Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

One of the main safety concerns associated with semi-autonomous vehicles is the sharing of control between a human driver and an autonomous driving system. Even with an attentive driver, such switches in control may pose a threat to the safety of the driver and the surrounding vehicles. The aim of this study is to develop an indicator that can measure the level of safety during a driver take-over, using knowledge about the system known a priori. A model-based approach is used to analyse the system with special focus on the lateral dynamics of the vehicle. The driver and the vehicle are modelled as linear systems, and a path tracking controller is used to serve as an autonomous system. With this structure, shared control is studied as a switched system, in which the vehicle’s lateral control switches between the autonomous system and the driver. A bound on the transient dynamics that arise due to a switch is derived, using the induced $L_{\infty}$ norm. This bound is then used to formulate an indicator that checks if the states/outputs of interest are within acceptable limits. A comparison with simulation results has shown that the indicator successfully captures the effect of different system parameters on take-over safety, although in a slightly conservative manner. This indicator can be further developed as a tool to be used in the design and evaluation of shared-/multi-modal control systems in future vehicles.

Keywords

Switched control systems transient dynamics semi-autonomous driving systems shared-/multi-modal control human–machine systems transition of control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kohler

Brotschi

. Automotive revolution – perspective towards 2030 (Advanced Industries). New York: Mckinsey & Company, 2016.

Happee

Cabrall

, et al. Human factors of transitions in automated driving: a general framework and literature survey. Transport Res F: Traf 2016; 43: 183–198.

Alirezaei

Corno

Ghaffari

, et al. A new approach to the design of coordinated road departure avoidance systems. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-Body Dynamics 2012; 226: 45–60.

Vlakveld

. Transition of control in highly automated vehicles: a literature review. R-2015-22. The Hague: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, 2016, 30 pp.

Gold

Damböck

Lorenz

, et al. ‘Take over!’ How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Ann Meet 2013; 57: 1938–1942.

Merat

Jamson

Lai

, et al. Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transport Res F: Traf 2014; 27: 274–282.

Ploeg

Van

Wouw

Nijmeijer

. Lp string stability of cascaded systems: application to vehicle platooning. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2014; 22: 786–793.

Hespanha

Morse

. Stability of switched systems with average dwell-time. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE conference on decision and control, Phoenix, AZ, 7–10 December 1999, vol. 3, pp.2655–2660. New York: IEEE.

Kaustubh

Willemsen

Mazo

. The modeling of transfer of steering between automated vehicle and human driver using hybrid control framework. In: 2016 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), Gothenburg, 19–22 June 2016, pp.808–814. New York: IEEE.

10.

Pacejka

. Tire and vehicle dynamics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.

11.

Rajamani

. Vehicle dynamics and control. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.

12.

Craens

Das

. Taking over the steering of a Toyota Prius using the electric steering motor. Technical report, Fontys, Eindhoven, 2014.

13.

Schmeitz

Zegers

Ploeg

, et al. Towards a generic lateral control concept for cooperative automated driving theoretical and experimental evaluation. In: 2017 5th IEEE international conference on models and technologies for intelligent transportation systems (MT-ITS), Naples, 26–28 June 2017, pp.134–139. New York: IEEE.

14.

Jürgensohn

. Control theory models of the driver. In: Carlo

(ed) Modelling driver behaviour in automotive environments. London: Springer, 2007, pp.277–292.

15.

McRuer

Allen

Weir

, et al. New results in driver steering control models. Human Factors 1977; 19: 381–397.

16.

Modjtahedzadeh

Hess

. A model of driver steering control behavior for use in assessing vehicle handling qualities. J Dyn Syst: T ASME 1993; 115: 456–456.

17.

McRuer

Krendel

. Mathematical models of human pilot behavior. Technical report, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly-sur-Seine, 1974.

18.

Gerdes

Rossetter

. A unified approach to driver assistance systems based on artificial potential fields. J Dyn Syst: T ASME 2001; 123: 431–438.

19.

Xing

Ploeg

Nijmeijer

. Padé approximation of delays in cooperative ACC based on string stability requirements. IEEE T Intell Veh 2016; 1: 277–286.

20.

Desoer

Vidyasagar

. Feedback systems: input-output properties, vol. 55. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1975.

21.

Hespanha

. Linear systems theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.

22.

Hespanha

. Root-mean-square gains of switched linear systems. IEEE T Automat Contr 2003; 48: 2040–2045.

Switching from autopilot to the driver: A transient performance analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References