A mathematical model has been applied to simulate a confined, turbulent natural gas diffusion flame for which measurements were reported in the literature [7]. The combustion is modelled using both eddy dissipation [2] and non-equilibrium, mixedness—reactedness flamelet [6, 20] models. The latter model is based on a laminar flamelet approach originally developed for premixed combustion. The turbulence is represented by a Reynolds stress model based on the differential transport equations for stresses. The computational results are compared with experimental data for gas temperature and species concentrations. The predictions obtained using the flamelet model are found to be in good agreement with measurements, whereas the eddy dissipation combustion model fails to capture the measured trends in the near-burner region. Efforts have been made to improve the quality of the predictions of the latter model by incorporating an extinction criterion [25] and by adjusting the value of the model parameter. Both actions generate predictions similar to that of the flamelet model.
MagnussenB. F.HjertagerB. H.On mathematical modelling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. In Proceedings of 16th International Symposium on Combustion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1976, pp. 719–728 (The Combustion Institute).
3.
VisserB. M.SmartJ. P.Van de KampW. L.WeberR.Measurements and predictions of quarl zone properties of swirling pulverised coal flames. In Proceedings of 23rd International Symposium on Combustion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1990, pp. 949–955 (The Combustion Institute).
4.
IslamA. K. M. S.HossainM.Prediction of local species concentration of a turbulent diffusion combustion in an axisymmetric furnace. J. Energy Heat and Mass Transfer, 1996, 18, 141–146.
5.
PetersN.Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Prog. in Energy and Combust. Sci., 1984, 10, 319–339.
6.
BradleyD.GaskellP. H.LauA. K. C.A mixedness-reactedness flamelet model for turbulent diffusion flames. In Proceedings of 23rd International Symposium on Combustion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1990, pp. 685–692 (The Combustion Institute).
7.
LewisM. H.SmootL. D.Turbulent gaseous combustion, Part I: Local species concentration measurements. Combust. and Flame, 1981, 42, 183–196.
8.
SmithP. J.SmootL. D.Turbulent gaseous combustion, Part II: Theory and evaluation for local properties. Combust. and Flame, 1981, 42, 277–285.
9.
NikjooyM.SoR. M. C.PeckR. E.Modelling of jet- and swirling-stabilized reacting flows in axisymmetric combustors. Combust. Sci. and Technol., 1988, 58, 135–144.
10.
SpaldingD. B.Mixing and chemical reaction in steady confined turbulent flames. In Proceedings of 13th International Symposium on Combustion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1971, pp. 649–657 (The Combustion Institute).
11.
GranI. R.MelaaenM. C.MagnussenB. F.Numerical simulation of local extinction effects in turbulent combustor flows of methane and air. In Proceedings of 25th International Symposium on Combustion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1994, pp. 1283–1291 (The Combustion Institute).
12.
GuX. J.A theoretical and computational study of turbulent flames. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 1993.
13.
LaunderB. E.ReeceG. J.RodiW.Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 68, 537–566.
14.
GibsonM. M.LaunderB. E.Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 86, 491–505.
15.
Abd Al-MasseehW. A.BradleyD.GaskellP. H.LauA. K. C.Turbulent premixed, swirling combustion: Direct stress, strained flamelet modelling and experimental investigation. In Proceedings of 23rd International Symposium on Combustion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1990, pp. 825–833 (The Combustion Institute).
LaunderB. E.SpaldingD. B.The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Meth. in Appl. Mech. Engng, 1974, 3, 269–288.
18.
BradleyD.GaskellP. H.GuX. J.Application of a Reynolds stress, stretched flamelet, mathematical model to computations of turbulent burning velocities and comparison with experiments. Combust, and Flame, 1994, 96, 221–248.
19.
BradleyD.LauA. K. C.LawesM.Flame stretch rate as a determinant of turbulent burning velocity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 1992, A338, 359–387.
20.
BradleyD.GaskellP. H.GuX. J.Turbulent flame structure in non-premixed tunnel burners. In Proceedings of Joint Meeting of Portuguese, British, Spanish and Swedish Sections of the Combustion Institute, Madeira, Portugal, 1996, paper 11.5.
21.
KeeR. J.GrcarJ. F.SmookeM. D.MillerJ. A.A Fortran program for modeling steady laminar one-dimensional premixed flames. Sandia Report SAND85-8240.UC-401, September 1993.
22.
GaskellP. H.LauA. K. C.Curvature-compensated convective transport: SMART, a new boundedness-preserving transport algorithm. Int. J. Numer. Meth. in Fluids, 1988, 8, 617–641.
23.
PatankarS. V.Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, 1980 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
24.
NallasamyM.Turbulence models and their applications to the prediction of internal flows: A review. Comput. and Fluids, 15, 151–194.
25.
ByggstoylS.MagnussenB. F.A model for flame extinction in turbulent flow. In Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, 1983, pp. 1032–1038.
