There is little research on the degrees of drivers’ short-term behaviours regarding driving safety. To solve this problem, this paper investigated the concept of driving proneness and evaluated the propensities of different drivers to engage in different operations for the following scenarios of urban traffic. From the real driving data of sixteen drivers on a city road, car-following data fragments were extracted and six key parameters were obtained: throttle percentage, change rate of throttle percentage, brake pressure, change rate of brake pressure, absolute value of steering angle and absolute value of steering angle speed. Symbolic Aggregate Approximation was used to reduce the dimensionality of the parameters. The input of the Hidden Markov Model-Viterbi was obtained by the use of statistical methods. The output of the model is the probability of the three proneness states of introversion, neutrality and extroversion, from which the proneness value of each driver was calculated. The weighted proneness value of each driver was obtained by the use of the entropy weight method to assign weights to each parameter. The operating characteristics of the drivers were also analysed and described. The method presented in this paper can provide accurate and real-time warning in network-driven environments.
DelhommePMioaraCFrancoiseP. Self-reported frequency and perceived difficulty of adopting eco-friendly driving behavior according to gender, age, and environmental concern. Transport Res Part D Transport Environ2013; 20: 55–58.
2.
LiXYanXWongSC, et al. Effects of fog, driver experience and gender on driving behavior on S-curved road segments. Accid Anal Prevent2015; 77: 91–104.
3.
GrigoriosFSarvaniSPKevinFH, et al. The effects of driver fatigue, gender, and distracted driving on perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior: a correlated grouped random parameters bivariate probit approach. Anal Meth Accid Res2019; 22: 100091.
4.
HavârneanuCMăireanCPopusoiS, et al. Workplace stress as predictor of risky driving behavior among taxi drivers. The role of job-related affective state and taxi driving experience. Saf Sci2019; 111: 264–270.
5.
GeYQuWJiangC, et al. The effect of stress and personality on dangerous driving behavior among Chinese drivers. Accid Anal Prevent2014; 73: 34–40.
6.
FarmerEChambersEG. A psychological study of individual differences in accident rates. London: H. M. Stationery Off, 1926.
7.
YaoYZhaoXZhangY, et al. Modeling of individual vehicle safety and fuel consumption under comprehensive external conditions. Transport Res Part D Transport Environ2020; 79: 102224.
8.
ChenCZhaoXZhangY, et al. A graphical modeling method for individual driving behavior and its application in driving safety analysis using GPS data. Transport Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav2019; 63: 118–134.
9.
MantoukaEGBarmpounakisENVlahogianniEI, et al. Identifying driving safety profiles from smartphone data using unsupervised learning. Saf Sci2019; 119: 84–90.
10.
CastignaniGDerrmannTFrankR, et al. Driver behavior profiling using smartphones: a low-cost platform for driver monitoring. IEEE Intellig Transport Syst Magaz2015; 7(1): 91–102.
11.
CastignaniGFrankREngelT. An evaluation study of driver profiling fuzzy algorithms using smartphones. In: IEEE international conference on network protocols, Goettingen, Germany, 7–10 October 2013. New York: IEEE.
12.
YuanGWangYYanY, et al. Multi-source feature extraction and visualization for driving behavior analysis. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on big data and smart computing (BigComp), Kyoto, Japan, 27 February–2 March 2019. New York: IEEE.
13.
PalatBPierreGSDelhommeP, et al. Evaluating individual risk proneness with vehicle dynamics and self-report data – toward the efficient detection of at-risk drivers. Accid Anal Prevent2019; 123: 140–149.
14.
MartinelliFMercaldoFOrlandoA, et al. Human behavior characterization for driving style recognition in vehicle system. Comput Electr Eng2018; 83: 102504.
15.
AndriaGAttivissimoFNisioAD, et al. Development of an automotive data acquisition platform for analysis of driving behavior. Measurement2016; 93: 278–287.
16.
HwangCChenMShihC, et al. Apply Scikit-Learn in Python to analyze driver behavior based on OBD data. In: 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), Krakow, Poland, 16–18 May 2018, pp. 636–639. New York: IEEE.
17.
BellemHThielBSchraufM, et al. Comfort in automated driving: an analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits. Transport Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav2018; 55: 90–100.
18.
Van HuysduynenHHTerkenJEggenB, et al. The relation between self-reported driving style and driving behaviour: a simulator study. Transport Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav2018; 56: 45–255.
19.
WangWXiJZhaoD. Driving style analysis using primitive driving patterns with Bayesian nonparametric approaches. IEEE Trans Intellig Transport Syst2019; 20(8): 2986–2998.
20.
ChenKTChenHYW. Driving style clustering using naturalistic driving data. Transport Res Record2019; 2673(6): 176–188.
21.
YimingBMingjieHMengzhuG. Optimal electric bus scheduling based on the combination of all-stop and short-turning strategies. Sustainability2021; 13(4): 1–21.
22.
WangSZhangWBieY, et al. Mixed-integer second-order cone programming model for bus route clustering problem. Transport Res2019; 102: 351–369.
23.
BieYXiongXYanY, et al. Dynamic headway control for high-frequency bus line based on speed guidance and intersection signal adjustment. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng2020; 35(1): 4–25.
24.
Traffic Administration Bureau of the Ministry of public security of the people’s Republic of China. Statistics of China’s motor vehicle and driver data in2020, https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/TmGW4_mZZ_G3S-Pa0xk4Ow (2021, accessed 25 January 2021).
25.
LinJKeoghELonardiS, et al. A symbolic representation of time series, with implications for streaming algorithms. In: 8th ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Research Issues in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, California, USA, June 2003, pp.2–11. New York: ACM.
MeiringGAMyburghHC. A review of intelligent driving style analysis systems and related artificial intelligence algorithms. Sensors2016; 15(12): 30653–30682.
28.
ViterbiAJ. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Trans Inform Theory1967; 13(2): 260–269.
29.
ShannonCE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Techn J1948; 27(3): 379–423.
