The rate of fatalities in vehicle-to-pedestrian crashes is high with respect to the frequency of occurrence. In recent years, a pedestrian safety system, which consists of a pop-up hood and a pedestrian airbag, was developed to reduce pedestrian injuries. However, the effects of the system and a reasonable design direction were not clearly established. In this research, the protection performance of the pedestrian safety system was investigated using actual impact tests. The pedestrian safety system was installed in a mid-size vehicle and tested according to the headform test of the New Car Assessment Program. The necessity and usefulness of the safety system using the test results are discussed. These results are incorporated into the simulation modelling process. The airbag system is designed to reduce head injuries by using computational impact analysis. Two categories are considered when designing the system: the design of the airbag housing and the design of the airbag itself. The airbag housing is designed by selecting appropriate materials. The design flow for the pedestrian airbag employs the orthogonal array and the response surface method. The newly designed airbag system reduces the severity of head injuries.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Transport Division. UNECE/TRANS/180/Add.7/Appendix 1, Proposal to develop a Global Technical Regulation concerning head restraints. Report, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
2.
ChangD. National pedestrian crash report. Report DOT HS 810 968, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
3.
SchusterPJ. Evaluation of the real-world injury reduction potential of the proposed European pedestrian ‘leg-form’ impact test using a detailed finite element model of the lower limb. Report, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA, 2000.
4.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Transport Division. UNECE/TRANS/180/Add.9/Appendix 1, Proposal to develop a Global Technical Regulation concerning the protection of pedestrians and other vulnerable road user in collision with vehicles. Report, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
5.
European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group 10. Proposals for methods to evaluate pedestrian protection for passenger cars. Report, European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee, Brussels, Belgium, 1996.
6.
European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group 17. Improved test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection affected by passenger cars. Report, European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee, Brussels, Belgium, 1998.
7.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Working Party 29. UNECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/INF-GR-PS-143, Proposal for a global technical regulation uniform provision concerning the approval of vehicle with regard to their construction in order to improve the protection and mitigate the severity of injuries to pedestrians and other vulnerable road user in the event of a collision. Report, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
8.
European New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP). Pedestrian testing protocol. Report, Euro NCAP, Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
9.
HanYHLeeYW. Development of a vehicle structure with enhanced pedestrian safety. SAE paper 2003-01-1232, 2003.
10.
MinJS. Optimization of the energy absorber in an automobile bumper using sequential algorithm with orthogonal arrays (in Korean). Master’s Thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2006.
11.
ShinMKYiSIKwonOTParkGJ. Structural optimization of the automobile frontal structure for pedestrian protection and the low-speed impact test. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2008; 222(12): 2373–2387.
12.
McMahonDMoojimanFShulerS. Engineering thermoplastic energy absorber solutions for pedestrian impact. SAE paper 2002-01-1225, 2002.
13.
GlassonEMaistreVLaurentC. Car front end module structure development regarding pedestrian protection and other mechanical constraints. SAE paper 2001-01-0761, 2001.
14.
ShinMKParkKTParkGJ. Design of the active hood lift system using orthogonal arrays. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2008; 222(5): 705–717.
15.
HuangSYangJ. Optimization of a reversible hood for protecting a pedestrian’s head during car collisions. Accid Analysis Prevention2010; 42(4): 1136–1143.
16.
FredrikssonRBostromOZhangLYangK. Influence of pop-up hood systems on brain injuries for vulnerable road users. In: 2006 international IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impact, Madrid, Spain, 20–22 September 2006, pp. 253–264. Bron: IRCOBI Secretariat/INRETS.
17.
BaeHJungHLeeK. The study on developing active hood lift system for decreasing pedestrian head injury. In: 20th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Lyon, France, 18–21 June 2007, paper 07-0198, 6 pp. Washington, DC: National Highway Safety Administration.
18.
KrennMMlekuschBWilflingK. Development and evaluation of a kinematic hood for pedestrian protection. SAE paper 2003-01-0897, 2003.
19.
JingwenHKathleenDK. Toward designing pedestrian-friendly vehicles. Report UMTRI-2012-19, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, July2012.
20.
MakiTAsaiTKajzerJ. Development of future pedestrian protection technologies. In: 18th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, 19–22 May 2003, paper 165, 12 pp. Washington, DC: National Highway Safety Administration.
21.
McCarthyMGMoxeyEJohnsonN. The advanced protection of vulnerable road users (APVRU): final report. Report, APVRU Consortium, Department of Transport, London, UK, June2004.
22.
FredrikssonR. Priorities and potential of pedestrian protection: accident data, experimental tests and numerical simulations of car-to-pedestrian impacts. PhD Thesis, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden, 2011.
HamacherMEcksteinL. Assessment of active and passive technical measures for pedestrian protection at the vehicle front. In: 22nd international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington, DC, USA, 13–16 June 2011, paper 11-0057, 12 pp. Washington, DC: National Highway Safety Administration.
