To address the high aerodynamic drag of long-distance buses at elevated speeds, this study proposes a numerical simulation-based optimization framework. The SHERPA algorithm in STAR-CCM+ was employed to automate the multi-parameter co-optimization of six key geometric variables: front/rear/side edge chamfer radii, front windshield angle, front spoiler angle, and rear windshield angle. A constrained multi-objective optimization strategy was developed to balance aerodynamic performance and engineering constraints, achieving a 37.1% drag reduction (CD: 0.499 → 0.314). Localized refinement with front wheel deflectors further reduced CD to 0.303, demonstrating a cumulative drag reduction of 39.3%. The findings provide validated methodologies for the energy-efficient design of commercial vehicles.
WidodoWAKarohmahMN.CFD based investigations into optimization of diffuser angle on rear bus body. Appl Mech Mat2016; 836: 127–131.
2.
HuchoWH.Aerodynamic of road vehicles. SAE International Press; 1998.
3.
HuchoWHJanssenLJEmmelmannHJ.The optimization of body details—A method for reducing the aerodynamic drag of road vehicles. SAE Transact1976; 85: 865–882.
4.
AhmedSR. Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake. SAE Paper, 1984, p. 840300.
5.
CooperKR.The effect of front-edge rounding and rear-edge shaping on the aerodynamic drag of bluff vehicles in ground proximity. SAE Transact1985; 94: 727–757.
6.
CamaraEFGirardiRM. On the aerodynamic analysis of a bus model. SAE Technical Paper, SAE International, 1995.
7.
KimMHKukJYChyunIB. A numerical simulation on the drag reduction of large-sized bus using rear-spoiler. SAE Technical Paper, SAE International, 2002.
8.
GurlekCSahinBOzkanGM.PIV studies around a bus model. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci2012; 38: 115–126.
9.
JowseyLPassmoreM.Experimental study of multiple-channel automotive underbody diffusers. Proceed Instit Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng2010; 224(7): 865–879.
10.
DanielGRPedroDBMJimmyA, et al. Drag reduction of a commercial bus with add-on aerodynamic devices. Proceed Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng2023; 237(7): 1623–1636.
11.
FuL.Experimental study on aerodynamic drag reduction of domestic heavy-duty trucks. Fluid Mech Exp Meas1987; 1: 008.
12.
GuZQinDHuangT.Wind tunnel test study on the aerodynamics of JT6120 bus model. Spec Veh1994; 1: 32–34.
13.
FuLLiuX.Study on the wake structure of typical cars. Autom Eng1996; 18(6): 343–347.
14.
GaoLZhouR.Wind tunnel test study of domestic bus models. Autom Technol2002; 7: 27–31.
15.
WangSZhangDMaJ.Aerodynamic simulation analysis of LCK6122 Bus. Bus Technol Res2007; 29(2): 14–17.
16.
ZhangYZhangZFuL, et al. Transient cfd simulation of the overtaking process of cars and buses in a tunnel. J Harbin Inst Technol2009; 9: 105–108.
17.
ChengX.Study on the aerodynamic characteristics of the external flow field of a bus. Jilin University, 2010.
18.
LiuCKWangJ.Bus body design and calculation of aerodynamic drag coefficient. Appl Mech Mat2014; 496: 2655–2659.
19.
HuH.Aerodynamic characteristics analysis and optimization of a 12-meter tourist bus. Xiamen University of Technology, 2016.
20.
FangZ.Analysis of the external flow field of a 12m bus and research on some appearance design for drag reduction. Xiamen University of Technology, 2019.
21.
ZhangY.Numerical simulation technology for automobile aerodynamics. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2011.
22.
CooperK.SAE wind tunnel test procedure for trucks and buses. SAE Recommended Practice J2012; 1252.
23.
ZhanHLiWFangQ, et al. Simulation calculation of flow around a cylinder at different reynolds numbers. J Wuhan Univ Technol2008; 12: 129–132.
24.
PillerMNobileEHanrattyTJ.DNS study of turbulent transport at low Prandtl numbers in a channel flow. J Fluid Mech2002; 458: 419–441.
25.
WissinkJG.DNS of separating, low Reynolds number flow in a turbine cascade with incoming wakes. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2003; 24(4): 626–635.
26.
WangJ.Aerodynamic characteristics analysis and modeling optimization research of light-duty buses. Changchun: Jilin University, School of Automotive Engineering, 2008.
27.
SongYGuZLiuS, et al. Study on the applicability of the k-ε model in the numerical simulation of vehicle external flow fields. J Hunan Univ Technol2019; 33(01): 66–72.
28.
XueX.Study on aerodynamic drag optimization of the local shape of a Sedan. Jilin University, 2017.
29.
WangJYangZZhuH. Grid independence study of aerodynamic drag simulation of MIRA model with step-back configuration. J Jiamusi Univ (Nat Sci Ed)2012(3): 345–349.
30.
GilhausA.The aerodynamic drag of buses, paper XI-3, Proc. Colloque Construire avec le vent (Designing with the Wind), 15–19 June 1981, CSTB Nantes.
BayraktarIBayraktarT.Assessment of Reynolds averaged turbulence models in predicting flow structure behind a generic automobile body. SAE Technical Paper, 2006.
33.
HuchoWHSovranG.Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Ann Rev Fluid Mech1993; 25: 485–537.
34.
KilavuzAOzgorenMKavurmaciogluLA, et al. Flow characteristics comparison of PIV and numerical prediction results for an unmanned underwater vehicle positioned close to the free surface. Applied Ocean Res2022; 129: 103399.
