Tightnening emission regulations and increasing powertrain complexity lead car manufacturers to rely on novel testing methods in order to frontload development. Among these, Engine-in-the-Loop, that is, the coupling of a physical internal combustion engine (ICE) on a testbed with a virtual environment, shows great promise for emission- and consumption-related tasks. In particular, this study focuses on the driver model, a simple yet crucial component of the virtual environment. A longitudinal driver model is developed in Simulink based on the PI-regulation structure and augmented with anti-windup, cycle preview, and takeoff strategy. While the PI approach is generally chosen in the literature, this study details the implementation of the added functions, and proposes a method for the gains of the model to be tuned in simulation by considering engine dynamics, and using several performance indicators. The virtual driver is then tested in a complete EiL setup simulating an electric hybrid driveline and shows satisfactory cycle-following and overall behavior on a WLTC. Robustness of the tuning method is also studied by varying vehicle parameters on the EiL bench.
HooftmanNMessagieMVan MierloJ, et al. A review of the European passenger car regulations – real driving emissions vs local air quality. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2018; 86: 1–21.
2.
JoumardR. Actual use emissions of road transport. SAE technical paper 2001-24-0087, 2001.
3.
Kumar PathakSSoodVSinghY, et al. Real world vehicle emissions: their correlation with driving parameters. Transport Res Part D: Transp Environ2016; 44: 157–176.
4.
European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU). 2017/1151 of 1 June 2017 Supplementing regulation (EC) no. 715/2007 of the European parliament and of the council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles. Euro 5. Technical report, European Commission, 2017.
LeeWYoonMSunwooM.A cost- and time-effective hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform for automotive engine control systems. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2003; 217(1): 41–52.
7.
RamaswamyDMcGeeRSivashankarS, et al. A case study in hardware-In-the-loop testing: development of an ECU for a hybrid electric vehicle. SAE technical papers 2004-01-03, 2004.
8.
GehringJSchütteH. A hardware-in-the-loop test bench for the validation of complex ECU networks. SAE technical papers 2002-01-08, 2002.
9.
SchuetteHPloegerM. Hardware-in-the-loop testing of engine control units – a technical survey. SAE technical papers 2007-01-05, 2007.
10.
IsermannRSchaffnitJSinselS.Hardware-in-the-loop simulation for the design and testing of engine-control systems. Control Eng Pract1999; 7(5): 643–653.
11.
FilipiZHagenaJFathyH.Investigating the impact of in-vehicle transients on diesel soot emissions. Therm Sci2008; 12(1): 53–72.
12.
GuseDKleinSAndertJ, et al. Virtual transmission evaluation using an engine-in-the-loop test facility. SAE International 2018-01-1361, 2018.
13.
KleinSGriefnowPGuseD, et al. Virtual 48 V mild hybridization: efficient validation by engine-in-the-loop. SAE Int J Alt Power2018; 7(3): 297–309.
14.
RymaniakLSiedleckiMSokolnickaB, et al. Comparative test of an internal combustion engine ecological indicators in real operating conditions and on a dynamic engine dynamometer. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2018; 421: 042069.
15.
WangXFuTWangC, et al. Fuel consumption and emissions at China automotive test cycle for a heavy duty vehicle based on engine-in-the-loop methodology. J Phys2020; 1549(022119): 1–8.
16.
JohriRFilipiZ.Optimal energy management of a series hybrid vehicle with combined fuel economy and low-emission objectives. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2014; 228(12): 1424–1439.
17.
WenzelTABurnhamKJWilliamsRA, et al. Closed-loop driver/vehicle model for automotive control. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on systems engineering, pp.1–6. Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, London.
SymondsPSharpRSCasanovaD.A mathematical model for driver steering control, with design, tuning and performance results. Veh Syst Dyn2000; 33(5): 289–326.
20.
XieJXuXWangF, et al. Modeling human-like longitudinal driver model for intelligent vehicles based on reinforcement learning. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235: 2226–2241.
XiongLYangXLengB, et al. Integrated longitudinal and lateral control for autonomous vehicles with active load transfer strategy at the handling limits. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235: 961–974.
23.
PanFBaoH.Preceding vehicle following algorithm with human driving characteristics. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235: 1825–1834.
24.
KleinSSavelsbergRXiaF, et al. Engine in the loop: closed loop test bench control with real-time simulation. SAE Int J Commer Veh2017; 10(1): 95–105.
25.
FilipiZLoucaLDaranB, et al. Combined optimisation of design and power management of the hydraulic hybrid propulsion system for the 6 ? 6 medium truck. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2004; 11(3/4): 372–402.
26.
FilipiZFathyHHagenaJ, et al. Engine-in-the-loop testing for evaluating hybrid propulsion concepts and transient emissions – HMMWV case study. SAE technical paper 2006-01-0443, 2006.
27.
FilipiZKimYJ.Hydraulic hybrid propulsion for heavy vehicles: combining the simulation and engine-In-the-loop techniques to maximize the fuel economy and emission benefits. Oil Gas Sci Technol2010; 65(1): 155–178.
28.
KimYErsalTSalviA, et al. Engine-in-the-loop validation of a frequency domain power distribution strategy for series hybrid powertrains. In: 2012 Workshop on engine and powertrain control, simulation and modeling (IFAC), Rueil-Malmaison, France, 2012, vol. 45, pp.432–439. Laxenburg, Austria: IFAC.
29.
KimYSalviASiegelJB, et al. Hardware-in-the-loop validation of a power management strategy for hybrid powertrains. Control Eng Pract2014; 29: 277–286.
30.
ErsalTBrudnakMSalviA, et al. Development and model-based transparency analysis of an Internet-distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform. Mechatronics2011; 21(1): 22–29.
FathyHKAhlawatRSteinJL.Proper powertrain modeling for engine-in-the-loop simulation. Dynam Syst Control, Parts A and B2005; IMECE2005-81592, 1195–1201.
33.
PerezFMoulinPMastroAD. Vehicle simulation on an engine test bed. In: Diesel Engines - The low CO2 & emissions reduction challenge. SIA international conference, 2009, pp.1–8. France: SIA.
34.
JiangSSmithMHKitchenJ, et al. Development of an engine-in-the-loop vehicle simulation system in engine dynamometer test cell. SAE International 2009-01-10, 2009. http://www.sae.org.
35.
KorsaneDTYadavVRautKH.PID tuning rules for first order plus time delay system. Int J Innovat Res Electr Electron Instrum Control Eng2014; 2(1): 582–586.
36.
O’DwyerA.A summary of PI and PID controller tuning rules for processes with time delay. Part 1: PI controller tuning rules. IFAC Proc Vol2000; 33(4): 159–164.
37.
LiXLParkJGShinHB.Comparison and evaluation of anti-windup PI controllers. J Power Electron2011; 11(1): 45–50.
38.
ÅströmKJMurrayR.Feedback systems – an introduction for scientists and engineers. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2010. http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8701.html
DiasJEAPereiraGASPalharesRM.Longitudinal model identification and velocity control of an autonomous car. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2014; 16(2): 1–11.
41.
OsmanKRahmatMFAhmadMA. Modelling and controller design for a cruise control system. In: Proceedings of 2009 5th international colloquium on signal processing and its applications, CSPA2009, 2009, pp.254–258. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IEEE, NYC, USA.
42.
JenaKSJosephAV.Dynamic modelling and control design for a vehicle in its longitudinal motion. Indian J Sci Technol2016; 9(30): 1–6.
43.
SailanKKuhnertKD. Modeling and design of cruise control system with feedforward for all terrian vehicles. In: Second international conference on advanced information technologies and applications, 2013, pp.339–349. Dubai, UAE: CS & IT-CSCP.
