Effect of housing size on the performance of a centrifugal compressor for turbocharger application: An experimental and numerical study

Abstract

Currently, engine downsizing through turbocharging is widespread in the automotive industry to improve fuel economy and emissions. The engine downsizing demands compact and high performance centrifugal compressors for turbochargers. A compressor contains mainly an impeller and housing, which often uses a vaneless diffuser and an overhanging volute. High-speed flow from the impeller is decelerated in the diffuser and volute, to recover static pressure for boosting the engine. The volute flow characteristics and pressure recovery depend on the housing size, which determines the overall compressor performance and size. This study evaluates the effect of four different housing sizes viz., baseline, 12% scaled up, and 12% and 20% scaled-down geometrically, through experimental and numerical analysis. The experiments are conducted using different housing sizes with a given impeller to measure the compressor pressure ratio and efficiency. Also, steady-state numerical simulations are performed to examine the flow mechanisms causing pressure losses due to changes in housing size. Then, the simulation is also done for different volute surface roughness levels in each housing to establish its effect on compressor performance. From the results, it is found that there is no marked change in compressor efficiency between the baseline and 12% scaled-up housing. Whereas, the scaled-down housings (12% and 20%) showed efficiency drop of about 2–5 percentage points at near-choke flow rate. The CFD analyses of these scaled down housings with reduced cross-sectional area indicated substantial increase of meridional velocity, which results in higher swirl velocity in the volute causing more pressure losses. Besides, the increased volute surface roughness is realized to cause extra pressure loss due to higher wall shear stress. It amounts to additional efficiency reduction of 0.5–1 percentage points at the same near-choke flow.

Keywords

Turbocharger centrifugal compressor compressor housing size surface roughness level CFD

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Denton

. Some limitations of turbomachinery CFD. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2010: power for land, sea and air, Glasgow, UK, 14–18 June 2010, paper GT2010-22540, pp.735–745. New York: ASME.

Lakeh

KS.

CFD application to turbochargers of internal combustion engines. Doctoral Thesis, Milan Polytechnic University, Italy, 2017.

Krivitzky

Yamamoto

Eliminating engine performance degradation over time through compressor redesign. SAE Int J Engines 2013; 6: 806–814.

Brown

Bradshaw

. Design and performance of family of diffusing scrolls with mixed-flow impeller and vaneless diffuser. NACA technical note, TN-1568, 1948.

Bowerman

Acosta

. Effect of the volute on performance of a centrifugal-pump impeller. In: Semi-annual meeting, hydraulic and gas turbine power divisions, Cleveland, OH, 17–21 June 1956, pp.1057–1069.

Stiefel

Experience in development of radial compressor. Von Karman Institute of Fluid Dynamics, Lecture series 50: Advanced radial compressors, 15–19 May 1972.

Mishina

Gyobu

. Performance investigations of large capacity centrifugal compressors. In: Proceedings of the 1978 ASME international gas turbine conference and products show, London, 9–13 April 1978, paper 78-GT-3. New York: ASME.

Liberti

. Effect of the exit system on the performance of a low specific speed industrial centrifugal compressor stage. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2003: international joint power generation conference, Atlanta, GA, 16–19 June 2003, paper GT2003-38570, pp.789–798. New York: ASME.

Bartelt

Kwitschinski

Ceyrowsky

, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of different rectangular volute geometries for large radial compressors. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 turbo expo: turbine technical conference and exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–10 June 2011, paper GT2011-46296, pp.2125–21237. New York: ASME.

10.

Fischer

Seume

. Low-inertia centrifugal compressor wheels: aerodynamic and mechanical design. Adv Mech Eng 2017; 9: 1–14.

11.

Chen

. Component matching of centrifugal compressors for turbocharger applications. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2017: turbomachinery technical conference and exposition, Charlotte, NC, 26–30 June 2017, paper GT2017-63108. New York: ASME.

12.

Hagelstein

Hillewaert

Van den Braembussche

, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the flow in a centrifugal compressor volute. J Turbomach 2000; 122: 22–31.

13.

Sun

Zheng

Linghu

, et al. Influence of volute design on flow field distortion and flow stability of turbocharger centrifugal compressors. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2019; 233: 484–494.

14.

Engeda

. A numerical investigation on the volute/impeller steady state interaction due to circumferential distortion. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2001: power of land, sea and air, New Orleans, LA, 4–7 June 2001, paper 2001-GT-0328. New York: ASME.

15.

Engeda

Cave

, et al. A numerical investigation on the volute/diffuser interaction due to the axial distortion at the impeller exit. J Fluid Eng 2001; 123: 475–483.

16.

Dai

Engeda

Cave

, et al. Numerical study and experimental validation of the performance of two different volutes with the same compressor impeller. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2009; 223: 157–166.

17.

Dai

Engeda

Cave

, et al. A flow field study of the interaction between a centrifugal compressor impeller and two different volutes. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2010; 224: 345–356.

18.

Varghese

Kumar

TCM

Rao

YVN

. Influence of volute surface roughness on the performance of a centrifugal pump. J Fluid Eng 1978; 100: 473–476.

19.

Casey

MV.

The effects of Reynolds number on the efficiency of centrifugal compressor stages. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 1985; 107: 541–548.

20.

Simon

Bulskamper

On the evaluation of Reynolds number and relative surface roughness effects on centrifugal compressor performance based on systematic experimental investigations. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 1984; 106: 489–498.

21.

Javed

Kamphues

. Evaluation of the influence of volute roughness on turbocharger compressor performance from a manufacturing perspective. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2014: turbine technical conference and exposition, Dusseldorf, Germany, 16–20 June 2014, paper GT2014-26949. New York: ASME.

22.

Numakura

Kawakubo

Tamaki

Prediction of surface roughness effects on centrifugal compressor performance. Turbomach Soc Jpn 2009; 37: 554–558.

23.

Gulich

JF.

Effect of Reynolds number and surface roughness on the efficiency of centrifugal pumps. J Fluid Eng 2003; 125: 670–679.

24.

Zhang

Wang

, et al. Influence of critical wall roughness on the performance of double-channel sewage pump. Energies 2020; 13: 464–520.

25.

SAE international surface vehicle recommended practice – turbocharger gas stand test code. SAE Standard J1826, Rev. March 1995.

26.

ASME performance test code – performance test code on compressors and exhausters. ASME PTC 10-1997, 1998.

27.

VDI guideline – acceptance and performance tests on turbo compressors and displacement compressors. VDI 2045, 1993.

28.

Sirakov

Casey

. Evaluation of heat transfer effects on turbocharger performance. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2011: turbine technical conference and exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–10 June 2011, paper GT2011-45887, pp.2075–2086. New York: ASME.

29.

Guillou

. Uncertainty and measurement sensitivity of turbocharger compressor gas stands. SAE technical paper 2013-01-0925, 2013.

30.

ANSYS-CFX. V19.4, Solver Theory guide.

31.

Adams

Grant

Watson

A simple algorithm to relate measured surface roughness to equivalent sand-grain roughness. Int J Mech Eng Mechatron 2012; 1: 66–71.

32.

Bons

JP.

A review of surface roughness effects in gas turbines. J Turbomach 2010; 132: 021004.

33.

Tang

Wang

, et al. Quantitative study on equivalent roughness conversion coefficient and roughness effect of centrifugal compressor. J Fluid Eng 2020; 142(2): 021208.

34.

Aldi

Morini

Pinelli

, et al. Numerical analysis of the effects of surface roughness localization on the performance of an axial compressor stage. Energy Procedia 2014; 45: 1057–1066.

35.

Tanganelli

Balduzzi

Bianchini

, et al. An investigation on the loss generation mechanisms inside different centrifugal compressor volutes for turbochargers. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2019; 141: 021004.

36.

Juckelandt

Bleeck

Wurm

. Analysis of losses in centrifugal pumps with low specific speed with smooth and rough walls. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on turbomachinery fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, Madrid, Spain, 23–27 March 2015.