This study aims to improve the performance and emission characteristics of E25 (a blend of 25% ethanol and 75% gasoline) fuel using a single–cylinder, air-cooled spark-ignition engine through the implementation of a dual fuel system. The research employed the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and the Box–Behnken Design (BBD) to investigate and simulate interactions among three primary factors: LPG, E25, and engine speed. An experimental engine with a displacement of 392 cm3 and a compression ratio of 8.5:1 was tested to evaluate engine performance and emissions. The objective was to improve brake power (BP) and brake thermal efficiency (BTE) while reducing brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and emissions of CO, HC, and NOx. The results showed statistically significant response models (p 0.0001), with optimal performance achieved at 26% LPG, 74% E25, and an engine speed of 3000 rpm. Under these conditions, the engine delivered a brake power of 7.20 kW, brake thermal efficiency of 34.11%, brake-specific fuel consumption of 0.286 kg/kWh, and emissions of CO (0.37%), HC (195.5 ppm), and NOx (1208 ppm). These findings indicate that LPG has beneficial effects on combustion efficiency and emissions by compensating for the lower energy density of ethanol in ethanol–gasoline blends. The results reveal that LPG–E25 dual-fuel system provides a feasible approach to mitigating environmental effects while ensuring engine performance and can serve as a more environmentally friendly and efficient option compared to conventional gasoline blends.
GaBThanhTTungH, et al. Plug-in hybrid three-wheeler fueled with LPG-ethanol dual injection. Int J Eng Res2021; 10(01): 414.
2.
QadiriUAlkhedherM. One-dimensional computational investigations on a 3- cylinder spark ignition engine fuelled LPG/H2, methanol/gasoline blends, and E85 for meeting future emission norms. Atmos Environ X2025; 28: 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2025.100360
3.
ChenYMaJHanB, et al. Emissions of automobiles fueled with alternative fuels based on engine technology: a review. J Traffic Transp Eng2018; 5(4): 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2018.05.001
4.
IodicePCardoneM. Ethanol/gasoline blends as alternative fuel in last generation spark-ignition engines: a review on CO and HC engine out emissions. Energies2021; 14(13): 4034.
5.
YusufAAInambaoFL. Effect of cold start emissions from gasoline-fueled engines of light-duty vehicles at low and high ambient temperatures: recent trends. Case Stud Therm Eng2019; 14: 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100417
6.
MohammedMKBallaHHAl-DulaimiZMH, et al. Effect of ethanol-gasoline blends on SI engine performance and emissions. Case Stud Therm Eng2021; 25: 100891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.100891
7.
GajewskiMWyrąbkiewiczSKaszkowiakJ. Effects of ethanol–gasoline blends on the performance and emissions of a vehicle spark-ignition engine. Energies2025; 18(13): 3466.
8.
WangLHuangZRenL, et al. Experimental Investigation of combustion and emission characteristics of ethanol-gasoline blends across varying operating parameters. ACS Omega2025; 10: 16079–16089.
9.
KumarRArnabSJyotiS, et al. Influence of alternate fuels on the performance and emission from internal combustion engines and soot particle collection using thermophoretic sampler: a comprehensive review. Waste Biomass Valorization2019; 10(10): 2801–2823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0338-2
10.
AbelRCConeyKJohnsonC, et al. Global ethanol-blended-fuel vehicle compatibility study. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400-81252, 2021.
11.
GhazaliMFRosdiSMMamatR. Effect of the ethanol-fuel oil mixture on combustion stability, efficiency, and engine performance. Results Eng2025; 25: 104273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104273
12.
ElkelawyMEl ShenawyEABastawissiHAE, et al. Impact of gasoline fuel commercial additive properties on engine performance and emissions characteristics. Pharos Eng Sci J2025; 2: 87–105.
13.
CostaHLCousseauTSouzaRM. Current knowledge on friction, lubrication, and wear of ethanol-fuelled engines—a review. Lubricants2023; 11(7): 1–18.
14.
Di IorioSCatapanoFMagnoA, et al. The potential of ethanol/methanol blends as renewable fuels for DI SI Engines. Energies2023; 16(6): 2791.
15.
ConțiuRChiriacR. On the influence of different alcohol-type biofuels on performance and engine emissions of an SI engine. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2024; 1303(1): 012025.
16.
DoğuYYontarAAKantaroğluE. Experimental investigation of effects of single and mixed alternative fuels (gasoline, CNG, LPG, acetone, naphthalene, and boron derivatives) on a commercial i-DSI engine. Energy Sources A: Recovery Util Environ Eff2024; 46(1): 12680–12699. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1800864
17.
AldhaidhawiMNajiMSubhiKA. Numerical Study of combustion characteristics, performance and emissions of an SI engine running on gasoline, ethanol and LPG. Saudi J Eng Technol2019; 04(09): 382–386.
18.
VermaADugalaNSSinghS. Experimental investigations on the performance of SI engine with ethanol-premium gasoline blends. Mater Today Proc2022; 48: 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.255
19.
MalaquiasACTNettoNADda CostaRBR, et al. An evaluation of combustion aspects with different compression ratios, fuel types and injection systems in a single-cylinder research engine. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2020; 42(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02575-0
20.
ZhangLHuangZWangT, et al. Lean combustion and emission performance of a gasoline direct injection engine with active pre-chamber. Adv Mech Eng2022; 14(7): 1–13.
21.
QadriUWaniMM. Comparative Parametric and emission characteristics of single cylinder spark ignition engine using gasoline, ethanol, and H2O as microemulsion. Renew Energy2017; 4(12): 75372.
22.
ZhuCzSamuelODTaheri-GaravandA, et al. ANN-ANFIS model for optimising methylic composite biodiesel from neem and castor oil and predicting emissions of the biodiesel blend. Sci Rep2025; 15: 5638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88901-9
23.
SamuelODPatelGCMThomasL, et al. RSM integrated GWO, driving training, and election-based algorithms for optimising ethylic biodiesel from ternary oil of neem, animal fat, and jatropha. Sci Rep2024; 14: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72109-4
24.
ZhuCZSamuelODPatel G CM, et al. Enhancing CI engine performance and emission control using a hybrid RSM–Rao algorithm for ZnO-doped castor–neem biodiesel blends. Case Stud Therm Eng2025; 74: 106841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106841
25.
Szpisják-GulyásNAl-TayawiANHorváthZH, et al. Methods for experimental design, central composite design and the Box–Behnken design, to optimise operational parameters: a review. Acta Aliment2023; 52(4): 521–537.
26.
ShaoWZhaWZhouX, et al. Experimental study based on Box – Behnken Design and Response Surface Methodology for optimization proportioning of activated lithium slag composite cement-based cementitious materials. Materials2024; 17(11): 2651.
27.
MohammedASAnchaVRAtnawSM, et al. Analysis of cylinder pressure and heat release rate variation in diesel engine fueled with Croton macrostachyus (CMS) seed oil biodiesel as an alternative fuel. Energies2025; 18(6): 1449.
28.
MondalPSadhukhanAKGuptaP, et al. Bioethanol-gasoline blend a promising fuel for motorized two-wheelers: optimization of operating conditions for minimum regulated emissions. Int J Environ Sci Technol2023; 20: 11391–11406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04623-9
29.
YontarAADoğuY. The characteristics of gasoline engines with the use of LPG : An experimental and numerical study. Energy Sources A: Recovery Util Environ Eff2018; 40(18): 2176–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1495783
30.
MithaiwalKAModiAJGosaiDC. Energy and exergy analysis on Si engine by blend of ethanol with petrol. Int J Adv Eng Res Sci2017; 4(4): 49–61.
31.
LanjeASPvpitAP. Effect of compression ratio on performance and emission characteristics of LPG-ethanol fuelled SI engine. Review2017; 6(11): 12–16.
32.
VezaISpraggonMFattahIMR, et al. Response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing engine performance and emissions fueled with biofuel: review of RSM for sustainability energy transition. Results Eng2023; 18: 101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101213
33.
Siaw PawJKKiongTSKamarulzamanMK, et al. Advancing renewable fuel integration: a comprehensive response surface methodology approach for internal combustion engine performance and emissions optimization. Heliyon2023; 9(11): e22238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22238
34.
ChhabraMSainiBSDwivediG. Optimization of the dual stage procedure of biodiesel synthesis from neem oil using RSM based Box Behnken design. Energy Sour Part A: Recov Utilization Environ Effects2024; 46(1): 8888–8911. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1771480
35.
ElkelawyMBastawissiHAEEsmaeilKK, et al. Maximization of biodiesel production from sunflower and soybean oils and prediction of diesel engine performance and emission characteristics through response surface methodology. Fuel2020; 266: 117072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117072
36.
AlsawalhaM. An approach utilizing the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to optimize adsorption-desorption of Natural Saudi Arabian diatomite- with the box- Behnken Design Technique. Arab J Chem2023; 16(1): 104413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104413
37.
HirkudeJPadalkarAVedarthamD. Investigations on the effect of waste fried oil methyl ester blends and load on performance and smoke opacity of diesel engine using response surface methodology. Energy Proc2014; 54: 606–614.
38.
RahmanMA. Induction of hydrogen, hydroxy, and LPG with ethanol in a common SI engine: a comparison of performance and emission characteristics. Environ Sci Pollut Res2019; 26: 3033–3040.
39.
MohsenMJAl-DawodyMFJamshedW, et al. Experimental and numerical study of using of LPG on characteristics of dual fuel diesel engine under variable compression ratio. Arab J Chem2023; 16(8): 104899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104899
40.
MaterEOSolimanKMAbdulnaimA, et al. Co-firing of LPG and diesel fuels through an innovative double swirl burner: combustion characteristics and exhaust emissions. Trends Adv Sci Technol2024; 1: Article 3.
41.
Al QubeissiMAl-EsawiNSazhinSS, et al. Ethanol/gasoline droplet heating and evaporation: Effects of fuel blends and ambient conditions. Energy & fuels2018; 32(6): 6498–6506.
42.
JumareAIAbou-El-HosseinKAbdulkadirLN, et al. Predictive modeling and multiobjective optimization of diamond turning process of single-crystal silicon using RSM and desirability function approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 103(9–12): 4205–4220.
43.
TeferaNNallamothuRBAlemayehuG. Optimization of performance and emissions of RCCI engine at various speed conditions using response surface methodology technique. Ethiop J Sci Sustain Dev2025; 12(2): 73–88.
44.
KanchanSPriyadarshiniMKumarP, et al. Multi-objective statistical optimisation utilising response surface methodology to predict engine performance using biofuels from waste plastic oil in CRDi engines. Green Proc Synth2014; 13(1): 20230159.
45.
WangCZeraati-RezaeiSXiangL, et al. Ethanol blends in spark ignition engines: RON, octane-added value, cooling effect, compression ratio, and potential engine efficiency gain. Appl Energy2017; 191: 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.081
46.
RatcliffMABurtonJSindlerP, et al. Effects of heat of vaporization and octane sensitivity on knock-limited spark ignition engine performance. In: WCX world congress experience, 2019, pp.1–14. SAE Technical Paper.
LataDBMisraAMedhekarS. Effect of hydrogen and LPG addition on the efficiency and emissions of a dual fuel diesel engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2012; 37(7): 6084–6096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.014
49.
AjukaLOKazeemRAKutiOA, et al. Decarbonized automotive fuel: liquefied petroleum gas biosynthesis, benefits and drawbacks. Results Eng2024; 21: 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101889
50.
TibaquiráJEHuertasJIOspinaS, et al. The effect of using ethanol-gasoline blends on the mechanical, energy and environmental performance of in-use vehicles. Energies2018; 11(1): 1–17.
51.
IkiayeDJOjapahMM. Performance, emission and cost analysis of LPG and gasoline in a single cylinder engine. Int J Enhanc Res Sci Technol Eng2023; 12(4): 212–219.
52.
SurahmantoFArifinASyamsiroM, et al. Emission characteristics and efficiency assessment of biomass-derived syngas in a spark-ignition generator compared to LPG and gasoline. Results Eng2025; 27: 106393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106393
53.
AydinMIrginAÇelikMB. The impact of diesel/LPG dual fuel on performance and emissions in a single cylinder diesel generator. Appl Sci2018; 8(5): 1–14.
54.
YeYHuJZhangZ, et al. Effect of different ratios of gasoline-ethanol blend fuels on combustion enhancement and emission reduction in electronic fuel injection engine. Polymers2023; 15(19): 3932.
55.
Al-kaabiMMAl-ZuhairyMSBallaHH. Effect of a new design electronic control system on the emissions improve for diesel engine operation by Diesell+lpg). Int J Des Nat Ecodyn2020; 15(4): 565–572.
56.
ElshenawyAAAbdel RazikSMGadMS. Modeling of combustion and emissions behavior on the effect of ethanol–gasoline blends in a four stroke SI engine. Adv Mech Eng2023; 15(3): 1–16.
57.
AshwiniRLawankarSM. Experimental investigation on use of LPG-ethanol blends as a fuel in spark ignition engine. Int J Eng Res Technol2013; 2(6): 3183–3187.
58.
ÇinarCŞahinFCanÖ, et al. A comparison of performance and exhaust emissions with different valve lift profiles between gasoline and LPG fuels in a si engine. Appl Therm Eng2016; 107: 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.031
59.
ÖzerSBağatuB. Investigation of the effects of liquid LPG use in a gasoline injection turbocharged engine. Int J Automot Sci Technol2021; 5: 172–178.
60.
HashemGTAl-DawidyM. Use of LPG in SI engine- a review study. Al-Qadisiyah J Eng Sci2021; 14(1): 52–59.
61.
DongSWangZYangC, et al. Investigations on the effects of fuel stratification on auto-ignition and combustion process of an ethanol/diesel dual-fuel engine. Appl Energy2018; 230: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.082
62.
ZhaoZYuXHuangY, et al. Study on combustion and emissions of a combined injection spark ignition engine with natural gas direct injection plus ethanol port injection under lean-burn conditions. ACS Omega2022; 7(25): 21901–21911.
63.
UsmanMFarooqMNaqviM, et al. Use of gasoline, LPG and LPG-HHO blend in SI engine: a comparative performance for emission control and sustainable environment. Processes2020; 8(1): 1–15.
64.
ChenXZhengWWangK, et al. Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty of Net Power of Automobile Engine. Int J Automot Manuf Mater2025; 4(1): 5.
65.
ŞahinSTorunA (2024) Comparison of engine performance and emission values of biodiesel obtained from waste pumpkin seeds with machine learning. Agriculture2024; 14(2), 227.
66.
DeySSinghAPGajghateSS, et al. Optimization of ci engine performance and emissions using alcohol–biodiesel blends: A regression analysis approach. Sustainability2023; 15(20): 14667.
