Reducing the motor power losses of a four-wheel drive,fully electric vehicle via wheel torque allocation

Abstract

Individually controlled electric motors provide opportunities for enhancing the handling characteristics and the energy efficiency of fully electric vehicles. Online power loss minimisation schemes based on the electric motor efficiency data may, however, be impractical for real-time implementation owing to the heavy computational demand. In this paper, the optimal wheel torque distribution for minimal power losses from the electric motor drives is evaluated in an offline optimisation procedure and then approximated using a simple function for online control allocation. The wheel torque allocation scheme is evaluated via a simulation approach incorporating straight-ahead driving at a constant speed, a ramp manoeuvre and a sequence of step steer manoeuvres. The energy-efficient wheel torque allocation scheme provides motor power loss reductions and yields savings in the total power utilisation compared with a simpler method in which the torques are evenly distributed across the four wheels. The method does not rely on complex online optimisation and can be applied on real electric vehicles in order to improve the efficiency and thus to reduce power consumption during different manoeuvres.

Keywords

Fully electric vehicles control allocation energy efficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Esmailzadeh

Goodarzi

Vossoughi

. Optimal yaw moment control law for improved vehicle handling. Mechatronics 2003; 13(7): 659–675.

Sakai

Sado

Hori

. Motion control in an electric vehicle with four independently driven in-wheel motors. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 1999; 4(1): 9–16.

Gillespie

. Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: SAE International, 1992.

Doumiati

. Optimal wheel torque distribution for a four-wheel-drive fully electric vehicle. SAE paper 2013-01-0673, 2013.

Tjønnås

Johansen

. Stabilization of automotive vehicles using active steering and adaptive brake control allocation. IEEE Trans Control System Technol 2010; 18(3): 545–558.

Tavasoli

Naraghi

. Comparison of static and dynamic control allocation techniques for integrated vehicle control. In: 18th IFAC world congress, Milano, Italy, 28 August–2 September 2011, Vol 2, pp. 1244–1250. Red Hook, New York: Curran Associates.

Chen

Wang

. Energy-efficient control allocation with applications on planar motion control of electric ground vehicles. In: American control conference, San Francisco, California, USA, 29 June–1 July 2011, pp. 2719–2724. New York: IEEE.

Chen

Wang

. Fast and global optimal energy-efficient control allocation with applications to over-actuated electric ground vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Systems Technol 2012; 20(5): 1202–1211.

Yuan

Wang

Colombage

. Torque distribution strategy for a front and rear wheel driven electric vehicle. In: 6th IET international conference on power electronics, machines and drives, Bristol, UK, 27–29 March 2012, pp. 32–37. Stevenage, Hertfordshire: IET.

10.

Pennycott

De Novellis

Gruber

Sorniotti

. Enhancing the energy efficiency of fully electric vehicles via the minimization of motor power losses. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, Manchester, UK, 13–16 October 2013. New York: IEEE.

11.

Härkegård

. Efficient active set algorithms for solving constrained least squares problems in aircraft control allocation. In: 41st IEEE conference on decision and control, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 10–13 December 2002, pp. 1295–1300. New York: IEEE.

12.

Härkegård

Glad

. actuator redundancy – optimal control vs.control allocation. Automatica 2005; 41(1): 137–144.

13.

Rahman

Gopalakrishnan

Fahimi

. Optimized torque control of switched reluctance motor at all operational regimes using neural network. IEEE Trans Ind Applic 2001; 37(3): 904–913.

14.

Assanis

Delagrammatikas

Fellini

. Optimization approach to hybrid electric propulsion system design. J Struct Mech 1999; 27(4): 393–421.

15.

UN Economic Commission for Europe. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles of categories M, N and O with regard to braking. Addendum 12, Regulation No. 13, Revision 6, UN Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.

16.

Härkegård

. Backstepping and control allocation with applications to flight control. PhD Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 2003.

17.

Petersen

JAM

Bodson

. Constrained quadratic programming techniques for control allocation. IEEE Trans Control Systems Technol 2006; 14(1): 91–98.