretical and finite element analysis (FEA) of coated composite leaf spring for heavy-duty truck application. Mater Today Proc2022; 62: 4283–4290.
129.
GaoQGeCZhuangW, et al. Crashworthiness analysis of double-arrowed auxetic structure under axial impact loading. Mater Des2019; 161: 22–34.
130.
EmadiMBeheshtiHHeidari-RaraniM.Thickness effect study on the crushing characteristics of aluminum and composite tubes: numerical analysis and multi-objective optimization. Mech Adv Mater Struct2021; 28(24): 2585–2594.
131.
Özen GedikliHAslanM. Experimental and numerical investigation on energy absorbing characteristics of empty and cellular filled composite crash boxes. Eng Struct2023; 289: 116315.
132.
Nasir HussainNPrakash RegallaSDaseswara RaoYV. Low velocity impact characterization of glass fiber reinforced plastics for application of crash box. Mater Today Proc2017; 4(2): 3252–3262.
133.
BeheraSKKKumarVKumarASRV, Numerical modelling of V-Shaped composite plate subjected to blast loading. In: KrishnapillaiSVelmuruganRHaSK (eds) Composite materials for extreme loading. Singapore: Springer, 2022, pp.495–504.
134.
BeheraSKSinghSPBeheraBK.Design and development of composites walking stick using filament winding process: analytical experimental & numerical analysis. Adv Res Text Eng2024; 9(1): 1096.
135.
MaJDaiHShiM, et al. Quasi-static axial crushing of hexagonal origami crash boxes as energy absorption devices. Mech Sci2019; 10(1): 133–143.
136.
ChoironMAPurnowidodoASiswantoE, et al. Crash energy absorption of multi-segments crash box under frontal load. J Teknol2016; 78(5): 347–350.
137.
KerteszJKovácsTA.Finite element analysis regarding folding behaviour of different crashbox versions. Eur J Mech - A/Solids2024; 107: 105375.
138.
HassinNMYunusMARaniMNA, et al. Experimental and finite element analysis of riveted joints structure of a simplified model of aluminium crash box. J Eng Appl Sci2016; 11: 1451–1455.
139.
PrabhaharanSABalajiGAnnamalaiK, et al. Robust design assessment of automotive crash box structures through model order reduction. Int J Crashworthiness2023; 28(2): 256–269.
140.
WangCLiYZhaoW, et al. Structure design and multi-objective optimization of a novel crash box based on biomimetic structure. Int J Mech Sci2018; 138–139: 489–501.
141.
BayuATKoronkaKKadarnoP, et al. Energy absorption analysis of composite crash box by finite element method. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on contemporary risk studies (ICONICRS 2022), 31 March–1 April 2022, South Jakarta, Indonesia, Article 2320764. EAI.
142.
HouWHePYangY, et al. Crashworthiness optimization of crash box with 3D-printed lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci2023; 247: 108198.
143.
ChenXYuGWangZ, et al. Enhancing out-of-plane compressive performance of carbon fiber composite honeycombs. Compos Struct2021; 255: 112984.
144.
ZhangETLiuHNgBF.Novel arc-shaped ligaments to enhance energy absorption capabilities of re-entrant anti-trichiral structures. Compos B Eng2021; 227: 109366.
145.
HuLLWuZJFuMH.Mechanical behavior of anti-trichiral honeycombs under lateral crushing. Int J Mech Sci2018; 140: 537–546.
146.
CiampagliaAFiumarellaDBoursier NiuttaC, et al. Impact response of an origami-shaped composite crash box: experimental analysis and numerical optimization. Compos Struct2021; 256: 113093.
147.
TanHHeZLiE, et al. Crashworthiness design and multi-objective optimization of a novel auxetic hierarchical honeycomb crash box. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2021; 64: 2009–2024.
148.
JahaniMBeheshtiHHeidari-RaraniM.Effects of geometry, triggering and foam-filling on crashworthiness behaviour of a cylindrical composite crash box. Int J Autom Mech Eng2019; 16(2): 6568–6587.
149.
ChiuLNSFalzonBGBomanR, et al. Finite element modelling of composite structures under crushing load. Compos Struct2015; 131: 215–228.
150.
HoushyarSShanksRAHodzicA.Modelling of polypropylene fibre-matrix composites using finite element analysis. Express Polym Lett2009; 3(1): 2–12.
151.
TeotiaMSoniRK.Applications of finite element modelling in failure analysis of laminated glass composites: A review. Eng Fail Anal2018; 94: 412–437.
152.
GlaessgenEHPastoreCMGriffinOH, et al. Geometrical and finite element modelling of textile composites. Compos B Eng1996; 27(1): 43–50.
153.
KumarVBajyaMMajumdarA, et al. Design of cost-effective hybrid soft armour panels by strategic replacement of backing layers with a non-ballistic material: a parametric study. Int J Impact Eng2023; 180: 104678.
154.
BilalisEPKeramidisMSTsouvalisNG.Structural design optimization of composite materials drive shafts. Mar Struct2022; 84: 103194.
155.
HernandezDRodriguezRMerchánE, et al. Optimal design of a drive shaft with composite materials through particle swarm optimization. IEEE Lat Am Trans2020; 18(06): 1008–1016.
156.
CherniaevAKomarovV.Multistep optimization of composite drive shaft subject to strength, buckling, vibration and manufacturing constraints. Appl Compos Mater2015; 22(5): 475–487.
157.
YangMGuiLHuY, et al. Dynamic analysis and vibration testing of CFRP drive-line system used in heavy-duty machine tool. Results Phys2018; 8: 1110–1118.
158.
Stedile FilhoPAlmeidaJHSAmicoSC. Carbon/epoxy filament wound composite drive shafts under torsion and compression. J Compos Mater2018; 52(8): 1103–1111.
159.
RangaswamyTVijayaranganS. Optimal sizing and stacking sequence of composite drive shafts. Mater Sci2005; 11(2): 133–140.
160.
HuYYangMZhangJ, et al. Research on torsional capacity of composite drive shaft under clockwise and counter-clockwise torque. Adv Mech Eng2015; 7(4): 1687814015582109.
161.
YefaHJinYJinguangZ, et al. Material design and failure experiment of a carbon fibre reinforced plastics drive shaft. Mater Res Innov2015; 19(sup5): S5-5-463458.
162.
MutasherSASahariBBHamoudaAMS, et al. Static and dynamic characteristics of a hybrid aluminium/composite drive shaft. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials Design and Applications2007; 221: 63–75.
163.
GongLGaoXYangH, et al. Design on the driveshaft of 3D 4-Directional carbon fiber braided composites. Compos Struct2018; 203: 466–473.
164.
GuJChenP.Some modifications of Hashin’s failure criteria for unidirectional composite materials. Compos Struct2017; 182: 143–152.
