Advancements and perspectives on hollow sphere filled syntactic foams: A promising solution for structural applications

Abstract

The incessant demand for lightweight, multifunctional materials in aerospace, automotive, and defense sectors has spurred the development of advanced cellular metals. While traditional metal foams (MFs) offer benefits, their inherent microstructural irregularities and poor mechanical predictability limit their reliability. This review critically assesses the emergence of Metal Matrix Composite Syntactic Foams (MMCSFs) as a superior alternative, in which a continuous metal matrix is reinforced with engineered hollow spherical fillers to overcome these limitations, resulting in lightweight yet robust composites. Introducing hollow metallic spheres (HMS) into MMCSFs enhances energy absorption by deforming under impact, thereby improving impact resistance and crashworthiness. Recent manufacturing advancements and interface-engineering strategies have markedly improved the mechanical robustness and reliability of MMCSFs, positioning them for structural and functional roles in automotive crash absorbers and lightweight chassis components, aerospace panels and cores, blast- and fragment-mitigating armor for defense, marine buoyancy and hull structures, and bio-adaptable implants and fixation devices. This review critically evaluates the composition, processing routes, microstructure-property relationships, and application landscape of MMCSFs. It identifies key challenges and research opportunities for their deployment in next-generation lightweight engineering systems.

Keywords

metal matrix composite syntactic foam metal foam cellular structures materials mechanical properties energy absorbing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mukherjee

Garcia-Moreno

Banhart

Defect generation during solidification of aluminum foams. Scr Mater 2010; 63(2): 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.064

Duarte

Vesenjak

Krstulović-Opara

Variation of quasi-static and dynamic compressive properties in single aluminium-alloy foam block. Mater Sci Eng A 2014; 4: 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.580

Göhler

Jehring

Kuemmel

, et al. Metallic hollow sphere structures-status and outlook. In: Proceedings of the conference on cellular materials CELLMAT-2012, Dresden, Germany2012.

Szyniszewski

Smith

Hajjar

, et al The mechanical properties and modeling of a sintered hollow sphere steel foam. Mater Des 2014; 54: 1083–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.045

Matz

Mocker

Müller

, et al Mesostructural design and manufacturing of open-pore metal foams by investment casting. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014; 2014: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/421729

Jain

Gupta

Kumar

, et al Microstructure and compressive deformation behavior of SS foam made through evaporation of urea as space holder. Mater Chem Phys 2019; 223: 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.040

Garcia-Moreno

Mukherjee

Jiménez

, et al Metal foaming investigated by X-ray radioscopy. Metals 2011; 2(1): 10–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/met2010010

Couteau

Dunand

DC.

Creep of aluminum syntactic foams. Mater Sci Eng A 2008; 488(1-2): 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.022

Srivastava

Gupta

Joshi

, et al Insight into classifications and manufacturing processes of metallic foams: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng 2023; 09544089231190551. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089231190551

10.

Wang

Hao

, et al Compressive properties of expanded glass and alumina hollow spheres hybrid reinforced aluminum matrix syntactic foams. J Alloys Comp 2020; 821: 153233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153233

11.

Yang

Cui

, et al Compressive properties of an Al-matrix syntactic foam filled with Al2O3 hollow sphere. Met Mater 2023; 61(1): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.31577/km.2023.1.35

12.

Jagadeesh

Gangi Setti

A review on micromechanical methods for evaluation of mechanical behavior of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 2020; 55: 9848–9882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04715-2

13.

Rabiei

Garcia-Avila

Effect of various parameters on properties of composite steel foams under variety of loading rates. Mater Sci Eng A 2013; 564: 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.108

14.

Orbulov

IN.

Metal matrix syntactic foams produced by pressure infiltration—the effect of infiltration parameters. Mater Sci Eng A 2013; 583: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.066

15.

Pandey

Birla

Mondal

, et al Compressive deformation behavior and strain rate sensitivity of Al-cenosphere hybrid foam with mono-modal, bi-modal and tri-modal cenosphere size distribution. Mater Charact 2018; 144: 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.08.011

16.

Marx

Rabiei

Overview of composite metal foams and their properties and performance. Adv Eng Mater 2017; 19(11): 1600776. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201600776

17.

Vendra

Brown

Rabiei

Effect of processing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–steel composite foam. J Mater Sci 2011; 46: 4574–4581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5356-4

18.

Vendra

Rabiei

A study on aluminum–steel composite metal foam processed by casting. Mater Sci Eng A 2007; 465(1–2): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.037

19.

Yang

, et al Processing, characterization and mechanical properties of welded steel hollow sphere-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Mater Sci 2023; 58(13): 5865–5883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08365-y

20.

Szlancsik

Katona

Bobor

, et al Compressive behaviour of aluminium matrix syntactic foams reinforced by iron hollow spheres. Mater Des 2015; 83: 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.011

21.

Szlancsik

Katona

Májlinger

, et al Compressive behavior and microstructural characteristics of iron hollow sphere filled aluminum matrix syntactic foams. Materials 2015; 8(11): 7926–7937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8115432

22.

Wang

Jiang

Shao

, et al Acoustic properties of 316L stainless steel hollow sphere composites fabricated by pressure casting. Metals 2020; 10(8): 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10081047

23.

Zhuang

Wang

Particle distribution-dependent micromechanical simulation on mechanical properties and damage behaviors of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 2021; 56: 6780–6798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05684-2

24.

Augustin

Hungerbach

Production of hollow spheres (HS) and hollow sphere structures (HSS). Mater Lett 2009; 63(13-14): 1109–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.01.015

25.

Muchhala

Pandey

Raj

, et al Crashworthiness performance of foam filled composite tubular structures. In: Praveen Kumar

Dirgantara

Rangappa

(eds.)Thin-walled composite protective structures for crashworthiness applications: Recent Advances and future developments. Springer, 2023, pp. 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5289-2_3

26.

Orbulov

Kemény

Filep

, et al Compressive characteristics of bimodal aluminium matrix syntactic foams. Compos 2019; 124: 105479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105479

27.

Wang

Hao

Compressive properties of aluminum matrix syntactic foams prepared by stir casting method. Adv Eng Mater 2019; 21(8): 1900183. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201900183

28.

Mondal

Das

Ramakrishnan

, et al Cenosphere filled aluminum syntactic foam made through stir-casting technique. Compos 2009; 40(3): 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.006

29.

Sahu

Ansari

Mondal

, et al Quasi-static compressive behaviour of aluminium cenosphere syntactic foams. Mater Sci Technol 2019; 35(7): 856–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2019.1593670

30.

Birla

Mondal

Das

, et al Compressive deformation behavior of highly porous AA2014-Cenosphere closed cell hybrid foam prepared using CaH2 as foaming agent: comparison with aluminum foam and syntactic foam. Trans Indian Ins Metals 2017; 70: 1827–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-016-0984-7

31.

Pan

Rao

Yang

, et al Gravity casting of aluminum-Al2O3 hollow sphere syntactic foams for improved compressive properties. J Porous Mater 2020; 27: 1127–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-020-00889-x

32.

Al-Sahlani

Broxtermann

Lell

, et al Effects of particle size on the microstructure and mechanical properties of expanded glass-metal syntactic foams. Mater Sci Eng A 2018; 728: 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.04.103

33.

Lin

Zhang

Interfacial microstructure and compressive properties of Al–Mg syntactic foam reinforced with glass cenospheres. J Alloys Comp 2016; 655: 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.175

34.

Santa Maria

Schultz

Ferguson

, et al Effect of hollow sphere size and size distribution on the quasi-static and high strain rate compressive properties of Al-A380–Al2O3 syntactic foams. J Mater Sci 2014; 49: 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7810-y

35.

Orbulov

Szlancsik

Kemény

, et al Compressive mechanical properties of low-cost, aluminium matrix syntactic foams. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 2020; 135: 105923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105923

36.

Dou

Sun

, et al Compression behaviors of cenosphere–pure aluminum syntactic foams. Scr Mater 2007; 56(3): 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.10.008

37.

Rohatgi

Kim

Gupta

, et al Compressive characteristics of a356/fly ash cenosphere composites synthesized by pressure infiltration technique. Compos 2006; 37: 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.047

38.

Orbulov

Ginsztler

Compressive behaviour of metal matrix syntactic foams. Acta Polytechnica Hung 2012; 9(2): 43–56. http://www.uni-obuda.hu/journal/Orbulov_Ginsztler_34.pdf

39.

Zhang

Zhao

YY.

Mechanical response of Al matrix syntactic foams produced by pressure infiltration casting. J Compos Mater 2007; 41(17): 2105–2117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998307074132

40.

Tao

Zhao

YY.

Compressive behavior of Al matrix syntactic foams toughened with Al particles. Scr Mater 2009; 61(5): 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.04.045

41.

Luong

Strbik

Hammond

, et al Development of high performance lightweight aluminum alloy/sic hollow sphere syntactic foams and compressive characterization at quasi-static and high strain rates. J Alloys Comp 2013; 550: 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.17141

42.

Licitra

Luong

Strbik

, et al Dynamic properties of alumina hollow particle filled aluminum alloy A356 matrix syntactic foams. Mater Des 2015; 66: 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.041

43.

Bolat

Akgün

İC

Gökşenli

. Effect of aging heat treatment on compressive characteristics of bimodal aluminum syntactic foams produced by cold chamber die casting. Int J Metalcasting 2022; 16(2): 646–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00629-0

44.

Bolat

Bekar

Göksenliä

. Mechanical and physical characteristics of bubble alumina reinforced aluminum syntactic foams made through recyclable pressure infiltration technique. Gazi University Journal of Science 2022; 35(1): 184–196. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.855321

45.

Bolat

Akgün

İC

Gökşenli

. Effects of particle size, bimodality and heat treatment on mechanical properties of pumice reinforced aluminum syntactic foams produced by cold chamber die casting. China Foundry 2021; 18(6): 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41230-021-1133-4

46.

Maróti

Orbulov

IN.

Compressive properties of Al99.5 matrix syntactic foams reinforced by SiC particles in the matrix. Period Polytechnica Mech Eng 2025; 69(4): 377–391. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppme.42144

47.

Srivastava

Gupta

Joshi

, et al Existence of advanced ceramic materials in human life. In: Singh

Kumar

Mondal

(eds.) Advanced ceramics for versatile interdisciplinary applications. Elsevier, 2022, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89952-9.00013-0

48.

Behnam

Salemi Golezani

Mehdizadeh Lima

Optimization of surface quality and shell porosity in low carbon steel hollow spheres produced by powder metallurgy. Powder Technol 2013; 235: 1025–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.11.038

49.

Cao

Jiang

Wang

, et al Preparation, microstructure and mechanical property of double-layered metal-ceramic hollow spheres. Mater Sci Eng A 2020; 780: 139188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139188

50.

Jiang

Wang

, et al Investigation on fabrication and microstructure of Ti–6Al–4V alloy hollow spheres by powder metallurgy. Met Mater Int 2021; 27(5): 1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00462-5

51.

Sazegaran

Kiani-Rashid

A-R

Khaki

JV.

Effects of copper content on the shell characteristics of hollow steel spheres manufactured using an advanced powder metallurgy technique. Int J Miner Metall Mater 2016; 23(4): 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-016-1253-9

52.

Davari

Gholamzadeh

Dehghan

, et al Effect of sintering parameters (time and temperature) upon the fabrication process of organic binder-based metallic hollow sphere. Powder Metall 2017; 60(5): 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325899.2017.1355424

53.

Wang

Jiang

Qin

, et al Preparation and characterization of Hollow 316L stainless steel spheres prepared by powder metallurgy. J Mater Eng Perform 2022; 31(2): 1540–1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06246-6

54.

Sankaranarayanan

Nguyen

Shabadi

, et al Powder metallurgy hollow fly ash cenospheres’ particles reinforced magnesium composites. Powder Metall 2016; 59(3): 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325899.2016.1139339

55.

Manakari

Parande

Doddamani

, et al Enhancing the ignition, hardness and compressive response of magnesium by reinforcing with hollow glass microballoons. Materials 2017; 10(9): 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10090997

56.

Nguyen

Sharon Nai

Nguyen

, et al Synthesis and properties of light weight magnesium–cenosphere composite. Mater Sci Technol 2016; 32: 923–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2015.1104017

57.

Newsome

Schultz

Ferguson

, et al Synthesis and quasi-static compressive properties of Mg-AZ91D-Al₂O₃ syntactic foams. Materials 2015; 8(9): 6085–6095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095292

58.

Linul

Lell

Movahedi

, et al Compressive properties of zinc syntactic foams at elevated temperatures. Compos B Eng 2019; 167: 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.019

59.

Peroni

Scapin

Avalle

, et al Dynamic mechanical behavior of syntactic iron foams with glass microspheres. Mater Sci Eng A 2012; 552: 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.053

60.

Lehmhus

Weise

Szlancsik

, et al Fracture toughness of hollow glass microsphere-filled iron matrix syntactic foams. Materials 2020; 13(11): 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112566

61.

Cho

Lee

, et al Preparation and characterization of iron matrix syntactic foams with glass microspheres via powder metallurgy. Met Mater Int 2019; 25: 794–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-018-00215-w

62.

Peroni

Scapin

Avalle

, et al Syntactic iron foams – on deformation mechanisms and Strain-Rate dependence of compressive properties. Adv Eng Mater 2012; 14(10): 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201200160

63.

Weise

Salk

Jehring

, et al Influence of powder size on production parameters and properties of syntactic invar foams produced by means of metal powder injection moulding. Adv Eng Mater 2013; 15(3): 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201200129

64.

Luong

Shunmugasamy

Gupta

, et al Quasi-static and high strain rates compressive response of iron and Invar matrix syntactic foams. Mater Des 2015; 66: 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.030

65.

Neville

Rabiei

Composite metal foams processed through powder metallurgy. Mater Des 2008; 29(2): 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.026

66.

Weise

Lehmhus

Baumeister

, et al Production and properties of 316L stainless steel cellular materials and syntactic foams. Steel Res Int 2014; 85(3): 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201300131

67.

Peroni

Scapin

Fichera

, et al Investigation of the mechanical behaviour of AISI 316L stainless steel syntactic foams at different strain-rates. Compos B Eng 2014; 66: 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.001

68.

Brown

Vendra

Rabiei

Bending properties of Al-steel and steel-steel composite metal foams. Metallurgical Mater Trans A 2010; 41: 2784–2793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0343-y

69.

Yang

, et al Melt flow and solidification during infiltration in making steel matrix syntactic foams. Mater Sci Technol 2019; 35(15): 1831–1839. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2019.1650444

70.

Castro

Nutt

SR.

Synthesis of syntactic steel foam using mechanical pressure infiltration. Mater Sci Eng A 2012; 535: 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.084

71.

Murali

Duraisamy

Samuthiram

, et al Current and emerging methods for manufacturing of closed pore metal foams and its characteristics: a review. J Mater Sci 2025; 60(3): 1187–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-10318-y

72.

Bolat

Akgün

İC

Gökşenli

. Influences of reinforcement size and artificial aging on the compression features of hybrid ceramic filled aluminum syntactic foams. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 2022; 236(14): 8027–8037. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062221083208

73.

Akinwekomi

AD.

Microstructural characterisation and corrosion behaviour of microwave-sintered magnesium alloy AZ61/fly ash microspheres syntactic foams. Heliyon 2019; 5(4): e01531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01531

74.

Srivastava

Elambasseril

Gupta

, et al Spray fluidized bed assisted flexible robust lightweight hollow metallic sphere based triboelectric nanogenerator. ACS Appl Electron Mater 2024; 6: 6543–6553. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.4c01010

75.

Yang

Cheng

Wei

, et al Innovative compound casting technology and mechanical properties of steel matrix syntactic foams. J Alloys Comp 2021; 853: 156572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156572

76.

Bolat

Ergene

Karakılınç

, et al Investigating on the machinability assessment of precision machining pumice reinforced AA7075 syntactic foam. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 2022; 236(5): 2380–2394. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062211027613

77.

Guan

, et al Acoustic performance of aluminum foams with semiopen cells. Appl Acoust 2015; 87: 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.06.016

78.

Liu

Yang

, et al A green biocompatible fabrication of highly porous functional ceramics with high strength and controllable pore structures. J Mater Sci Technol 2016; 32(8): 729–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.07.002

79.

Rajak

Kumaraswamidhas

Das

Investigation and characterisation of aluminium alloy foams with TiH2 as a foaming agent. Mater Sci Technol 2016; 32(13): 1338–1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2015.1123846

80.

International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical testing of metals: ductility testing: compression test for porous and cellular metals. International Organization for Standardization; 2010.

81.

Andrews

Sanders

Gibson

LJ.

Compressive and tensile behaviour of aluminum foams. Mater Sci Eng A 1999; 270(2): 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00170-7

82.

Simone

Gibson

LJ.

The compressive behaviour of porous copper made by the GASAR process. J Mater Sci 1997; 32(2): 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018573904809

83.

Mondal

Goel

Das

Compressive deformation and energy absorption characteristics of closed cell aluminum-fly ash particle composite foam. Mater Sci Eng A 2009; 507(1–2): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.019

84.

Degischer

Kriszt

Handbook of cellular metals. Wiley-VCH, 2002.

85.

Mondal

Goel

Bagde

, et al Closed cell ZA27–sic foam made through stir-casting technique. Mater Des 2014; 57: 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.026

86.

Soni

Biswas

Evaluation of mechanical properties under quasi-static compression of open-cell foams of 6061-T6 Al alloy fabricated by pressurized salt infiltration casting method. Mater Charact 2017; 130: 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.06.008

87.

Ramamurty

Paul

Variability in mechanical properties of a metal foam. Acta Mater 2004; 52(4): 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.021

88.

Koza

Leonowicz

Wojciechowski

, et al Compressive strength of aluminium foams. Mater Lett 2004; 58(1–2): 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00430-0

89.

Ashby

Evans

Fleck

, et al Metal foams: a design guide. Elsevier, 2000.

90.

Mediaswanti

Wen

Ivanova

, et al A review on bioactive porous metallic biomaterials. J Biomim Biomater Tissue Eng 2013; 18(1): 1–8.

91.

Kunze

Baumeister

Banhart

, et al P/M technology for the production of metal foams. PMI Powder Metallurgy International 1993; 25(4): 182–185.

92.

Gibson

Ashby

MF.

The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 1982; 382(1782): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1982.0088

93.

Kováčik

Marsavina

Linul

Poisson’s ratio of closed-cell aluminium foams. Materials 2018; 11(10): 1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101904

94.

Zhu

Knott

Mills

NJ.

Analysis of the elastic properties of open-cell foams with tetrakaidecahedral cells. J Mech Phys Solids 1997; 45(3): 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00090-7

95.

Warren

Kraynik

The linear elastic properties of open-cell foams. J Appl Mech 1988; 55(2): 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3173680

96.

Warren

Kraynik

The nonlinear elastic behavior of open-cell foams. J Appl Mech 1991; 58(2): 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2897196

97.

Niu

Bai

Qiu

, et al Processing and properties of porous titanium using space holder technique. Mater Sci Eng A 2009; 506(1-2): 148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.022

98.

Kumar

Jain

Sriram

, et al Lightweight open cell aluminum foam for superior mechanical and electromagnetic interference shielding properties. Mater Chem Phys 2020; 240: 122274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122274

99.

Simone

Gibson

LJ.

Effects of solid distribution on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams. Acta Mater 1998; 46(6): 2139–2150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00421-7

100.

Idris

Vodenitcharova

Hoffman

Mechanical behaviour and energy absorption of closed-cell aluminium foam panels in uniaxial compression. Mater Sci Eng A 2009; 517(1–2): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.067

101.

Ravi Kumar

Gokhale

. Mechanical properties of Al–Si–Mg foams with different SiC contents and densities. Trans Indian Ins Metals 2022; 75: 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02436-x

102.

Gibson

LJ.

Mechanical behavior of metallic foams. Annu Rev Mater Res 2000; 30: 191–227.

103.

Gibson

LJ.

Cellular solids. MRS Bull 2003; 28(4): 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2003.79

104.

Jing

Yang

, et al Compressive strain rate dependence and constitutive modeling of closed-cell aluminum foams with various relative densities. J Mater Sci 2018; 53: 14739–14757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2663-z

105.

Mondal

Goel

Das

Effect of strain rate and relative density on compressive deformation behaviour of closed cell aluminum–fly ash composite foam. Mater Des 2009; 30(4): 1268–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.059

106.

Goel

Mondal

Yadav

, et al Effect of strain rate and relative density on compressive deformation behavior of aluminum cenosphere syntactic foam. Mater Sci Eng A 2014; 590: 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.048

107.

Shen

Ruan

Compressive behaviour of closed-cell aluminium foams at high strain rates. Compos B Eng 2010; 41(8): 678–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.07.005

108.

Birla

Mondal

Das

, et al Influence of cell anisotropy and relative density on compressive deformation responses of LM13-cenosphere hybrid foam. J Mater Eng Perform 2019; 28: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3731-x

109.

Rajak

Kumaraswamidhas

Das

An energy absorption behaviour of foam filled structures. Procedia Mater Sci 2014; 5: 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.254

110.

Pan

Yang

Ahsan

, et al Zn-matrix syntactic foams: effect of heat treatment on microstructure and compressive properties. Mater Sci Eng A 2018; 731: 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.072

111.

Bolat

Akgün

İC

Göksenliä

. On the way to real applications: aluminum matrix syntactic foams. Eur Mech Sci 2020; 4(3): 131–141. https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.703619

112.

Zhang

Lin

Chi

, et al Quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of glass cenospheres/5A03 syntactic foam and its sandwich structure. Compos Struct 2018; 183: 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.024

113.

Broxtermann

Taherishargh

Belova

, et al On the compressive behaviour of high porosity expanded perlite-metal syntactic foam (P-MSF). J Alloys Comp 2017; 691: 690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.284

114.

Liu

, et al Deformation and energy absorption characteristic of Al2O3f/Zn–Al composite foams during compression. J Alloys Comp 2010; 506(2): 620–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.107

115.

Bolat

Bilge

Gökşenli

. An investigation on the effect of heat treatment on the compression behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foam fabricated by sandwich infiltration casting. Mater Res 2021; 24(2): e20200381. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2020-0381

116.

Sonti

KSM

Vincent

Narala

SKR

. Quasi-static compressive response and energy absorption properties of aluminum matrix syntactic foams: room temperature and elevated temperature conditions. Mater Today Commun 2023; 35: 105580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105580

117.

Rakow

Waas

AM.

Size effects and the shear response of aluminum foam. Mech Mater 2005; 37(1): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.12.002

118.

Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al alloy and Al alloy Si Cp composite foam. Trans Indian Ins Metals 2007; 60: 495–504.

119.

Mukai

Kanahashi

Miyoshi

, et al Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading. Scr Mater 1999; 40(8): 921–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00038-X

120.

Mondal

Patel

Das

, et al Titanium foam with coarser cell size and wide range of porosity using different types of evaporative space holders through powder metallurgy route. Mater Des 2014; 63: 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.054

121.

Ruan

Chen

, et al Compressive behaviour of aluminium foams at low and medium strain rates. Compos Struct 2002; 57(1-4): 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00100-9

122.

Hanssen

Hopperstad

Langseth

, et al Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams. Int J Mech Sci 2002; 44(2): 359–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00091-1

123.

McCullough

KYG

Fleck

Ashby

. Uniaxial stress–strain behaviour of aluminium alloy foams. Acta Mater 1999; 47(8): 2323–2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00128-7

124.

Markaki

Clyne

TW.

The effect of cell wall microstructure on the deformation and fracture of aluminium-based foams. Acta Mater 2001; 49(9): 1677–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00072-6

125.

Peroni

Avalle

Peroni

The mechanical behaviour of aluminium foam structures in different loading conditions. Int J Impact Eng 2008; 35(7): 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.007

126.

Motz

Pippan

Deformation behaviour of closed-cell aluminium foams in tension. Acta Mater 2001; 49(13): 2463–2470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00152-5

127.

H-J

Yao

G-C

Liu

Y-H.

Tensile property of Al-Si closed-cell aluminum foam. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 2006; 16(6): 1335–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60016-8

128.

Zhou

Wang

Zhao

, et al Uniaxial and biaxial failure behaviors of aluminum alloy foams. Compos B Eng 2014; 61: 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.004

129.

Xia

Feng

Zhang

, et al The compressive properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with different Mn additions. Mater Des 2013; 51: 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.008

130.

Simone

Gibson

LJ.

The effects of cell face curvature and corrugations on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams. Acta Mater 1998; 46(11): 3929–3935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00072-X

131.

Saadatfar

Mukherjee

Madadi

, et al Structure and deformation correlation of closed-cell aluminium foam subject to uniaxial compression. Acta Mater 2012; 60(8): 3604–3615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.029

132.

Wang

Zhao

, et al Effect of cell size on the dynamic compressive properties of aluminum alloy foams. Solid State Phenom 2007; 124-126: 1317–1320. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.124-126.1317

133.

Zhao

Fung

Zhang

, et al Lost carbonate sintering process for manufacturing metal foams. Scr Mater 2005; 52(4): 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.10.012

134.

Yang

Hodgson

, et al Effect of pore size on mechanical properties of titanium foams. Mater Sci Forum 2010; 654–656: 827–830. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.827

135.

Sahu

Goel

Mondal

, et al High temperature compressive deformation behavior of ZA27–sic foam. Mater Sci Eng A 2014; 607: 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.004

136.

Mondal

Jha

Badkul

, et al High temperature compressive deformation behaviour of aluminum syntactic foam. Mater Sci Eng A 2012; 534: 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.002

137.

Liu

, et al Compressive properties of Al-Si-SiC composite foams at elevated temperatures. J Alloys Comp 2016; 676: 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.076

138.

Movahedi

Linul

Marsavina

The temperature effect on the compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum-alloy foams. J Mater Eng Perform 2018; 27: 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-3098-4

139.

Linul

Movahedi

Marsavina

The temperature and anisotropy effect on compressive behavior of cylindrical closed-cell aluminum-alloy foams. J Alloys Comp 2018; 740: 1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.102

140.

Yang

Liu

, et al Elevated temperature compressive properties and energy absorption response of in-situ grown CNT-reinforced Al composite foams. Mater Sci Eng A 2017; 690: 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.004

141.

Taherishargh

Linul

Broxtermann

, et al The mechanical properties of expanded perlite-aluminium syntactic foam at elevated temperatures. J Alloys Comp 2018; 737: 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.083

142.

Meng

X-F

D-H

Shen

X-Q

, et al Preparation and magnetic properties of nano-Ni coated cenosphere composites. Appl Surf Sci 2010; 256(12): 3753–3756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.01.019

143.

Kader

Hazell

Islam

, et al Strain-rate dependency and impact dynamics of closed-cell aluminium foams. Mater Sci Eng A 2021; 818: 141379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.141379

144.

Sun

QM.

Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: a review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling. Int J Impact Eng 2018; 112: 74–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.006

145.

Paul

Ramamurty

Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng A 2000; 281(1-2): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00750-9

146.

Zhang

Lin

, et al Quasi-static and high strain rates compressive behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foams. Compos B Eng 2016; 98: 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.034

147.

Alvandi-Tabrizi

Whisler

Kim

, et al High strain rate behavior of composite metal foams. Mater Sci Eng A 2015; 631: 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.027

148.

Fiedler

Taherishargh

Krstulović-Opara

, et al Dynamic compressive loading of expanded perlite/aluminum syntactic foam. Mater Sci Eng A 2015; 626: 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.032

149.

Májlinger

Orbulov

IN.

Characteristic compressive properties of hybrid metal matrix syntactic foams. Mater Sci Eng A 2014; 606: 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.100

150.

Myers

Katona

Cortes

, et al Quasi-static and high strain rate response of aluminum matrix syntactic foams under compression. Compos 2015; 79: 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.018

151.

Orbulov

Ginsztler

Compressive characteristics of metal matrix syntactic foams. Compos 2012; 43(4): 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.008

152.

Curd

Morrison

Smith

MJA

, et al Geometrical and mechanical characterisation of hollow thermoplastic microspheres for syntactic foam applications. Compos B Eng 2021; 223: 108952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108952

153.

Rohatgi

Gupta

Schultz

, et al The synthesis, compressive properties, and applications of metal matrix syntactic foams. JOM 2011; 63(2): 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-011-0026-1

154.

Omar

Xiang

Gupta

, et al Data characterizing flexural properties of Al/Al2O3 syntactic foam core metal matrix sandwich. Data Brief 2015; 5: 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2015.09.054

155.

Sanders

Gibson

LJ.

Mechanics of hollow sphere foams. Mater Sci Eng A 2003; 347(1-2): 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00583-X

156.

Zhang

Mechanical properties of metal matrix syntactic foam. University of Liverpool, 2020.

157.

Gupta

Luong

Cho

Magnesium matrix composite foams—density, mechanical properties, and applications. Metals 2012; 2(3): 238–252. https://doi.org/10.3390/met2030238

158.

Liu

Zhang

, et al The effect of the Cu interlayer on the interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/Fe bimetal by compound casting. Materials 2023; 16(15): 5469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155469

159.

Wang

Leng

Yang

, et al Effects of Fe—Al intermetallic compounds on interfacial bonding of clad materials. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 2014; 24(1): 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63058-2

160.

Rao

Yang

Huang

, et al Microstructure and compressive properties of aluminum matrix syntactic foams containing Al2O3 hollow particles. Metallic Mater 2021; 58(06): 395–407.https://doi.org/10.4149/km_2020_6_395

161.

Kumar

GSV

Heim

Garcia-Moreno

, et al Foaming of aluminum alloys derived from scrap. Adv Eng Mater 2013; 15(3): 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201200122

162.

Lorenzi

Fuganti

Todaro

, et al Aluminum foam applications for impact energy absorbing structures, SAE transactions, 1997: 27–36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44657544

163.

Fuganti

Lorenzi

Grønsund

, et al Aluminum foam for automotive applications. Adv Eng Mater 2000; 2(4): 200–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(200004)2:4%3C200::AID-ADEM200%3E3.0.CO;2-2

164.

Banhart

Aluminium foams for lighter vehicles. Int J Veh Des 2005; 37(2–3): 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2005.006640

165.

Rajendran

Prem Sai

Chandrasekar

, et al Preliminary investigation of aluminium foam as an energy absorber for nuclear transportation cask. Mater Des 2008; 29(9): 1732–1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.028

166.

Rajendran

Prem Sai

Chandrasekar

, et al Impact energy absorption of aluminium foam fitted AISI 304L stainless steel tube. Mater Des 2009; 30(5): 1777–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.021

167.

Baumeister

Banhart

Weber

Aluminium foams for transport industry. Mater Des 1997; 18(4-6): 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00050-2

168.

Crupi

Epasto

Guglielmino

Impact response of aluminum foam sandwiches for light-weight ship structures. Metals 2011; 1(1): 98–112. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1010098

169.

Pinnoji

Mahajan

Bourdet

, et al Impact dynamics of metal foam shells for motorcycle helmets: Experiments & numerical modeling. Int J Impact Eng 2010; 37(3): 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.05.013

170.

Schwingel

Seeliger

Vecchionacci

, et al Aluminium foam sandwich structures for space applications. 57th International Astronautical Congress 2007. p. C2. 4.10.

171.

Simancik

Metallic foams-ultra light materials for structural applications. Inż Mater 2001; 22(5): 823–828.

172.

Fragoso-Medina

Velázquez-Villegas

Aluminum foam to improve crash safety performance: a numerical simulation approach for the automotive industry. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 2023; 51: 3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2021.1927076

173.

Goel

Matsagar

VA.

Blast-resistant design of structures. Pract Period Struct Design Constr 2014; 19(2): 04014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000188

174.

Wang

Zhai

Yan

, et al Experimental, numerical and analytical studies on the aluminum foam filled energy absorption connectors under impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct 2018; 131: 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.056

175.

Xia

Zhang

Zhao

, et al Acoustic properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with different macrostructures. J Mater Sci Technol 2017; 33(11): 1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.012

176.

Hess

Ashby

MF.

Sound absorption in metallic foams. J Appl Phys 1999; 85(11): 7528–7539. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.370550

177.

Krishnan

Murthy

Garimella

SV.

Direct simulation of transport in open-cell metal foam. J Heat Transfer 2006; 128(8): 793–799. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2227038

178.

Wang

Shen

Luo

, et al Synthesis of high-quality vertical graphene nanowalls on metal foams and their applications in EMI shielding. Mater Today Commun 2022; 33: 104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104608

179.

Zhou

Wang

, et al Energy absorption of graded foam subjected to blast: A theoretical approach. Mater Des 2015; 84: 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.124

180.

Cheng

Chen

, et al Compressive properties and energy absorption of aluminum foams with a wide range of relative densities. J Mater Eng Perform 2018; 27(8): 4016–4024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3514-4

181.

Kremer

. Metal foams for improved crash energy absorption in passenger equipment. In: Final Report for High-Speed Rail IDEA Project, 2004, p. 34.

182.

Maddever

Guinehut

Use of Aluminum foam to increase crash box efficiency. SAE Technical Paper; 2005. https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0704

183.

Gokhale

Prasad

Basu

Light weighting for defense, aerospace, and transportation. Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1263-6

184.

Gokhale

Kumar

Sudhakar

, et al Cellular metals and ceramics for defence applications. Def Sci J 2011; 61(5): 567–575. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.61.640

185.

Tan

YJ.

3D Printing of Metallic Cellular Scaffolds for Bone Implants. In: Maniruzzaman

(ed.) 3D and 4D Printing in Biomedical Applications. 2019, pp. 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527813704.ch12

186.

Tan

Chow

CSL

, et al Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: a state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C 2017; 76: 1328–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094

187.

Oriňaková

Gorejová

Králová

, et al Novel trends and recent progress on preparation methods of biodegradable metallic foams for biomedicine: a review. J Mater Sci 2021; 56(25): 13925–13963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06163-y

188.

Murr

LE.

Strategies for creating living, additively manufactured, open-cellular metal and alloy implants by promoting osseointegration, osteoinduction and vascularization: an overview. J Mater Sci Technol 2019; 35(2): 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.003

189.

Oriňaková

Gorejová

Orságová Králová

, et al Surface modifications of biodegradable metallic foams for medical applications. Coatings 2020; 10(9): 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090819

190.

Orbulov

. Metal matrix composite syntactic foams for light-weight structural materials. In: Brabazon

(ed.) Encyclopedia of Materials: Composites. Elsevier, 2021, pp. 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11918-6

191.

Amsterdam

Babcsán

Hosson

JTMD

, et al Fracture behavior of metal foam made of recycled MMC by the melt route. Mater Trans 2006; 47(9): 2219–2222. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.47.2219

192.

Kumar

Bharti

Review on Powder Metallurgy: A Novel Technique for recycling and foaming of aluminium-based materials. Powder Metall Met Ceram 2021; 60(1-2): 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11106-021-00214-4

193.

Changdar

Chakraborty

. State-of-the-art manufacturing of metal foams and processing—a review. In: Advances in forming, machining and automation: select proceedings of AIMTDR 2021, 2022, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3866-5_11

194.

Yan

Hao

Hussein

, et al Evaluation of light-weight AlSi10Mg periodic cellular lattice structures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering. J Mater Process Technol 2014; 214(4): 856–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.004

195.

Yan

Hao

Hussein

, et al Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy cellular lattice structures manufactured by direct metal laser sintering. Mater Sci Eng A 2015; 628: 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.063

196.

Leary

Mazur

Elambasseril

, et al Selective laser melting (SLM) of AlSi12Mg lattice structures. Mater Des 2016; 98: 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.127

197.

Maskery

Aboulkhair

Aremu

, et al A mechanical property evaluation of graded density Al-Si10-Mg lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 2016; 670: 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.013

198.

Mazur

Leary

McMillan

, et al Mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V and AlSi12Mg lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM). In: Brandt

(ed.) Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials. Laser Additive Manufacturing, Woodhead Publishing; 2017, pp. 119–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00005-1.

199.

Chen

Jha

Raut

, et al Tomography of 3D-printed lattice structured aluminum-silicon alloy and its deformation. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2021; 8(1): 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2019.0200

200.

Yang

, et al Mechanical properties and energy absorption of AlSi10Mg gyroid lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Smart Manufacturing 2022; 01(01): 2150001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2737549821500010

201.

Pirinu

Primo

Del Prete

, et al Mechanical behaviour of AlSi10Mg lattice structures manufactured by the selective laser melting (SLM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2023; 124(5): 1651–1680.

202.

Chaudhari

Ekade

Krishnan

Experimental investigation of heat transfer and fluid flow in octet-truss lattice geometry. Int J Therm Sci 2019; 143: 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.05.003

203.

Delroisse

Jacques

Maire

, et al Effect of strut orientation on the microstructure heterogeneities in AlSi10Mg lattices processed by selective laser melting. Scr Mater 2017; 141: 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.07.020

204.

Dong

Liu

, et al Orientation dependency for microstructure, geometric accuracy and mechanical properties of selective laser melting AlSi10Mg lattices. J Alloys Comp 2019; 791: 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.344

205.

Alhammadi

Al-Ketan

Khan

, et al Microstructural characterization and thermomechanical behavior of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg sheet cellular materials. Mater Sci Eng A 2020; 791: 139714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139714

206.

Wong

Owen

Sutcliffe

, et al Convective heat transfer and pressure losses across novel heat sinks fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2009; 52(1-2): 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.06.002

207.

Sélo

RRJ

Catchpole-Smith

Maskery

, et al On the thermal conductivity of AlSi10Mg and lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 2020; 34: 101214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101214

208.

Leong

Wong

TN.

Additively-manufactured metallic porous lattice heat exchangers for air-side heat transfer enhancement. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2020; 150: 119262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119262

209.

Matheson

Cross

Nowell

, et al A multiscale comparison of stochastic open-cell aluminum foam produced via conventional and additive-manufacturing routes. Mater Sci Eng A 2017; 707: 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.102

210.

Zhang

Chen

Huang

Laser additive manufacturing foam aluminium-12 wt-% silicon with different addition TiH₂ foaming agent. Mater Sci Technol 2018; 34(8): 968–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2017.1415014

211.

Calignano

Cattano

Iuliano

, et al Controlled porosity structures in aluminum and titanium alloys by selective laser melting. In: Industrializing Additive Manufacturing-Proceedings of Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications-AMPA2017 1. Springer; 2018. pp. 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_18

212.

Feng

Zhang

Cui

, et al Additive manufactured closed-cell aluminum alloy foams via laser melting deposition process. Mater Lett 2018; 233: 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.08.146

213.

Dubinin

Bondareva

Kuzminova

, et al A promising approach to 3D printing of metal foam with defined porosity. J Porous Mater 2023; 30(5): 1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-023-01440-4

214.

Gupta

Rohatgi

PK.

Metal matrix syntactic foams: processing, microstructure, properties and applications. DEStech Publications, Inc, 2014.

215.

Mei

, et al Effect of particle size and distribution of hollow spheres on the compressive behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foams. J Mater Res 2023; 38(19): 4408–4419. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-023-01153-z

216.

Sarrafan

Conductive and ferromagnetic syntactic foam with shape memory and self-healing/Recycling Capabilities. Adv Funct Mater 2024; 34(11): 2308085. https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fadfm.202308085

217.

Standard I, ISO 13314: 2011 (E). Mechanical testing of metals—ductility testing—compression test for porous and cellular metals, Ref number ISO, 2011, 13314: 1–7.

218.

Mehta

Zhao

Tribological properties of aluminium matrix syntactic foams manufactured with aluminium smelter waste. Appl Sci 2024; 14(10): 4288. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104288

219.

Taherishargh

Belova

Murch

, et al Pumice/aluminium syntactic foam. Mater Sci Eng A 2015; 635: 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.061

220.

Movahedi

Murch

Belova

, et al Functionally graded metal syntactic foam: Fabrication and mechanical properties. Mater Des 2019; 168: 107652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107652

221.

Thomas

Kannan

Nazzal

, et al A numerical simulation of machining 6061 syntactic foams reinforced with hollow Al2O3 shells. Metals 2022; 12(4): 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12040596

222.

Thomas

Kannan

. Machining simulation of biomedical AZ31 magnesium syntactic foam. In: Proceedings Of The 2022 4th International Conference On Sustainable Manufacturing, Materials And Technologies. AIP Publishing LLC; 2023. p. 030010. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142501

223.

Kannan

Kishawy

Pervaiz

, et al Machining of novel AA7075 foams containing thin-walled ceramic bubbles. Mater Manuf Process 2020; 35(16): 1812–1821. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1802038

224.

Kannan

Pervaiz

Jahan

, et al Cryogenic drilling of AZ31 magnesium syntactic foams. Materials 2020; 13(18): 4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13184094

225.

Sarmah

Gupta

A review on the machinability enhancement of metal matrix composites by modern machining processes. Micromachines 2024; 15(8): 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15080947

226.

Szalóki

Viharos

ZJ.

Surface structure analysis of syntactic metal foams machined by milling. Period Polytech Mech Eng 2018; 32(1): 26–32. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPme.11003

227.

Bolat

Ergene

Akgun

, et al An experimental examination of the dry drilling machinability features of cellular glass-filled new-generation metallic composite foams. Materwiss Werksttech 2023; 54(11): 1378–1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.202300010

228.

Thomas

Kannan

Pervaiz

, et al Computational analysis of machining induced stress distribution during dry and cryogenic orthogonal cutting of 7075 aluminium closed cell syntactic foams. Micromachines 2023; 14(1): 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010174

229.

Kannan

Pervaiz

Alhourani

, et al On the role of hollow aluminium oxide microballoons during machining of AZ31 magnesium syntactic foam. Materials 2020; 13(16): 3534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163534

230.

Bolat

Özdoğan

Çoban

, et al Estimation of cutting forces in CNC slot-milling of low-cost clay reinforced syntactic metal foams by artificial neural network modeling. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct 2024; 20(3): 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/mmms-09-2023-0295

231.

Sánchez de la Muela

García Cambronero

Malheiros

, et al New aluminum syntactic foam: synthesis and mechanical characterization. Materials 2022; 15(15): 5320. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155320

232.

Motaharinia

Drelich

Goldman

, et al Current status and recent advances in magnesium-matrix syntactic foams: preparation, mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior. J Mater Res Technol 2024; 30: 8316–8344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.191

233.

Gupta

Pinisetty

Shunmugasamy

VC.

Introduction. In: Gupta

Pinisetty

Shunmugasamy

(eds) Reinforced polymer matrix syntactic foams: Effect of Nano and micro-scale Reinforcement. Springer International Publishing, 2013, pp. 1–8.

234.

Maróti

Orbulov

IN.

Characteristic compressive properties of Al2O3 particle reinforced Al99.5 matrix composite foams. Compos 2026; 202: 109468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.109468

235.

Orbulov

Dobránszky

Producing metal matrix syntactic foams by pressure infiltration. Period Polytechnica Mech Eng 2008; 52(1): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.me.2008-1.06

236.

Orbulov

Szlancsik

On the mechanical properties of aluminum matrix syntactic foams. Adv Eng Mater 2018; 20(5): 1700980. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700980

237.

Chacko

Yeboah

Rabiei

A study on thermal expansion and thermomechanical behavior of composite metal foams. Adv Eng Mater 2025; 27: 2402871. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202402871

238.

Thiyagarajan

Senthil kumar

A review on closed cell metal matrix syntactic foams: A green initiative towards Eco-Sustainability. Mater Manuf Process 2021; 36(12): 1333–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.1928696

239.

Market

DI.

Metal Matrix Syntactic Foam Comprehensive Market Study: Trends and Predictions

2026–2034. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/metal-matrix-syntactic-foam-1119315?tab=methodology (2026, accessed January 2026).

240.

Data Ra: Metal Matrix Syntactic Foam Market.https://www.reportsanddata.com/report-detail/metal-matrix-syntactic-foam-market. https://www.reportsanddata.com/report-detail/metal-matrix-syntactic-foam-market (2025, accessed January 2026).

241.

Wang

Guo

Preparation and compression behavior of high porosity, microporous open-cell Al foam using supergravity infiltration method. Materials 2024; 17(2): 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020337

242.

Shukla

Mondal

Dileep

, et al Studies on aluminum cenosphere composite foam developed by plasma-spray-assisted additive manufacturing. J Mater Eng Perform 2025; 34(18): 21280–21296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-10739-z

243.

Spratt

Newkirk

Chandrashekhara

Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam Fabricated with Additive Manufacturing, 2017. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/2243/

244.

Hossain

Rabi

Mohammad

, et al Investigation of thermomechanical properties of hollow glass microballoon-filled composite materials developed by additive manufacturing with machine learning validation. Polymers 2025; 17(11): 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111495

245.

Jang

Cho

YJ.

Effects of interfacial debonding of microspheres on mechanical properties of iron matrix syntactic foams: roles of Ni coating. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2025; 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2025.2455519

246.

Zhang

Birch

Zhao

, et al Experimental investigation of energy dissipation of aluminum matrix syntactic foam under impulsive loading. Int J Impact Eng 2025; 203: 105373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105373

247.

Afolabi

Ariff

Hashim

SFS

, et al Syntactic foams formulations, production techniques, and industry applications: A review. J Mater Res Technol 2020; 9(5): 10698–10718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.074

248.

Chacko

Lucier

Rabiei

Performance of composite metal foams under cyclic loading at elevated temperatures. J Mater Sci 2025; 60(40): 19184–19203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-025-11516-y

249.

Thomas

KK.

Finite element analysis of machining lightweight syntactic foams. 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11073/21517

250.

Zhuang

Wang

Zhang

Prediction of compressive mechanical properties of three-dimensional mesoscopic aluminium foam based on deep learning method. Mech Mater 2023; 182: 104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104684

251.

Tikadar

Kumar

Investigation of thermal-hydraulic performance of metal-foam heat sink using machine learning approach. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2022; 199: 123438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123438