In order to solve the problems of longitudinal and lateral control coupling, low accuracy and poor real-time of existing control strategy in the process of active collision avoidance, a longitudinal and lateral collision avoidance control strategy of intelligent vehicle based on model predictive control is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the vehicle nonlinear coupling dynamics model is established. Secondly, considering the accuracy and real-time requirements of intelligent vehicle motion control in pedestrian crossing scene, and combining the advantages of centralized control and decentralized control, an integrated unidirectional decoupling compensation motion control strategy is proposed. The proposed strategy uses two pairs of unidirectional decoupling compensation controllers to realize the mutual integration and decoupling in both longitudinal and lateral directions. Compared with centralized control, it simplifies the design of controller, retains the advantages of centralized control, and improves the real-time performance of control. Compared with the decentralized control, it considers the influence of longitudinal and lateral control, retains the advantages of decentralized control, and improves the control accuracy. Finally, the proposed control strategy is simulated and analyzed in six working conditions, and compared with the existing control strategy. The results show that the proposed control strategy is obviously better than the existing control strategy in terms of control accuracy and real-time performance, and can effectively improve vehicle safety and stability.
LiYIbanez-GuzmanJ. Lidar for autonomous driving: the principles, challenges, and trends for automotive Lidar and perception systems. IEEE Signal Process Mag2020; 37(4): 50–61.
2.
MouhagirHTaljRCherfaouiV, et al. Evidential-based approach for trajectory planning with tentacles, for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2020; 21(8): 3485–3496.
3.
ZhangJZhangBZhangN, et al. A novel reliable robust adaptive event-triggered automatic steering control approach of autonomous land vehicles under communication delay. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2021; 31: 2436–2464.
4.
Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems, SAE standard J3016_ 201401, 2014.
5.
PengTSuLZhangR, et al. A new safe lane-change trajectory model and collision avoidance control method for automatic driving vehicles. Expert Syst Appl2020; 141: 112953.
6.
YuanYTasikRAdhataraoSS, et al. RACE: reinforced cooperative autonomous vehicle collision avoidance. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2020; 69(9): 9279–9291.
7.
FunkeJBrownMErlienSM, et al. Collision avoidance and stabilization for autonomous vehicles in emergency scenarios. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2017; 25(4): 1204–1216.
8.
FengJWangCXuC, et al. Active collision avoidance strategy considering motion uncertainty of the pedestrian. In: IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 24 November 2020, pp.1–13. New York: IEEE.
9.
JondHBPlatosJ. A fast trajectory tracking control design for autonomous driving. In: 2019 7th international conference on robotics and mechatronics (ICRoM), Tehran, Iran, 20–21 November 2019, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
10.
ZhangW. A robust lateral tracking control strategy for autonomous driving vehicles. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 150: 107238.
11.
XuSPengH. Design, analysis, and experiments of preview path tracking control for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2020; 21(1): 48–58.
12.
Hernandez-AlcantaraDAmezquita-BrooksLMorales-MenendezR, et al. The cross-coupling of lateral-longitudinal vehicle dynamics: towards decentralized fault-tolerant control schemes. Mechatronics2017; 50: 377–393.
13.
YuZWangJ. Automatic vehicle trajectory tracking control with self-calibration of nonlinear tire force function. In: 2017 american control conference (ACC), Seattle, WA, 24–26 May 2017, pp. 985–990. New York: IEEE.
14.
CuiQDingRZhouB, et al. Path-tracking of an autonomous vehicle via model predictive control and nonlinear filtering. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2018; 232(9): 1237–1252.
15.
TurriVCarvalhoATsengHE, et al. Linear model predictive control for lane keeping and obstacle avoidance on low curvature roads. In: 16th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC 2013), The Hague, The Netherlands, 6–9 October 2013, pp.378–383. New York: IEEE.
16.
GuoJHuPWangR. Nonlinear coordinated steering and braking control of vision-based autonomous vehicles in emergency obstacle avoidance. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2016; 17(11): 3230–3240.
17.
HamidUZZamzuriHYamadaT, et al. Modular design of artificial potential field and nonlinear model predictive control for a vehicle collision avoidance system with move blocking strategy. Proc IMechEng, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2018; 232(10): 1353–1373.
18.
BrownMGerdesJC. Coordinating tire forces to avoid obstacles using nonlinear model predictive control. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2020; 5(1): 21–31.
19.
GaoYGrayATsengH, et al. A tube-based robust nonlinear predictive control approach to semiautonomous ground vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn2014; 52(6): 802–823.
20.
KimJParkJ-HJhangK-Y. Decoupled longitudinal and lateral vehicle control based autonomous lane change system adaptable to driving surroundings. IEEE Access2020; 9: 4315–4334.
21.
MatuteJALattaruloRZubizarretaA, et al. A comparison between coupled and decoupled vehicle motion controllers based on prediction models. In: 2019 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), Paris, France, 9–12 June 2019, pp. 1843–1848. New York: IEEE.
22.
TanBChenYLiaoQ, et al. A condensed dynamic model of a heavy-duty truck for optimization of the powertrain mounting system considering the chassis frame flexibility. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(10–11): 2602–2617.
23.
PacejkaHB. Tire and vehicle dynamics. 2nd ed., Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.
24.
RužinskasASivilevičiusH. Magic formula tyre model application for a tyre-ice interaction. Procedia Eng2017; 187: 335–341.
25.
QiHZhangNChenY, et al. A comprehensive tune of coupled roll and lateral dynamics and parameter sensitivity study for a vehicle fitted with hydraulically interconnected suspension system. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(1): 143–161.
26.
TanBChenYZhangB, et al. A reduced dynamic model of a heavy-duty truck for optimization of the powertrain mounting system considering the chassis frame flexibility. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(10–11): 2602–2617.
27.
PaucaOCaruntuCFLazarC. Predictive control for the lateral and longitudinal dynamics in automated vehicles. In: 2019 23rd international conference on system theory, control and computing (ICSTCC), Sinaia, Romania, 9–11 October 2019, pp.797–802. New York: IEEE.
28.
WangYBianNZhangL, et al. Coordinated lateral and longitudinal vehicle-following control of connected and automated vehicles considering nonlinear dynamics. IEEE Control Syst Lett2020; 4(4): 1054–1059.
29.
SanchezID’JorgeAFerramoscaA, et al. Path following and trajectory tracking model predictive control using artificial variables for constrained vehicles. In: 2019 XVIII workshop on information processing and control (RPIC), Bahía Blanca, Argentina, 18–20 September 2019, pp.198–203. New York: IEEE.
30.
ZengMTanBDingF, et al. An experimental investigation of resonance sources and vibration transmission for a pure electric bus. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2019; 234(4): 950–962.
31.
SiampisEVelenisEGariuoloS, et al. A real-time nonlinear model predictive control strategy for stabilization of an electric vehicle at the limits of handling. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2018; 26(6): 1982–1994.
32.
LiKBianYEbenS, et al. Distributed model predictive control of multi-vehicle systems with switching communication topologies. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2020; 118: 102717.
33.
QiHChenYZhangN, et al. Improvement of both handling stability and ride comfort of a vehicle via coupled hydraulically interconnected suspension and electronic controlled air spring. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(2–3): 552–571.
34.
JalaliMKhosravaniSKhajepourA, et al. Model predictive control of vehicle stability using coordinated active steering and differential brakes. Mechatronics2017; 48: 30–41.
35.
KırlıAChenYOkwudireCE. Torque-vectoring-based backup steering strategy for steer-by-wire autonomous vehicles with vehicle stability control. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2019; 68(8): 7319–7328.
36.
QiHZhangNChenY, et al. A comprehensive tune of coupled roll and lateral dynamics and parameter sensitivity study for a vehicle fitted with hydraulically interconnected suspension system. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 235(1): 143–161.
37.
GuoCLiDZhangG. Dynamic interior point method for vehicular traffic optimization. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2020; 69(5): 4855–4868.
