Due to the increased unsprung mass and unbalanced electromagnetic force excitations, the comfort of the ride and the stability of handling of Hub Motor Driven Vehicles (HMDV) are deteriorated. In response to the deterioration of the performance indicators brought by the hub motors, this study first establishes the full car model of HMDV, and combines inertial suspension with the Skyhook (SH) and Mixed Skyhook-Acceleration Driven Damping (SH-ADD) control strategies. The inertial suspension is used to minimize the negative impact of HMDV, and the NSGA-II optimization algorithm is employed for optimizing suspension parameters with multiple objectives. Then, this study analyzes the variation trends of different performance indicators with increasing vehicle speed and the effects of inertial coefficient changes on the evaluation of the SH-ADD inertial suspension performance. And results indicate that the inertial suspension enhances both the ride comfort and handling stability of HMDV, with SH-ADD performing superior to single SH in suppressing vehicle vibrations across a broader frequency range.
DeepakKFrikhaMABenômarY, et al. In-wheel motor drive systems for electric vehicles: state of the art, challenges, and future trends. Energies2023; 16(7): 3121.
2.
ShiDLiuSShenY, et al. Analysis and optimization of transient mode switching behavior for power split hybrid electric vehicle with clutch collaboration. Automot Innov2024; 7(1): 150–165.
3.
AjamlooAMIbrahimMNSergeantP.Design, modelling and optimization of a high power density axial flux SRM with reduced torque ripple for electric vehicles. Machines2023; 11(7): 759.
4.
NalinashiniGTamilselviV.Experimental investigation of modified in-wheel switched reluctance motor with reduced torque ripple for electric vehicles. Electr Eng2021; 103(6): 1–9.
5.
DiaoKSunXBramerdorferG, et al. Design optimization of switched reluctance machines for performance and reliability enhancements: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2022; 168: 112785.
6.
ZhaoXXuLTianQ, et al. Modeling and suppression of unbalanced radial force for in-wheel motor driving system. J Vib Control2022; 28(21–22): 3108–3119.
7.
HejraMMansouriATrabelsiH. Optimal design of a permanent magnet synchronous motor: application of in-wheel motor. In: 2014 5th international renewable energy congress (IREC), Hammamet, Tunisia, 25–27 March 2014, pp.1–5. New York: IEEE.
8.
WangQLiRZhuY, et al. Integration design and parameter optimization for a novel in-wheel motor with dynamic vibration absorbers. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2020; 42(9): 39–45.
9.
KimJYSohnYChangS, et al. Vibration control of car body and wheel motions for in-wheel motor vehicles using road type classification. Actuators2024; 13(2): 80.
10.
ShiPShiPYanC, et al. Analysis of the electric wheel vibration reduction system of a wheel-hub motor-driven vehicle. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233(3): 848–856.
11.
ShaoXNaghdyFDuH, et al. Coupling effect between road excitation and an in-wheel switched reluctance motor on vehicle ride comfort and active suspension control. J Sound Vib2018; 443: 683–702.
12.
TangFLinS.Game-based multiobjective optimization of suspension system for in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle. Math Probl Eng2021; 2021: 5589199.
13.
LiZLiuCSongX, et al. Vibration suppression of hub motor electric vehicle considering unbalanced magnetic pull. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(12): 3185–3198.
14.
SmithMC.Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2002; 47(10): 1648–1662.
15.
LiuCChenLLeeHP, et al. A review of the inerter and inerter-based vibration isolation: theory, devices, and applications. J Franklin Inst2022; 359(14): 7677–7707.
16.
ShenYHuaJFanW, et al. Optimal design and dynamic performance analysis of a fractional-order electrical network-based vehicle mechatronic ISD suspension. Mech Syst Signal Process2023; 184: 109718.
17.
ShenYQiuDYangX, et al. Vibration isolation performance analysis of a nonlinear fluid inerter-based hydro-pneumatic suspension. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2024; 2024: 2650079.
18.
LiuCChenLZhangX.Stability analysis of semi-active inerter-spring-damper suspensions based on time-delay. J Theor Appl Mech2020; 58(3): 599–610.
19.
CuiLXueXLeF, et al. Design and experiment of electro hydraulic active suspension for controlling the rolling motion of spray boom. Int J Agric Biol Eng2019; 12(4): 72–81.
20.
ZhangBZhaoHZhangX.Adaptive variable domain fuzzy PID control strategy based on road excitation for semi-active suspension using CDC shock absorber. J Vib Control2024; 30(3–4): 860–875.
21.
ShenYChenADuF, et al. Performance enhancements of semi-active vehicle air ISD suspension. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering. Epub ahead of print 25 February 2024. DOI: 10.1177/09544070241233024.
22.
ShenYJiaMYangX, et al. Vibration suppression using a mechatronic PDD-ISD-combined vehicle suspension system. Int J Mech Sci2023; 250: 108277.
23.
YangXZhangTShenY, et al. Tradeoff analysis of the energy-harvesting vehicle suspension system employing inerter element. Energy2024; 308: 132841.
24.
SavaresiSMSilaniEBittantiS.Acceleration driven damper (ADD): an optimal control algorithm for comfort oriented semi-active suspensions. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2005; 127(2): 218–229.
25.
DingRWangRMengX, et al. A new hybrid electromagnetic actuator for a modified skyhook control strategy with energy reduction. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2019; 234(7): 2025–2037.
26.
NegashBAYouWLeeJ, et al. Semi-active control of a nonlinear quarter-car model of hyperloop capsule vehicle with Skyhook and Mixed Skyhook-Acceleration Driven Damper controller. Adv Mech Eng2021; 13(2): 1687814021999528.
27.
MaHZhangYSunS, et al. A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications. Artif Intell Rev2023; 56(12): 15217–15270.
28.
LiQXuAShangC, et al. Non-linear deadbeat direct torque and flux control for switched reluctance motor. IET Power Electron2020; 13(18): 4176–4182.
29.
ZhuYZhaoCYinL, et al. A comparative study of switched reluctance motors with a single-phase and a novel Synchronous double-phase excitation mode. IET Electr Power Appl2021; 15(9): 1217–1231.
30.
GuoZQinDLiA, et al. Influence of random road excitation on DCT vehicle dynamic characteristics during starting and shifting. J Mech Sci Technol2023; 37(9): 4567–4582.
31.
ZhangYZhangJ.Numerical simulation of stochastic road process using white noise filtration. Mech Syst Signal Process2005; 20(2): 363–372.
32.
BarbaroMGenoveseATimponeF, et al. Extension of the multiphysical magic formula tire model for ride comfort applications. Nonlinear Dyn2024; 112(6): 4183–4208.
33.
SavaresiSMSpeltaC.Mixed sky-hook and ADD: approaching the filtering limits of a semi-active suspension. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2007; 129(4): 382–392.
34.
ZhaoKHeKLiangZ, et al. Global optimization-based energy management strategy for series–parallel hybrid electric vehicles using multi-objective optimization algorithm. Automot Innov2023; 6(3): 492–507.
