With the development of intelligent vehicles for different types of drivers, generating different driving styles of driving schemes can improve the comfort of the automatic driving system. This paper proposes a human-like planning method for lane change and intersections. Firstly, in planning for the speed driving scheme to enter the intersection, a planning method is proposed to generate different types of speed schemes after determining the start and end speeds. Secondly, by analyzing the data collected under turning conditions on a driving simulator, we extracted the characteristics of driving behavior for each experiment and calculated the probabilistic statistical properties of turning radius and maximum lateral acceleration. Thirdly, the driving characteristics of lane changes are obtained through the fitting of the lane change dataset, and based on this, the probabilistic statistical properties of lane change behavior are determined. Fourthly, this paper proposes a method for deciding longitudinal acceleration by deep learning, by inputting the motion information of the surrounding traffic participants and the motion information of the host vehicle and outputting the decided acceleration, which has the characteristics of imitating the driving behaviors of the real drivers, and adding a safety limit to the output. Finally, simulations and tests are conducted on the VTD (Virtual Test Drive).
MillarRCHashemiLMahmoodiA, et al. Integrating unmanned and manned UAVs data network based on combined Bayesian belief network and multi-objective reinforcement learning algorithm. Drone Syst Appl2023; 11: 1–17.
2.
MahmoodiAHashemiLLalibertéJ, et al. Secured multi-dimensional robust optimization model for remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS) delivery network based on the SORA standard. Designs2022; 6(3): 55.
3.
SadeqAMHomodRZHusseinAK, et al. Hydrogen energy systems: technologies, trends, and future prospects. Sci Total Environ2024; 939: 173622.
4.
ChenCRickertMKnollA.Combining task and motion planning for intersection assistance systems. In: 2016 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), Gothenburg, Sweden, 19–22 June 2016, pp.1242–1247. New York: IEEE.
5.
DiasCIryo-AsanoMAbdullahM, et al. Modeling trajectories and trajectory variation of turning vehicles at signalized intersections. IEEE Access2020; 8: 109821–109834.
6.
ZhaoWLiuRNgoduyD.A bilevel programming model for autonomous intersection control and trajectory planning. Transportmetrica A Transp Sci2021; 17(1): 34–58.
7.
WangYLiuZZuoZ, et al. Trajectory planning and safety assessment of autonomous vehicles based on motion prediction and model predictive control. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2019; 68(9): 8546–8556.
8.
NilssonJBrännströmMFredrikssonJ, et al. Longitudinal and lateral control for automated yielding maneuvers. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2016; 17(5): 1404–1414.
9.
MorsaliMÅslundJFriskE.Trajectory planning in traffic scenarios using support vector machines. IFAC Pap OnLine2019; 52(5): 91–96.
10.
DebadaEUngAGilletD.Occlusion-aware motion planning at roundabouts. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2020; 6(2): 276–287.
11.
LattaruloRGonzálezLMartíE, et al. Urban motion planning framework based on n-Bézier curves considering comfort and safety. J Adv Transp2018; 2018: 6060924.
12.
ZhouJZhengHWangJ, et al. Multiobjective optimization of lane-changing strategy for intelligent vehicles in complex driving environments. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2019; 69(2): 1291–1308.
13.
YangSZhengHWangJ, et al. A personalized human-like lane-changing trajectory planning method for automated driving system. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2021; 70(7): 6399–6414.
14.
SchnelleSWangJSuH, et al. A driver steering model with personalized desired path generation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2016; 47(1): 111–120.
15.
XuDDingZZhaoH, et alNaturalistic lane change analysis for human-like trajectory generation. In: 2018 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), Changshu, China, 26–30 June 2018, pp.1393–1399. New York: IEEE.
16.
YaoWZhaoHDavoineF, et al. Learning lane change trajectories from on-road driving data. In: 2012 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, Madrid, Spain, 3–7 June 2012, pp.885–890. New York: IEEE.
17.
GuTDolanJM.Toward human-like motion planning in urban environments. In: 2014 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium proceedings, Dearborn, MI, USA, 8–11 June 2014, pp.350–355. New York: IEEE.
18.
HeXXuDZhaoH, et al. A human-like trajectory planning method by learning from naturalistic driving data. In: 2018 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), Changshu, China, 26–30 June 2018, pp.339–346. New York: IEEE.
19.
SunRHuSZhaoH, et alHuman-like highway trajectory modeling based on inverse reinforcement learning. In: 2019 IEEE intelligent transportation systems conference (ITSC), Auckland, New Zealand, 27–30 October 2019, pp.1482–1489. New York: IEEE.
20.
HuangCHuangHHangP, et al. Personalized trajectory planning and control of lane-change maneuvers for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2021; 70(6): 5511–5523.
21.
XuDDingZHeX, et al. Learning from naturalistic driving data for human-like autonomous highway driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2020; 22(12): 7341–7354.
22.
LiuZChenJXiaH, et al. Human-like trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles based on spatiotemporal geometric transformation. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23(11): 20160–20176.
23.
LuHLiuYZhuM, et al. Enhancing interpretability of autonomous driving via human-like cognitive maps: a case study on lane change. IEEE Trans Intell Veh. Epub ahead of print 29January2024. DOI: 10.1109/TIV.2024.3359281.
24.
HangPZhangYLvC.Brain-inspired modeling and decision-making for human-like autonomous driving in mixed traffic environment. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2023; 24(10): 10420–10432.
25.
HuangZWuJLvC.Efficient deep reinforcement learning with imitative expert priors for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst2022; 34(10): 7391–7403.
26.
SamaKMoralesYLiuH, et al. Extracting human-like driving behaviors from expert driver data using deep learning. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2020; 69(9): 9315–9329.
27.
WangLFernandezCStillerC.High-level decision making for automated highway driving via behavior cloning. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2022; 8(1): 923–935.
28.
ChenYLiGLiS, et al. Exploring behavioral patterns of lane change maneuvers for human-like autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 23(9): 14322–14335.
29.
NanJDengWZhangR, et al. Interaction-aware planning with deep inverse reinforcement learning for human-like autonomous driving in merge scenarios. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2024; 9: 2714–2726.
30.
TianYCaoXHuangK, et al. Learning to drive like human beings: a method based on deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 23(7): 6357–6367.
31.
XuCZhaoWWangC, et al. Driving behavior modeling and characteristic learning for human-like decision-making in highway. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2022; 8(2): 1994–2005.
32.
HuangZLiuHWuJ, et al. Conditional predictive behavior planning with inverse reinforcement learning for human-like autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2023; 24(7): 7244–7258.
33.
AcerboFSAlirczaeiMVan der AuweraerH, et alSafe imitation learning on real-life highway data for human-like autonomous driving. In: 2021 IEEE international intelligent transportation systems conference (ITSC), Indianapolis, IN, USA, 19–22 September 2021, pp.3903–3908. New York: IEEE.
34.
AminiAGilitschenskiIPhillipsJ, et al. Learning robust control policies for end-to-end autonomous driving from data-driven simulation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2020; 5(2): 1143–1150.
35.
XiaoYCodevillaFGurramA, et al. Multimodal end-to-end autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2020; 23(1): 537–547.
36.
CaiLGuanHZhangHL, et al. Multi-maneuver vertical parking path planning and control in a narrow space. Rob Auton Syst2022; 149: 103964.
